Startseite Philosophie Descartes’ Sum-Res-Cogitans-Argument in der Zweiten Meditation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Descartes’ Sum-Res-Cogitans-Argument in der Zweiten Meditation

  • Simon Dierig EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. Februar 2021

Abstract

Two major interpretations have been advanced for the sum res cogitans passage in Descartes’s Second Meditation. According to the first interpretation, he argues in this passage that only thinking belongs to his essence. According to the second interpretation, due to Anthony Kenny, Harry Frankfurt and others, no such claim is defended by Descartes. Rather, it is his aim to argue that only thinking can be ascribed to him with certainty. In this essay, it will be shown that the “naive”, essentialist reading of the sum res cogitans reasoning is closer to the text than the perhaps more sophisticated, purely epistemic reading. Although the interpretation defended here is not new, it will be arrived at by way of (hopefully) new arguments.

Ayers, M. 2005. „The Second Meditation and Objections to Cartesian Dualism“. In Early Modern Philosophy. Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. Hg. C. Mercer/E. O’Neill. Oxford/New York, 24–45.10.1093/0195177606.003.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Broughton, J. 2002. Descartes’s Method of Doubt. Princeton/Oxford.10.1515/9781400825042Suche in Google Scholar

Carriero, J. P. 1986. „The Second Meditation and the Essence of the Mind“. In Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Hg. A. O. Rorty. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, 199–221.10.1525/9780520907836-012Suche in Google Scholar

Carriero, J. P. 2009. Between Two Worlds. A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton/Oxford.10.1515/9781400833191Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, D. M. 2003. Descartes’s Theory of Mind. Oxford/New York.10.1093/0199261237.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dennett, D. 1978. „Current Issues in the Philosophy of Mind“. American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 249–61.10.1007/978-94-009-1882-5_2Suche in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, H. G. 1970. Demons, Dreamers, and Madmen. The Defense of Reason in Descartes’s Meditations. Indianapolis/New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Hooker, M. 1975. „Descartes’ Argument for the Claim that His Essence Is to Think“. Grazer Philosophische Studien 1, 143–63.10.5840/gps1975110Suche in Google Scholar

Kemmerling, A. 2005. Ideen des Ichs. Studien zu Descartes’ Philosophie. 2. Aufl. Frankfurt/M.Suche in Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1968. Descartes. A Study of His Philosophy. New York/Toronto.Suche in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. Counterfactuals. 2. korr. Aufl. Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Locke, D. 1981. „Mind, Matter, and the Meditations“. Mind 90, 343–66.10.1093/mind/XC.359.343Suche in Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. 1965. „Descartes’s Proof that His Essence Is Thinking“. The Philosophical Review 74, 315–38.10.1007/978-1-349-15265-0_15Suche in Google Scholar

Markie, P. J. 1986. Descartes’s Gambit. Ithaca/London.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinkster, H. 1988. Lateinische Syntax und Semantik. Rev. u. erw. Fassung. Tübingen.Suche in Google Scholar

Reith, H. R. 1986. René Descartes. The Story of a Soul. Lanham.Suche in Google Scholar

Röd, W. 1987. Descartes’ Erste Philosophie. Versuch einer Analyse mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Cartesianischen Methodologie. 2. Aufl. Bonn.Suche in Google Scholar

Rubenbauer, H./Hofmann, J. B. 1995. Lateinische Grammatik. 12. korr. Aufl. Bamberg/München.Suche in Google Scholar

Schiffer, S. 1976. „Descartes on His Essence“. The Philosophical Review 85, 21–43.10.2307/2184253Suche in Google Scholar

Schütt, H.-P. 1990. Substanzen, Subjekte und Personen. Eine Studie zum Cartesischen Dualismus. Heidelberg.Suche in Google Scholar

Vinci, T. C. 1998. Cartesian Truth. Oxford/New York.10.1093/0195113292.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1978. Descartes. The Project of Pure Enquiry. London.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, M. D. 1982. Descartes. 2. korr. Aufl. London/New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-02-19
Published in Print: 2022-03-28

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2018-0134/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen