Home Correlation between fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy in glass-fiber-reinforced composite materials
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Correlation between fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy in glass-fiber-reinforced composite materials

  • Senji Hamanaka , Chisato Nonomura , Thanh Binh Nguyen Thi and Atsushi Yokoyama EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 9, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study investigates the correlation between the fiber orientation distribution along the thickness and mechanical anisotropy in injection-molded products using a thermoplastic resin reinforced by short fibers. To this end, polyamide-6 samples containing 15, 30, 50, and 65 wt% of short fiberglass were compounded, and flat plates with side gates were injection-molded. The fiber orientation distribution near the center of the plates was observed via X-ray computed tomography and that along the thickness was quantified via a fiber orientation tensor. Coupon test pieces were cut from the plates along the machine and transverse directions, and a three-point bending test was performed. Mechanical anisotropy was evaluated from the ratio of the flexural modulus in each direction. Evaluation results of the fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy were compared. As a result of the above investigation, a clear correlation was found between the fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy when the glass fiber content was 15–50 wt%. In the anisotropic expression under the condition of high glass fiber content (65 wt%), contributions of parameters other than the fiber orientation distribution became evident.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Center of Toyobo Co., Ltd., Otsu City, Shiga 520-0243, Japan, and by the Department of Advanced Fibro-Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto city, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan.

Appendix

The moment of inertia of the area in the case of a laminated plate is expressed by the following equations according to the parallel axis theorem:

(A.1)Ep=(i=1nEiIi)/Ip(i=1,2,3,4,,n)
(A.2)Ip=bH3/12
(A.3)Ii=bH3/12+bhyi2(i=1,2,3,4,,n)

Here, Ep is the longitudinal elastic modulus of the laminated material, Ip is the geometrical moment of inertia of the laminate, Ei is Young’s modulus of each layer, Ii is the geometrical moment of inertia of each layer, yi is the distance between the center of each layer in the thickness direction and the neutral axis of the laminate material, H is the thickness of the laminated material, h is the thickness of each layer, and b is the width of the laminate.

References

[1] Bay RS, Tucker CL. Polym. Compos. 1992, 13, 332–341.10.1002/pc.750130410Search in Google Scholar

[2] Darlington MW, McGinley PL. J. Mater. Sci. 1975, 10, 906–910.10.1007/BF01163086Search in Google Scholar

[3] Darlington MW, Gladwell BK, Smith GR. Polymer 1977, 18, 1269–1274.10.1016/0032-3861(77)90292-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] Thi TBN, Morioka M, Yokoyama A, Hamanaka S, Yamashita K, Nonomura C. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2015, 219, 1–9.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.11.048Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jørgensen JK, Andreassen E, Salaberger D. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 6115–629.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Hamanaka S, Yamashita K, Nonomura C, Thi TBN, Wakano T, Yokoyama A. AIP Conf. Proc. 2017, 1914, 140011.10.1063/1.5016776Search in Google Scholar

[7] Fujiyama M, Awaya H, Kimura S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1977, 21, 3291–3309.10.1002/app.1977.070211209Search in Google Scholar

[8] Malzahn JC, Schultz JM. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1986, 27, 253–289.10.1016/0266-3538(86)90071-0Search in Google Scholar

[9] Thomason JL. Polym. Compos. 2006, 27, 552–562.10.1002/pc.20226Search in Google Scholar

[10] Thomason JL, Vlug MA. Composites A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 1996, 27, 477–484.10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-ASearch in Google Scholar

[11] Fu SY, Hu X, Yue CY. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1999, 59, 1533–1542.10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00022-6Search in Google Scholar

[12] Bernasconi A, Cosmi F, Dreossi D. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 2574–2581.10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.05.022Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bernasconi A, Cosmi F, Hine PJ. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2012, 72, 2002–2008.10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.018Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ayadi A, Nouri H, Guessasma S, Roger F. Compos. Struct. 2016, 136, 635–649.10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.041Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jansen KMB, Van Dijk DJ, Freriksen MJA. Polym. Compos. 1998, 19, 325–334.10.1002/pc.10105Search in Google Scholar

[16] Xia M, Hamada H, Maekawa Z. Int. Polym. Proc. 1995, 10, 74–81.10.3139/217.950074Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mudassir S, Shankar DR, Hussain MM. Int. J. Mater. Sci. 2016, 11, 47–55.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-11-25
Accepted: 2019-05-23
Published Online: 2019-07-09
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2018-0371/html
Scroll to top button