Home Linguistics & Semiotics Tracing the “extinctness” of Tai Ahom: issues of language loss and death
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Tracing the “extinctness” of Tai Ahom: issues of language loss and death

  • Dipima Buragohain ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 22, 2018

Abstract

The extinction of Tai Ahom, a language from the Tai-Kadai family that was once spoken in Assam, India, can be contributed to a number of socio-historical, linguistic and cultural factors including the development and strong influence of Assamese, a language from the Indo-Aryan family spoken in that region. In an effort to examine the dynamics that contributed to the loss of Tai Ahom, the current article focuses on a descriptive overview of issues including language shift, variation, and extinction in the case of Tai Ahom. It will also highlight the factors which contributed to its shift and gradual extinction and discuss current efforts to revive the language.

References

Buragohain, Dilip. 1999. Sanchipat Aru Ahom Jugar Puthi. Samannai. Sivasagar: Paper Hive.Search in Google Scholar

Buragohain, Dipima. 2011. A Descriptive Grammar of Tai Ahom. Unpublished PhD Thesis. New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.Search in Google Scholar

Buragohain, Dipima. 2013. Ancient Manuscript Literature in Tai Ahom. In Awadesh K Mishra, Melissa G Wallang & CH. Sarajubala Devi (eds.), Studies in Linguistics of the North-eastern Languages, 170–188. New Delhi: Lakshi Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Case, Anthea. 2015. The Endangered Archives Programme after ten years. In Maja Kominko (ed.), From Dust to Digital: Ten Years of the Endangered Archives Programme. Cambridge. Open Book Publishers.10.11647/OBP.0052.22Search in Google Scholar

Cerny, Miroslav. 2010. Language Death versus Language Survival: A Global Perspective. In Conference proceedings of Beyond Globalization: Exploring the Limits of Globalization in the Regional Context, 51–56. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139106856Search in Google Scholar

Diller, Anthony. 1992. Tai languages in Assam: Daughters or ghosts. In C. J. Compton & J. F. Hartmann (eds.), Papers on Tai Languages, Linguistics and Literatures, 5–43. Northern Illinois University: Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1978. The Fate of Morphological Complexity in Language Death: Evidence from East Sutherland Gaelic. Language 54(3). 590–609.10.1353/lan.1978.0024Search in Google Scholar

Duangthip, Rungkarn. 2013. Tai Ahom and standard Thai: A Descriptive-comparative study. Pune: Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, John. 2010. Minority Languages and Group Identity: Cases and Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.27Search in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren. 2015. Language documentation and division: Bridging the digital divide. Digital Studies 38(2). 292–318.10.16995/dscn.38Search in Google Scholar

Gogoi, Nabami. 2013. Gender in Turung and Aiton language: A contrastive study. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 3(2). 308–318.Search in Google Scholar

Gohain, Aimyakhang. 1997. Elementary Tai Primer with Grammar, Second. Dibrugarh: The Department of Assamese, Dibrugarh University.Search in Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A & Lindsay J Whaley. 2006. Saving Languages: An introduction to language revitalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615931Search in Google Scholar

Grierson, George A (ed.). 1903. Linguistic Survey of India. Vol.2. Mon-Khmer and Siamese-Chinese Families. Delhi: Low Price Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hazarika, Chow Nagen. 2004. Ahom Language: Its Typology, Language Contact and Historical Implications in Southeast Asian Languages. In S. Burusphat (ed.), Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Tempe, Arizona. Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies. 315–326.Search in Google Scholar

Hornsby, Michael. 2015. The “new” and “traditional” speaker dichotomy: Bridging the gap. IJDL 231. 107–125.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0034Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra. 2015. Defining the new speaker: Theoretical perspectives and learner trajectories. IJDL 231. 21–44.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0030Search in Google Scholar

Kakati, Banikanta. 1941. Assamese: Its Formation and Development. Gauhati: Government of Assam.Search in Google Scholar

Karna, Mahendra N. 1998. Social Movements in North-East India. New Delhi: Indus Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Khubchandani, Lachman. 1997. Revitalizing Boundaries: A Plurilingual Ethos. New Delhi: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

King, Kendall A. 2001. Language Revitalization Processes and Prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon: Cromwell Press.10.21832/9781853597077Search in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2005a. The Tai Languages of Assam – A Grammar and Texts. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2005b. Tonal change in the Tai languages of Northeast India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28. 2.Search in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2011. Documentation of traditional songs and ritual texts: Issues for archiving. In N. Thieberger, L. Barwick & J. Vaughan (eds.), Sustainable data form digital research: Humanities perspectives on digital scholarship. A PARDISEC Conference, University of Melbourne, Australia: Custom Book Centre.Search in Google Scholar

Morey, Stephen. 2013. Tai languages of Assam, a progress report – Does anything remain of the Tai Ahom language?. In D. Bradley & M. Bradley (eds.), Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance: An Active Approach. New York. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nartsupha, Chatthip & Ranoo Wichasin. 1995. The state of knowledge of Ahom history. Tai Culture 3(1). 3–36. Guwahati: Eastern Tai Literary Association.Search in Google Scholar

Ó Hlfearnáin, Tadhg. 2015. Sociolinguistic vitality of Manx after extreme language shift: Authenticity without traditional native speakers. IJSL 231. 45–62.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0031Search in Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Bernadette & John Walsh. 2015. New speakers of Irish: Shifting boundaries across time and space. IJSL 231. 63–83.10.1515/ijsl-2014-0032Search in Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzzane. 2002. The impact of language policy on endangered languages. International Journal on Multicultural Societies 4(2). 1–28.10.4324/9781315095028-10Search in Google Scholar

Saikia, Yasmin. 2004. Fragmented Memories: Struggling to be Tai Ahom in India. Durban: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822386162Search in Google Scholar

Sasse, Hans-Jurgen. 1992. Language decay and contact-induced change: Similarities and differences. In M. Brenzinger (ed.), Language Death: Factual and Theoretical Explorations with Special Reference to East Africa. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Sengupta, Madhumita. 2016. Becoming Assamese: Colonialism and new subjectivities in Northeast India. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315560274Search in Google Scholar

SIL International, 14th. 2002. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. <http://www.ethnologue.com/>Search in Google Scholar

Terwiel, Barend Jan. 1983. Ahom and the Study of Early Tai Society. Journal of the Siam Society 42–62. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Terwiel, Barend Jan & Ranoo Wichasin (eds.). 1992. Tai Ahoms and the Stars. Three Ritual Texts to Ward Off Danger. Cornell Southeast Asia Program.10.7591/9781501719004Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-06-22
Published in Print: 2018-06-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0020/html
Scroll to top button