Home Religion, Bible & Theology A First Step Towards Reading 1 Clement in its Roman Context: Re-assessing the Patristic Evidence on the Date and Authorship of the Letter
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A First Step Towards Reading 1 Clement in its Roman Context: Re-assessing the Patristic Evidence on the Date and Authorship of the Letter

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Early Christianity in Rome
This chapter is in the book Early Christianity in Rome

Abstract

The essay discusses the question of the date and authorship of 1 Clement as a crucial preliminary question for discussing the status of the letter and its author(s). The main focus is on the early Christian witnesses in this regard that are all cited or referred to by Eusebius of Caesarea in his Church History. It is argued (1) that these ancient witnesses have perhaps too quickly been dismissed as unreliable and (2) that Eusebius leads the reader through the ancient evidence in a kind of step-by-step procedure in which aspects of the authorship question are picked up, further developed, and enriched with new material in an attempt to create a general picture. Eusebius does not speak out for or against individual or collective authorship, but rather allows for combining the two. A critical survey of the more important suggestions concerning the authorship of the letter in modern scholarship shows the deficiencies of most of the proposals that have been made and in this way indirectly also offer support for the ancient evidence.

Abstract

The essay discusses the question of the date and authorship of 1 Clement as a crucial preliminary question for discussing the status of the letter and its author(s). The main focus is on the early Christian witnesses in this regard that are all cited or referred to by Eusebius of Caesarea in his Church History. It is argued (1) that these ancient witnesses have perhaps too quickly been dismissed as unreliable and (2) that Eusebius leads the reader through the ancient evidence in a kind of step-by-step procedure in which aspects of the authorship question are picked up, further developed, and enriched with new material in an attempt to create a general picture. Eusebius does not speak out for or against individual or collective authorship, but rather allows for combining the two. A critical survey of the more important suggestions concerning the authorship of the letter in modern scholarship shows the deficiencies of most of the proposals that have been made and in this way indirectly also offer support for the ancient evidence.

Downloaded on 30.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111656151-004/html
Scroll to top button