Startseite Finding Solvent for Polyamide 11 Using a Computer Software
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Finding Solvent for Polyamide 11 Using a Computer Software

  • Mostafa Jabbari EMAIL logo , Magnus Lundin , Saeed Bahadorikhalili , Mikael Skrifvars und Mohammad J. Taherzadeh
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. August 2019

Abstract

The solvent finding step has always been a time-consuming job in chemical-involved processes. The source of difficulty mainly comes from the trial-and-errors, as a repetitive process of chosing solvents and mixing them in different proportions. Computers are good at doing repetitive processes; however, they can only deal with numerical values, rather than qulitative scales. Numerification of qualitative parameters (like solubility) has already been introduced. The most recent one is the Hansen solubility parameters (HSPs). Using the HSPs could provide a solvent or solvent-mixture. In our previous study, we introduced a computer-aided model and a software to find a solvent mixture. In this study, we have used the computer-aided solvent selection model to find some solvent mixtures for polyamide 11, a biobased polymer which has attracted enormous attention recently. Using this numerical model significantly diminished the time of solvent development experimentation by decreasing the possible/necessary trials.

References

1. M. Hatamvand, S. A. Mirjalili, M. Sharzehee, A. Behjat, M. Jabbari, M. Skrifvars, Optik 140 (2017) 443.10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.02.101Suche in Google Scholar

2. V. Batori, M. Jabbari, D. Åkesson, P. R. Lennartsson, M. J. Taherzadeh, A. Zamani, Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2017 (2017) 9.10.1155/2017/9732329Suche in Google Scholar

3. I. Mitrofanov, G. Sin, R. Gani, In: 23rd European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, Lappeenranta, Finland (2013).Suche in Google Scholar

4. M. Jabbari, M. Lundin, M. Hatamvand, M. Skrifvars, M. Taherzadeh, J. Inf. Tech. Softw. Eng. 8 (2018) 1000242.Suche in Google Scholar

5. J. Gmehling, A. Schedemann, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014) 17794.10.1021/ie502909kSuche in Google Scholar

6. M. H. Charles, In: Solvents Theory and Practice, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, USA (1973), P. 48.Suche in Google Scholar

7. M. D. Kass, T. Theiss, C. Janke, S. Pawel, Compatibility study for plastic, elastomeric, and metallic fueling infrastructure materials exposed to aggressive formulations of ethanol-blended gasoline. ORNL/TM-2012/88, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA (2012).10.2172/1039968Suche in Google Scholar

8. C. M. Hansen, Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook, Second ed., CRC Press, Florida, USA (2007), P. 544.10.1201/9781420006834Suche in Google Scholar

9. C. M. Hansen, In: Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook, C. M. Hansen, Ed. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2000).10.1201/9781420049312Suche in Google Scholar

10. M. Feldmann, A. K. Bledzki, Compos. Sci. Technol. 100 (2014) 113.10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.06.008Suche in Google Scholar

11. P. Zierdt, T. Theumer, G. Kulkarni, V. Däumlich, J. Klehm, U. Hirsch, A. Weber, Sustainable Mater. Technol. 6 (2015) 6.10.1016/j.susmat.2015.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

12. B. Herzog, M. I. Kohan, S. A. Mestemacher, R. U. Pagilagan, K. Redmond, In: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA (2013).Suche in Google Scholar

13. R. B. S. S. Kirshenbaum, High Performance Polymers: Their Origin and Development, New York: American Chemical Society (1986).10.1007/978-94-011-7073-4Suche in Google Scholar

14. K. Behler, M. Havel, Y. Gogotsi, Polymer 48 (2007) 6617.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.058Suche in Google Scholar

15. M. A. Dechet, A. Goblirsch, S. Romeis, M. Zhao, F. J. Lanyi, J. Kaschta, D. W. Schubert, D. Drummer, W. Peukert, J. Schmidt, Chem. Eng. Sci. 197 (2019) 11.10.1016/j.ces.2018.11.051Suche in Google Scholar

16. P. Gorgojo, M. F. Jimenez-Solomon, A. G. Livingston, Desalination 344 (2014) 181.10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.009Suche in Google Scholar

17. C. Li, S. Li, L. Lv, B. Su, M. Z. Hu, J. Membr. Sci. 564 (2018) 10.10.1016/j.memsci.2018.06.048Suche in Google Scholar

18. S. K. Lim, L. Setiawan, T.-H. Bae, R. Wang, J. Membr. Sci. 501 (2016) 152.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.11.016Suche in Google Scholar

19. C. D. Vaughan, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. Jpn. 36 (1985) 319.10.2307/2870303Suche in Google Scholar

20. A. Benazzouz, L. Moity, C. Pierlot, M. Sergent, V. Molinier, J.-M. Aubry, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013) 16585.10.1021/ie402410wSuche in Google Scholar

21. C. M. Hansen, K. Skaarup, J. Paint Technol. 305 (1967) 511.Suche in Google Scholar

22. J. Durkee, In: Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook, Second ed., C. M. Hansen, Ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2007).Suche in Google Scholar

23. M. J. Todd, Math. Prog. 91 (2002) 417.10.1007/s101070100261Suche in Google Scholar

24. K. H. Borgwardt, The Simplex Method – A Probabilistic Analysis. Algorithms and Combinatorics – Study and Research Texts, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany (1987).10.1007/978-3-642-61578-8Suche in Google Scholar

25. J. Mark, In: Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook, Springer New York, USA (2007), P. 289.10.1007/978-0-387-69002-5Suche in Google Scholar

26. A. F. M. Barton, CRC Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters, Second ed., Taylor & Francis, UK (1991).Suche in Google Scholar

27. V. Y. Senichev, V. V. Tereshatov, G. Wypych, In: Handbook of Plasticizers, Second ed., William Andrew Publishing: Boston (2012), P. 135.10.1016/B978-1-895198-50-8.50008-4Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-09-08
Accepted: 2019-07-15
Published Online: 2019-08-10
Published in Print: 2020-03-26

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 6.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zpch-2018-1299/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen