Startseite Embodied Meaning in Comprehending Abstract Chinese Counterfactuals
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Embodied Meaning in Comprehending Abstract Chinese Counterfactuals

  • Xueyan Li

    Xueyan LI is an associate professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology. Her research focuses on psycholinguistics and cognitive neurolinguistics.

    , Yahui Zhao

    Yahui ZHAO is a graduate student at the School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology. His research focuses on psycholinguistics.

    , Huili Wang

    Huili WANG (Corresponding Author) is a professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou City University. She is the Director of Hangzhou Collaborative Innovation Institute of Language Services. Her research focuses on psycholinguistics and cognitive neurolinguistics.

    EMAIL logo
    und Xue Zhang

    Xue ZHANG is a lecturer at the School of Foreign Languages, Dalian Polytechnic University. Her research focuses on second language acquisition and psycholinguistics.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. September 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Embodied cognition theories propose that language comprehension triggers a sensorimotor system in the brain. However, most previous research has paid much attention to concrete and factual sentences, and little emphasis has been put on the research of abstract and counterfactual sentences. The primary challenges for embodied theories lie in elucidating the meanings of abstract and counterfactual sentences. The most prevalent explanation is that abstract and counterfactual sentences are grounded in the activation of a sensorimotor system, in exactly the same way as concrete and factual ones. The present research employed a dual-task experimental paradigm to investigate whether the embodied meaning is activated in comprehending action-related abstract Chinese counterfactual sentences through the presence or absence of action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). Participants were instructed to read and listen to the action-related abstract Chinese factual or counterfactual sentences describing an abstract transfer word towards or away from them, and then move their fingers towards or away from them to press the buttons in the same direction as the motion cue of the transfer verb. The action-sentence compatibility effect was observed in both abstract factual and counterfactual sentences, in line with the embodied cognition theories, which indicated that the embodied meanings were activated in both action-related abstract factuals and counterfactuals.

About the authors

Xueyan Li

Xueyan LI is an associate professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology. Her research focuses on psycholinguistics and cognitive neurolinguistics.

Yahui Zhao

Yahui ZHAO is a graduate student at the School of Foreign Languages, Dalian University of Technology. His research focuses on psycholinguistics.

Huili Wang

Huili WANG (Corresponding Author) is a professor at the School of Foreign Languages, Hangzhou City University. She is the Director of Hangzhou Collaborative Innovation Institute of Language Services. Her research focuses on psycholinguistics and cognitive neurolinguistics.

Xue Zhang

Xue ZHANG is a lecturer at the School of Foreign Languages, Dalian Polytechnic University. Her research focuses on second language acquisition and psycholinguistics.

References

Anderson, R. (2004). Intuitive inquiry: An epistemology of the heart for scientific inquiry. The Humanistic Psychologist, 32(4), 307-341.10.1080/08873267.2004.9961758Suche in Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2009). Structured event complexes in the medial prefrontal cortex support counterfactual representations for future planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1291-1300. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.031510.1098/rstb.2008.0315Suche in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.10.1017/S0140525X99002149Suche in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00029-310.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3Suche in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129-163). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511499968.00710.1017/CBO9780511499968.007Suche in Google Scholar

Bloom, A. H. (1982). The linguistic shaping of thought: A study in the impact of language on thinking in China and the West. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Boot, I., & Pecher, D. (2010). Representation of categories. Experimental Psychology, 58(2). https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a00008210.1027/1618-3169/a000082Suche in Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Di Ferdinando, A., & Parisi, D. (2011). Objects, spatial compatibility, and affordances: A connectionist study. Cognitive Systems Research, 12(1), 33-44.10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.06.001Suche in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.0043410.1111/1467-9280.00434Suche in Google Scholar

Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action-sentence compatibility effect: It’s all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1097-1112. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_9110.1207/s15516709cog0000_91Suche in Google Scholar

Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 355-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.02010.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020Suche in Google Scholar

Byrne, R. M. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 426-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01974-510.1016/S1364-6613(02)01974-5Suche in Google Scholar

Byrne, R. M. (2007). Précis of The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(5-6), 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0700257910.1017/S0140525X07002579Suche in Google Scholar

Byrne, R. M., Segura, S., Culhane, R., Tasso, A., & Berrocal, P. (2000). The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. Memory & Cognition, 28(2), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf0321380510.3758/BF03213805Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, G. H. (1988). 英汉假设条件句比较 [A formal description of Chinese expressions of hypothetical conditions in comparison with English]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (1),10-19.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215-224.10.1177/0146167299025002007Suche in Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.00710.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.007Suche in Google Scholar

De Brigard, F. (2014). Is memory for remembering? Recollection as a form of episodic hypothetical thinking. Synthese, 191, 155-185.10.1007/s11229-013-0247-7Suche in Google Scholar

Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2010). Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 20(2), 468-478. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp11510.1093/cercor/bhp115Suche in Google Scholar

de Vega, M., Moreno, V., & Castillo, D. (2013). The comprehension of action-related sentences may cause interference rather than facilitation on matching actions. Psychological Research, 77(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0356-110.1007/s00426-011-0356-1Suche in Google Scholar

de Vega, M., & Urrutia, M. (2011). Counterfactual sentences activate embodied meaning: An action-sentence compatibility effect study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 962-973.10.1080/20445911.2011.590471Suche in Google Scholar

Dove, G. (2010). An additional heterogeneity hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1000034810.1017/S0140525X10000348Suche in Google Scholar

Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 168-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/108886830831609110.1177/1088868308316091Suche in Google Scholar

Eskenazi, T., Grosjean, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Knoblich, G. (2009). The role of motor simulation in action perception: A neuropsychological case study. Psychological Research, 73(4), 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0231-510.1007/s00426-009-0231-5Suche in Google Scholar

Faul, L., St Jacques, P. L., DeRosa, J. T., Parikh, N., & De Brigard, F. (2020). Differential contribution of anterior and posterior midline regions during mental simulation of counterfactual and perspective shifts in autobiographical memories. NeuroImage, 215, 116843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.11684310.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116843Suche in Google Scholar

Ferguson, H. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 609-626.10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.007Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825-850. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747021070162360510.1080/17470210701623605Suche in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.01010.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010Suche in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf0319631310.3758/BF03196313Suche in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (1999). Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Processes, 28(1), 1-26.10.1080/01638539909545067Suche in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 905-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747021070162555010.1080/17470210701625550Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gough, P. M., Campione, G. C., & Buccino, G. (2013). Fine-tuned modulation of the motor system by adjectives expressing positive and negative properties. Brain and Language, 125(1), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.01210.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.012Suche in Google Scholar

Guan, Q. (2019). 具身语言学——人工智能时代的语言科学 [Embodied linguistics—Language science in the era of artificial intelligence], Beijing: Science Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Horoufchin, H., Bzdok, D., Buccino, G., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2018). Action and object words are differentially anchored in the sensory motor system: A perspective on cognitive embodiment. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 6583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24475-z10.1038/s41598-018-24475-zSuche in Google Scholar

Juárez, F. P. G., Labrecque, D., & Frak, V. (2019). Assessing language-induced motor activity through event related potentials and the grip force sensor: An exploratory study. Brain and Cognition, 135, 103572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.01010.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.010Suche in Google Scholar

Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 883-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747021070162385210.1080/17470210701623852Suche in Google Scholar

Kulakova, E., Aichhorn, M., Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., & Perner, J. (2013). Processing counterfactual and hypothetical conditionals: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 72, 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.06010.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.060Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, L. G. (1985). Reasoning counterfactually in Chinese: Are there any obstacles? Cognition, 21(3), 239-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90026-510.1016/0010-0277(85)90026-5Suche in Google Scholar

Markman, K. D., & Miller, A. K. (2006). Depression, control, and counterfactual thinking: Functional for whom?. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(2), 210-227.10.1521/jscp.2006.25.2.210Suche in Google Scholar

Nazir, T. A., Boulenger, V., Roy, A., Silber, B., Jeannerod, M., & Paulignan, Y. (2008). Language-induced motor perturbations during the execution of a reaching movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 933-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747021070162566710.1080/17470210701625667Suche in Google Scholar

Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184-211. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_110.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1Suche in Google Scholar

Nieuwland, M. S. (2012). Establishing propositional truth-value in counterfactual and real-world contexts during sentence comprehension: Differential sensitivity of the left and right inferior frontal gyri. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3433-3440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.01810.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.018Suche in Google Scholar

Pecher, D., Boot, I., & Van Dantzig, S. (2011). Abstract concepts: Sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. In The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 217-248). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00007-3Suche in Google Scholar

Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing, 8, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0164-010.1007/s10339-007-0164-0Suche in Google Scholar

Richardson, D. C., Spivey, M. J., Barsalou, L. W., & McRae, K. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27(5), 767-780. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2705_410.1207/s15516709cog2705_4Suche in Google Scholar

Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 133.10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.133Suche in Google Scholar

Sakreida, K., Scorolli, C., Menz, M. M., Heim, S., Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2013). Are abstract action words embodied? An fMRI investigation at the interface between language and motor cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.0012510.3389/fnhum.2013.00125Suche in Google Scholar

Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language, 105(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.00110.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.001Suche in Google Scholar

Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and Language, 117(1), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.00310.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.003Suche in Google Scholar

Urrutia, M., Gennari, S. P., & de Vega, M. (2012). Counterfactuals in action: An fMRI study of counterfactual sentences describing physical effort. Neuropsychologia, 50(14), 3663-3672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.00410.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.004Suche in Google Scholar

Van Hoeck, N., Begtas, E., Steen, J., Kestemont, J., Vandekerckhove, M., & Van Overwalle, F. (2014). False belief and counterfactual reasoning in a social environment. NeuroImage, 90, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.04310.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.043Suche in Google Scholar

Van Hoeck, N., Ma, N., Ampe, L., Baetens, K., Vandekerckhove, M., & Van Overwalle, F. (2013). Counterfactual thinking: An fMRI study on changing the past for a better future. Social Cognitive and Dffective Neuroscience, 8(5), 556-564. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss03110.1093/scan/nss031Suche in Google Scholar

Van Hoeck, N., Watson, P. D., & Barbey, A. K. (2015). Cognitive neuroscience of human counterfactual reasoning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.0042010.3389/fnhum.2015.00420Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, H., Yan, X., Cao, S., Li, L., & Kritikos, A. (2019). Interfering ACE on comprehending embodied meaning in action-related Chinese counterfactual sentences. Language and Cognition, 11(3), 479-498.10.1017/langcog.2019.29Suche in Google Scholar

Yong, Q. (2015). 违实句的形态类型及汉语违实句 [The typological stage of morphology in Chinese counterfactuals], Journal of Foreign Languages, (1),12.Suche in Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 35-62.10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4Suche in Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 135(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.110.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Zwaan, R. A., Taylor, L. J., & de Boer, M. (2010). Motor resonance as a function of narrative time: Further tests of the linguistic focus hypothesis. Brain and Language, 112(3), 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.00410.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.004Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-09-18
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2024 BFSU, FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Heruntergeladen am 20.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2024-0303/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen