Mandarin Chinese peer advice online: a study of gender disparity
-
Chihsia Tang
Abstract
In the higher education environment, peer-to-peer evaluation is a common learning activity and is beneficial to students’ development. Nevertheless, peer evaluations often include unsolicited advice, which potentially damages the face of advice-receivers and their interpersonal relationship with advice-givers. In the literature, little is known about how the potentially face-destructive advice messages in the academic discourse are pragmatically constructed by Chinese speakers who generally define advice-giving as a rapport-building behavior. The present study, therefore, investigated how Chinese language users rhetorically manage their unsolicited peer advice in an online learning activity. Also, whether and how the gender of the advice-givers and receivers exert impacts on the advice configurations in the formal institutional setting were examined. The corpus involved 1,118 units of advice speech events elicited from peer evaluations given by 43 Chinese-speaking Taiwanese students. The results revealed that the institutional context where the advice was addressed was critical to the advice-giver’s linguistic implicitness and selections of redressive modifiers. Besides, the gender of both the advice-givers and receivers had significant impacts on the pragmatics of the given advice. While the females often employed conditional constructions and reasoning discursive moves, the males preferred using subjectivizers to redress their advice, especially those addressed to men.
Funding source: National Science and Technology Council, R. O. C.
Award Identifier / Grant number: 110-2410-H-992-025
-
Research funding: This work was supported by National Science and Technology Council, R. O. C. (110-2410-H-992-025).
Appendix: Full terms for the abbreviations in the examples
| Abbreviation | Full-term |
|---|---|
| BA | Chinese ba construction |
| CL | classifier |
| CSC | complex stative construction |
| GEN | genitive |
| NEG | negation |
| NOM | nominalizer |
| PFV | perfective |
| PRT | particle |
References
Angouri, Jo. 2012. ‘Yes that’s a good idea’: Peer advice in academic discourse at a UK university. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 119–145. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.221.08angSuche in Google Scholar
Baca, Evelyn. 2011. Pragmatic competence: The case of advice in second language acquisition (SLA) abroad. Arizona: Arizona State University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Bekker, Marrie H. J. & Marcel A. L. M. van Assen. 2008. Autonomy-connectedness and gender. Sex Roles 59. 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9447-x.Suche in Google Scholar
Beutel, Ann M. & Margaret Mooney Marini. 1995. Gender and values. American Sociological Review 60(3). 436–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096423.Suche in Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriel Kasper. 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar
Boatman, Dana. 1987. A study of unsolicited advice. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 3(1). 35–60.Suche in Google Scholar
Bromnick, Rachel D. & Brian L. Swallow. 2001. Parties, lads, friends, love, and newcastle united: A study of young people’s values. Educational Studies 27(2). 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690125235.Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Suche in Google Scholar
Burleson, Brant R. 2003. The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationship 10. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00033.Suche in Google Scholar
Burleson, Brant R. & Steve R. Mortenson. 2003. Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors: Exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals. Communication Research 30. 113–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250873.Suche in Google Scholar
Chang, Hui-Ching & Richard G. Holt. 1994. A Chinese perspective on face as inter-relational concern. In Stella Ting-Toomey (ed.), The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues, 95–132. New York: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Chentsova-Dutton, Yulia E. & Alexandra Vaughn. 2012. Let me tell you what to do: Cultural differences in advice-giving. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43(5). 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111402343.Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Tzu-Ch Jill. 2002. Suggestion in Chinese: Its use in group counseling. Hsinchu: National Tsinghua University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Chu, Hsiao-Ching. 2006. Autonomy and well-being: Self-determination in Chinese students in the United States. West Hartford: University of Hartford PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
DeCapua, Andrea & Joan Findlay Dunham. 2012. ‘It wouldn’t hurt if you had your child evaluated’: Advice to mothers in responses to vignettes from a US teaching context. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 73–96. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.221.06decSuche in Google Scholar
DeCapua, Andrea & Lisa Huber. 1995. ‘If I were you …’: Advice in American English. Multilingua 14(2). 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1995.14.2.117.Suche in Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis. 1981. Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Fang, Zhi-Ying. 2005. On the speech act of suggestions in Chinese: A study on the speech act of suggestions made by Chinese university students. Anhui: Anhui University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Bo & Eran Magen. 2016. Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 33(6). 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515592262.Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, Hairong. 2015. Understanding cultural variations in giving advice among Americans and Chinese. Communication Research 42(8). 1143–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213486668.Suche in Google Scholar
Fischer, Agneta. 2011. Gendered social interactions in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. In Arvid Kappas & Nicole C. Krämer (eds.), Face-to-face communication over the Internet: Emotions in a web of culture, language, and technology, 53–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977589.005Suche in Google Scholar
