Home Social Sciences Chapter 13 Welfare to Work and the Organisation of Opportunity: European and American approaches from a British perspective
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 13 Welfare to Work and the Organisation of Opportunity: European and American approaches from a British perspective

  • Martin Evans
View more publications by Policy Press
What future for social security?
This chapter is in the book What future for social security?

Abstract

The phrase ‘welfare to work’ describes policies that move people who claim out-ofwork social transfers into the labour market. But as use of the phrase has grown its precision has suffered. It is used cross-nationally to refer to schemes but often refers to very differently conceived and targeted programmes. The recent US influence on British policy-both in the adoption of the phrase itself and in policy design (for example, Deacon 1999, Walker 1998, Wilson et al. 1998) has been obvious but there are also European influences. The danger for policy analysis is that the term ‘welfare to work’ is used rhetorically by policy makers who can portray policy outcomes in simple headline terms, especially in the USA. This means that when their counterparts in other countries look abroad and draw conclusions about foreign policy performance they often do so without any requirement to confuse a politically simple message with complexities of fact and context.

Comparing policy design and implementation across different countries must get behind the rhetoric in order to understand what programmes apply to which target groups under what circumstances. This is often difficult because the different national policy contexts often mean that the ‘welfare’ target groups are not only different in composition but also have very different underlying entitlements to cash transfers. The word ‘welfare’ only refers to unemployed social assistance claimants in some countries while in others the term is wide enough to encompass social insurance claimants of both unemployment and invalidity benefits. This chapter uses a three-part categorisation of common elements of policy based on the phrase ‘welfare to work’ itself.

Abstract

The phrase ‘welfare to work’ describes policies that move people who claim out-ofwork social transfers into the labour market. But as use of the phrase has grown its precision has suffered. It is used cross-nationally to refer to schemes but often refers to very differently conceived and targeted programmes. The recent US influence on British policy-both in the adoption of the phrase itself and in policy design (for example, Deacon 1999, Walker 1998, Wilson et al. 1998) has been obvious but there are also European influences. The danger for policy analysis is that the term ‘welfare to work’ is used rhetorically by policy makers who can portray policy outcomes in simple headline terms, especially in the USA. This means that when their counterparts in other countries look abroad and draw conclusions about foreign policy performance they often do so without any requirement to confuse a politically simple message with complexities of fact and context.

Comparing policy design and implementation across different countries must get behind the rhetoric in order to understand what programmes apply to which target groups under what circumstances. This is often difficult because the different national policy contexts often mean that the ‘welfare’ target groups are not only different in composition but also have very different underlying entitlements to cash transfers. The word ‘welfare’ only refers to unemployed social assistance claimants in some countries while in others the term is wide enough to encompass social insurance claimants of both unemployment and invalidity benefits. This chapter uses a three-part categorisation of common elements of policy based on the phrase ‘welfare to work’ itself.

Downloaded on 10.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447367017-016/html
Scroll to top button