Abstract
The relevance of the study is that specific individual linguistic customs and traditions are characteristic of each nation. The objective of the study is to examine the key aspects of anthroponyms and the methodology of their development in Turkish and Kazakh languages. In conducting the research, general scientific and special methods were used to achieve its goals and objectives. Its main results can be defined as follows. It was argued that the lexical-semantic approach to word formation is one of the most widespread approaches to the creation of meaningful anthroponyms, reflecting the features and characteristics of the named person. According to the results of the conducted research, the necessity of studying anthroponyms and word formations was revealed and substantiated. The reason for this is that they have an important social and cultural significance in the process of interaction between the peoples of the world, as well as the study of their cultural heritage. The latter is directly related to the fact that personal names express moral and philosophical values of a certain ethos, fix in themselves the history, traditions, and beliefs of a particular society or community. As a result of the research, it was concluded that anthroponyms in the onomastic field of any language of the world are nuclear constituents. At the same time, the whole set of anthroponyms contained in it will be unique, as the factors influencing the speakers of the language will differ.
-
Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
-
Conflict of interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
References
Aliakbarova, Aigerim, Gulmira Madiyeva & Chen Xiao. 2020. Evolution of anthroponyms: Transformation in the naming of newborn babies and its role for society in the period of linguistic transition. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8(4). 1522–1534. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.84140.Suche in Google Scholar
Anyanwu, Esther. 2023. An investigation into anthroponyms comparative linguistic study of Igbo and English personal names. Nnadiebube Journal of Languages and Literatures 1(1). 58–70.Suche in Google Scholar
Arginbekova, Gulnar, Shamshidin Amitov, Yklas Dulatov, Kairat Bakbergen & Rimma Kyndybayeva. 2024. The transformation of spiritual consciousness in modern conditions. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series Physics 55. 2285–2294. https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.228wd5.Suche in Google Scholar
Arif, Vusala Aliyeva. 2024. Structural-semantic features of semi̇-affixes in English-French languages. Scientific Journal of Polonia University 61(6). 130–134. https://doi.org/10.23856/6116.Suche in Google Scholar
Bidzilya, Yuriy. 2015. Slovak press in Zakarpattia as the revival of national identity. European Journal of Science and Theology 11(6). 67–78.Suche in Google Scholar
Bismildina, Dinara, Maya Myrzabekova & Asiya Nurzhanova. 2024. Nature of common words in Kazakh and Turkish languages. InterConf 45(201). 281–289. https://doi.org/10.51582/interconf.19-20.05.2024.027.Suche in Google Scholar
Brait, Beth, Maria Helena Cruz Pistori, Bruna Lopes Dugnani, Paulo Rogério Stella & Carlos Gontijo Rosa. 2023. Culture, literary scholarship, and great time. Bakhtiniana 18(4). e64121e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e64121.Suche in Google Scholar
Bromham, Lindell, Russell Dinnage, Hedvig Skirgard, Andrew Ritchie, Marcel Cardillo, Felicity Meakins, Simon Greenhill & Xia Hua. 2021. Global predictors of language endangerment and the future of linguistic diversity. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6(2). 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01604-y.Suche in Google Scholar
Bush, Stephen J. 2020. Ambivalence, avoidance, and appeal: Alliterative aspects of Anglo anthroponyms. Names: A Journal of Onomastics 68(3). 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2020.1775471.Suche in Google Scholar
Chanda, Osward & Peeter Päll. 2020. Treatment of names in Zambia and Estonia: A comparative analysis. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 11(1). 235–247. https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2020.11.1.10.Suche in Google Scholar
Dahl, Niklas. 2022. A fixed-point problem for theories of meaning. Synthese 200. 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03559-4.Suche in Google Scholar
Darginavičienė, Irena. 2023. The multilingualism: Language and cultural identity. Logos 116. 167–174.Suche in Google Scholar
Denys, Iryna. 2024. Language as an important means of information encoding. Library Science. Record Studies. Informology 20(1). 8–11. https://doi.org/10.63009/lsrsi/1.2024.08.Suche in Google Scholar
Emike, Acheoah John & Williams Ocheme. 2024. Semantics in theory and practice. Global Journal of Research in Education & Literature 4(1). 12–16.Suche in Google Scholar
Ezeudo, Chika Obiageli, Sopuruchi Christian Aboh & Kalu Mba Idika. 2021. Morphosyntactic analysis of Onitsha personal names. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 12(3). 411–418. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1203.11.Suche in Google Scholar
Fernández-Domínguez, Jesús. 2019. The onomasiological approach. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.579Suche in Google Scholar
Fonseca, Guilherme & André Xavier. 2024. Analysis of anthroponyms for famous people in Libras. SciELO Preprints 1. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/scielopreprints.8045.Suche in Google Scholar
Frigerio, Aldo. 2019. Sentences as systems: The principle of compositionality and its limits. In The systemic turn in human and natural sciences, 171–184. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-00725-6_9Suche in Google Scholar
Garré, Matilde, Elisa Le Bail & Audrey Vasselin. 2024. Proper nouns: Untranslated or untranslatable? Calenda 1. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.58079/ve7e.Suche in Google Scholar
Habibli, Yusif Gizi. 2023. Linguoculturological aspect of personal names. Scientific Magazine of the University of Cienfuegos 15(4). 166–174.Suche in Google Scholar
Hasjim, Munira. 2023. Social change and its effect on the self-naming system of millennial society in Indonesia. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2250115.Suche in Google Scholar
Héois, Aurélie. 2019. When proper names become verbs: A semantic perspective. Lexis – Journal in English Lexicology 16.10.4000/lexis.4681Suche in Google Scholar
Huguin, Mathilde. 2017. Anthroponyms and paradigmatic derivation in French. ATILF UMR 1. 1–16. https://perso.atilf.fr/mhuguin/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2021/11/Anthroponyms-and-paradigmatic-derivation-in-French.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Huy, Vo Quoc. 2024. Exploring linguistic evolution: A comprehensive analysis of vocabulary in Japanese and English languages. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 30(4). 276–280.Suche in Google Scholar
Ionescu, Denisa-Alexandra. 2022. Anthroponyms at the crossroads of different cultures. Multiculturalism în Onomastică 1. 183–195. https://doi.org/10.30816/iconn5/2019/15.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2022. Lexical semantics. In The Oxford handbook of the mental lexicon, 126–150. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.3Suche in Google Scholar
Kačmár, Pavol & Lívia Körtvélyessy. 2022. Big-five model of personality and word formation: Role of open-mindedness in semantic transparency and economy of expression. Language and Cognition 15(2). 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2022.34.Suche in Google Scholar
Kasym, Balkia. 2010. Word-formation potential and semantic fields of black colour in Kazakh language. Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abay, Vol. 1. 1–3. https://www.rusnauka.com/30_NNM_2010/Philologia/72928.doc.htm.Suche in Google Scholar
Kauf, Carina, Greta Tuckute, Roger Levy, Jacob Andreas & Evelina Fedorenko. 2024. Lexical-semantic content, not syntactic structure, is the main contributor to ANN-brain similarity of fMRI responses in the language network. Neurobiology of Language 5(1). 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00116.Suche in Google Scholar
Kinyua, Susan & David Barasa. 2022. Anthroponymy in Eastern Nilotic: A case of Turkana personal names. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities 3(2). https://doi.org/10.58256/rjah.v3i2.843.Suche in Google Scholar
Kortabayeva, Gulzhamal Kydyrbaevna & Janara Muratbekova. 2024. Ethnolinguistic nature of riddles in Kazakh and Chinese languages. Bulletin of the Karaganda University, Philology Series 29(113). 96–105.Suche in Google Scholar
Kuldashev, Akramjon Makhmudovich & Shakhnoza Akramovna Kuldasheva. 2024. Evolution of common Turkic divergent elements used in Alisher Navaiy’s works. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 30(5). 6598–6603.Suche in Google Scholar
Kurtyigit, Sinan, Maike Park, Dominik Schlechtweg, Jonas Kuhn & Sabine Schulte. 2021. Lexical semantic change discovery. Proceedings of the 59th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 11th international joint conference on natural language processing, 6985–6998. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.543Suche in Google Scholar
Lande, Kevin J. 2023. Contours of vision: Towards a compositional semantics of perception. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/725094.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, Martha. 2024. Grounded learning for compositional vector semantics. arXiv:2401.06808. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06808.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, Zhu, Cunliang Kong, Ying Liu & Maosong Sun. 2024. Fantastic semantics and where to find them: Investigating which layers of generative LLMs reflect lexical semantics. Ithaca: Cornell University.10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.866Suche in Google Scholar
Madiyeva, Gulmira, Ernst Hoffmann & Aytaj Aliakbarova. 2020. Linguistic attribution of modern Kazakh anthroponyms. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education 177(1). 78–85. https://doi.org/10.26577/ejph.2020.v177.i1.ph11.Suche in Google Scholar
Mandende, Itani Peter, Mzwamadoda Phillip Cekiso & Christopher Rwodzi. 2020. Personal names as communicative tools in Tshiven? Cultural-Historical perspectives. Sociolinguistic Studies 13(2-4). 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.37867.Suche in Google Scholar
Mangena, Tendai & Alice Mitchell. 2023. Hauntings of the metaphysical empire? Anthroponomic patterns in contemporary Zimbabwe. Critical African Studies 15(3). 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2023.2232053.Suche in Google Scholar
Mensah, Eyo & Kirsty Rowan. 2020. African anthroponyms: Sociolinguistic currents and anthropological reflections. Sociolinguistic Studies 13(2-4). 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.37819.Suche in Google Scholar
Milo, Andrianna. 2024. The concept of linguoculture in modern science: Formation and potential. Logos 118. 58–67.Suche in Google Scholar
Nusubalieva, Eliza, Aisulu Beishenova, Toktobubu Ashymbaeva, Nurzhan Sartbekova & Nazar Dogdurbek. 2023. Civic identity of youth as an important element of modern sociocultural transformation of society. Social and Legal Studios 6(4). 145–154. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2023.145.Suche in Google Scholar
Obinna, Patrick Kenneth, Osondu Amarachi Stephenie & Ofoha N. Ugonna. 2024. Aspects of onomastics in Ngwa Igbo: Preliminary notes. Journal of Language Development and Linguistics 3(1). 57–74. https://doi.org/10.55927/jldl.v3i1.8184.Suche in Google Scholar
Oralbaeva, Nazım. 1989. Word formation system of the modern Kazakh language. Almaty: Gylym. https://www.sudoc.fr/124819281.Suche in Google Scholar
Otarbekova, Zhamila Kerimbaevna. 2020. The lexical-semantic method of compilation. KazYltKyzPU 1. 1–4. https://nbisu.moy.su/_ld/12/1254_Otarbekova_J.K..pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Pannitto, Ludovica & Alessandro Lenci. 2019. Event knowledge in compositional distributional semantics. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 5(1). 73–88. https://doi.org/10.4000/ijcol.463.Suche in Google Scholar
Rabiah, Sitti. 2018. Language as a tool for communication and cultural reality discloser. INA-Rxiv Papers 1. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/nw94m.Suche in Google Scholar
Ram, Parikshit, Tim Klinger & Alexander G. Gray. 2024. What makes models compositional? A theoretical view: With supplement. Thirty-third international joint conference on artificial intelligence. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.02350.10.24963/ijcai.2024/533Suche in Google Scholar
Rapoport, Hillel, Sulin Sardoschau & Arthur Silve. 2020. Migration and cultural change. CEPII Working Paper 1. 1–55. http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2020/wp2020-10.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Rizka, Haira. 2018. Cirebon cultural representation in the use of proper names: A study of the anthroponymy of the Cirebon society, vol. I, 1–14. Indonesia: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. https://oailib.unej.ac.id/vufind/Record/0%20%1Fnhttp:__kbi.kemdikbud.go.id_kbi_back_file_dokumen_makalah_dokumen_makalah_1540519285.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar
Sarseke, Gulnar Adebietqyzy, Miramgul Mnaidarova & İbrahim Şahin. 2022. Anthroponyms in Kazakh and Turkish languages: Historical review of their studies and structural features. SSRN 1. 1–17. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4214570.Suche in Google Scholar
Sekyi-Baidoo, Yaw. 2024. The commemorability principle in Akan personal name construction. Genealogy 8(2). 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8020048.Suche in Google Scholar
Sindarov, Fazliddin. 2024. Etymological characteristics of French anthroponym. Modern Science and Research 3(5). 703–705.Suche in Google Scholar
Strilets, Valentyna. 2023. Approaches to assessing translation proficiency. International Journal of Philology 27(4). 89–98.10.31548/philolog14(4).2023.09Suche in Google Scholar
Strzelecka, Kinga Weronika. 2020. Translation of artificial anthroponyms on the example of French and English translation of the novel “Under the Strong Angel” by Jerzy Pilch. Tertium Linguistic Journal 5(2).Suche in Google Scholar
Suleimenova, Gulmira, Gulnara Syrlybayeva, Kuldirsin Saryhova, Raushan Assylova & Karlygash Sarbasova. 2020. Formation of anthroponomical system of the modern Kazakh language in higher school. Opción 36(91). 536–550.Suche in Google Scholar
Temirgazina, Zifa & Olga Andryushchenko. 2019. Desemantization of the Old Turkic khan, baj, beg in the modern Kazakh anthroponyms. Turkic Studies Journal 5(1). 131–144. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2023-1-131-144.Suche in Google Scholar
Temirgazina, Zifa, Gulnara Abisheva & Rumaniyat Aselderova. 2024. Actant models of Kazakh anthroponyms-composites with substantive and verb components. Names: A Journal of Onomastics 72(1). 22–32. https://doi.org/10.5195/names.2023.2457.Suche in Google Scholar
Thomas, Mousumi Tresa. 2024. The modernisation of English language in India. Educational administration: Theory and Practice 30(5). 8170–8176.Suche in Google Scholar
Yang, Shuling, Natalia A. Ward & Emily Hayden. 2023. Her Chinese name means beautiful: Culture, care and naming practices. Journal for Multicultural Education 17(3). 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-11-2022-0159.Suche in Google Scholar
Yashnyk, Svitlana & Olena Turitsyna. 2023. The structure of cross-cultural competence and levels of its formation. International Journal of Philology 27(1). 103–111.10.31548/philolog14(1).2023.011Suche in Google Scholar
Zumrutdal, Iryna Semeniuk. 2023. Speech Act Theories in the XXI century. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics 2(5). 10–14.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- “I was embroidering the towel with a sincere hand and praying to God for fate and godsend”: hybrid beliefs presented on Ukrainian rushnyks
- Pragmatic characteristics of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages
- Anthroponyms: the lexico-semantic approach to word formation and its social and cultural implications
- Unveiling humour in digital discourse: the pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish WhatsApp chat groups
- Gender stereotype: the features of development and functioning in the Kazakh language
- Cognitive foundations of the formation of communicative competencies in the theory of dialogue
- Family(jiārénmen) is not a family: a study on the construction of pragmatic identities in the generalization of Internet address term “jiārénmen”
- On the social meanings of avoiding fully-articulated explicatures and the role of pragmatics in utterance explication
- The issues of developing the historical subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Translation of Perso-Arabic loanwords from Hindi into Polish: a pilot study
- Book Review
- Rod Ellis, Carsten Roever, Natsuko Shintani & Yan Zhu: Measuring Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Psycholinguistic Perspective
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- “I was embroidering the towel with a sincere hand and praying to God for fate and godsend”: hybrid beliefs presented on Ukrainian rushnyks
- Pragmatic characteristics of diminutive adjectives in Kazakh and English languages
- Anthroponyms: the lexico-semantic approach to word formation and its social and cultural implications
- Unveiling humour in digital discourse: the pragmatic functions of humorous stickers in Spanish WhatsApp chat groups
- Gender stereotype: the features of development and functioning in the Kazakh language
- Cognitive foundations of the formation of communicative competencies in the theory of dialogue
- Family(jiārénmen) is not a family: a study on the construction of pragmatic identities in the generalization of Internet address term “jiārénmen”
- On the social meanings of avoiding fully-articulated explicatures and the role of pragmatics in utterance explication
- The issues of developing the historical subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Kazakh Language
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: Translation of Perso-Arabic loanwords from Hindi into Polish: a pilot study
- Book Review
- Rod Ellis, Carsten Roever, Natsuko Shintani & Yan Zhu: Measuring Second Language Pragmatic Competence: A Psycholinguistic Perspective