Startseite The complexity of non-seriousness: a case study of a (mock?) mock impolite utterance
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The complexity of non-seriousness: a case study of a (mock?) mock impolite utterance

  • Jim O’Driscoll

    Jim O’Driscoll (BA Cambridge 1974, MA Essex 1986, PhD Ghent 1999) has held posts in six different countries, mostly recently at the Universities of Huddersfield, Sheffield and Leeds in England. His research interests straddle several aspects of language-in-situated-use. His articles have appeared in Functions of Language, Intercultural Pragmatics, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Journal of Politeness Research, Journal of Pragmatics, Multilingua and Pragmatics and Society. His book on Offensive Language was published in 2020. He is currently Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Politeness Research.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Januar 2024

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of verbal behaviour which, being neither markedly polite nor markedly impolite nor simply politic, is interpersonally ambivalent. It focuses on what are known as mock impolite utterances (in which a positive attitude to the addressee(s) masquerades as a negative one). Through the detailed analysis of one attested utterance, it shows that apparently non-serious utterances of this kind can be more than simply the opposite of their surface realisations, that they can contain within them varying degrees of ‘seriousness’, so that interpretation of them is not just a binary matter of serious versus non-serious. It proceeds to propose that we can go some way to capturing this complexity by recognising that (non)seriousness operates on at least two dimensions – the affective and the propositional – and moreover that the precise degree of (non)seriousness of an utterance on each dimension is independent of the other. Two further examples are briefly examined to illustrate this variability.


Corresponding author: Jim O’Driscoll, E-mail:

About the author

Jim O’Driscoll

Jim O’Driscoll (BA Cambridge 1974, MA Essex 1986, PhD Ghent 1999) has held posts in six different countries, mostly recently at the Universities of Huddersfield, Sheffield and Leeds in England. His research interests straddle several aspects of language-in-situated-use. His articles have appeared in Functions of Language, Intercultural Pragmatics, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Journal of Politeness Research, Journal of Pragmatics, Multilingua and Pragmatics and Society. His book on Offensive Language was published in 2020. He is currently Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Politeness Research.

References

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Bernal, María. 2008. Do insults always insult? Genuine impoliteness versus non-genuine impoliteness in colloquial Spanish. Pragmatics 18(4). 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18.4.10ber.Suche in Google Scholar

Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Steven C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Main body of which first published in Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Suche in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness. Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Suche in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2017. (Im)politeness and mixed messages. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 323–355. London: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_13Suche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1987. Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25. 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.219.Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2011. Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains, 217–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.210.15dynSuche in Google Scholar

Fox, Kate. 2005. Watching the English. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff. 2018. “Joking, kidding, teasing”: Slippery categories for cross-cultural comparison but key words for understanding Anglo conversational humor. Intercultural Pragmatics 15(4). 487–514. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0017.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967a. On face-work. In Erving Goffman (collection), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour, 5–45. Harmondsworth: Penguin.10.4324/9780203788387-2Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967b. The nature of deference and demeanour. In Erving Goffman (collection), Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour, 47–95. Harmondsworth: Penguin.10.4324/9780203788387-3Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14(2). 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-o.Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2010. Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2106–2119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2014. Jocular mockery as interactional practice in everyday Anglo-Australian conversation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(1). 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2014.875456.Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240078Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2016. “Just kidding”: Teasing and claims to non-serious intent. Journal of Pragmatics 95. 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2017. Teasing. In Salvatore Attardo (ed.), Routledge handbook of language and humour, 204–218. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315731162-15Suche in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Derek Bousfield. 2012. Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2001. The pragmatics of humour support. Humor 14(1). 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55.Suche in Google Scholar

Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki & Tsunao Ogino. 1986. Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 10. 347–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(86)90006-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowalski, Robin M. 2007. Teasing and bullying. In Brian H. Spitzberg & William R. Cupach (eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication, 169–197. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 1973. The logic of politeness: Or, minding your p’s and q’s. In Claudia W. Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics 17. 365–399. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1979.17.5-6.365.Suche in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Suche in Google Scholar

Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2015. Jocular mockery in computer-mediated communication: A contrastive study of a Spanish and English Facebook community. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2). 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0012.Suche in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Re-examination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12. 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Murphy, Lynne M. & Rachele De Felice. 2018. Routine politeness in American and British English requests: Use and non-use of please. Journal of Politeness Research 15(1). 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0027.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 1996. About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00069-x.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2007. Brown & Levinson’s face: How it can – and can’t – help us to understand interaction across cultures. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(4). 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip.2007.024.Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan. 2008. Teasing at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of face work in performing and responding to teases. Text & Talk 28(6). 771–792. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2008.039.Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1975. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500006837.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2019. Conversational humour and (im)politeness: A pragmatic analysis of social interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.8Suche in Google Scholar

Technau, Björn. 2017. Aggression in banter: Patterns, possibilities, and limitations of analysis. In Silvia Bonacchi (ed.), Verbale aggression. Multidisziplinäre Zugänge zur verletzenden Macht der Sprache (Diskursmuster/Discourse Patterns 16), 97–130. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110522976-005Suche in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2002. Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 3(1). 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4(2). 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91.Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie. 2022. Complaining, teasing, and meme-framing. Internet Pragmatics 5(1). 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00077.ton.Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behaviour. Multilingua 8(2–3). 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131.Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, 43–69. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542-005Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-13
Accepted: 2023-12-18
Published Online: 2024-01-22
Published in Print: 2024-02-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pr-2023-0076/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen