Im/politeness research – what it says on the tin? (Not quite)

References

Agha, Asif. 1999. Register. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9(1–2). 216–219. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.216.Search in Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23. 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0.Search in Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arundale, Robert B. 2010. 6. Relating. In Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 137–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338.1.137Search in Google Scholar

Arundale, Robert B. 2021. Relationships and relating. In Michael Haugh, Dániel Kádár & Marina Terkourafi (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics, 272–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.016Search in Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11. 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5.Search in Google Scholar

Bousfield, Derek. 2010. Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions. In Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 101–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338.1.101Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, 56–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Cabré, M. Teresa. 1999. Terminology: Theory, methods, and applications (Juan C. Sager, ed., Janet Ann DeCesaris trans.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Caffi, Claudia. 2013. Mitigation. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 257–286. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214383.257Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko M. 1996. Japanese language socialization: Indexing the modes of self. Discourse Processes 22. 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544971.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko M. 1997. The role of the Japanese masu form in caregiver-child conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28. 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00071-4.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko M. 2011. Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 3655–3672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Haruko M. 2013. A scientist or salesman? Identity construction through referent honorifics on a Japanese shopping channel program. Multilingua 32(2). 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011a. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011b. Politeness and impoliteness. In Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijm (eds.), Pragmatics of society, 393–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214420.393Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Dániel Kádár (eds.). 2017a. The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Dániel Kádár. 2017b. Introduction. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 1–8. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_1Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan, Jim O’Driscoll & Claire Hardaker. 2019. Notions of politeness in Britain and North America. In Eva Ogiermann & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.), From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness: Multilingual and multicultural perspectives, 177–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108182119.008Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Bethan L. 2018. Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order. Journal of Politeness Research 14. 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0037.Search in Google Scholar

De Kadt, Elizabeth. 1994. Towards a model for the study of politeness in Zulu. South African Journal of African Languages 14(3). 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.1994.10587038.Search in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Search in Google Scholar

Ehlich, Konrad. 1992. On the historicity of politeness. In Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language studies in its history, theory and practice, 71–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542-006Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1981 [1970]. The order of discourse. In Robert Young (ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader, 48–78. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Gagné, Nana Okura. 2010. Reexamining the notion of negative face in the Japanese sociolinguistic politeness of request. Language & Communication 30(2). 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2009.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1). 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Grainger, Karen & Jim O’Driscoll. 2022. Editorial: Where we have been and where we are going. Journal of Politeness Research 18(1). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-2041.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14. 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-o.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Kira & Mary Bucholtz. 2013. Epilogue: Facing identity. Journal of Politeness Research 9. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2013-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2007. Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4). 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.005.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2010. Respect and deference. In Miriam A. Locher & Sage L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 271–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338.2.271Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2012. Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 8(1). 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2013. Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2018. Afterword: Theorizing (im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0058.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2019. The Metapragmatics of consideration in (Australian and New Zealand) English. In Eva Ogiermann & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.), From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness, 201–225. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108182119.009Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael, Dániel Kádár & Sara Mills. 2013. Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. Journal of Pragmatics 58. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.009.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper. 2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Cornelia Ilie & Neil R. Norrick (eds.), Pragmatics and its interfaces, 213–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.294.10hauSearch in Google Scholar

Horgan, Mervin. 2021. Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology. Journal of Politeness Research 17(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0031.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1986. Discourse: Scope without depth. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 57. 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1986.57.49.Search in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 2(3). 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223.Search in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 2005. How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance: The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic rituals. In Robin T. Lakoff & Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness, 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.139.06ideSearch in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko, Beverly Hill, Yukiko M. Carnes, Tsunao Ogino & Akiko Kawasaki. 1992. The concept of politeness: An empirical study of American English and Japanese. In Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide & Richard Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, 299–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel & Jonathan Culpeper. 2010. Historical (im)politeness: An introduction. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 9–36. Peter Lang: Bern.Search in Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139382717Search in Google Scholar

Kienpointner, Manfred & Maria Stopfner. 2017. Ideology and (im)politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin T. 1973. The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. 2006. Polite behavior within relational work: The discursive approach to politeness. Multilingua 25. 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi.2006.015.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. 2015. Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Sage Graham. 2010. Introduction to interpersonal pragmatics. In Miriam Locher & Sage Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, language, power, and social process, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344.2.77Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12(4). 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, Ardith. 1995. Defining politeness: Universality in appropriateness. Language Sciences 17. 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(95)00019-4.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, Ardith. 1996a. Two cultures mirrored in repair work. Multilingua 15. 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1996.15.2.149.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, Ardith. 1996b. Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 24(4). 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00053-h.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238Search in Google Scholar

Nwoye, Onuigbo G. 1992. Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90092-p.Search in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2010. Epilogue. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 265–287. Peter Lang: Bern.Search in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2017. Face and (Im)politeness. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 89–118. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_5Search in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2018. Dances with footings: A Goffmanian perspective on the Soto case. Journal of Politeness Research 14(1). 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0038.Search in Google Scholar

O’Driscoll, Jim. 2020. Offensive language: Taboo, offence and social control. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781350169708Search in Google Scholar

Ogiermann, Eva. 2009. Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2). 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2009.011.Search in Google Scholar

Ōishi, Hatsutarō. 1983. Gendai keigo hyōgen. [Contemporary keigo expressions]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō.Search in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shigeko. 1998. The use and non-use of honorifics in sales talk in Kyoto and Osaka: Are they rude or friendly? In Sung-Ock Sohn, Susan Strauss, Noriko Akatsuka, Hajime Hoji & Shoichi Iwasaki (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 7, 141–157. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shinichiro. 2002. Politeness and the perception of irony: Honorifics in Japanese. Metaphor and Symbol 17. 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1702_3.Search in Google Scholar

Pan, Yuling & Dániel Kádár. 2011. Politeness in historical and contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1992. Defining politeness in Indian English. World Englishes 11(2/3). 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1992.tb00068.x.Search in Google Scholar

Pizziconi, Barbara. 2003. Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 1471–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00200-x.Search in Google Scholar

Pizziconi, Barbara. 2007. The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2). 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr.2007.010.Search in Google Scholar

Pizziconi, Barbara. 2011. Honorifics: The cultural specificity of a universal mechanism in Japanese. In Dániel Kádár & Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia, 45–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977886.005Search in Google Scholar

Pizziconi, Barbara. 2020. Social deixis in Japanese. In Wesley M. Jacobsen & Yukinori Takubo (eds.), Handbook of Japanese semantics and pragmatics, 733–772. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614512073-016Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Allan Collins & Edward E. Smith (eds.), Readings in cognitive science, a perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence, 312–322. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50028-5Search in Google Scholar

Sifianou, Maria. 1993. Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua – Journal of Cross Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 12(1). 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1993.12.1.69.Search in Google Scholar

Sifianou, Maria. 2019a. Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship? Journal of Pragmatics 147. 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008.Search in Google Scholar

Sifianou, Maria. 2019b. Conflict, disagreement and (im)politeness. In Matthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries & Jim O’Driscoll (eds.), The Routledge handbook of language in conflict, 1st edn., 176–195. Routledge.10.4324/9780429058011-11Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1998. The uses and utility of ideology: A commentary. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard & Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 123–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4). 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00013-2.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2017. Standards, styles, and signs of the social self. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 9(1). 134–164.Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2021. The dialectics of indexical semiosis: Scaling up and out from the “actual” to the “virtual”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 272. 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-2124.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2000. Rapport management: A framework for analysis. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking. Managing rapport through talk across cultures, 11–46. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. (Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95.Search in Google Scholar

Ten Hacken, Pius. 2015. Terms and specialized vocabulary: Taming the prototypes. In Hendrik J. Kockaert & Frieda Steurs (eds.), Handbook of terminology, vol. 1, 3–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hot.1.ter1Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2002. Politeness and formulaicity: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 3. 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter.Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. Beyond the micro-level in politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2). 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237.Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. From politeness1 to politeness2: Tracking norms of im/politeness across time and space. Journal of Politeness Research 7. 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.009.Search in Google Scholar

Terkourafi, Marina. 2015. Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Usami, Mayumi. 1997. Poraitonesu riron no tenkai: Disukoosu Poraitonesu to iu toraekata [Developments of the politeness theory: Its interpretation as discourse politeness]. Nihon Kenkyuu Kyoiku Nenpoo. 145–159.Search in Google Scholar

Usami, Mayumi. 2006. Discourse politeness theory and cross-cultural pragmatics. In Asako Yoshitomi, Tae Umino & Masahi Negishi (eds.), Readings in second language pedagogy and second language acquisition in Japanese context, 19–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ubli.4.05usaSearch in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality. In Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, 43–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542-005Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard. 2010. Linguistic politeness theory and its aftermath: Recent research trails. In Miriam Locher & Sage Graham (eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics, 43–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214338.1.43Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich. 1992. Introduction. In Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542Search in Google Scholar

Wetzel, Patricia & Fumio Inoue. 1999. Vernacular theories of Japanese honorifics. Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 33(1). 68–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/489631.Search in Google Scholar