Startseite Simulation of Membrane Gas Separation Process Using Aspen Plus® V8.6
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Simulation of Membrane Gas Separation Process Using Aspen Plus® V8.6

  • Seyedmehdi Sharifian EMAIL logo , Michael Harasek und Bahram Haddadi
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Januar 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Implementing membrane gas separation systems have led to remarkable profits in both processes and products. This study presents the modeling and simulation of membrane gas separation systems using Aspen Plus® V8.6. A FORTRAN user model and a numerical solution procedure have been developed to characterize asymmetric hollow fiber membrane modules. The main benefit of this model is that it can be easily incorporated into a commercial simulator and used as a unit operation model in complex systems. A comparison between the model and the experimental cases at different operation conditions shows that calculated values are in good agreement with measured values. This model is suitable for future developments as well as design and performance analysis of multicomponent gas permeation systems prior to experimental realization.

Nomenclature

u

feed side flow rate, mol/s

D

outer diameter of hollow fiber, m

J

permeance, mol/m2 sPa

P

feed side pressure, Pa

p

permeate side pressure, Pa

x

feed side molar fraction

y

permeate mole fraction

N

number of fibers in the module

z

change hollow fiber length, m

v

permeate side flow rate, mol/s

L

active length, m

Subscripts

i

component index

f

referring to feed

References

1. Baker RW. Future directions of membrane gas separation technology. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002;41:1393–411.10.1021/ie0108088Suche in Google Scholar

2. Drioli E, Romano M. Progress and new perspectives on integrated membrane operations for sustainable industrial growth. Ind Eng Chem Res 2001;40:1277–300.10.1021/ie0006209Suche in Google Scholar

3. Ho WS, Sirkar KK. Membrane handbook. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992:954.10.1007/978-1-4615-3548-5Suche in Google Scholar

4. Rautenbach R, Welsch K. Treatment of landfill gas by gas permeation – pilot plant results and comparison to alternatives. J Membr Sci 1994;87:107–18.10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0091-QSuche in Google Scholar

5. Chung TS, Ren J, Wang R, Li D, Liu Y, Pramoda KP, Cao C, Loh WW. Development of asymmetric 6FDA-2, 6DAT hollow fiber membranes for CO2/CH4 separation: Part 2. Suppression of plasticization. J Membr Sci 2003;214:57–69.10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00535-5Suche in Google Scholar

6. Pan CY. Gas separation by high-flux, asymmetric hollow-fiber membrane. AIChE J 1986;32:2020–7.10.1002/aic.690321212Suche in Google Scholar

7. Makaruk A, Harasek M. Numerical algorithm for modelling multicomponent multipermeator systems. J Membr Sci 2009;344:258–65.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.013Suche in Google Scholar

8. Pan CY. Gas separation by permeators with high-flux asymmetric membranes. AIChE J 1983;29(4):545–52.10.1002/aic.690290405Suche in Google Scholar

9. Aspen Plus. Aspen engineering suite: user models manual. Burlington, MA 01803-5501: Aspen Technology, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Tranchino L, Santarossa R, Carta F, Fabiani C, Bimbi L. Gas separation in a membrane unit: experimental results and theoretical predictions. Sep Sci Technol 1989;24(14):1207–26.10.1080/01496398908049898Suche in Google Scholar

11. Sada E, Kumazawa H, Wang JS, Koizumi M. Separation of carbon dioxide by asymmetric hollow fiber membrane of cellulose triacetate. J Appl Polym Sci 1992;45(12):2181–6.10.1002/app.1992.070451214Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-15
Accepted: 2015-12-16
Published Online: 2016-1-8
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Note
  3. Editorial Special Issue: Selected Extended Papers from the 12th International Conference on Membrane Science and Technology (MST2015) Symposium on Modeling and Simulation
  4. Research Articles
  5. Molecular Perspective of Radionuclides Separation by Nanoporous Graphene Oxide Membrane
  6. Mathematical Modeling and Investigation on the Temperature and Pressure Dependency of Permeation and Membrane Separation Performance for Natural gas Treatment
  7. Mathematical Modeling of Natural Gas Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane Modules by Application of Finite Element Method through Statistical Analysis
  8. Modelling Study of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Methan Steam Reforming using CFD Method
  9. Performance Investigation of Membrane Process in Natural Gas sweeting by Membrane Process: Modeling Study
  10. Gas Separation in Nanoporous Graphene from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
  11. The Effect of Module Geometry on Heat and Mass Transfer in Membrane Distillation
  12. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of the Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) Process
  13. Multi-objective Optimization of Preparation Conditions of Asymmetric Polyetherimide Membrane for Prevaporation of Isopropanol
  14. Investigation of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Ethanol Steam Reforming using CFD Method
  15. Designing Better Membrane Modules Using CFD
  16. Simulation of Membrane Gas Separation Process Using Aspen Plus® V8.6
  17. Numerical Simulation of Salt Water Passing Mechanism Through Nanoporous Single-Layer Graphene Membrane
  18. Facilitated Transport of Propylene Through Composite Polymer-Ionic Liquid Membranes. Mass Transfer Analysis
  19. CFD Simulation of Hydrogen Separation in Pd Hollow Fiber Membrane
  20. Numerical Study on Concentration Polarization for H2-N2 Separation through a Thin Pd Membrane by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Heruntergeladen am 14.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2015-0067/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen