Startseite Identifying Factors that Influence Terrorist Decisions and Target Selection
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Identifying Factors that Influence Terrorist Decisions and Target Selection

  • Barry C. Ezell , Joshua Behr und Andrew Collins
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. Mai 2012

Currently, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) elicits probabilistic judgments from the intelligence community on actions terrorists may take to attack the continental U.S. For example, how likely is the adversary to choose agent ‘x’ over agent ‘y’ or target ‘a’ over target ‘b’? Eliciting these types of judgments is difficult and time consuming. The National Academies and others have suggested that a better approach may be to elicit information on adversary’s preferences, perceptions, and capabilities and use this information to calculate probabilities of interest to DHS. Some terrorist groups are thinking about using weapons of mass destruction (WMD), each with its own values, perceptions of reality, and capabilities. This presentation details the findings on the factors & relationships among factors that lead to a terrorist decision to initiate an attack against the continental U.S as well as target selection. To accomplish this, we assembled international experts in WMD, adversary modeling, political science, terrorism, psychiatry, social sciences as well as experts from national laboratories, the Commonwealth of Virginia State Fusion Center, and Hampton Roads Emergency Management.This paper provides a summary of the findings from an Adaptive Adversary Workshop. In this paper, we provide an overview of the motivation for and design of the workshop as well as 19 emerging themes. The purpose of the workshop was to illicit expert opinions on terrorist decision-making and target selections in an effort to improve our understanding of adversaries (individuals, local/regional groups, transnational groups, states) who may initiate a bioterrorism attack in the form of releasing biological agents upon U.S. interests. Furthermore, these expert opinions are intended to be used to inform Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) models of terrorist networks. These models must be informed or populated with substantive information about the intelligent and adaptive adversary who may initiate an attack. To this end, a conceptual framework, informed broadly by the social sciences community, is intended to capture the terrorists’ motivations, methods, and decision calculi.

Published Online: 2012-5-23

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Article
  2. Use of Small-Scale Test Data to Enhance Fire-Related Threat, Vulnerability, Consequence and Risk Assessment for Passenger Rail Vehicles
  3. Strategic Cyber Defense: Which Way Forward?
  4. Effect of a Marketing Program on Freshman Student Registration for an Emergency Notification System
  5. Strategic uses of Lessons for Building Collaborative Emergency Management System: Comparative Analysis of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Gustav Response Systems
  6. The Relationship between Turkey's Provinces' Development Levels and Social and Economic Vulnerability to Disasters
  7. A Review of the Key Legal dynamics of Chinese Military Involvement in Domestic Disaster Relief (MI/DDR)
  8. Testing Social Vulnerability Theory: A Quantitative Study of Hurricane Katrina's Perceived Impact on Residents living in FEMA Designated Disaster Areas
  9. If You Can't Trust, Stick to Hierarchy: Structure and Trust as Contingency Factors in Threat Assessment Contexts
  10. Regional Disaster Risk: Assessment and Mitigation Concepts in an All-Hazards Context
  11. Evacuation Patterns of Ethnic Groups Under Fire
  12. Risk Informed Decision Framework for Integrated Evaluation of Countermeasures against CBRN Threats
  13. The Influence of Politics on Federal Disaster Declaration Decision Delays
  14. Cross-Sectoral Scanning of Critical Infrastructures: from Functional Differences to Policy-Relevant Similarities
  15. Identifying Communication Strategies in Cases of Domestic Terrorism: Applying Cultural Context to the Fort Hood Shooting
  16. The Evolving Role of the Public Information Officer: An Examination of Social Media in Emergency Management
  17. Structural Dynamics of Organizations during the Evolution of Interorganizational Networks in Disaster Response
  18. Investigating the Roots of Crisis Management Studies and Outlining Future Trajectories for the Field
  19. The Multiplicity of Actors Involved in Securing America's Food Imports
  20. Homeland Security as International Security? The Case for International Relations as Disciplinary Model
  21. Challenges for Multi-sector Organizations in Tracking and Sheltering Registered Sex Offenders in Disasters
  22. Communicating H1N1 Risk to College Students: A Regional Cross-Sectional Survey Study
  23. Cultural Influence on the Implementation of Incident Command System for Emergency Management of Natural Disasters
  24. Influencing Factors of Emergency Information Spreading in Online Social Networks: A Simulation Approach
  25. Responding in Crises: A Comparative Analysis of Disaster Responses between Mainland China and Taiwan
  26. Updating the National Planning Scenarios: Using Wicked Problems and Capability-Based Planning Concepts for Homeland Security
  27. The 'Titanic Syndrome': Risk and Crisis Management on the Costa Concordia
  28. Book Reviews
  29. Review of Freedom and Order: How Democratic Governments Restrict Civil Liberties after Terrorist Attacks - and Why Sometimes They Don't
  30. Review of National Security Reform: How Commissions Can Drive Change During Crises
  31. Review of The Four Stages of Highly Effective Crisis Management
  32. Communication/News
  33. Public Health's Role in Understanding Community Resilience
  34. Identifying Factors that Influence Terrorist Decisions and Target Selection
  35. Opinion
  36. Emerging Dangers from Direct Botulinum Access and Use
  37. Failing to Establish a Unified Command in Louisiana During Hurricane Katrina
Heruntergeladen am 23.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/1547-7355.1974/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen