Startseite Quality assurance programs for vitamin A and E in serum: are we doing enough to assess laboratory performance?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Quality assurance programs for vitamin A and E in serum: are we doing enough to assess laboratory performance?

  • Michael Fitzpatrick ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Trisha Andersen , Jonathan Bush , Ronda F. Greaves ORCID logo , Gerald Woollard , Kirsten Hoad , Jake T.B. Collie , Sarah Browning , Tamantha Harrower , Peter Graham und Wilson Punyalack
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. September 2023
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objectives

Monitoring serum vitamin A (retinol) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) concentrations is common practice for assessing nutritional status. Measurement of these vitamins can be challenging due to several factors. Whilst the RCPAQAP Vitamins: Serum Program assists participating laboratories in harmonisation, the materials provided do not contain the analogues of retinol and α-tocopherol that may be present in real patient samples. We aimed to assess participants’ capacity to accurately report retinol and α-tocopherol in the presence of the vitamin E analogues tocopherol acetate and γ-tocopherol.

Methods

A supplementary series of a control sample and three matched spiked samples were distributed to each laboratory participating in the Program. Retinol and α-tocopherol results for each spiked sample were compared to the results of the control sample submitted by each participant. Acceptability of retinol and α-tocopherol results was determined based on the RCPAQAP allowable performance specifications (APS).

Results

Thirteen participants returned results for the supplementary sample series. Interference from α-tocopherol acetate was observed with results below the APS in 30 % (n=4) of laboratories for retinol quantification and in 23 % (n=3) for α-tocopherol quantification. One laboratory returned results above the APS for α-tocopherol when γ-tocopherol was present.

Conclusions

This supplementary sample series has shown that the presence of vitamin E analogues can lead to the over or under estimation of nutritional status by some participants. Affected laboratories are encouraged to review their analytical procedures. To further assess laboratory competence, EQA providers should consider using patient samples or spiked challenge samples.


Corresponding author: Michael Fitzpatrick, AACB/RCPAQAP Vitamins Advisory Committee, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia; and New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: All funding was provided by RCPAQAP.

  6. Data availability: All data not presented in the manuscript is available for reviewby request. Please contact the corresponding author.

References

1. Jiang, Q, Christen, S, Shigenaga, MK, Ames, BN. γ-Tocopherol, the major form of vitamin E in the US diet, deserves more attention. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;74:714–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/74.6.714.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Greaves, RF, Woollard, GA, Hoad, KE, Walmsley, TA, Johnson, LA, Briscoe, S, et al.. Laboratory medicine best practice guideline: vitamins a, e and the carotenoids in blood. Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:81–113.Suche in Google Scholar

3. White, GH. Metrological traceability in clinical biochemistry. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:393–409. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2011.011079.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Sciacovelli, L, Secchiero, S, Padoan, A, Plebani, M. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1644–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2017-1179.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Miller, WG, Myers, GL, Rej, R. Why commutability matters. Clin Chem 2006;52:553–4. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.063511.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Badrick, T, Punyalack, W, Graham, P. Commutability and traceability in EQA programs. Clin Biochem 2018;56:102–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.04.018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. RCPAQAP. Chemical Pathology Product Catalogue [online]. https://rcpaqap.com.au/products/chemical/ [Accessed 12 May 2023].Suche in Google Scholar

8. Wagner, KH, Kamal-Eldin, A, Elmadfa, I. Gamma-tocopherol – an underestimated vitamin? Ann Nutr Metab 2004;48:169–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079555.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Jiang, Q. Natural forms of vitamin E: metabolism, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities and their role in disease prevention and therapy. Free Radic Biol Med 2014;72:76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.03.035.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Jiang, Q, Im, S, Wagner, JG, Hernandez, ML, Peden, DB. Gamma-tocopherol, a major form of vitamin E in diets: insights into antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, mechanisms, and roles in disease management. Free Radic Biol Med 2022;178:347–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.12.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Chai, W, Maskarinec, G, Franke, AA, Monroe, KR, Park, SY, Kolonel, LN, et al.. Association of serum γ-tocopherol levels with mortality: the multiethnic cohort study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2020;74:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-019-0460-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. PubChem Compound Summary alpha-tocopherol [online]. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/14985 [Accessed 9 Aug 2023].Suche in Google Scholar

13. PubChem Compound Summary gamma-tocopherol [online]. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/gamma-Tocopherol [Accessed 9 Aug 2023].Suche in Google Scholar

14. Blount, BC, Karwowski, MP, Morel-Espinosa, M, Rees, J, Sosnoff, C, Cowan, E, et al.. Evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients in an outbreak of E-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury – 10 states, August–October 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:1040–1. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6845e2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. White, S, Adcock, N, Elbast, W, Hiller, J, Knutsson, M, Lausecker, B, et al.. European Bioanalysis Forum: recommendation for dealing with internal standard variability. Bioanalysis 2014;6:2767–74. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.14.221.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Vinter, S. Variations in internal standard: an inspector’s perspective. Bioanalysis 2019;11:1649–51. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2019-0232.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. RCPAQAP. Chemical pathology analytical performance specifications [online]. https://rcpaqap.com.au/resources/chemical-pathology-analytical-performance-specifications/ [Accessed 12 May 2023].Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-29
Accepted: 2023-08-16
Published Online: 2023-09-19
Published in Print: 2024-01-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Rapid rule-in and rule-out protocols of acute myocardial infarction using hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods
  4. Reviews
  5. A guide to conducting systematic reviews of clinical laboratory tests
  6. Improving diagnosis and treatment of hypomagnesemia
  7. Opininon Paper
  8. Documenting and validating metrological traceability of serum alanine aminotransferase measurements: a priority for medical laboratory community for providing high quality service in hepatology
  9. EFLM Paper
  10. Assessing the status of European laboratories in evaluating biomarkers for chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and recommendations for improvement: insights from the 2022 EFLM Task Group on CKD survey
  11. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  12. Bland and Altman agreement method: to plot differences against means or differences against standard? An endless tale?
  13. Assessment of three equations to calculate plasma LDL cholesterol concentration in fasting and non-fasting hypertriglyceridemic patients
  14. Validation of metrological traceability of the new generation of Abbott Alinity alkaline phosphatase assay
  15. Quality assurance programs for vitamin A and E in serum: are we doing enough to assess laboratory performance?
  16. A supervised machine-learning approach for the efficient development of a multi method (LC-MS) for a large number of drugs and subsets thereof: focus on oral antitumor agents
  17. Performance evaluation of alternate ESR measurement method using BC-780 automated hematology analyzer: a comparison study with the Westergren reference method
  18. Total error in lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry-based in state of the art using Spanish EQAS data
  19. Development and multi-center validation of a fully automated digital immunoassay for neurofilament light chain: toward a clinical blood test for neuronal injury
  20. CSF and plasma Aβ42/40 across Alzheimer’s disease continuum: comparison of two ultrasensitive Simoa® assays targeting distinct amyloid regions
  21. Improving regional medical laboratory center report quality through a report recall management system
  22. Cardiovascular Diseases
  23. Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay
  24. Hemodialysis and biomarkers of myocardial infarction – a cohort study
  25. Letters to the Editor
  26. Chatbot GPT can be grossly inaccurate
  27. Blood collection in heparin vs. EDTA results in an inflammasome-independent increase in monocyte distribution width at 4 h
  28. Week-to-week within-subject and between-subject biological variation of copeptin
  29. The effect of unintended shortage in technical resources on the quality of endpoint clinical laboratory diagnosis
  30. Epigenetic signatures of cfDNA enable a topological assignment of tissue damage
  31. Six Sigma driven QC in antibody testing for infectious diseases
  32. Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor
  33. Comment to: Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor
  34. Evaluation of serum cortisol measurement by Ortho Vitro after stimulation by ACTH or insulin hypoglycaemia
  35. Diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative detection of antimitochondrial antibodies subtype M2 using chemiluminescence immunoassay in primary biliary cholangitis
  36. Blood plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: Aβ1–42/1–40 vs. AβX–42/X–40
Heruntergeladen am 31.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0670/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen