Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Tracing the “extinctness” of Tai Ahom: issues of language loss and death
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Tracing the “extinctness” of Tai Ahom: issues of language loss and death

  • Dipima Buragohain ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. Juni 2018

Abstract

The extinction of Tai Ahom, a language from the Tai-Kadai family that was once spoken in Assam, India, can be contributed to a number of socio-historical, linguistic and cultural factors including the development and strong influence of Assamese, a language from the Indo-Aryan family spoken in that region. In an effort to examine the dynamics that contributed to the loss of Tai Ahom, the current article focuses on a descriptive overview of issues including language shift, variation, and extinction in the case of Tai Ahom. It will also highlight the factors which contributed to its shift and gradual extinction and discuss current efforts to revive the language.

References

Buragohain, Dilip. 1999. Sanchipat Aru Ahom Jugar Puthi. Samannai. Sivasagar: Paper Hive.Suche in Google Scholar

Buragohain, Dipima. 2011. A Descriptive Grammar of Tai Ahom. Unpublished PhD Thesis. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.Suche in Google Scholar

Buragohain, Dipima. 2013. Ancient Manuscript Literature in Tai Ahom. In Awadesh K Mishra, Melissa G Wallang & CH. Sarajubala Devi (eds.), Studies in Linguistics of the North-eastern Languages, 170–188. New Delhi: Lakshi Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Case, Anthea. 2015. The Endangered Archives Programme after ten years. In Maja Kominko (ed.), From Dust to Digital: Ten Years of the Endangered Archives Programme. Cambridge. Open Book Publishers.10.11647/OBP.0052.22Suche in Google Scholar

Cerny, Miroslav. 2010. Language Death versus Language Survival: A Global Perspective. In Conference proceedings of Beyond Globalization: Exploring the Limits of Globalization in the Regional Context, 51–56. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.Suche in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139106856Suche in Google Scholar

Diller, Anthony. 1992. Tai languages in Assam: Daughters or ghosts. In C. J. Compton & J. F. Hartmann (eds.), Papers on Tai Languages, Linguistics and Literatures, 5–43. Northern Illinois University: Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1978. The Fate of Morphological Complexity in Language Death: Evidence from East Sutherland Gaelic. Language 54(3). 590–609.10.1353/lan.1978.0024Suche in Google Scholar

Duangthip, Rungkarn. 2013. Tai Ahom and standard Thai: A Descriptive-comparative study. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, John. 2010. Minority Languages and Group Identity: Cases and Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.27Suche in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren. 2015. Language documentation and division: Bridging the digital divide. Digital Studies 38(2). 292–318.10.16995/dscn.38Suche in Google Scholar

Gogoi, Nabami. 2013. Gender in Turung and Aiton language: A contrastive study. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 3(2). 308–318.Suche in Google Scholar

Gohain, Aimyakhang. 1997. Elementary Tai Primer with Grammar, Second. Dibrugarh: The Department of Assamese, Dibrugarh University.Suche in Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A & Lindsay J Whaley. 2006. Saving Languages: An introduction to language revitalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615931Suche in Google Scholar

Grierson, George A (ed.). 1903. Linguistic Survey of India. Vol.2. Mon-Khmer and Siamese-Chinese Families. Delhi: Low Price Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazarika, Chow Nagen. 2004. Ahom Language: Its Typology, Language Contact and Historical Implications in Southeast Asian Languages. In S. Burusphat (ed.), Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Tempe, Arizona. Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies. 315–326.Suche in Google Scholar

Hornsby, Michael. 2015. The “new” and “traditional” speaker dichotomy: Bridging the gap. IJDL 231. 107–125.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0034Suche in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2015. Defining the new speaker: Theoretical perspectives and learner trajectories. IJDL 231. 21–44.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0030Suche in Google Scholar

Kakati, Banikanta. 1941. Assamese: Its Formation and Development. Gauhati: Government of Assam.Suche in Google Scholar

Karna, Mahendra N. 1998. Social Movements in North-East India. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Khubchandani, Lachman. 1997. Revitalizing Boundaries: A Plurilingual Ethos. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

King, Kendall A. 2001. Language Revitalization Processes and Prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon: Cromwell Press.10.21832/9781853597077Suche in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2005a. The Tai Languages of Assam – A Grammar and Texts. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2005b. Tonal change in the Tai languages of Northeast India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28. 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2011. Documentation of traditional songs and ritual texts: Issues for archiving. In N. Thieberger, L. Barwick & J. Vaughan (eds.), Sustainable data form digital research: Humanities perspectives on digital scholarship. A PARDISEC Conference, University of Melbourne, Australia: Custom Book Centre.Suche in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2013. Tai languages of Assam, a progress report – Does anything remain of the Tai Ahom language?. In D. Bradley & M. Bradley (eds.), Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance: An Active Approach. New York. Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Nartsupha, Chatthip & Ranoo Wichasin. 1995. The state of knowledge of Ahom history. Tai Culture 3(1). 3–36. Guwahati: Eastern Tai Literary Association.Suche in Google Scholar

Ó Hlfearnáin, Tadhg. 2015. Sociolinguistic vitality of Manx after extreme language shift: Authenticity without traditional native speakers. IJSL 231. 45–62.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0031Suche in Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Bernadette & John Walsh. 2015. New speakers of Irish: Shifting boundaries across time and space. IJSL 231. 63–83.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0032Suche in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzzane. 2002. The impact of language policy on endangered languages. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 4(2). 1–28.10.4324/9781315095028-10Suche in Google Scholar

Saikia, Yasmin. 2004. Fragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai Ahom in India. Durban: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822386162Suche in Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jurgen. 1992. Language decay and contact-induced change: Similarities and differences. In M. Brenzinger (ed.), Language Death: Factual and Theoretical Explorations with Special Reference to East Africa. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Sengupta, Madhumita. 2016. Becoming Assamese: Colonialism and new subjectivities in Northeast India. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315560274Suche in Google Scholar

SIL International, 14th. 2002. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. <http://www.ethnologue.com/>Suche in Google Scholar

Terwiel, Barend Jan. 1983. Ahom and the Study of Early Tai Society. Journal of the Siam Society 42–62. Canberra: Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar

Terwiel, Barend Jan & Ranoo Wichasin (eds.). 1992. Tai Ahoms and the Stars. Three Ritual Texts to Ward Off Danger. Cornell Southeast Asia Program.10.7591/9781501719004Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-06-22
Published in Print: 2018-06-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0020/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen