Startseite Gray optimization of process parameters of surface modification of coconut sheath reinforced polymer composites
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Gray optimization of process parameters of surface modification of coconut sheath reinforced polymer composites

  • Irullappasamy Siva EMAIL logo , Jebas Thangaih Winowlin Jappes , Pandian Pitchipoo , Sandro Campos Amico , Erumaipatty Rajagounder Nagarajan und Nainar Azhagesan
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. August 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Surface modification of natural fiber may greatly enhance the mechanical interlocking between fiber and matrix. Although there are many reports on surface modification of natural fibers, little technical information is available to enable the selection of optimized surface modification conditions. In this work, treatment parameters, such as bath temperature, agent concentration, and treatment time, are optimized to achieve higher interfacial adhesion. The effect of these parameters on flexural and impact strength is investigated by applying gray relational techniques. Experimental results show that NaOH concentration and treatment time are significant variables which improve interfacial strength, while NaOH bath temperature appears less important.


Corresponding author: Irullappasamy Siva, Centre for Composite Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam University, Krishnankoil-626126, India, e-mail:

The authors wish to thank the Department of Science and Technology, India for the funding and also the Center for Composite Materials and Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kalasalingam University for their kind permission to carry out the preparation and testing of the composites.

References

[1] Ibraheem SA, Aidy A, Khalina A. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50, 613–621.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Bledzki AV, Gassan J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 224–274.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Onal L, Karaduman Y. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 1751–1768.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Ahmad SH, Rasid R, Bonnia NN, Zainol I, Mamun AA, Bledzki AK, Beg MDH. J. Compos. Mater. 2011, 45, 203–217.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Rout J, Misra M, Tripathy SS, Nayak SK, Mohanty AK. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1303–1310.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Park S-J, Kim K-D. Carbon 2001, 39, 1741–1746.10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00305-5Suche in Google Scholar

[7] John MJ, Francis B, Varughese KT, Thomas S. Composites: Part A 2008, 39, 352–363.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.002Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Park CH, Lee WI. J. Compos. Mater. 2005, 39, 347–374.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Kiran Kumar P, Raghavendra NV, Sridhara BK. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 549–556.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Aleksendric D, Senatore A. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 2777–2791.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Lin CL. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2004, 19, 209–220.10.1081/AMP-120029852Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Chang C-Y, Hourng L-W, Chou T-Y. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2006, 25, 1027–1037.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Das D, Mukhopadhyay S, Kaur H. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 3311–3319.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Qiao P, Davalos JF, Barbero EJ. J. Compos. Mater. 1998, 32, 177–196.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Deng JL. J. Grey System 1989, 1, 1–24.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Silva GG, Souza DD, Machado J, Hourston D. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 76, 1197–1206.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Rahman MM, Khan MA. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 2369–2376.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Satapathy BK, Bijwe J, Kolluri DK. J. Compos. Mater. 2006, 40, 483–501.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Rajini N, Jappes JTW, Rajakarunakaran S, Siva I. J. Polym. Eng. 2012, 32, 555–566.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Jee D-H, Kang K-J. Mater. Des. 2000, 21, 199–206.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Hwang C-L, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Springer-Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 1981.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Pomerol J-C, Barba-Romero S. Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice. Springer: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Ahilan C, Kumanan S, Sivakumaran N. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manage. 2010, 5, 171–180.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Narender Singh P, Raghukandan K, Pai BC. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004, 155–156, 1658–1661.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Brahmakumar M, Pavithran C, Pillai R. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 563–569.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Cantero G, Arbelaiz A, Llano-Ponte R, Mondragon I. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 1247–1254.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Sinha E, Rout SK. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2009, 32, 65–76.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Sinha E, Rout SK. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 2590–2601.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Jannah M, Mariatti M, Bakker A, Khalil A. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2009, 28, 1519–1532.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-11-15
Accepted: 2013-7-30
Published Online: 2013-08-30
Published in Print: 2013-10-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Heruntergeladen am 3.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2012-0151/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen