Received: 2023-08-07
 
 
  Accepted: 2023-08-09
 
 
  Published Online: 2023-08-23
 
 
  Published in Print: 2024-01-26
 
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
                                        
                                        You are currently not able to access this content.
                                    
                                    
                                    
                                        
                                        You are currently not able to access this content.
                                    
                                    
                                    Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Rapid rule-in and rule-out protocols of acute myocardial infarction using hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods
- Reviews
- A guide to conducting systematic reviews of clinical laboratory tests
- Improving diagnosis and treatment of hypomagnesemia
- Opininon Paper
- Documenting and validating metrological traceability of serum alanine aminotransferase measurements: a priority for medical laboratory community for providing high quality service in hepatology
- EFLM Paper
- Assessing the status of European laboratories in evaluating biomarkers for chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and recommendations for improvement: insights from the 2022 EFLM Task Group on CKD survey
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Bland and Altman agreement method: to plot differences against means or differences against standard? An endless tale?
- Assessment of three equations to calculate plasma LDL cholesterol concentration in fasting and non-fasting hypertriglyceridemic patients
- Validation of metrological traceability of the new generation of Abbott Alinity alkaline phosphatase assay
- Quality assurance programs for vitamin A and E in serum: are we doing enough to assess laboratory performance?
- A supervised machine-learning approach for the efficient development of a multi method (LC-MS) for a large number of drugs and subsets thereof: focus on oral antitumor agents
- Performance evaluation of alternate ESR measurement method using BC-780 automated hematology analyzer: a comparison study with the Westergren reference method
- Total error in lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry-based in state of the art using Spanish EQAS data
- Development and multi-center validation of a fully automated digital immunoassay for neurofilament light chain: toward a clinical blood test for neuronal injury
- CSF and plasma Aβ42/40 across Alzheimer’s disease continuum: comparison of two ultrasensitive Simoa® assays targeting distinct amyloid regions
- Improving regional medical laboratory center report quality through a report recall management system
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay
- Hemodialysis and biomarkers of myocardial infarction – a cohort study
- Letters to the Editor
- Chatbot GPT can be grossly inaccurate
- Blood collection in heparin vs. EDTA results in an inflammasome-independent increase in monocyte distribution width at 4 h
- Week-to-week within-subject and between-subject biological variation of copeptin
- The effect of unintended shortage in technical resources on the quality of endpoint clinical laboratory diagnosis
- Epigenetic signatures of cfDNA enable a topological assignment of tissue damage
- Six Sigma driven QC in antibody testing for infectious diseases
- Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor
- Comment to: Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor
- Evaluation of serum cortisol measurement by Ortho Vitro after stimulation by ACTH or insulin hypoglycaemia
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative detection of antimitochondrial antibodies subtype M2 using chemiluminescence immunoassay in primary biliary cholangitis
- Blood plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: Aβ1–42/1–40 vs. AβX–42/X–40
Keywords for this article
                        
                            endpoint clinical laboratory diagnosis;
                        
                            laboratory medicine;
                        
                            political sanction;
                        
                            quality
                        
                    Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Rapid rule-in and rule-out protocols of acute myocardial infarction using hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT methods
- Reviews
- A guide to conducting systematic reviews of clinical laboratory tests
- Improving diagnosis and treatment of hypomagnesemia
- Opininon Paper
- Documenting and validating metrological traceability of serum alanine aminotransferase measurements: a priority for medical laboratory community for providing high quality service in hepatology
- EFLM Paper
- Assessing the status of European laboratories in evaluating biomarkers for chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and recommendations for improvement: insights from the 2022 EFLM Task Group on CKD survey
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Bland and Altman agreement method: to plot differences against means or differences against standard? An endless tale?
- Assessment of three equations to calculate plasma LDL cholesterol concentration in fasting and non-fasting hypertriglyceridemic patients
- Validation of metrological traceability of the new generation of Abbott Alinity alkaline phosphatase assay
- Quality assurance programs for vitamin A and E in serum: are we doing enough to assess laboratory performance?
- A supervised machine-learning approach for the efficient development of a multi method (LC-MS) for a large number of drugs and subsets thereof: focus on oral antitumor agents
- Performance evaluation of alternate ESR measurement method using BC-780 automated hematology analyzer: a comparison study with the Westergren reference method
- Total error in lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry-based in state of the art using Spanish EQAS data
- Development and multi-center validation of a fully automated digital immunoassay for neurofilament light chain: toward a clinical blood test for neuronal injury
- CSF and plasma Aβ42/40 across Alzheimer’s disease continuum: comparison of two ultrasensitive Simoa® assays targeting distinct amyloid regions
- Improving regional medical laboratory center report quality through a report recall management system
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay: hs-cTnI (CLIA) assay
- Hemodialysis and biomarkers of myocardial infarction – a cohort study
- Letters to the Editor
- Chatbot GPT can be grossly inaccurate
- Blood collection in heparin vs. EDTA results in an inflammasome-independent increase in monocyte distribution width at 4 h
- Week-to-week within-subject and between-subject biological variation of copeptin
- The effect of unintended shortage in technical resources on the quality of endpoint clinical laboratory diagnosis
- Epigenetic signatures of cfDNA enable a topological assignment of tissue damage
- Six Sigma driven QC in antibody testing for infectious diseases
- Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor
- Comment to: Extensive analytical evaluation of the performances of the new DiaSys PCT assay and comparison with Elecsys B·R·A·H·M·S PCT test on Roche Cobas and B·R·A·H·M·S PCT-sensitive Kryptor
- Evaluation of serum cortisol measurement by Ortho Vitro after stimulation by ACTH or insulin hypoglycaemia
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative detection of antimitochondrial antibodies subtype M2 using chemiluminescence immunoassay in primary biliary cholangitis
- Blood plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: Aβ1–42/1–40 vs. AβX–42/X–40