Startseite Characteristics analysis and mold design for ultrasonic-assisted injection molding
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Characteristics analysis and mold design for ultrasonic-assisted injection molding

  • Yi-Jen Yang EMAIL logo , Chung-Ching Huang , Shih-Kai Lin und Jie Tao
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Juni 2014
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study investigated the use of ultrasonic technology in assisted injection molding (AIM) and mold design. An ultrasonic device installed in a mold was employed to vibrate a melt, thereby converting kinetic energy into thermal energy. This method enabled maintaining the desired temperature in the melt flow, preventing a high level of shear and the formation of a thick frozen layer surrounding the skin layer; thus, the injection molding efficiency was enhanced and the residual stress inside the injection-molded component was reduced. In this study, a flat sample (75 mm×47 mm×1 mm) of an ultrasonic-assisted injection mold was developed. An ultrasonic oscillation device 45 mm in diameter was placed in the center of the cavity and used to vibrate a polycarbonate melt at a frequency of 20 KHz. In addition, cavity pressure sensors were positioned at the front and rear of the vibration region to analyze the melt flow behavior under ultrasonic-AIM (UAIM) conditions. The results showed that ultrasonic oscillations can reduce the amount of melt pressure lost through the cavity. The pressure loss of the flat sample used in UAIM was approximately 29% lower than that of the sample used in conventional injection molding (CIM; nonultrasonic-assisted injection); the power of UAIM did not yield substantial effects. Direct ultrasonic oscillations destroyed the melt flow and thermal stresses, therefore, the region exhibited a low stress distribution. Compared with using CIM, using UAIM reduced the average residual stress by 27%. Ultrasonic oscillation affected the surface roughness during melt solidification. When the ultrasonic power was <70%, no substantial increase in surface roughness was observed; however, when the ultrasonic power >70%, the surface roughness was 10 times higher compared with that observed using CIM.


Corresponding author: Yi-Jen Yang, Mold and Die Engineering Department, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, 415 Chien-Kung Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 807, R.O.C., e-mail: ,

References

[1] Li Y, Liao Y, Gao X, Yuan Y, Shen K. Acta Polym. Sin. 2004, 6, 839–843.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Li Y, Gao X, Yuan Y, Shen K. Acta Polym. Sin. 2007, 12, 1111–1115.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Benitez-Rangel JP, Trejo-Hernández M, Morales-Hernández LA, Domínguez-González A. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2010, 25, 577–580.10.1080/10426910903124902Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Gao J, Zhang Q, Wang K, Fu Q, Chen Y, Chen H, Huang H, Rego JM. Composites, Part A Appl. Sci. Manufact. 2012, 43, 562–569.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Zhang J, Liu H, Zhang L, Zhou Q, Gao X, Shen K. Polym. Bull. 2012, 68, 239–251.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Balasubramaniam K, Alluri S, Nidumolu P, Mantena PR, Vaughan JG, Kowsika M. Compos. Eng. 1995, 5, 1433–1451.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Isayev AI, Kumar R, Lewis TM. Polymer 2009, 50, 250–260.10.1016/j.polymer.2008.10.052Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Michaeli W, Starke C. Polym. Test. 2005, 24, 205–209.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Yu X, Lu C, Wu H, Guo S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 102, 2990–2997.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Lu C, Yu X, Guo S. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2005, 45, 1666–1672.10.1016/j.jmig.2005.07.049Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Liu SJ, Lin KY, Tsai SK. Plast., Rubber Compos.: Macromol. Eng. 2008, 37, 23–28.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Lee J, Kim N, Lee J. Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 2008, 20, 79–88.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Lee J, Kim N. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 201, 710–715.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Lee J, Kim N. Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 2009, 21, 17–25.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Michaeli W, Opfermann D. 4M 2006 – Second International Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture 2006, 345–348.10.1016/B978-008045263-0/50078-7Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Sato A, Ito H, Koyama K. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009, 49, 768–773.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Sato A, Abe T. Sekei Kakou. 1998, 10, 445.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Sato A, Abe T. Application of Ultrasonic Oscillation to Injection Molding in 6th Japan International SAMPE Symposium, Tokyo October 27–28, 1999, p 622.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Sato A, Katagiri K. Seikei Kakou. 2000, 12, 340.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-12-26
Accepted: 2014-5-6
Published Online: 2014-6-17
Published in Print: 2014-9-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 3.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2013-0328/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen