Startseite Geschichte 3 George Orwell, pan-Africanism and reconciling antiimperialism with ‘Britishness’
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

3 George Orwell, pan-Africanism and reconciling antiimperialism with ‘Britishness’

  • Theo Williams
Weitere Titel anzeigen von Manchester University Press
Anti-racism in Britain
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Anti-racism in Britain

Abstract

This chapter explores how activist-intellectuals on the British left attempted to reconcile ‘Britishness’ and ‘Englishness’ with anti-imperialism, focusing particularly on the political thought of George Orwell, George Padmore and C. L. R. James. In so doing, the chapter moves beyond the usual scholarly concern with Orwell’s Burma writings to examine his (anti-)imperialist politics during the late 1930s and the 1940s. Orwell can productively be read in conjunction with figures such as James and Padmore for a number of reasons: perhaps most obviously because of the synchronicity of their works and their shared association with the Independent Labour Party, but also because each held a sense of ‘Britishness’/‘Englishness’ that was forged in a colonial context. Padmore and James, through embracing certain forms of British identity, made claims for the ending of colonial subjecthood and the creation of a socialist commonwealth. Orwell invoked English patriotism as the basis of a future socialist revolution. These invocations of ‘Britishness’ and ‘Englishness’ were not identical, but each hinged on recovering and reinterpreting what the respective actor considered to be radical traditions of Britishness or Englishness in order to serve a contemporary left-wing end. Ultimately, Orwell’s politics would diverge from James and Padmore’s, as he supported the British war effort during the Second World War, while James and Padmore opposed it. But this episode points to an instructive example of how left-wing actors have sought to reconcile anti-imperialism with Britishness, and the fault lines they have encountered in doing so.

Abstract

This chapter explores how activist-intellectuals on the British left attempted to reconcile ‘Britishness’ and ‘Englishness’ with anti-imperialism, focusing particularly on the political thought of George Orwell, George Padmore and C. L. R. James. In so doing, the chapter moves beyond the usual scholarly concern with Orwell’s Burma writings to examine his (anti-)imperialist politics during the late 1930s and the 1940s. Orwell can productively be read in conjunction with figures such as James and Padmore for a number of reasons: perhaps most obviously because of the synchronicity of their works and their shared association with the Independent Labour Party, but also because each held a sense of ‘Britishness’/‘Englishness’ that was forged in a colonial context. Padmore and James, through embracing certain forms of British identity, made claims for the ending of colonial subjecthood and the creation of a socialist commonwealth. Orwell invoked English patriotism as the basis of a future socialist revolution. These invocations of ‘Britishness’ and ‘Englishness’ were not identical, but each hinged on recovering and reinterpreting what the respective actor considered to be radical traditions of Britishness or Englishness in order to serve a contemporary left-wing end. Ultimately, Orwell’s politics would diverge from James and Padmore’s, as he supported the British war effort during the Second World War, while James and Padmore opposed it. But this episode points to an instructive example of how left-wing actors have sought to reconcile anti-imperialism with Britishness, and the fault lines they have encountered in doing so.

Heruntergeladen am 10.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526171122.00009/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen