Startseite Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties

  • Renbo Ma , Xuewei Zhang , Chao Liu und Wei Wu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Juli 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The loss factor (tanδ) and glass transition temperature (Tg) are two important parameters for evaluating damping properties. Hydrogen bonds (H bonds) play an important role in improving damping properties. In this work, the effect of the hydrogen bond strength and number on the damping properties was studied. Four hindered phenols with different steric hindrances were used to form hydrogen bonds with different strengths to mediate tanδ and Tg. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed that hindered phenol content lower than 38 wt% led to a linear increase in tanδ and Tg because of the formation of H bonds. The Kwei equation was used to explain the relationship between H bonds and tanδ. When the content was higher than 38 wt%, the small molecule-hindered phenols can be divided into two categories: those that can maintain a good miscibility, thus continuously increasing the tanδ, and those that make tanδ increase slowly or decrease because of poor miscibility. These results demonstrated that tanδ is closely related to both hydrogen bond strength and number. The degree of hindrance of the hydroxyl group determines the hydrogen bond strength, whereas the miscibility determines the number.

References

[1] Deng ZX, Dapino MJ. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 18.10.1088/1361-665X/aadff5Suche in Google Scholar

[2] He Y, Asakawa N, Inoue Y. J. Polym. Sci. Pt. B-Polym. Phys. 2015, 38, 1848–1859.10.1002/1099-0488(20000715)38:14<1848::AID-POLB30>3.0.CO;2-FSuche in Google Scholar

[3] Wu CF. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2001, 39, 23–31.10.1002/1099-0488(20010101)39:1<23::AID-POLB30>3.0.CO;2-ISuche in Google Scholar

[4] Xiao DL, Zhao XY, Feng YP, Xiang P, Zhang LQ, Wang WM. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 2143–2150.10.1002/pola.23982Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Daga VK, Watkins JJ. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 9990–9997.10.1021/ma101694nSuche in Google Scholar

[6] Tamai Y, Tanaka H. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6750–6760.10.1021/ma951635zSuche in Google Scholar

[7] Hu T, Bo Q, Zhao XY, Wu SZ. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 410, 313–316.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.410.313Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Wu C, Otani Y, Namiki N, Emi H, Nitta KH, Kubota S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 82, 1788–1793.10.1002/app.2021Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Wu C, Yamagishi T-A, Nakamoto Y, Ishida S-I, Nitta K-H. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 2943–2953.10.1002/1099-0488(20001115)38:22<2943::AID-POLB100>3.0.CO;2-KSuche in Google Scholar

[10] Zhou R, Gao W, Xia L, Wu H, Guo S. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 9350–9362.10.1007/s10853-018-2218-3Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Liu C, Yin X, Lin Y, Guan A, Wu G. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2015, 53, 400–408.10.1002/polb.23642Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Perla R, Priestley RD, Broadbelt LJ, Torkelson JM. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 278–282.10.1038/nmat1870Suche in Google Scholar

[13] He Y, Zhu B, Inoue Y. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 1021–1051.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.07.002Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Kuo SW, Lin HC, Huang WJ, Huang CF, Chang FC. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2010, 44, 673–686.10.1002/polb.20731Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Blaise P, Déjardin PM, Henri-Rousseau O. Chem. Phys. 2005, 313, 177–197.10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Wang J, Man KC, Mi Y. Polymer 2002, 43, 1357–1364.10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00673-5Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Xu K, Zhang F, Zhang X, Guo J, Guo S. Rsc Adv. 2015, 5, 4200–4209.10.1039/C4RA06644HSuche in Google Scholar

[18] Zhao XY, Cao YJ, Hua Z, Jing L, Zhang LQ. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 123, 3696–3702.10.1002/app.35043Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Wu C, Akiyama S. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2004, 42, 209–215.10.1002/polb.10540Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Kalogeras IM, Brostow W. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2010, 47, 80–95.10.1002/polb.21616Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Huang XD, Goh SH, Lee SY, Zhao ZD, Ming WW. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4327–4331.10.1021/ma981700fSuche in Google Scholar

[22] Quijada-Garrido I, Iglesias-González V, Mazón-Arechederra JM, Barrales-Rienda JM. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 68, 173–186.10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.025Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Kwei TK. J. Polym. Sci. C Polym. Lett. 1984, 22, 307–313.10.1002/pol.1984.130220603Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Lenhart JL, Fischer DA, Chantawansri TL, Andzelm JW. Langmuir 2012, 28, 15713–15724.10.1021/la303507eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-12-03
Accepted: 2019-05-17
Published Online: 2019-07-18
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 3.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2018-0378/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen