Home History 6 British Jews and the Race Relations Acts
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

6 British Jews and the Race Relations Acts

  • Joseph Finlay
View more publications by Manchester University Press
Anti-racism in Britain
This chapter is in the book Anti-racism in Britain

Abstract

This chapter uncovers the forgotten Jewish contribution to the Race Relations Acts of 1965, 1968 and 1976. It discusses the Jewish lawyers who helped draft the Act, the actions of Jewish bodies such as the Board of Deputies in lobbying for it, and the parliamentary discussions of Jews in the debates preceding its implementation. It shows that the protection of New Commonwealth immigrants from discrimination was not the only, or even the main, impetus for the 1965 Act; another key parliamentary motivation was the early 1960s upsurge in neo-fascist activity. Protection from incitement was the key concern of Jewish organisations in lobbying Parliament, and the eventual legalisation provided much stronger sanctions against it, in comparison to the conciliation mechanism provided to deal with complaints of discrimination. Whilst discrimination against Jews continued to exist, both MPs and Jewish bodies behaved as if it only impacted Black and Asian citizens. Ultimately, the Act had several consequences for Jews: they were brought under the legal umbrella of race relations, without ever having sought to be covered by it; they never enjoyed protection from discrimination or incitement on religious grounds, as religion was excluded from its remit; and the measures designed to protect them were placed in a separate part of the Act from those designed to protect Black and Asian Britons from discrimination. This separation, and the associated divide between antisemitism and racism, would continue to reverberate throughout subsequent decades.

Abstract

This chapter uncovers the forgotten Jewish contribution to the Race Relations Acts of 1965, 1968 and 1976. It discusses the Jewish lawyers who helped draft the Act, the actions of Jewish bodies such as the Board of Deputies in lobbying for it, and the parliamentary discussions of Jews in the debates preceding its implementation. It shows that the protection of New Commonwealth immigrants from discrimination was not the only, or even the main, impetus for the 1965 Act; another key parliamentary motivation was the early 1960s upsurge in neo-fascist activity. Protection from incitement was the key concern of Jewish organisations in lobbying Parliament, and the eventual legalisation provided much stronger sanctions against it, in comparison to the conciliation mechanism provided to deal with complaints of discrimination. Whilst discrimination against Jews continued to exist, both MPs and Jewish bodies behaved as if it only impacted Black and Asian citizens. Ultimately, the Act had several consequences for Jews: they were brought under the legal umbrella of race relations, without ever having sought to be covered by it; they never enjoyed protection from discrimination or incitement on religious grounds, as religion was excluded from its remit; and the measures designed to protect them were placed in a separate part of the Act from those designed to protect Black and Asian Britons from discrimination. This separation, and the associated divide between antisemitism and racism, would continue to reverberate throughout subsequent decades.

Downloaded on 10.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526171122.00013/html
Scroll to top button