Summary
This comparative syntactic study claims that the possessor of Russian and Hungarian BE-possessives neither originates nor lands in [Spec,VoiceP], the designated structural position of external arguments since Kratzer (1996). Possessive sentences universally describe a state with two eventuality participants, the possessor and the possessee (Stassen 2009). BE-possessives are built on dyadic-unaccusative existential BE. Neither of its two eventuality participants passes the agent/cause tests provided by Alexiadou, Anagnostopoulou & Schäfer (2015). It is claimed here that possessive BE-sentences in Russian and Hungarian pattern with the piacere-subclass of psych-predicates, inasmuch as the possessor bears the oblique case and the theme appears in the nominative in them. In the cartographic model, the oblique experiencer of the piacere-type of psych-predicates targets a position higher than canonical, agent/cause subjects do (see Cardinaletti 1997, 2004; Rizzi 1997, 2004 for Italian). This paves the way for oblique possessors and non-canonical subjects to appear in positions left-adjacent to the designated position for canonical, nominative subjects (see Cardinaletti 1997, 2004 for Italian; Benedicto 1995; Livitz 2006, 2012 for Russian; Dalmi 2000, 2005 for Hungarian). Possessive BE-predicates in Russian and Hungarian share a number of syntactic and semantic properties with existential BE (see Partee & Borschev 2008 for Russian and Szabolcsi 1992, 1994 for Hungarian). Nonetheless, BE-possessives and BE-existentials differ in the two languages in their clausal architecture, due to the fact that EPP is fulfilled in different ways in them.
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou 1998. Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539. 10.1023/A:1006090432389Suche in Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer 2015. External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations. A Layering Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Arylova, Aysa 2012. AnchorP. Argument structure of the Russian BE-possessive. In Proceedings of ConSole XIX, 25–48. Suche in Google Scholar
Bailyn, John 2010. The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi 1988. Psych-verbs and Theta-theory. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352. 10.1007/BF00133902Suche in Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena 1995. Mne ne chitaetsia. Relativized modality and dative impersonal reflexive constructions. In UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 2 (2), 1–17. Suche in Google Scholar
Benveniste, Ėmile 1966. Ȇtre et avoir dans leurs fonctions lingistiques. In Ėmile Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale. Vol. 1, 187–207. Paris: Gallimard. Suche in Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna 2007. Phase Syntax. The Polish Genitive of Negation. Habilitation treatise. University of Potsdam.Suche in Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna 2010. A spurious genitive puzzle in Polish. In Thomas Hanneforth & Gisbert Fanselow (eds.), Language and Logos. Studia Grammatica 72, 17–47. Berlin: Akademieverlag.10.1524/9783050062365.17Suche in Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna 2018. Clause structure, case and agreement in Polish existential, possessive and copular sentences. A phase-based account. In Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54 (4), 637–696.10.1515/psicl-2018-0025Suche in Google Scholar
Bosković, Zhel’ko 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. In Linguistic Inquiry 33, 351–383.10.1162/002438902760168536Suche in Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Suche in Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, 33–64. London: Longman. Suche in Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Vol. 2, 115–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Suche in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chvany, Catherine 1972. On the Syntax of BE-sentences in Russian. Cambridge, MA: Slavica.Suche in Google Scholar
Coppock, Elisabeth & Stephen Wechsler 2012. The objective conjugation in Hungarian: Agreement without phi features. In Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 30, 699–740.10.1007/s11049-012-9165-5Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 1981. A case of re-analysis in a ‘topic-prominent’ language. In Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, 57–85. Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 1994. Hungarian Infinitival Constructions. MPhil dissertation. Department of Linguistics. The University of Sydney, Sydney. Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2000. The structure of psych-impersonal predicates. In Arthur Holmer & Jan-Olof Svantesson & Ake Viberg (eds.), Proceedings of SCL18, 193–206. Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2005. The Role of Agreement in Non-finite Predication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.90Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2010. Copular sentences, predication and cyclic agree. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing (VDM).Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2012. Copular sentences as Kimian states in Irish and Russian. In Canadian Journal of Linguistics 57, 341–358. 10.1017/S0008413100002322Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2014. The feature geometry of generic inclusive null DPs in Hungarian. In Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi & Alexander Grosu (eds.), Advances in the Syntax of DPs. Structure, Agreement and Case, 165–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.217.07dalSuche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2016. What does it take to be a copula? In YPLM 2, 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/yplm-2016-0001Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2017. Little pro’s but how many of them? – On 3SG generic inclusive null pronominals in Hungarian. In LingBaW Journal 3, 61–73.10.31743/lingbaw.5650Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2020 a. The argument structure of BE-possessives and BE-existentials in Hungarian. In Gréte Dalmi, Piotr Ceglowski & Jacek Witkoś (eds.), Approaches to Predicative Possession. The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric, 136–162. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350062498.ch-007Suche in Google Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte 2020 b. Existence and Possession. A cartographic approach to Hungarian possessive sentences. Manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel 1997. The syntax of possession sentences and the verb have. In Lingua 101, 129–150.10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00054-XSuche in Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement. The case of anti-agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.), Crossing Boundaries: Theoretical Advances in Central and Eastern European Languages, 137–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.182.10dikSuche in Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel 2006. Relators and Linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 10.1007/978-94-009-3703-1Suche in Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin 2002. Hungarian Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin 2013. From Proto-Hungarian SOV to Old Hungarian Top, Foc, V X*. In Diachronica 3 (2), 202–231.10.1075/dia.30.2.03kisSuche in Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin 2014. Ways of licensing external possessors. In Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61 (1), 45–68.10.1556/ALing.61.2014.1.2Suche in Google Scholar
Francez, Itamar 2007. Existential propositions. PhD dissertation. Stanford University. Suche in Google Scholar
Freeze, Ray 1972. Existentials and other locatives. In Language 68 (3), 553–595.10.2307/415794Suche in Google Scholar
Geist, Ljudmila 2008. Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English. In Ileana Comorowski & Karl von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 79–105, New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_3Suche in Google Scholar
Geist, Ljudmila 2015. Genitive alternation in Russian. A situation semantics approach. In Gerhild Zybatov, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Maria Yastrebova (eds.), Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective, 157–174. Berlin: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi 2002. Possession and the double object construction. In Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds.), The Yearbook of Linguistic Variation. Vol 2: 31–70. Amsterdam: John Benja-mins.10.1075/livy.2.04harSuche in Google Scholar
Hegedűs, Veronika 2014. Predicate movement in Hungarian. The syntax of non-verbal predicates. PhD dissertation. Tilburg. Suche in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Urpo Nikanne 2002. Expletives, subjects and topics in Finnish. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, 1–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar
Jung, Hakyung 2011. The syntax of BE-possessives. Parametric variation and surface diversities. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.172Suche in Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga 2013. Semantics of Genitive Objects. A Study of Genitive of Negation and Intensional Genitive Case. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5225-2Suche in Google Scholar
Kagan, Olga 2020. Definiteness Effect in Russian existential and possessive sentences. In Gréte Dalmi, Piotr Ceglowski & Jacek Witkoś (eds.), Approaches to Predicative Possession. The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric, 61–80. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350062498.ch-004Suche in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laura Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Suche in Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche 1991. The position of subjects. In Lingua 85, 211–258. 10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-WSuche in Google Scholar
Larson, Robert 1988. The double object construction. In Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.Suche in Google Scholar
Livitz, Inna 2006. What’s in a nominative? Implications of Russian non-nominative subjects for a cross-linguistic approach to subjecthood. Harvard University, BA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Livitz, Inna 2012. Modal possessive construction: evidence from Russian. In Lingua 122, 714–747.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.002Suche in Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary 1979. Existential sentences in English. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Myler, Neil 2016. Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Paducheva, Elena 2000. Definiteness Effect: the case of Russian. In Karl von Heusinger & Urs Egli (eds.), Reference and Anaphoric Relations, 133–146. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_7Suche in Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara & V. Borschev 2008. Existential sentences, BE and GEN NEG in Russian. In Ileana Comorowski & Karl von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 147– 191. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_6Suche in Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya 2007. Copular sentences in Russian. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/1-4020-5793-8Suche in Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva 1997. Focus and the CP domain. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, 145–165. London: Longman. Suche in Google Scholar
Rákosi, György 2014. Possessed by something out there. On anaphoric possessors in Hungarian. In Argumentum 10, 548–559.Suche in Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter 1999. Morfofonológiai jelenségek [Morpho-phonological phenomena]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [The structure of Hungarian 3. Morphology], 763–947. Budapest: Akadmémiai Kiadó.Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 1997. The fine structure of the Left Periphery. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 2004. On the cartography of syntactic structures. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 2, 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 2006. On the form of chains. Criterial position and the ECP effects. In Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0010Suche in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi 2013. Topic, focus and the cartography of the Left Periphery. In Silvia Luragi & Claudia Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, 436–451. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472542090.ch-026Suche in Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon 2009. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199211654.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. In The Linguistic Review 3, 89–102.10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89Suche in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna 1992. A birtokos szerkezet és az egzisztenciális mondat [Possessive constructions and existential sentences]. Budapest: Akadémiai kiadó. Suche in Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna 1994. The noun phrase. In Katalin É. Kiss & Ferenc Kiefer (eds.), The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, 179–274. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373174_004Suche in Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Menschen zu sein...
- Online hate speech in Belarus: Highlighting the topical issues
- The long-journeying poor cousin before the shut EU door: How the Western Balkans are metaphorically conceptualised in the context of the EU integrations
- A discourse analysis of Montenegrin university lectures: How structured are they?
- The status of the oblique possessor in BE-possessives: Evidence from Russian and Hungarian
- Adam Naruszewiczs Oda do sprawiedliwości im Kontext des politischen Denkens und der Gelegenheitsdichtung der Aufklärung
- Der Religionsdisput in Feofan Prokopovyčs Vladimir
- Nachruf
- In memoriam Gerhard Giesemann (14.7.1937–21.4.2021)
- Buchbesprechung
- Varianz im Russischen
- Georgien zwischen Eigenstaatlichkeit und russischer Okkupation. Die Wurzeln des Konflikts vom 18. Jh. bis 1924
- Bildspuren – Sprachspuren. Postkarten als Quellen zur Mehrsprachigkeit in der späten Habsburger Monarchie
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Menschen zu sein...
- Online hate speech in Belarus: Highlighting the topical issues
- The long-journeying poor cousin before the shut EU door: How the Western Balkans are metaphorically conceptualised in the context of the EU integrations
- A discourse analysis of Montenegrin university lectures: How structured are they?
- The status of the oblique possessor in BE-possessives: Evidence from Russian and Hungarian
- Adam Naruszewiczs Oda do sprawiedliwości im Kontext des politischen Denkens und der Gelegenheitsdichtung der Aufklärung
- Der Religionsdisput in Feofan Prokopovyčs Vladimir
- Nachruf
- In memoriam Gerhard Giesemann (14.7.1937–21.4.2021)
- Buchbesprechung
- Varianz im Russischen
- Georgien zwischen Eigenstaatlichkeit und russischer Okkupation. Die Wurzeln des Konflikts vom 18. Jh. bis 1924
- Bildspuren – Sprachspuren. Postkarten als Quellen zur Mehrsprachigkeit in der späten Habsburger Monarchie