Band 123, Heft 6

Context Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) are secondary prevention interventions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) with a class 1a indication yet suboptimal utilization. To date, there are only three approved ICR programs. Alternative programing should be explored to increase enrollment and adherence in these interventions. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Strong Hearts program in cardiovascular patients following a major cardiovascular event. Methods One hundred ninety-seven (n = 197) participants were enrolled in this prospective, nonrandomized study. Patients were eligible for participation if they were referred by a physician after a major cardiovascular event, defined as any of the following: (1) acute myocardial infarction (MI) within the preceding 12 months; (2) current stable or unstable angina pectoris; (3) heart valve procedure; (4) percutaneous intervention of any kind; (5) heart transplant; (6) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); or (7) congestive heart failure (CHF) with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Participants were asked to attend program visits four times per week for 9 weeks. Visits consisted of individualized exercise and intensive healthy lifestyle education. Paired t tests were utilized to compare pre- and postprogram outcome measures. Results One hundred twenty-eight (n = 128) participants completed the program within the 9-week time frame and their outcome measures were included in the data analysis. Among this, 35.2% participants were female and 64.8% were male. The mean age was 65 (range, 19-88). Qualifying diagnoses were percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 60, 46.9%), CABG (33, 25.8%), angina (24, 18.8%), valve procedures (8, 6.2%), and CHF (3, 2.3%). After implementation of the intervention, statistically significant decreases in weight (P < .001), body mass index (BMI, P < .001), waist circumference (P < .001), triglycerides (P = .01), systolic blood pressure (SBP, P <.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP, P = .002), total fat mass (P < .001), Dartmouth Quality of Life Index P < .001), and cardiac depression scores (P = .044) were detected. In other instances, there were statistically significant increases across time for the clinical parameters of high-density lipoprotein (HDL, P = .02), Vitamin D (P = .001), metabolic equivalents (METS, P < .001), Duke activity scores (P < .001), and Rate Your Plate nutrition scores (P < .001). There were no significant changes across time for total cholesterol (P = .17), low-density lipoprotein (LDL, P = .21), A1c (P = .27), or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) total lean mass (P = .86). Conclusions The 9-week structured program resulted in significant cardiovascular benefit to patients with CVD by reducing cardiac risk factors, increasing exercise capacity, and improving quality of life.

Context Some racial and ethnic groups are underrepresented in the medical field because they face unique barriers to admission to medical school. One admission requirement that can present a barrier for applicants is the physician letter of recommendation (PLOR). Undergraduate students report confusion with the application process and lack of mentorship to be two of their biggest challenges to becoming a doctor. It is especially challenging to those who already have limited access to practicing physicians. Therefore, we hypothesized that in the presence of a PLOR requirement, the diversity of students who apply and matriculate into medical school will be decreased. Objectives This study aims to determine if a relationship exists between a PLOR requirement for the medical school application and the proportion of underrepresented in medicine (URM) students applying and matriculating to that school. Methods A retrospective study was conducted utilizing data published by the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Application Services (AACOMAS) on the race and ethnicity of applicants and matriculants to osteopathic medical schools during the years 2009–2019. In total, 35 osteopathic schools with 44 campuses were included in the study. Schools were grouped based on whether they required a PLOR. For each group of schools, descriptive statistics were performed for the following variables: number of total applicants, class size, application rate per ethnicity, matriculation rate per ethnicity, number of applicants per ethnicity, number of matriculants per ethnicity, and percentage of student body per ethnicity. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to detect differences between the two groups. Statistical significance was assessed at the α=0.05 level. Results Schools that required a PLOR showed decreases in the number of applicants across all races and ethnicities. Black students showed the greatest difference between groups and were the only ethnicity to show significant reductions across all outcomes in the presence of a PLOR requirement. On average, schools that required a PLOR have 37.3% (185 vs. 295; p<0.0001) fewer Black applicants and 51.2% (4 vs. 8.2; p<0.0001) fewer Black matriculants. Conclusions This study strongly suggests a relationship between requiring a PLOR’s and decreasing racial and ethnic diversity in medical school matriculants, specifically the Black applicants. Based on this result, it is recommended that the requirement of a PLOR be discontinued for osteopathic medical schools.

Context The acquisition of clinical skills is an essential part of the osteopathic medical school curriculum. Preclinical medical students, especially at osteopathic medical schools, have limited exposure to abnormal physical examination (PE) findings that are not typically seen in a student’s peers or in a standardized patient (SP). The early exposure of first-year medical students (MS1s) to normal and abnormal findings in the simulation settings better equips them to identify abnormalities when they encounter them in a clinical setting. Objectives The aim of this project was to develop and implement the introductory course on learning abnormal PE signs and pathophysiology of abnormal clinical findings to address the educational needs of MS1s. Methods The didactic part of the course consisted of PowerPoint presentations and lecture on the topics related to the simulation. The practical skill session was 60 min, during which time students first practiced PE signs and then were assessed on their ability to accurately identify abnormal PE signs on a high-fidelity (HF) mannequin. Faculty instructors guided students through clinical cases and challenged them with probing questions in clinically relevant content. Before- and after-simulation evaluations were created to assess students’ skills and confidence. Student satisfaction levels after the training course were also assessed. Results This study demonstrated significant improvements in five PE skills (p<0.0001) after the introductory course of abnormal PE clinical signs. The average score for five clinical skills increased from 63.1 to 88.74% (before to after simulation). The confidence of students in performing clinical skills and their understanding of the pathophysiology of abnormal clinical findings also increased significantly (p<0.0001) after simulation activity and educational instruction. The average confidence score increased from 3.3 to 4.5% (before to after simulation) on a 5-point Likert scale. Survey results demonstrated high satisfaction with the course among learners with mean satisfaction score 4.7 ± 0.4 on 5-point Likert scale. The introductory course was well received by MS1s and they left positive feedback. Conclusions This introductory course offered MS1s with novice PE skills the ability to learn a variety of abnormal PE signs, including heart murmurs and rhythms, lung sounds, measurement of blood pressure (BP), and palpation of the femoral pulse. This course also allowed abnormal PE findings to be taught in a time-efficient and faculty-resource–efficient manner.

Context In recent years, patient-centered healthcare has become a primary concern for researchers and healthcare professionals. When included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures serve a critical role in supplementing efficacy outcomes with a patient perspective. Objectives The goals of this study are to evaluate the reporting completeness of PROs within literature concerning carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) utilizing the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Patient-Reported Outcomes (CONSORT-PRO) extension. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for published RCTs relating to CTS with at least one PRO measure from 2006 to 2020. Two investigators screened all RCTs for inclusion utilizing Rayyan (https://rayyan.qcri.org/), a systematic review screening platform. In an independent, masked fashion, investigators then evaluated all RCTs utilizing the CONSORT-PRO adaptation and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool. Bivariate regression analyses were utilized to assess relationships between trial characteristics and completeness of reporting. Results Our search returned 374 publications, yet only 31 unique RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The mean overall percent of adherence for CONSORT-PRO was 41%. Our secondary outcome—assessing study characteristics—indicated significantly higher completeness of reporting in the absence of a conflict of interest statement (p<0.05), ‘some concerns’ for bias (p<0.005), and when journals required the use of the CONSORT statement (p<0.005). The RoB assessment determined overall suspicion for bias among included RCTs, with 35% (n=11/31) being labeled as ‘high,’ 58% (n=18/31) as ‘some concerns,’ and 7% (n=2/31) as ‘low.’ Conclusions Our study indicated that the completeness of CONSORT-PRO reporting was deficient within CTS trials. Because of the importance placed on PROs in clinical practice, we recommend adherence to CONSORT-PRO prior to publication of RCTs to increase the understanding of various interventions on patients’ quality of life (QoL).

Context Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been established as a beneficial and noninvasive treatment option for multiple conditions. With the total number of osteopathic providers tripling and the subsequent increase in osteopathic physician representation, we would expect the clinical use of OMT to increase accordingly. Objectives To that end, we evaluated the utilization and reimbursement of OMT services among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 98925 to 98929 were accessed from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from 2000 to 2019. These codes indicate OMT treatment, 98925 (1–2 body regions treated), 98926 (3–4 body regions treated), 98927 (5–6 body regions treated), 98928 (7–8 body regions treated), and 98929 (9–10 body regions treated). Monetary reimbursement from Medicare was adjusted for inflation, and total code volume was scaled to codes per 10,000 beneficiaries to account for the increase in Medicare enrollment. Results Overall OMT utilization declined between 2000 and 2019 by 24.5%. A significant downward trend in the utilization of CPT codes for OMT involving fewer body regions (98925–98927) was observed, and was contrasted by a slight upward trend in the use of codes for more body regions (98928, 98929). The adjusted sum reimbursement of all codes decreased by 23.2%. Lower value codes showed a higher rate of decline, whereas higher value codes changed less dramatically. Conclusions We conjecture that lower remuneration for OMT has disincentivized physicians financially and may have contributed to the overall decline in OMT utilization among Medicare patients, along with a decreased number of residencies offering specific training in OMT, and increased billing complexity. In considering the upward trend of higher-value code usage, it is possible that some physicians are increasing the comprehensiveness of their physical assessment and associated OMT to reduce the overall financial impact of reimbursement cuts.

Context Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a high mortality rate and a large financial burden. Therefore, it is imperative to screen appropriately for this disease. By evaluating trends in different CRC screening methods and evaluating screening methods based on sex and race, improvements in screening can be made. Objectives By analyzing data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), our primary objective was to evaluate trends in CRC screening methods from 2018 through 2020. Our secondary objectives were to investigate deviations in screening rates by sex and race/ethnicity. Methods A cross-sectional design was utilized to analyze trends in CRC screening methods utilizing data from the BRFSS for the years 2018 through 2020. Sex and race were also analyzed to evaluate for deviations in screening rates. Results All race/ethnicity groups most often completed colonoscopies, with all but individuals identifying as Hispanic having higher than 56% completion rates. Individuals reporting as Hispanic received more blood stool tests than other races at 23.4%. Average CRC screening among all methods showed that 89.7% of individuals who reported as being White completed screening, with 91.3% of individuals reporting as Black, and 81.9% with race not listed, completed screening. Individuals identifying as Asian (74.4%), American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN [79.2%]) and Hispanic (78.1%) had lower rates of screening overall. Conclusions Our study found that trends in CRC screening were similar across years for individuals who reported as being White or Black. We also found that those identifying as Asian, AI/AN, Hispanic, and those whose identifying race was not listed deviated across years. These latter groups were also less likely to have received colonoscopies, the gold standard of screening. Because CRC is oftentimes a preventable disease, the importance of appropriate screening cannot be emphasized enough.