Home Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties

  • Renbo Ma , Xuewei Zhang , Chao Liu and Wei Wu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 18, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Journal of Polymer Engineering
From the journal Journal of Polymer Engineering Volume 39 Issue 7

Abstract

The loss factor (tanδ) and glass transition temperature (Tg) are two important parameters for evaluating damping properties. Hydrogen bonds (H bonds) play an important role in improving damping properties. In this work, the effect of the hydrogen bond strength and number on the damping properties was studied. Four hindered phenols with different steric hindrances were used to form hydrogen bonds with different strengths to mediate tanδ and Tg. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed that hindered phenol content lower than 38 wt% led to a linear increase in tanδ and Tg because of the formation of H bonds. The Kwei equation was used to explain the relationship between H bonds and tanδ. When the content was higher than 38 wt%, the small molecule-hindered phenols can be divided into two categories: those that can maintain a good miscibility, thus continuously increasing the tanδ, and those that make tanδ increase slowly or decrease because of poor miscibility. These results demonstrated that tanδ is closely related to both hydrogen bond strength and number. The degree of hindrance of the hydroxyl group determines the hydrogen bond strength, whereas the miscibility determines the number.

Keywords: damping property; hindered phenol; hydrogen bonding; polyacrylate rubber

References

[1] Deng ZX, Dapino MJ. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 18.10.1088/1361-665X/aadff5Search in Google Scholar

[2] He Y, Asakawa N, Inoue Y. J. Polym. Sci. Pt. B-Polym. Phys. 2015, 38, 1848–1859.10.1002/1099-0488(20000715)38:14<1848::AID-POLB30>3.0.CO;2-FSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Wu CF. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2001, 39, 23–31.10.1002/1099-0488(20010101)39:1<23::AID-POLB30>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Xiao DL, Zhao XY, Feng YP, Xiang P, Zhang LQ, Wang WM. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 2143–2150.10.1002/pola.23982Search in Google Scholar

[5] Daga VK, Watkins JJ. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 9990–9997.10.1021/ma101694nSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Tamai Y, Tanaka H. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 6750–6760.10.1021/ma951635zSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Hu T, Bo Q, Zhao XY, Wu SZ. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 410, 313–316.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.410.313Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wu C, Otani Y, Namiki N, Emi H, Nitta KH, Kubota S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 82, 1788–1793.10.1002/app.2021Search in Google Scholar

[9] Wu C, Yamagishi T-A, Nakamoto Y, Ishida S-I, Nitta K-H. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 2943–2953.10.1002/1099-0488(20001115)38:22<2943::AID-POLB100>3.0.CO;2-KSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Zhou R, Gao W, Xia L, Wu H, Guo S. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 9350–9362.10.1007/s10853-018-2218-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] Liu C, Yin X, Lin Y, Guan A, Wu G. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2015, 53, 400–408.10.1002/polb.23642Search in Google Scholar

[12] Perla R, Priestley RD, Broadbelt LJ, Torkelson JM. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 278–282.10.1038/nmat1870Search in Google Scholar

[13] He Y, Zhu B, Inoue Y. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 1021–1051.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.07.002Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kuo SW, Lin HC, Huang WJ, Huang CF, Chang FC. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2010, 44, 673–686.10.1002/polb.20731Search in Google Scholar

[15] Blaise P, Déjardin PM, Henri-Rousseau O. Chem. Phys. 2005, 313, 177–197.10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.01.001Search in Google Scholar

[16] Wang J, Man KC, Mi Y. Polymer 2002, 43, 1357–1364.10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00673-5Search in Google Scholar

[17] Xu K, Zhang F, Zhang X, Guo J, Guo S. Rsc Adv. 2015, 5, 4200–4209.10.1039/C4RA06644HSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Zhao XY, Cao YJ, Hua Z, Jing L, Zhang LQ. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 123, 3696–3702.10.1002/app.35043Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wu C, Akiyama S. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2004, 42, 209–215.10.1002/polb.10540Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kalogeras IM, Brostow W. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2010, 47, 80–95.10.1002/polb.21616Search in Google Scholar

[21] Huang XD, Goh SH, Lee SY, Zhao ZD, Ming WW. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4327–4331.10.1021/ma981700fSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Quijada-Garrido I, Iglesias-González V, Mazón-Arechederra JM, Barrales-Rienda JM. Carbohydr. Polym. 2007, 68, 173–186.10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.025Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kwei TK. J. Polym. Sci. C Polym. Lett. 1984, 22, 307–313.10.1002/pol.1984.130220603Search in Google Scholar

[24] Lenhart JL, Fischer DA, Chantawansri TL, Andzelm JW. Langmuir 2012, 28, 15713–15724.10.1021/la303507eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-12-03
Accepted: 2019-05-17
Published Online: 2019-07-18
Published in Print: 2019-07-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Material properties
  3. Banana and plantain fiber-reinforced polymer composites
  4. Characterizations of PMMA-based polymer electrolyte membranes with Al2O3
  5. Effects of grafting parameters on the properties of proton exchange membranes based on sulfo-functionalized porous silicon for micro direct methanol fuel cells
  6. The effect of surface modification of PMMA/chitosan composites on improving adsorption properties for chelating Pb2+
  7. Characterization of organic solar cells using semiconducting polymers with different bandgaps
  8. Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties
  9. Correlation between fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy in glass-fiber-reinforced composite materials
  10. Preparation and assembly
  11. Replacement of sodium alginate polymer, urea and sodium bicarbonate in the conventional reactive printing of cellulosic cotton
  12. Carboxylic acid modified pH-responsive composite polymer particles
  13. Synthesis of SiO2 nanoparticle from bamboo leaf and its incorporation in PDMS membrane to enhance its separation properties
https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2018-0378
Keywords for this article
damping property; hindered phenol; hydrogen bonding; polyacrylate rubber

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Material properties
  3. Banana and plantain fiber-reinforced polymer composites
  4. Characterizations of PMMA-based polymer electrolyte membranes with Al2O3
  5. Effects of grafting parameters on the properties of proton exchange membranes based on sulfo-functionalized porous silicon for micro direct methanol fuel cells
  6. The effect of surface modification of PMMA/chitosan composites on improving adsorption properties for chelating Pb2+
  7. Characterization of organic solar cells using semiconducting polymers with different bandgaps
  8. Hindered phenol-mediated damping of polyacrylate rubber: effect of hydrogen bonding strength on the damping properties
  9. Correlation between fiber orientation distribution and mechanical anisotropy in glass-fiber-reinforced composite materials
  10. Preparation and assembly
  11. Replacement of sodium alginate polymer, urea and sodium bicarbonate in the conventional reactive printing of cellulosic cotton
  12. Carboxylic acid modified pH-responsive composite polymer particles
  13. Synthesis of SiO2 nanoparticle from bamboo leaf and its incorporation in PDMS membrane to enhance its separation properties
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 3.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2018-0378/html
Scroll to top button