Ford, Cecili E. 1983. A look at the work of if-clause in informal spoken English. Paper written for English 250K. Los Angeles: University of California.Suche in Google Scholar
Gordon, Anne K., Dara R. Musher-Eizenman, Shayla C. Holub & John Dalrymple. 2004. What are children thankful for? An archival analysis of gratitude before and after the attacks of September 11. Applied Developmental Psychology 25(5). 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2). 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-o.Suche in Google Scholar
Hampel, Elisabeth. 2015. “Mama Zimbi, pls help me!”—Gender differences in (im)politeness in Ghanaian English advice-giving on Facebook. Journal of Politeness Research 11(1). 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0005.Suche in Google Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1990. Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society 19(2). 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500014378.Suche in Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Sue Sefi. 1992. Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first-time mothers. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2003. Gender and power in online communication. In Janet Holmes, Miriam Meyerhoff & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), Handbook of language and gender, 202–228. Chichester: Hoboken.10.1002/9780470756942.ch9Suche in Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. & Sharon Stoerger. 2014. Gender and (a)nonymity in computer-mediated communication. In Janet Holmes, Miriam Meyerhoff & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality, 576–586. Chichester: Hoboken.10.1002/9781118584248.ch29Suche in Google Scholar
Hinkel, Eli. 1997. Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics 18(1). 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar
Hobbs, Pamela. 2003. The medium is the message: Politeness strategies in men’s and women’s voice mail messages. Journal of Pragmatics 35(2). 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00100-5.Suche in Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2008. Gendered discourse at work. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(3). 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2008.00063.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Hudson, Thom. 1990. The discourse of advice-giving in English: “I wouldn’t feed till Spring no matter what you do”. Language and Communication 10(4). 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90014-3.Suche in Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 1995. Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes 19. 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544915.Suche in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Fiona Hyland. 2012. ‘You could make this clearer’: Teachers’ advice on ESL academic writing. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 53–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.221.05hylSuche in Google Scholar
Jansen, Frank & Daniel Janssen. 2010. Effects of positive politeness strategies in business letters. Journal of Pragmatics 42(9). 2531–2548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.013.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 1995. Gender and discourse: A comparative study of male-female differences in conversational style. Taipei: Taiwan's National Science Council. Final Research Report for Taiwan’s National Science Council (NSC 84-2411-H007-006).Suche in Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robbin. 1990. Talking power. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Eden Sum-Hung. 2010. Making suggestions: A contrastive study of young Hong Kong and Australian students. Journal of Pragmatics 42(3). 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.014.Suche in Google Scholar
Lin, Man-Yu. 2015. A contrastive analysis of the speech act of advice on Chinese and English Internet forums: A case study on healthcare subject. Taipei: Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Li, Wen. 2014. A pragmatic study of advice-giving in an online forum. Guangdong: Guangdong University of Foreign Studies MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2006. Advice online: Advice-giving in an American Internet health column. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.149Suche in Google Scholar
Mao, Lu-Ming Robert. 1994. Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5). 451–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Ma, Rong & Anita Atwell Seate. 2017. Reexamining the use of tentative language in emails: The effects of gender salience and gender typicality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(6). 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17706941.Suche in Google Scholar
Martínez-Flor, Alicia. 2010. Suggestion: How social norms affect pragmatic behavior. In Alicia Martínez Flor & Esther Usó Juan (eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues, 258–273. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.26.15marSuche in Google Scholar
Olshtain, Elite & Andrew Cohen. 1983. Apology: A speech act set. In Nessa Wolfson & Elliot Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 18–36. Rowley: Newbury House.Suche in Google Scholar
Paik, Jihyun Esther. 2020. The contextual effects of advice solicitation on advice outcomes: The role of perceived face threats and psychological reactance. Communication Monographs 87(1). 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1641729.Suche in Google Scholar
Ren, Yuxin. 2013. Sequence of advising in Chinese academic interactions. Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Science) 35(3). 154–160.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: In experimental social psychology. In Mark P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 1–65. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6Suche in Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. & Tammy Rube. 2005. Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89(6). 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010.Suche in Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. & Tammy Rubel-Lifschitz. 2009. Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97(1). 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015546.Suche in Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Suche in Google Scholar
