Home The Relationship between Turkey's Provinces' Development Levels and Social and Economic Vulnerability to Disasters
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Relationship between Turkey's Provinces' Development Levels and Social and Economic Vulnerability to Disasters

  • Dilek Ozceylan and Erman Coskun
Published/Copyright: May 25, 2012

Disasters are constantly happening in the world and people suffer as a result of these disasters. The Van Earthquake and many others which have occurred in the past few years in Turkey, and disasters around the world like the South Asian Earthquake and the tsunami which followed in 2004, the earthquake in Pakistan, Hurricane Katrina and the humanitarian crisis in Darfur in 2005, the Chinese earthquake in 2009, the Haitian and Chilean earthquakes, and floods in Pakistan in 2010, and finally the Japanese Earthquake and East African drought this year have all shown the extent of the losses caused by disasters.The fact that the level of damage and losses in those disasters are not the same in each country and even in different provinces of a country, and that underdeveloped and developing countries and regions have suffered more damage, suggest the possibility that disaster vulnerability is a problem caused or exasperated by a lower level of development.The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between vulnerability and social and economic development by analyzing a region’s socioeconomic development (SED) level and social and economic vulnerability (SEV) level, and to show the direction and the power of this correlation. In literature there are studies supporting this correlation. Some of these studies claim that social and economic development adds some new dimensions to vulnerability. This study which has been done with data on Turkey’s provinces, uses four different types of analysis to see different dimensions of this correlation. The results show that SEV is partially correlated with SED, yet there are other aspects that appear to be unrelated. Thus in order to reduce future damage and make better planning, detailed vulnerability analyses have to be conducted.

Published Online: 2012-5-25

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Article
  2. Use of Small-Scale Test Data to Enhance Fire-Related Threat, Vulnerability, Consequence and Risk Assessment for Passenger Rail Vehicles
  3. Strategic Cyber Defense: Which Way Forward?
  4. Effect of a Marketing Program on Freshman Student Registration for an Emergency Notification System
  5. Strategic uses of Lessons for Building Collaborative Emergency Management System: Comparative Analysis of Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Gustav Response Systems
  6. The Relationship between Turkey's Provinces' Development Levels and Social and Economic Vulnerability to Disasters
  7. A Review of the Key Legal dynamics of Chinese Military Involvement in Domestic Disaster Relief (MI/DDR)
  8. Testing Social Vulnerability Theory: A Quantitative Study of Hurricane Katrina's Perceived Impact on Residents living in FEMA Designated Disaster Areas
  9. If You Can't Trust, Stick to Hierarchy: Structure and Trust as Contingency Factors in Threat Assessment Contexts
  10. Regional Disaster Risk: Assessment and Mitigation Concepts in an All-Hazards Context
  11. Evacuation Patterns of Ethnic Groups Under Fire
  12. Risk Informed Decision Framework for Integrated Evaluation of Countermeasures against CBRN Threats
  13. The Influence of Politics on Federal Disaster Declaration Decision Delays
  14. Cross-Sectoral Scanning of Critical Infrastructures: from Functional Differences to Policy-Relevant Similarities
  15. Identifying Communication Strategies in Cases of Domestic Terrorism: Applying Cultural Context to the Fort Hood Shooting
  16. The Evolving Role of the Public Information Officer: An Examination of Social Media in Emergency Management
  17. Structural Dynamics of Organizations during the Evolution of Interorganizational Networks in Disaster Response
  18. Investigating the Roots of Crisis Management Studies and Outlining Future Trajectories for the Field
  19. The Multiplicity of Actors Involved in Securing America's Food Imports
  20. Homeland Security as International Security? The Case for International Relations as Disciplinary Model
  21. Challenges for Multi-sector Organizations in Tracking and Sheltering Registered Sex Offenders in Disasters
  22. Communicating H1N1 Risk to College Students: A Regional Cross-Sectional Survey Study
  23. Cultural Influence on the Implementation of Incident Command System for Emergency Management of Natural Disasters
  24. Influencing Factors of Emergency Information Spreading in Online Social Networks: A Simulation Approach
  25. Responding in Crises: A Comparative Analysis of Disaster Responses between Mainland China and Taiwan
  26. Updating the National Planning Scenarios: Using Wicked Problems and Capability-Based Planning Concepts for Homeland Security
  27. The 'Titanic Syndrome': Risk and Crisis Management on the Costa Concordia
  28. Book Reviews
  29. Review of Freedom and Order: How Democratic Governments Restrict Civil Liberties after Terrorist Attacks - and Why Sometimes They Don't
  30. Review of National Security Reform: How Commissions Can Drive Change During Crises
  31. Review of The Four Stages of Highly Effective Crisis Management
  32. Communication/News
  33. Public Health's Role in Understanding Community Resilience
  34. Identifying Factors that Influence Terrorist Decisions and Target Selection
  35. Opinion
  36. Emerging Dangers from Direct Botulinum Access and Use
  37. Failing to Establish a Unified Command in Louisiana During Hurricane Katrina
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/1547-7355.1981/html
Scroll to top button