Home Investigation of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Ethanol Steam Reforming using CFD Method
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Investigation of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Ethanol Steam Reforming using CFD Method

  • K. Ghasemzadeh EMAIL logo , R. Zeynali , F. Ahmadnejad , A. A. Babalou and A. Basile
Published/Copyright: January 8, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The main purpose of present study is the analysis of dense palladium membrane reactor (MR) performance during ethanol steam reforming (ESR) reaction using computational fluid dynamic (CFD). To this aim, a two-dimensional and isothermal model based on CFD method was developed and results validation was tested by our experimental data achieved in ITM-CNR of Italy. In this work, Pd-based MR modeling was performed by using COMSOL-MULTIPHYSICS software. Regarding to model validation results, a good agreement was found between CFD model results and experimental data. Moreover, in this study, the effects of the some important operating parameters (reaction temperature and pressure) on the performance of Pd-based MR was studied in terms of ethanol conversion and hydrogen recovery. Concerning to simulation results, the CFD model presented velocity and pressure profiles in both side of MR and also compositions of various species in permeate and retentate streams. The simulation results indicated that the Pd-based MR has better performance with respect to traditional reactor (TR) in terms of the ethanol conversion, especially, at lower reaction temperatures and higher reactions pressures. As a consequence, CFD model results illustrated that Pd-based MR performance was improved by increasing the reaction pressure, while this parameter had negative effect on the TR performance. This result related to enhancement of hydrogen permeance through the palladium membrane by increasing the pressure gradient. Indeed, this shift effect can provide a higher ethanol conversion in lower temperatures in the Pd-based MR. In particular, 98% ethanol conversion and 37% hydrogen recovery was achieved at 350°C and 2 atm.

References

1. Aghaeinejad-Meybodi A, Ghasemzadeh K, Babaluo AA, Basile A. Modeling study of silica membrane performance for hydrogen production. Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng 2015;10:781–90.10.1002/apj.1915Search in Google Scholar

2. Ghasemzadeh K, Morrone P, Liguori S, Babaluo AA, Basile A. Evaluation of silica membrane reactor performance for hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming: modeling study. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:16698–709.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.121Search in Google Scholar

3. Ghasemzadeh K, Morrone P, Iulianelli A, Liguori S, Babaluo AA, Basile A. H2 production in silica membrane reactor via methanol steam reforming: modeling and HAZOP analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:10315–26.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.008Search in Google Scholar

4. Rikukawa M, Sanui K. Proton-conducting polymer electrolyte membranes based on hydrocarbon polymers. Prog Polym Sci 2000;25:1463–502.10.1016/B978-008044696-7/50052-0Search in Google Scholar

5. Neburchilov V, Martin J, Wang H, Zhang J. A review of polymer electrolyte membranes for direct methanol fuel cells. J Power Sources 2007;169:221–38.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.044Search in Google Scholar

6. Yaroslavtsev AB, Yu A, Dobrovolsky NS, Shaglaeva LA Frolova EV, Gerasi-mova EA. Sanginov, Nanostructured materials for low-temperature fuel cells.Russ Chem Rev 2012;81:191–220.10.1070/RC2012v081n03ABEH004290Search in Google Scholar

7. Carrette L, Friedrich KA, Stimming U. Fuel cells: fundamentals and applications. Fuel Cells 2001;1:5–39.10.1002/1615-6854(200105)1:1<5::AID-FUCE5>3.0.CO;2-GSearch in Google Scholar

8. Gallucci F, Fernandez E, Corengia P, Sint Annaland M. Recent advances on membranes and membrane reactors for hydrogen production. Chem Eng Sci 2013;92:40–66.10.1016/j.ces.2013.01.008Search in Google Scholar

9. Mielenz JR. Ethanol production from biomass: technology and commercialization status. Curr Opin Microbiol 2001;4:324–9.10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00211-3Search in Google Scholar

10. Tsodikov MV, Chistyakov AV, Yandieva FA, Zmakin VV, Gekhman AE, Moiseev II. Conversion of biomass products to energy sources in the presence of nano-catalysts and membrane catalyst systems. Catal Ind 2011;3:4–10.10.1134/S2070050411010156Search in Google Scholar

11. Ni M, Leung DY, Leung MK. A review on reforming bio-ethanol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007;32:3238–47.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.038Search in Google Scholar

12. Bion N, Epron F, Duprez D. Bioethanol reforming for H2 production. A comparison with hydrocarbon reforming. Catalysis 2010;22:1–59.Search in Google Scholar

13. Bion N, Duprez D, Epron F. Design of nanocatalysts for green hydrogen production from bioethanol. Chem Sus Chem 2012;15:76–91.10.1002/cssc.201100400Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Ghasemzadeh K, Liguori S, Morrone P, Iulianelli A, Piemonte V, Babaluo AA, et al. H2 production by low pressure methanol steam reforming in a dense Pd-Ag membrane reactor in cocurrent flow configuration: experimental and modeling analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:16685–97.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.001Search in Google Scholar

15. Ghasemzadeh K, Aghaeinejad-Meybodi A, Javad Vaezi Mo, Gholizadeh A, Adel Abdi M, Akbar Babaluo A, et al. Hydrogen production via silica membrane reactor during methanol, steam reforming process: experimental study. RSC Adv 2015;5:95823–32.10.1039/C5RA14002ASearch in Google Scholar

16. Basile A, Parmaliana A, Tosti S, Iulianelli A, Gallucci F, Espro C, et al. Hydrogen production by methanol steam reforming carried out in membrane reactor on Cu/Zn/Mg-based catalyst. Catal Today 2008;137:17–22.10.1016/j.cattod.2008.03.015Search in Google Scholar

17. Iulianelli A, Basile A. Hydrogen production from ethanol via inorganic membrane reactors technology: a review. Catal Sci Technol 2011;1:366–79.10.1039/c0cy00012dSearch in Google Scholar

18. Iulianelli A, Liguuori S, Longo T, Pinacci P, Basile A. An experimental study onbio-ethanol steam reforming in a catalytic membrane reactor. Part I: temperature and sweep-gas configuration effects. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:3170–7.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.076Search in Google Scholar

19. Iulianelli A, Basile A. An experimental study on bio-ethanol steam reforming in a catalytic membrane reactor. Part II: reaction pressure, sweep factor and WHSV effects. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:3159–64.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.034Search in Google Scholar

20. Seelam PK, Liguori S, Iulianelli A, Pinacci P, Calabrò V, Huuhtanen M, et al. Hydrogen production from bio-ethanol steam reforming reaction in a Pd/PSS membrane reactor. Catal Today 2012;19:42–8.10.1016/j.cattod.2012.01.008Search in Google Scholar

21. Gallucci F, Basile A. Palladium membrane reactor for steam reforming reaction: a comparison between different fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33:1671–87.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.01.010Search in Google Scholar

22. Ghasemzadeh K, Morrone P, Babalou AA, Basile A. A simulation study on methanol steam reforming in the silica membrane reactor for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40:3909–18.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.010Search in Google Scholar

23. Hristov HV, Middle KC, Mann R. Fluid mixing and the safe quenching of a runaway reaction in a stirred autoclave. Chem Eng Res Des 2002;80:872–9.10.1205/026387602321143417Search in Google Scholar

24. Evans GM, Machniewski PM. Mass transfer in a confined plunging liquid jet bubble column. Chem Eng Sci 1999;59:4981–8.10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00221-3Search in Google Scholar

25. Milewska A, Molga E. CFD simulation of accidents in industrial batch stirred tank reactors. Chem Eng Sci 2007;62:4920.10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.036Search in Google Scholar

26. Milewska A. Modelling of batch and semi-batch reactors-safety aspects, PhD. Thesis. Available at: http://www.ichip.pw.edu.pl/milewska/thesis_Milewska.pdf. 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-2
Revised: 2015-12-12
Accepted: 2015-12-12
Published Online: 2016-1-8
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial Note
  3. Editorial Special Issue: Selected Extended Papers from the 12th International Conference on Membrane Science and Technology (MST2015) Symposium on Modeling and Simulation
  4. Research Articles
  5. Molecular Perspective of Radionuclides Separation by Nanoporous Graphene Oxide Membrane
  6. Mathematical Modeling and Investigation on the Temperature and Pressure Dependency of Permeation and Membrane Separation Performance for Natural gas Treatment
  7. Mathematical Modeling of Natural Gas Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane Modules by Application of Finite Element Method through Statistical Analysis
  8. Modelling Study of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Methan Steam Reforming using CFD Method
  9. Performance Investigation of Membrane Process in Natural Gas sweeting by Membrane Process: Modeling Study
  10. Gas Separation in Nanoporous Graphene from Molecular Dynamics Simulation
  11. The Effect of Module Geometry on Heat and Mass Transfer in Membrane Distillation
  12. Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of the Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) Process
  13. Multi-objective Optimization of Preparation Conditions of Asymmetric Polyetherimide Membrane for Prevaporation of Isopropanol
  14. Investigation of Palladium Membrane Reactor Performance during Ethanol Steam Reforming using CFD Method
  15. Designing Better Membrane Modules Using CFD
  16. Simulation of Membrane Gas Separation Process Using Aspen Plus® V8.6
  17. Numerical Simulation of Salt Water Passing Mechanism Through Nanoporous Single-Layer Graphene Membrane
  18. Facilitated Transport of Propylene Through Composite Polymer-Ionic Liquid Membranes. Mass Transfer Analysis
  19. CFD Simulation of Hydrogen Separation in Pd Hollow Fiber Membrane
  20. Numerical Study on Concentration Polarization for H2-N2 Separation through a Thin Pd Membrane by Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cppm-2015-0056/html
Scroll to top button