Startseite Religionswissenschaft, Bibelwissenschaft und Theologie Hippolytus, Gaius and the Alogi in Second and Third Century Rome
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Hippolytus, Gaius and the Alogi in Second and Third Century Rome

  • Emanuela Prinzivalli
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Early Christianity in Rome
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Early Christianity in Rome

Abstract

In recent decades, research has repeatedly revisited Hippolytus, Gaius, and the Alogi, emphasizing the obscurities in the sources and multiplying hypotheses. This essay aims to present the issue without overlooking the difficulties, but avoiding the improper practice of building one hypothesis on top of another. The body of evidence at our disposal confirms that in Rome, during the last decades of the second century and up to the beginning of the third, there was a debate concerning the authority of the Gospel of John and the Apocalypse. It is highly likely that among the protagonists of the discussions were Irenaeus, Gaius, and Hippolytus, and that Gaius criticized the Apocalypse and the Gospel of John. This was an internal debate within the church, where all participants remained within orthodoxy. It was only later sources, unaware of the earlier historical context, that accused the opponents of the Johannine writings, primarily Gaius, of heresy.

Abstract

In recent decades, research has repeatedly revisited Hippolytus, Gaius, and the Alogi, emphasizing the obscurities in the sources and multiplying hypotheses. This essay aims to present the issue without overlooking the difficulties, but avoiding the improper practice of building one hypothesis on top of another. The body of evidence at our disposal confirms that in Rome, during the last decades of the second century and up to the beginning of the third, there was a debate concerning the authority of the Gospel of John and the Apocalypse. It is highly likely that among the protagonists of the discussions were Irenaeus, Gaius, and Hippolytus, and that Gaius criticized the Apocalypse and the Gospel of John. This was an internal debate within the church, where all participants remained within orthodoxy. It was only later sources, unaware of the earlier historical context, that accused the opponents of the Johannine writings, primarily Gaius, of heresy.

Heruntergeladen am 5.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111656151-015/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen