With increasing life expectancy, neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), as well as neurovascular diseases such as cerebral ischemia, are becoming a rapidly growing worldwide problem causing an increased burden on society. The development of biomarkers is aimed to enable the identification of at-risk individuals, enable early diagnosis, and reflect the progression of disease. Future challenges refer to the need for standardization of known biomarkers on the one hand and the identification of new biomarkers on the other hand. The former is impressively exemplified by a recent study addressing the impact of various types of cerebrospinal fluid collection tubes for detection of total tau, phosphorylated tau, and β-amyloid 1–42 on the diagnosis of AD. This issue was identified as a key issue by the Alzheimer’s Biomarkers Standardization Initiative (ABSI) and recommendations were listed which should be used to enable better standardization between laboratories and enable results for the AD biomarkers to be comparable between different sites. The latter challenge in particular concerns PD and is addressed by the Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI), a comprehensive observational, international, multi-center study designed to identify PD progression biomarkers both to improve understanding of disease etiology and course and to provide crucial tools to enhance the likelihood of success of PD modifying therapeutic trials. With regard to cerebral ischemia, at present there are no clinically validated biomarkers. Nevertheless, the development of a clinically validated biomarker of acute cerebral ischemia would have the potential to facilitate the use of time-sensitive reperfusion strategies, allow for individualization of patient care by predicting relative risk of hemorrhage and volume of penumbral tissue, and add valuable prognostic information for patients presenting with acute stroke. Thereby, it is expected that a panel of biomarkers rather than one single marker will meet these criteria in the future. Unlike cerebral ischemia, cerebral hemorrhage biomarkers will probably be limited to the assessment of prognosis in the course of the disease.
Contents
-
Publicly AvailableBiomarkers for neurological disorders – call for standardizationFebruary 22, 2014
-
Publicly AvailableSignificance of teardrop cells in peripheral blood smearsMarch 15, 2014
-
Publicly AvailableChallenges in the diagnosis and prevention of viral infectionsApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableLaboratory diagnostics of systemic autoimmune diseases – Update 2013April 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableLaboratory diagnostics of non-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableOral glucose tolerance test within the scope of prenatal care: Evaluation 2010–2012April 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableImmunodeficiency and ImmunomonitoringApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableRecommendations for the frequency of ordering laboratory testingApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableEthical challenges of whole genome sequencing in translational research and answers by the EURAT-projectApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableNMR spectroscopy – a modern analytical tool for serum analytics of lipoproteins and metabolitesApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableLegal issues of genome analysisApril 16, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableDFS70 antibodies – biomarkers for the exclusion of ANA-associated autoimmune rheumatic diseasesMay 20, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableA systematic approach to billing laboratory services – the legal frameworkJune 4, 2015
-
Publicly AvailablePlatelet analysis in laboratory hematologyJune 13, 2015
-
Publicly AvailableRelevance and diagnostics of cryoproteinsJune 22, 2015