Skewis, Malcolm. 2003. Mitigated directness in Honglou meng: Direct speech acts and politeness in eighteen century Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 35(2). 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00084-x.Suche in Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D. M. 1992. Cross-cultural politeness: British and Chinese conceptions of the tutor-student relationship. Lancaster: Lancaster University PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Tang, Chihsia. 2015. The influence of the addressers’ and the addressees’ gender identities on the addressers’ linguistic politeness behavior: Some evidence from criticisms in Taiwanese media discourse. Pragmatics 25(3). 477–499.10.1075/prag.25.3.07tanSuche in Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah F. 1990. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.Suche in Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah F. 2005. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195221817.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Thonus, Terese. 1996. Tutors as male and female: Gendered language in writing conferences. Paper presented at the 13th annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Chicago. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED398767.pdf (accessed 30 December 2022).Suche in Google Scholar
Thonus, Terese. 1999. Dominance in academic writing tutorials: Gender, language proficiency, and the offering of suggestions. Discourse and Society 10(2). 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002005.Suche in Google Scholar
van Gundy, Karen. 2002. Gender, the assertion of autonomy, and the stress process in young adulthood. Social Psychology Quarterly 65(4). 346–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090107.Suche in Google Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla. 2004. “Very carefully managed”: Advice and suggestions in post-observation meetings. Linguistics and Education 15(1–2). 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2004.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2012. Question-prefaced advice in feedback sequences in Finnish academic supervisions. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 31–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.221.04vehSuche in Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1981. The semantics of forgotten routines. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routines, 133–153. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110809145.133Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Xiao-Yan & Zhe Feng. 2020. Relational work in peer advice in a Chinese corporate online discussion forum. Chinese Studies Review 10(1). 143–166.10.1007/s11632-008-0034-6Suche in Google Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2013. The advising sequence and its preference structures in graduate peer tutoring in an American university. In Holger Limberg & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Advice in discourse, 97–118. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.221.07warSuche in Google Scholar
Wu, Yong. 2008. Social power and advice-giving in Chinese. Journal of Gansu United University (Social Sciences Edition) 5. 90–96.Suche in Google Scholar
Yan, Sufen. 2011. Speech act of advice-giving in Chinese—A case study of advice-giving on the Internet in responses to questions of love. Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education 30(5). 130–132.Suche in Google Scholar
Young, Linda W. L. 1994. Crosstalk and culture in Sino-American communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511519901Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, Ming-Chung. 1999. Cross-cultural and interlanguage pragmatics: Developing communicative competence in a second language. Cambridge: Harvard University PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Yu, Ming-Chung. 2005. Sociolinguistic competence in the complimenting act of native Chinese and American English speakers: A mirror of cultural value. Language and Speech 48. 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309050480010501.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Yan-Yin. 1995. Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In Gabriel Kasper (ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language, 69–118. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Production of vowel reduction by Jordanian–Arabic speakers of English: an acoustic study
- The linguistic realization of focus in Uyghur: can the two focusing strategies be used interchangeably?
- Thematic role mappings in metaphor variation: contrasting English bake and Spanish hornear
- A probability distribution of dependencies in interlanguage
- Croatian (mor)phonotactic word-medial consonant clusters in the early lexicon
- The impact of gestural representation of metaphor schema on metaphor comprehension
- Licensing Case-mismatches and dependent plural markers in Korean left-node-raising
- Mandarin Chinese peer advice online: a study of gender disparity
- The pragmatics of ‘it is well’ in Nigerian English
- Active verbs with inanimate, text-denoting subjects in Polish and English abstracts of research articles in linguistics
- Book Reviews
- Book review. Melissa Yoong. 2020. Professional discourses, gender and identity in women’s media. Springer Nature Switzerland. 149pp. 49.99€, ISBN 978-3-030-55543-6.
- The status, roles, and dynamics of Englishes in Asia
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Production of vowel reduction by Jordanian–Arabic speakers of English: an acoustic study
- The linguistic realization of focus in Uyghur: can the two focusing strategies be used interchangeably?
- Thematic role mappings in metaphor variation: contrasting English bake and Spanish hornear
- A probability distribution of dependencies in interlanguage
- Croatian (mor)phonotactic word-medial consonant clusters in the early lexicon
- The impact of gestural representation of metaphor schema on metaphor comprehension
- Licensing Case-mismatches and dependent plural markers in Korean left-node-raising
- Mandarin Chinese peer advice online: a study of gender disparity
- The pragmatics of ‘it is well’ in Nigerian English
- Active verbs with inanimate, text-denoting subjects in Polish and English abstracts of research articles in linguistics
- Book Reviews
- Book review. Melissa Yoong. 2020. Professional discourses, gender and identity in women’s media. Springer Nature Switzerland. 149pp. 49.99€, ISBN 978-3-030-55543-6.
- The status, roles, and dynamics of Englishes in Asia
