Startseite Ensuring adequate power: the importance of statistically significant results in osteopathic research
Artikel Open Access

Ensuring adequate power: the importance of statistically significant results in osteopathic research

  • Amanda DiSabato EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. März 2023

To the Editor,

In “Effect of visceral manipulation on menstrual complaints in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome,” Yosri et al. [1] found that visceral manipulation with a low-calorie diet improved menstrual pain, menstrual irregularities, and premenstrual symptoms compared to a low-calorie diet alone. However, the authors did not perform an a priori power analysis to inform their sample size. With a sample size of only 30 patients, the internal validity of this study is questionable. The internal validity of a randomized trial depends largely on an appropriate sample size, which must be determined with an a priori sample size calculation to ensure adequate power [2]. The authors stated that they utilized a convenience sample, which is presumably why they did not include an a priori analysis. A convenience sample can be appropriate in the early stages of hypothesis generation; an encouraging result from a convenience sample can then prompt further study to more definitively answer the research question. The use of a convenience sample, however, only permits a study’s results to be described as preliminary and as a call to further research. Yosri et al. [1] did not acknowledge their use of a convenience sample in their limitations and presented their data as providing a definitive answer to this research question. Without an a priori power analysis, it is impossible to know whether this study was adequately powered to identify a meaningful result. Historically, many people have dismissed osteopathic literature as not evidence-based [3]. This dismissal has resulted in osteopathic practices and principles being undervalued by osteopaths and non-osteopaths alike. Within this context, it is of vital importance to ensure that osteopathic research include methodologic rigor that is as pristine as possible.


Corresponding author: Amanda DiSabato, DO, Resident Physician, OhioHealth Riverside Family Medicine Residency, 697 Thomas Lane, Columbus, OH 43214, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None reported.

  2. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: None reported.

References

1. Yosri, MM, Hamada, HA, Yousef, AM. Effect of visceral manipulation on menstrual complaints in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Osteopath Med 2022;122:411–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2021-0255.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Kang, H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2021;18:17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Steel, A, Sundberg, T, Reid, R, Ward, L, Bishop, FL, Leach, M, et al.. Osteopathic manipulative treatment: a systematic review and critical appraisal of comparative effectiveness and health economics research. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017;27:165–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2016.10.067. 27852531.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-08-16
Accepted: 2023-02-14
Published Online: 2023-03-06

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Heruntergeladen am 28.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jom-2022-0172/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen