Abstract
The term ‘explicatures’ pertains to the inferential developments made of utterances with the objective of attaining a greater degree of clarity by the speaker (Sperber and Wilson 1986). It was first introduced by relevance theory to provide evidence that the explicit part of communication may contain a pragmatically inferred material, which facilitates communication and makes it more relevant (Carston. 2000. Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 44–89). Nevertheless, there are instances where explicatures are deliberately not fully articulated in order to achieve certain social meanings as well as communicative goals. This research article examines the social functions, which are accomplished when communicators do not articulate pragmatically inferred material which is part of the explicit content of the utterance. Based on the analysis of genuine communications, obtained from real-life interactions from Jordanian Arabic, this article demonstrates that the act of not fully articulating explicatures serves certain social purposes, such as not inviting evil eye, not damaging the positive face of the addressee or the person under discussion, and avoiding the explicit mentioning of delicate matters like illnesses and social taboos; hence conforming to the established social conventions. Furthermore, the results referred to a remarkable association between particular areas of explicatures identification and certain social functions.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism and suggestions. We would also like to thank the audience at the The 10th International Conference on Intercultural Pragmatics and Communication (INPRA), Pisa, Italy where an early version of this paper was presented. Their discussion of some data and issues mentioned in this article were helpful and stimulating.
References
Al-Adaileh, Bilal. 2011. When the strategic displacement of the main topic of discussion is used as a face-saving technique: Evidence from Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Politeness Research 7. 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.012.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Jarrah, Rasheed, Ahmad Abu-Dalu & Obiedat Hisham. 2018. Translation of strategic ambiguity: A relevance-theoretic analysis. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2018-0001.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Khawaldeh, Sami, Jarrah Marwan & Alghazo. Sharif. 2023. Evil-eye expressive strategies between utterers and interpreters: A pragmatic study on Colloquial Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 204. 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar
Allott, Nicholas. 2013. Relevance theory. In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, 57–98. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_3Suche in Google Scholar
Alqarni, Muteb. 2020. Mock impoliteness in Saudi Arabia: Evil eye expressive and responsive strategies. Journal of Pragmatics 167. 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Al-Shawashreh, Ekab, Marwan Jarrah & Malek Zuraikat. 2021. The functions of the verb ‘to say’in the Jordanian Arabic dialect of Irbid. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57. 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2021-0010.Suche in Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2010. Defining pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511777912Suche in Google Scholar
Bani Mofarrej, Omar & Fawwaz Al-Abed Al-Haq. 2015. A sociolinguistic study of euphemistic death expressions in Jordanian Arabic. Arab World English Journal 6. 110–130. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no2.9.Suche in Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne & Robin Morris. 2004. Implicature, relevance and default pragmatic inference. In Ira Noveck & Dan Sperber (eds.), Experimental pragmatics, 257–282. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230524125_12Suche in Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11. 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5.Suche in Google Scholar
Borg, Emma. 2016. Exploding explicatures. Mind & Language 31. 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12109.Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 1998. Pragmatics and the Explicit and implicit distinction. University College London Ph.D. thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2000. Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12. 44–89.Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communications. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470754603Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2004. Relevance theory and the saying/implicating distinction. In Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 633–656. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch28Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2007. How many pragmatic systems are there? In María José Frápolli (ed.), Saying, meaning and referring. Essays on François recanati’s philosophy of language, 18–48. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2009. The Explicit/Implicit distinction in pragmatics and the limits of explicit communication. International Review of Pragmatics 1. 35–62, https://doi.org/10.1163/187731009x455839.Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2013. Word meaning, what is said and explicature. In Carlo Penco & Filipopo Domaneschi (eds.), What is said and what is not: The semantics/pragmatics interface, 175–203. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn & Alison Hall. 2017. Contextual effects on explicature: Optional pragmatics or optional syntax? International Review of Pragmatics 9. 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00901002.Suche in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn & Alison Hall. 2012. Explicature and implicature. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics, 47–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214215.47Suche in Google Scholar
Chaves, José. 2010. Explicature, what is said, and Gricean Factorisation Criteria. In Belén Soria & Esther Romero (eds.), Explicit communication, 109–125. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230292352_7Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Farghal, Mohammad & Haggan Madeline. 2006. Compliment behaviour in bilingual Kuwaiti college students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9. 94–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050608668632.Suche in Google Scholar
Foley, Anna Josefin. 2021. The construction of meaning in advertising: A relevance theoretic approach. England, UK: Language and Linguistic Science University of York MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190845230.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles & Billy Clark. 2014. CAN pictures have explicatures? Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14. 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140301-0114.Suche in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interactional ritual. New York: Anchor Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August. 1991. Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Hall, Alison. 2013. Relevance theory, semantic content and pragmatic enrichment. In Alessandro Capone, Lo Piparo Franco & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, 99–130. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_4Suche in Google Scholar
Hall, Alison. 2014. Free enrichment and the nature of pragmatic constraints. International Review of Pragmatics 6. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00601002.Suche in Google Scholar
Harb, Mustafa, Marwan Jarrah & Alghazo Sharif. 2022. Discourse markers within sentence grammar: Further evidence from ʕaad in Jordanian Arabic. Ampersand 9. 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100082.Suche in Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jarrah, Marwan. 2016. Explicit-implicit distinction: A review of related literature. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 7. 175–184.10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.1p.175Suche in Google Scholar
Jarrah, Marwan. 2019. A cartographic approach to embedded word order in Jordanian Arabic. Folia Linguistica 53. 367–409.10.1515/flin-2019-2015Suche in Google Scholar
Jarrah, Marwan. 2020. Complementizer agreement and the T0-Φ parameter in Jordanian Arabic. Studia Linguistica 74. 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12122.Suche in Google Scholar
Jarrah, Marwan & Rasheed Al-Jarrah. 2023. Translating explicatures between Arabic and English: Completing logical forms and calculating pragmatic competence and metalinguistic knowledge. Babel 69. 188–215. https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00319.alj.Suche in Google Scholar
Jary, Mark. 2016. Rethinking explicit utterance content. Journal of Pragmatics 102. 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth. 2001. Pragmatics: Language and communication. In Aronoff Mark & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), Handbook of linguistics, 415–443. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.10.1002/9781119072256.ch20Suche in Google Scholar
Kerkam, Zainab. 2015. A comparison of Arabic and English directness and indirectness: Cross-cultural politeness. United Kingdom: Sheffield Hallam University.Suche in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. The pragmatics of politeness. USA: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Maloney, Clarence (ed.). 1976. The evil eye. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Michalska, Anna. 2018. What Brandom won’t make explicit: On Habermas’s critique of Brandom. Philosophy & Social Criticism 44. 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453717723191.Suche in Google Scholar
Migdadi, Fathi, Mohammad Badarneh & Momani Kawakib. 2010. Divine will and its extensions: Communicative functions of maašaallah in colloquial Jordanian Arabic. Communication Monographs 77. 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2010.502539.Suche in Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1978. Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Peter Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 19–36. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques. 2007. The role of explicature in communication and in intercultural communication. In Istvan Kecskes & Laurence Horn (eds.), Exporations in pragmatics. linguistic, cognitive and intercultural aspects, 73–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198843.2.73Suche in Google Scholar
Murtisari, Elisabet. 2013. A relevance-based framework for explicitation and implicitation in translation. An alternative typology. Trans-kom 6. 315–344.Suche in Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Brian Clancy & Svenja Adolphs. 2019. Introducing pragmatics in use. Routledge.10.4324/9780429342950Suche in Google Scholar
Olmoso, Susana. 2008. A relevance theoretic analysis of contrast connectives in Spanish: Pero and aunque. University of Dublin Ph.D. dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 1993. Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 2004a. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Suche in Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 2004b. Pragmatics and semantics. In Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 442–462. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631225485.2005.00022.xSuche in Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 2010a. Pragmatics and logical form. In Belén Soria & Esther Romero (eds.), Explicit communication, 25–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9780230292352_2Suche in Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 2010b. Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2012. Contextualism: Some varieties. In Keith Allen & Kasia. M. Jaszczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 135–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.008Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1995. How do we communicate? In John Brockman & Katinka Matson (eds.), How things are: A science toolkit for the mind, 191–199. New York: Morrow.Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 1st edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Spooner, Brian. 1976. The evil eye in the Middle East. In Clarence Maloney (ed.), The evil eye, 76–84. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Subbarao, Karumuri, Rama Kant Agnihotri & Atreyee Mukherjee. 1991. Syntactic strategies and politeness phenomena. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 92. 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.35.Suche in Google Scholar
Tanaka, Keiko. 2005. Advertising language: A pragmatic approach to advertisements in Britain and Japan. Routledge.10.4324/9780203007303Suche in Google Scholar
van Niekerk, Angelique. 2020. A semantic-pragmatic approach to sentence structure in advertising language. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38. 185–199. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2020.1805777.Suche in Google Scholar
Weissman, Benjamin. 2019. The roles of linguistic meaning and context in the concept of lying. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois PhD dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2017. Relevance theory. In Yan Huang (ed.), Oxford Handbook of pragmatics, 79–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In Laurence Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2006. Relevance theory. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 512–519. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00313-8Suche in Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2012. Relevance, humour and translation. In Ewa Wałaszewska & Agnieszka Piskorska (eds.), Relevance theory: More than understanding, 117–145. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- “I was embroidering the towel with a sincere hand and praying to God for fate and godsend”: hybrid beliefs presented on Ukrainian rushnyks
- Pragmatic characteristics of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages
- Anthroponyms: the lexico-semantic approach to word formation and its social and cultural implications
- Unveiling humour in digital discourse: the pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish WhatsApp chat groups
- Gender stereotype: the features of development and functioning in the Kazakh language
- Cognitive foundations of the formation of communicative competencies in the theory of dialogue
- Family(jiārénmen) is not a family: a study on the construction of pragmatic identities in the generalization of Internet address term “jiārénmen”
- On the social meanings of avoiding fully-articulated explicatures and the role of pragmatics in utterance explication
- The issues of developing the historical subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Translation of Perso-Arabic loanwords from Hindi into Polish: a pilot study
- Book Review
- Rod Ellis, Carsten Roever, Natsuko Shintani & Yan Zhu: Measuring Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- “I was embroidering the towel with a sincere hand and praying to God for fate and godsend”: hybrid beliefs presented on Ukrainian rushnyks
- Pragmatic characteristics of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages
- Anthroponyms: the lexico-semantic approach to word formation and its social and cultural implications
- Unveiling humour in digital discourse: the pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish WhatsApp chat groups
- Gender stereotype: the features of development and functioning in the Kazakh language
- Cognitive foundations of the formation of communicative competencies in the theory of dialogue
- Family(jiārénmen) is not a family: a study on the construction of pragmatic identities in the generalization of Internet address term “jiārénmen”
- On the social meanings of avoiding fully-articulated explicatures and the role of pragmatics in utterance explication
- The issues of developing the historical subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Translation of Perso-Arabic loanwords from Hindi into Polish: a pilot study
- Book Review
- Rod Ellis, Carsten Roever, Natsuko Shintani & Yan Zhu: Measuring Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Psycholinguistic Perspective