Startseite An improved estimator of the logarithmic odds ratio for small sample sizes using a Bayesian approach
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

An improved estimator of the logarithmic odds ratio for small sample sizes using a Bayesian approach

  • Toru Ogura ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Takemi Yanagimoto ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. April 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The logarithmic odds ratio is a well-known method for comparing binary data between two independent groups. Although various existing methods proposed for estimating a logarithmic odds ratio, most methods estimate two proportions in each group independently and then estimate the logarithmic odds ratio using the two estimated proportions. When using a logarithmic odds ratio, researchers are more interested in the logarithmic odds ratio than proportions for each group. Parameter estimations, generally, incur random and systematic errors. These errors in initially estimated parameter may affect later estimated parameter. We propose a Bayesian estimator to directly estimate a logarithmic odds ratio without using proportions for each group. Many existing methods need to estimate two parameters (two proportions in each group) to estimate a logarithmic odds ratio; however, the proposed method only estimates one parameter (logarithmic odds ratio). Therefore, the proposed estimator can be closer to the population’s logarithmic odds ratio than existing estimators. Additionally, the validity of the proposed estimator is verified using numerical calculations and applications.


Corresponding author: Toru Ogura, Clinical Research Support Center, Mie University Hospital, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu City, Mie, 514-8507, Japan, E-mail: 

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Editor and the Reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which have contributed to the revised manuscript. This study was carried out under the ISM Cooperative Research Program (2023-ISMCRP-2042).

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Hauck, WW. A comparative study of conditional maximum likelihood estimation of a common odds ratio. Biometrics 1984;40:1117–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531163.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Hanley, JA, Miettinen, OS. An ‘unconditional-like’ structure for the conditional estimator of odds ratio from 2 × 2 tables. Biomed J 2006;48:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200510167.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Babu, M, Mani, T, Sappani, M, George, S, Bangdiwala, SI, Jeyaseelan, L. Exact correction factor for estimating the OR in the presence of sparse data with a zero cell in 2 × 2 tables. Int J Biostat 2024;20:229–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2022-0040.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Haldane, JBS. The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies. Ann Hum Genet 1956;20:309–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01285.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Gart, JJ, Zweifel, JR. On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with application to quantal bioassay. Biometrika 1967;54:181–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.181.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Hirji, KF, Tsiatis, AA, Mehta, CR. Median unbiased estimation for binary data. Am Statistician 1989;43:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1989.10475597.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Parzen, M, Lipsitz, S, Ibrahim, J, Klar, N. An estimate of the odds ratio that always exists. J Comput Graph Stat 2002;11:420–36. https://doi.org/10.1198/106186002760180590.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Vasquez, VR, Whiting, WB. Analysis of random and systematic error effects on uncertainty propagation in process design and simulation using distribution tail characterization. Chem Eng Commun 2004;191:278–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440490261890.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Muysoms, FE, Hauters, J, Van Nieuwenhove, Y, Huten, N, Claeys, DA. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a multi-centre retrospective review and shift in technique. Acta Chir Belg 2008;108:400–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2008.11680249.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Okuno, M, Hatano, E, Kasai, Y, Nishio, T, Seo, S, Taura, K, et al.. Feasibility of the liver-first approach for patients with initially unresectable and not optimally resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Surg Today 2016;46:721–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1242-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Böhning, D, Sangnawakij, P, Holling, H. Estimating risk and rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel estimator and assessing heterogeneity. Int J Biostat 2023;19:21–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2021-0087.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Ghosh, JK, Delampady, M, Samanta, T. An introduction to Bayesian analysis: theory and methods. New York: Springer; 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Bolstad, WM, Curran, JM. Introduction to Bayesian statistics, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.10.1002/9781118593165Suche in Google Scholar

14. Ogura, T, Yanagimoto, T. Improving and extending the McNemar test using the Bayesian method. Stat Med 2016;35:2455–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6875.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Thomas, DG, Gart, JJ. A table of exact confidence limits for differences and ratios of two proportions and their odds ratios. J Am Stat Assoc 1977;72:73–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1977.10479909.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Harkness, WL. Properties of the extended hypergeometric distribution. Ann Math Stat 1965;36:938–45. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177700066.Suche in Google Scholar

17. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2024.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Ogura, T, Yanagimoto, T. Estimation of highly heterogeneous multinomial probabilities observed at the beginning of COVID-19. Biostat Epidemiol 2022;6:164–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2022.2064693.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Ogura, T, Yanagimoto, T. Bayesian estimator of multiple Poisson means assuming two different priors. Commun Stat Simulat Comput 2023;52:649–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1861465.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2024-0105).


Received: 2024-07-08
Accepted: 2025-03-22
Published Online: 2025-04-30

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 6.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijb-2024-0105/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen