An Integrated Research Framework for Effect of EWOM

References

[1] Arndt J. Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 1967, 4(3): 291–295.10.2307/3149462Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner K P, Walsh G, et al. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2004, 18(1): 38–52.10.1002/dir.10073Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cheung C M K, Thadani D R. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 2012, 54(1): 461–470.10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kozinets R V. E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 1999, 17(3): 252–264.10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bickart B, Schindler R M. Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2001, 15(3): 31–40.10.1002/dir.1014Search in Google Scholar

[6] Haubl G, Murry K B. Intelligent double agent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2006, 43(3): 8–12.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jin L Y. The Effects of online WOM information on consumer purchase decision: An experimental study. Economic Management, 2007, 29(22): 36–42.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Xia L, Bechwati N N. Word of mouse: The role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2008, 9(1): 3–13.10.1080/15252019.2008.10722143Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bounie D, Bourreau M, Gensollen M, et al. Do online customer reviews matter? Evidence from the video game industry. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2008.10.2139/ssrn.1091449Search in Google Scholar

[10] Xi H, Xu J F, Luo S X, et al. Comparative study of the effect of on-line vs tranditional WOM on consumer’s purchase decision. Finance & Trade Economics, 2008, 2: 98–128.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lee M, Youn S. Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) how eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 2009, 28(3): 473–499.10.2501/S0265048709200709Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hao Y Y, Ye Q, Li Y J, et al. How does the valence of online consumer reviews matter in consumer decision making? Differences between search goods and experience goods. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2010: 1–10.10.1109/HICSS.2010.455Search in Google Scholar

[13] Chang L Y, Lee Y J, Huang C L. The influence of e-word-of-mouth on the consumer’s purchase decision: A case of body care products. Journal of Global Business Management, 2010, 6(2): 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Goyette I, Ricard L, Bergeron J, et al. E-WOM scale: Word-of-mouth measurement scale for e-services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2010, 27(1): 5–23.10.1002/cjas.129Search in Google Scholar

[15] Lee K T, Koo D M. Effects of attribute and valence of e-WOM on message adoption: Moderating roles of subjective knowledge and regulatory focus. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(5): 1974–1984.10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.018Search in Google Scholar

[16] Yang J, Kim W, Amblee N, et al. The heterogeneous effect of WOM on product sales: Why the effect of WOM valence is mixed?. European Journal of Marketing, 2012, 46(11/12): 1523–1538.10.1108/03090561211259961Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zou P, Yu B, Hao Y. Does the valence of online consumer reviews matter for consumer decision making? The moderating role of consumer expertise. Journal of Computers, 2011, 6(3): 484–488.10.4304/jcp.6.3.484-488Search in Google Scholar

[18] Yoo C W, Sanders G L, Moon J. Exploring the effect of e-WOM participation on e-Loyalty in e-commerce. Decision Support Systems, 2013, 55(3): 669–678.10.1016/j.dss.2013.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[19] Li X, Wu L. Measuring effects of observational learning and social-network word-of-mouth (WOM) on the sales of daily-deal vouchers, Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, 2013: 2908–2917.10.1109/HICSS.2013.397Search in Google Scholar

[20] Filieri R. What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(6): 1261–1270.10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kim W G, Lim H, Brymer R A. The effectiveness of managing social media on hotel performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2015, 44: 165–171.10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.014Search in Google Scholar

[22] Purnasari H, Yuliando H. How relationship quality on customer commitment influences positive e-WOM. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2015, 3: 149–153.10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.029Search in Google Scholar

[23] López M, Sicilia M. Determinants of E-WOM influence: The role of consumers internet experience. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2014, 9(1): 28–43.10.4067/S0718-18762014000100004Search in Google Scholar

[24] Alfina I, Ero J, Hidayanto A N, et al. The impact of cognitive trust and e-Wom on purchase intention in C2C e-commerce site. Journal of Computer Science, 2014, 10(12): 2518–2252.10.3844/jcssp.2014.2518.2524Search in Google Scholar

[25] Liu F, Xiao B, Lim E T K, et al. Do others’ opinion matter? Investigating the impact of gender differences on trustworthiness of e-WOM, Proceedings of the 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer Society, 2016: 909–918.10.1109/HICSS.2016.117Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zhang M, Lei M. The Dynamic interaction between product sales, EWOM and online observation learning information — An empirical analysis based on the information of notebook sales page in Tmall. Economic Management, 2016 (2): 91–101.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Yan Q, Wu S, Wang L, et al. E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt?. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2016, 17: 62–73.10.1016/j.elerap.2016.03.004Search in Google Scholar

[28] Dellarocas C. The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 2003, 49(10): 1407–1424.10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308Search in Google Scholar

[29] Liu Y. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 2006, 70(3): 74–89.10.1509/jmkg.70.3.74Search in Google Scholar

[30] Kiecker P, Cowles D. Interpersonal communication and personal influence on the Internet: A framework for examining online word-of-mouth. Journal of Euromarketing, 2002, 11(2): 71–88.10.1300/J037v11n02_04Search in Google Scholar

[31] Chintagunta P K, Gopinath S, Venkataraman S. The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Science, 2010, 29(5): 944–957.10.1287/mksc.1100.0572Search in Google Scholar

[32] Gilly M C, Graham J L, Wolfinbarger M F, et al. A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1998, 26(2): 83–100.10.1177/0092070398262001Search in Google Scholar

[33] Bansal H S, Voyer P A. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 2000, 3(2): 166–177.10.1177/109467050032005Search in Google Scholar

[34] Brown J, Broderick A J, Lee N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2007, 21(3): 2–20.10.1002/dir.20082Search in Google Scholar

[35] Chevalier J A, Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 2006, 43(3): 345–354.10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345Search in Google Scholar

[36] Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J. Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 2011, 48(2): 238–254.10.1509/jmkr.48.2.238Search in Google Scholar

[37] Moul C C. Measuring word of mouth’s impact on theatrical movie admissions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2007, 16(4): 859–892.10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00160.xSearch in Google Scholar

[38] Li X, Hitt L M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(4): 456–474.10.1287/isre.1070.0154Search in Google Scholar

[39] Klayman J, Ha Y W. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 1987, 94(2): 211.10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211Search in Google Scholar

[40] Cui G, Lui H K, Guo X. The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2012, 17(1): 39–58.10.2753/JEC1086-4415170102Search in Google Scholar

[41] East R, Hammond K, Lomax W, et al. What is the effect of a recommendation?. The Marketing Review, 2005, 5(2): 145–157.10.1362/1469347054426186Search in Google Scholar

[42] Berger J, Sorensen A T, Rasmussen S J. Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 2010, 29(5): 815–827.10.1287/mksc.1090.0557Search in Google Scholar

[43] Herr P M, Kardes F R, Kim J. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991, 17(4): 454–462.10.1086/208570Search in Google Scholar

[44] Hu N, Liu L, Zhang J J. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 2008, 9(3): 201–214.10.1007/s10799-008-0041-2Search in Google Scholar

[45] Sussman S W, Siegal W S. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 2003, 14(1): 47–65.10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767Search in Google Scholar

[46] Doh S J, Hwang J S. How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 2009, 12(2): 193–197.10.1089/cpb.2008.0109Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Wood W. Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42(5): 798.10.1037/0022-3514.42.5.798Search in Google Scholar

[48] Gilly M C, Graham J L, Wolfinbarger M F, et al. A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1998, 26(2): 83–100.10.1177/0092070398262001Search in Google Scholar

[49] Bansal H S, Voyer P A. Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 2000, 3(2): 166–177.10.1177/109467050032005Search in Google Scholar

[50] Bristor J M. Enhanced explanations of word of mouth communications: The power of relationships. Research in Consumer Behavior, 1990, 4(1): 51–83.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Kelman H C, Hovland C I. “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953, 48(3): 327.10.1037/h0061861Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Kiecker P, Cowles D. Interpersonal communication and personal influence on the Internet: A framework for examining online word-of-mouth. Journal of Euromarketing, 2002, 11(2): 71–88.10.1300/J037v11n02_04Search in Google Scholar

[53] Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 2008, 19(3): 291–313.10.1287/isre.1080.0193Search in Google Scholar

[54] Hu N, Liu L, Zhang J J. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 2008, 9(3): 201–214.10.1007/s10799-008-0041-2Search in Google Scholar

[55] Steffes E M, Burgee L E. Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research, 2009, 19(1): 42-59.10.1108/10662240910927812Search in Google Scholar

[56] King R A, Racherla P, Bush V D. What we know and dont know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2014, 28(3): 167–183.10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[57] Brown J J, Reingen P H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 1987, 14(3): 350–362.10.1086/209118Search in Google Scholar

[58] Godes D, Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 2004, 23(4): 545–560.10.1287/mksc.1040.0071Search in Google Scholar

[59] Cheung M Y, Luo C, Sia C L, et al. Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2009, 13(4): 9–38.10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402Search in Google Scholar

[60] Doh S J, Hwang J S. How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2009, 12(2): 193–197.10.1089/cpb.2008.0109Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] Lee J, Park D H, Han I. The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2008, 7(3): 341–352.10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[62] Park D H, Lee J, Han I. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2007, 11(4): 125–148.10.2753/JEC1086-4415110405Search in Google Scholar

[63] Zhang W, Watts S A. Capitalizing on content: Information adoption in two online communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008, 9(2): 73.10.17705/1jais.00149Search in Google Scholar

[64] Dellarocas C, Zhang X M, Awad N F. Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive marketing, 2007, 21(4): 23–45.10.1002/dir.20087Search in Google Scholar

[65] Sher P J, Lee S H. Consumer skepticism and online reviews: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 2009, 37(1): 137–143.10.2224/sbp.2009.37.1.137Search in Google Scholar

[66] Obermiller C, Spangenberg E R. Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1998, 7(2): 159–186.10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03Search in Google Scholar

[67] Cheung C M K, Thadani D R. The effectiveness of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis. Proceedings of the 23rd Bled eConference eTrust: Implications for the Individual, Enterprises and Society, 2010: 329–345.Search in Google Scholar

[68] Xia L, Bechwati N N. Word of mouse: The role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2008, 9(1): 3–13.10.1080/15252019.2008.10722143Search in Google Scholar

[69] Bone P F. Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments. Journal of Business Research, 1995, 32(3): 213–223.10.1016/0148-2963(94)00047-ISearch in Google Scholar

[70] Resnick P, Kuwabara K, Zeckhauser R, et al. Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 2000, 43(12): 45–48.10.1145/355112.355122Search in Google Scholar

[71] Mudambi S M, Schuff D. What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(1): 185–200.10.2307/20721420Search in Google Scholar

[72] Blazevic V, Hammedi W, Garnefeld I, et al. Beyond traditional word-of-mouth: An expanded model of customer-driven influence. Journal of Service Management, 2013, 24(3): 294–313.10.1108/09564231311327003Search in Google Scholar

[73] Lee J, Lee J N. Understanding the product information inference process in electronic word-of-mouth: An objectivity-subjectivity dichotomy perspective. Information & Management, 2009, 46(5): 302–311.10.1016/j.im.2009.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[74] King R A, Racherla P, Bush V D. What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2014, 28(3): 167–183.10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001Search in Google Scholar