Startseite A comparative analysis of the queuing search algorithm, the sine-cosine algorithm, the ant lion algorithm to determine the optimal weight design problem of a spur gear drive system
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A comparative analysis of the queuing search algorithm, the sine-cosine algorithm, the ant lion algorithm to determine the optimal weight design problem of a spur gear drive system

  • Hammoudi Abderazek

    Dr. Hammoudi Abderazek received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Setif -1- University, Algeria. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization and metaheuristic optimization techniques. Dr. Abderazek has been working at the Mechanical Research Center (CRM), Constantine, Algeria.

    , Ferhat Hamza

    Ferhat Hamza is a Ph.D. Student at the Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Setif -1-University, Algeria. His research interests are engineering design optimization using metaheuristic algorithms.

    , Ali Riza Yildiz

    Dr. Ali Riza Yildiz is a Professor in the Department of Automotive Engineering, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis of automobile components, lightweight design, composite materials, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and additive manufacturing. He serves as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Expert Systems.

    EMAIL logo
    , Liang Gao

    Liang Gao received his B.Sc. degree in Mechatronic Engineering from Xidian University, Xi’an, China, in 1996, and his Ph.D. degree in Mechatronic Engineering from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China, in 2002. He is a Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing System Engineering, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, HUST and Vice Director of the State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment. He has published over 350 refereed papers. He is a Fellow of IET and Highly Cited Researcher 2020 of Clarivate. His current research interests include optimization in design and manufacturing. He currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing and an Associate Editor of Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering and is an Editorial Board Member of Operations Research Perspectives. He also served as Guest Editor for the Journal of Cleaner Production, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, and International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

    und Sadiq M. Sait

    Dr. Sadiq M. Sait obtained his Bachelor’s degree in Electronics from Bangalore University in 1981, and his Master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia in 1983 & 1987, respectively. Since 1987 he has been working at the Department of Computer Engineering where he is now a Professor. He was the Head of the Computer Engineering Department, KFUPM from January 2001 to December 2004, Director of Information Technology and CIO of KFUPM between 2005 and 2011, and currently is Director of the Center for Communications and IT Research at the Research Institute of KFUPM.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Mai 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Metaheuristic optimization algorithms have gained relevance and have effectively been investigated for solving complex real design problems in diverse fields of science and engineering. In this paper, a recent meta-heuristic approach inspired by human social concepts, namely the queuing search algorithm (QSA), is implemented for the first time to optimize the main parameters of the spur gear, in particular, to minimize the weight of a single-stage spur gear. The effectiveness of the algorithm introduced is examined in two steps. First, the algorithm used is compared with descriptions in previous studies and indicates that the final results obtained by QSA lead to a reduction in gear weight by 7.5 %. Furthermore, the outcomes obtained are compared with those for the other five algorithms. The results reveal that the QSA outperforms the techniques with which it is compared such as the sine-cosine optimization algorithm, the ant lion optimization algorithm, the interior search algorithm, the teaching-learning-based algorithm, and the jaya algorithm in terms of robustness, success rate, and convergence capability.


Prof. Dr. Ali Rıza Yıldız Department of Automotive Engineering Uludağ University Görükle, Bursa, Turkey

About the authors

Dr. Hammoudi Abderazek

Dr. Hammoudi Abderazek received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Setif -1- University, Algeria. His research interests include multidisciplinary design optimization and metaheuristic optimization techniques. Dr. Abderazek has been working at the Mechanical Research Center (CRM), Constantine, Algeria.

Ferhat Hamza

Ferhat Hamza is a Ph.D. Student at the Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics, Setif -1-University, Algeria. His research interests are engineering design optimization using metaheuristic algorithms.

Prof. Dr. Ali Riza Yildiz

Dr. Ali Riza Yildiz is a Professor in the Department of Automotive Engineering, Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey. His research interests are the finite element analysis of automobile components, lightweight design, composite materials, vehicle design, vehicle crashworthiness, shape and topology optimization of vehicle components, meta-heuristic optimization techniques, and additive manufacturing. He serves as an Associate Editor of the Journal of Expert Systems.

Liang Gao

Liang Gao received his B.Sc. degree in Mechatronic Engineering from Xidian University, Xi’an, China, in 1996, and his Ph.D. degree in Mechatronic Engineering from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, China, in 2002. He is a Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing System Engineering, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, HUST and Vice Director of the State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment. He has published over 350 refereed papers. He is a Fellow of IET and Highly Cited Researcher 2020 of Clarivate. His current research interests include optimization in design and manufacturing. He currently serves as Co-Editor-in-Chief of IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing and an Associate Editor of Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering and is an Editorial Board Member of Operations Research Perspectives. He also served as Guest Editor for the Journal of Cleaner Production, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, and International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Dr. Sadiq M. Sait

Dr. Sadiq M. Sait obtained his Bachelor’s degree in Electronics from Bangalore University in 1981, and his Master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia in 1983 & 1987, respectively. Since 1987 he has been working at the Department of Computer Engineering where he is now a Professor. He was the Head of the Computer Engineering Department, KFUPM from January 2001 to December 2004, Director of Information Technology and CIO of KFUPM between 2005 and 2011, and currently is Director of the Center for Communications and IT Research at the Research Institute of KFUPM.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey, and King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, for their support of this research.

References

1 B. S. Yıldız: The spotted hyena optimization algorithm for weight-reduction of automobile brake components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 4, pp. 383-388 DOI:10.3139/120.11149510.3139/120.111495Suche in Google Scholar

2 B. S. Yıldız, A. R. Yildiz, E. I. Albak, H. Abderazek, Sadiq M. Sait, S. Bureerat: Butterfly optimization algorithm for optimum shape design of automobile suspension components, Materials Testing, 62 (2020), No. 4, pp. 365-370 DOI:10.3139/120.11149210.3139/120.111492Suche in Google Scholar

3 B. S. Yildiz: The mine blast algorithm for the structural optimization of electrical vehicle components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 5, pp. 497-501 DOI:10.3139/120.11151110.3139/120.111511Suche in Google Scholar

4 E. Kurtuluş, A. R. Yildiz, S .M. Sait, Bureerat: A novel hybrid Harris hawks-simulated annealing algorithm and RBF-based metamodel for design optimization of highway guardrails, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 3, pp. 251-260 DOI:10.3139/120.11147810.3139/120.111478Suche in Google Scholar

5 B. S. Yildiz, A. R. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, S. M. Sait, V. Patel: The Henry gas solubility optimization algorithm for optimum structural design of automobile brake components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 3, pp. 261-264 DOI:10.3139/120.11147910.3139/120.111479Suche in Google Scholar

6 Z. Meng, G. Li, X. Wang, S. M. Sait, A. R. Yildiz: A comparative study of metaheuristic algorithms for reliability-based design optimization problems, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28 (2021), pp. 1853-1869 DOI:10.1007/s11831-020-09443-z10.1007/s11831-020-09443-zSuche in Google Scholar

7 P. Champasak, N.Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz: Self-adaptive many-objective meta-heuristic based on decomposition for many-objective conceptual design of a fixed wing unmanned aerial vehicle, Aerospace Science and Technology 100 (2020), pp. 1-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ast.2020.10578310.1016/j.ast.2020.105783Suche in Google Scholar

8 B. S Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Robust design of a robot gripper mechanism using new hybrid grasshopper optimization algorithm, Expert Systems, 38 (3) 2021, e12666 DOI:10.1111/exsy.1266610.1111/exsy.12666Suche in Google Scholar

9 H. Abderazek, A. R. Yildiz, S. Mirjalili: Comparison of recent optimization algorithms for design optimization of a cam-follower mechanism, Knowledge-Based Systems 105 (2020), No. 105237 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.10523710.1016/j.knosys.2019.105237Suche in Google Scholar

10 A. R. Yildiz, H. Abderazek, S. Mirjalili: A comparative study of recent non-traditional methods for mechanical design optimization, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 27 (2020), pp. 1031-1048 DOI:10.1007/s11831-019-09343-x10.1007/s11831-019-09343-xSuche in Google Scholar

11 A. R. Yildiz, M. U. Erdaş: A new Hybrid Taguchisalp swarm optimization algorithm for the robust design of real-world engineering problems, Materials Testing 63(2021), pp.157-162 DOI:10.1515/mt-2020-002210.1515/mt-2020-0022Suche in Google Scholar

12 B. S Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Comparision of the political optimization algorithm, the Archimedes optimization algorithm and the Levy flight algorithm for design optimization in industry, Materials Testing 63 (2021) 4, pp. 356-359 DOI 10.1515/mt-2020-005310.1515/mt-2020-0053Suche in Google Scholar

13 B. S. Yıldız: Optimal design of automobile structures using moth-flame optimization algorithm and response surface methodology, Materials Testing 62 (2020), No. 4, pp. 372-377 DOI:10.3139/120.11149410.3139/120.111494Suche in Google Scholar

14 F. Hamza, H. Abderazek, S. Lakhdar, D. Ferhat, A. R. Yildiz: Optimum design of cam-roller follower mechanism using a new evolutionary algorithm, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 99 (2018), No. 5-8, pp. 1261-1282 DOI:10.1007/s00170-018-2543-310.1007/s00170-018-2543-3Suche in Google Scholar

15 B. S Yildiz, V. Patel, N. Pholdee, S. M. Sait, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz: Conceptual comparison of the ecogeography-based algorithm, equilibrium algorithm, marine predators algorithm and slime mold algorithm for optimal product design, Materials Testing 63 (2021) 4, pp. 336-340 DOI:10.1515/mt-2020-004910.1515/mt-2020-0049Suche in Google Scholar

16 H. Abderazek, D. Ferhat, A. Ivana: Adaptive mixed differential evolution algorithm for biobjective tooth profile spur gear optimization, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 90 (2017), No. 5-8, pp. 2063-2073 DOI:10.1007/s00170-016-9523-210.1007/s00170-016-9523-2Suche in Google Scholar

17 H. Abderazek, F. Hamza, A. R. Yildiz, S. M. Sait: Comparative investigation of the moth-flame algorithm and whale optimization algorithm for optimal spur gear design, Materials Testing 63 (2021) 3, pp. 266-271 DOI: 10.1515/mt-2020-003910.1515/mt-2020-0039Suche in Google Scholar

18 E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız: An investigation of the crash performance of magnesium, aluminum and advanced high strength steels and different cross-sections for vehicle thin-walled energy absorbers, Materials Testing 60 (2018), No. 7-8, pp. 661-668 DOI:10.3139/120.11120110.3139/120.111201Suche in Google Scholar

19 H. Ozkaya, M. Yildiz, A. R. Yildiz, S. Bureerat, B. S. Yildiz, Sadiq M. Sait: The equilibrium optimizationalgorithm and the response surface based metamodel for optimal structural design of vehicle components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 492-496 DOI:10.3139/120.11150910.3139/120.111509Suche in Google Scholar

20 A. R. Yildiz, N. Kaya, N. Öztürk, F. Öztürk: Hybrid approach for genetic algorithm and Taguchi’s method based design optimization in the automotive industry, International Journal of Production Research 44 (2006), pp. 4897-4914 DOI:10.1080/0020754060061993210.1080/00207540600619932Suche in Google Scholar

21 A. R. Yildiz: A novel hybrid whale nelder mead algorithm for optimization of design and manufacturing problems, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 105 (2019), pp. 5091-5104 DOI:10.1007/s00170-019-04532-110.1007/s00170-019-04532-1Suche in Google Scholar

22 T. Güler, A. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız, U. Yavuz: Lightweight design of an automobile hinge component using glass fiber polyamide composites, Materials Testing 60 (2018), No. 3, pp. 306-310 DOI:10.3139/120.11115210.3139/120.111152Suche in Google Scholar

23 B. S. Yıldız, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, Sadiq M. Sait: Sine-cosine optimization algorithm for the conceptual design of automobile components, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 744-748 DOI:10.3139/120.11154110.3139/120.111541Suche in Google Scholar

24 H. Abderazek, D. Ferhat, I. Atanasovska, K. Boualem: A differential evolution algorithm for tooth profile optimization with respect to balancing specific sliding coefficients of involute cylindrical spur and helical gears, Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7 (2015), No. 9, pp. 1-11 DOI:10.1177/168781401560500810.1177/1687814015605008Suche in Google Scholar

25 A. Karaduman, B. S. Yıldız, A. R. Yıldız: Experimental and numerical fatigue-based design optimisation of clutch diaphragm spring in the automotive industry, International Journal of Vehicle Design 80 (2020), No. 2-4, pp. 330-345 DOI:10.1504/IJVD.2019.10987510.1504/IJVD.2019.109875Suche in Google Scholar

26 A. R. Yildiz, F. Ozturk: Hybrid Taguchi harmony search approach for shape optimization, Recent Advances in Harmony Search Algorithm 270 (2010), pp. 89-98 DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-04317-8_810.1007/978-3-642-04317-8_8Suche in Google Scholar

27 E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız: An experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of geometry and spot welds on the crashworthiness of vehicle thin-walled structures, Materials Testing 60 (2018), No. 6, pp. 553-561 DOI:10.3139/120.11118710.3139/120.111187Suche in Google Scholar

28 B. Aslan, A. R. Yildiz: Optimum design of automobile components using lattice structures for additive manufacturing, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 633-639 DOI:10.3139/120.11152710.3139/120.111527Suche in Google Scholar

29 A. R. Yıldız, U. A. Kılıçarpa, E. Demirci: Topography and topology optimization of diesel engine components for light-weight design in the automotive industry, Materials Testing 61 (2019), No. 1, pp. 27-34 DOI:10.3139/120.11127710.3139/120.111277Suche in Google Scholar

30 N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A. R. Yildiz, Sadiq M. Sait: Seagull optimization algorithm for solving real-world design optimization problems, Materials Testing 62 (2020), pp. 640-644 DOI:10.3139/120.11152910.3139/120.111529Suche in Google Scholar

31 A. R. Yildiz: Designing of optimum vehicle components using new generation optimization methods, Journal of Polytechnic 20 (2017), No. 2, pp. 319-323 DOI:10.2339/2017.20.2 325-33210.2339/2017.20.2325-332Suche in Google Scholar

32 E. Demirci, A. R. Yıldız: A new hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization of structural components, Materials Testing 61 (2019), pp. 111-119 DOI:10.3139/120.11129110.3139/120.111291Suche in Google Scholar

33 M. Dorigo, M. Birattari, T. Stutzle : Ant colony optimization – artificial ants as a computational intelligence technique, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1 (2006), pp. 28-3910.1109/CI-M.2006.248054Suche in Google Scholar

34 X. S. Yang, S. Deb: Cuckoo search via levy flights, Proc. of the World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC-2009), Coimbatore, India (2009), pp. 210-21410.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690Suche in Google Scholar

35 S. Mirjalili: The ant lion optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software 83 (2015), pp. 80-98 DOI:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.010Suche in Google Scholar

36 S. Mirjalili: Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems, Neural Computing and Applications 27 (2016), No. 4, pp. 1053-1073 DOI:10.1007/s00521-015-1920-110.1007/s00521-015-1920-1Suche in Google Scholar

37 A. A. Heidari, S. Mirjalili, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, M. Mafarja, H. L. Chen: Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications, Future Generation Computer Systems 97 (2019), pp. 849-872 DOI:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.02810.1016/j.future.2019.02.028Suche in Google Scholar

38 R. V. Rao, V. J. Savsani, D. P. Vakharia: Teaching– learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems, Computer-Aided Design 43 (2011), No. 3, pp. 303-315 DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.01510.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015Suche in Google Scholar

39 F. Glover: Tabu search-uncharted domains, Annals of Operations Research 149 (2007). No. 1, pp. 89-98 DOI: 10.1007/s10479-006-0113-910.1007/s10479-006-0113-9Suche in Google Scholar

40 D. Manjarres, I. Landa-Torres, S. Gil-Lopez, J. Del Ser, M. N. Bilbao, S. Salcedo-Sanz, Z. W. Geem: A survey on applications of the harmony search algorithm, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26 (2013), No. 8, pp. 1818-1831 DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2013.05.00810.1016/j.engappai.2013.05.008Suche in Google Scholar

41 M. Kumar, A. J. Kulkarni, S. C. Satapathy: Socio evolution & learning optimization algorithm: A socio-inspired optimization methodology, Future Generation Computer Systems 81 (2018), pp. 252-272 DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.10.05210.1016/j.future.2017.10.052Suche in Google Scholar

42 J. Zhang, M. Xiao, L. Gao, Q. Pan: Queuing search algorithm: A novel metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems, Applied Mathematical Modelling 63 (2018), pp. 464-490 DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.06.03610.1016/j.apm.2018.06.036Suche in Google Scholar

43 V. Savsani, R. V. Rao, D. P. Vakharia: Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms, Mechanism and machine theory 45 (2010), No. 3, pp. 531-541 DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.01010.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.010Suche in Google Scholar

44 A. H. Gandomi: Interior search algorithm (isa): a novel approach for global optimization, ISA transactions 53 (2014), No. 4, pp. 1168-1183 DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.03.01810.1016/j.isatra.2014.03.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

45 B. S. Yildiz: Natural frequency optimization of vehicle components using the interior search algorithm, Materials Testing 59 (2017), No. 5, pp. 456-458 DOI:10.3139/120.11101810.3139/120.111018Suche in Google Scholar

46 R. Rao: Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations 7 (2016), No. 1, pp. 19-34 DOI:10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.00410.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004Suche in Google Scholar

47 S. Mirjalili: SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems, Knowledge-based systems 96 (2016), pp. 120-133 DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.02210.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.022Suche in Google Scholar

48 E. Mezura-Montes, C. A. C. Coello: Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: Past, present and future, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation 1 (2011), No. 4, pp. 173-194 DOI:10.1016/j.swevo.2011.10.00110.1016/j.swevo.2011.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

49 T. Yokota, T. Taguchi, M. Gen: A solution method for optimal weight design problem of the gear using Genetic Algorithms, Computers and Industrial Engineering 35 (1998), No. 3-4, pp. 523-526 DOI:10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00149-110.1016/S0360-8352(98)00149-1Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-05-23
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Germany

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Materials testing for welding and additive manufacturing applications
  3. Fracture characterization and modeling of Gyroid filled 3D printed PLA structures
  4. Component-oriented testing and simulation
  5. Experimental and numerical investigation of cutting forces during turning of cylindrical AISI 4340 steel specimens
  6. Modeling and simulation in materials testing
  7. Mechanical behavior of composite parts joined through different processes
  8. Materials testing for welding and additive manufacturing applications
  9. Effect of TIG welding parameters in joining grade 2 pure titanium
  10. Materialography/chemical resistance testing
  11. Precipitated phase in the β phase of IN783 alloy
  12. Component-oriented testing and simulation
  13. Notch (stress concentration) factor estimation of a cylinder under internal pressure using different approaches
  14. Materials testing for joining and additive manufacturing applications
  15. Effect of fiber orientation angle on patch repaired composite plates
  16. Component-oriented testing and simulation
  17. A comparative analysis of the queuing search algorithm, the sine-cosine algorithm, the ant lion algorithm to determine the optimal weight design problem of a spur gear drive system
  18. Comparison of the arithmetic optimization algorithm, the slime mold optimization algorithm, the marine predators algorithm, the salp swarm algorithm for real-world engineering applications
  19. A novel hybrid marine predators-Nelder-Mead optimization algorithm for the optimal design of engineering problems
  20. Wear testing
  21. Wear behavior of rice straw powder in automotive brake pads
  22. Mechanical testing/chemical resistance testing
  23. Effects of MgO Powder addition on mechanical, physical and thermal properties of Al waste bagasse composite
  24. Wear testing
  25. Short term tribological behavior of ceramic and polyethylene biomaterials for hip prosthesis
  26. Production-oriented testing
  27. Experimental validation of the predicted peak cutting force for seafloor polymetallic sulfide
Heruntergeladen am 21.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2020-0075/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen