Präsentiert durch Paradigm Publishing Services

Policy Press

Startseite Policy Press Chapter 7 Social divisions: class, gender, ethnicity – and more
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 7 Social divisions: class, gender, ethnicity – and more

  • , und

Abstract

We have seen how research grows out of historical social conditions. As times change, so the problems, strategies and, indeed, the very methods of research are transformed. Even the histories of disciplines and research can come to look out of date very quickly. Reading A. H. Halsey’s A History of Sociology (2004) is salutary: it shows how few women were involved before the 1970s, how there was a major neglect of race, and demonstrates the lack of interest in anything remotely postcolonial or ‘queer’. Halsey’s important history, published only 17 years ago, already documents a very different bygone world: a much more gentlemanly and privileged world. The worlds of research methods and its subjects keep being constructed and reconstructed, moving on through time and space.

In this chapter, we take issues of class, race and gender as major examples. Ill-defined and often absent in research of earlier periods, these become key issues strategically developed through research fields and methodologies. We show briefly how by the mid-1980s a major multiple/intersectional research field of social divisions was being carved out – one that did not exist before.

As Frank Bechhofer recalled of the 1950s:We thought, everybody had been studying the working-class, it is a miracle that the working-class of Britain did not rise as a man and slaughter the sociologists, even if they didn’t overthrow the government, because every sociologist in Britain seemed to be studying the luckless working-class! I mean, I think every miner had their own sociologist! It was really strange! (p 15)

Abstract

We have seen how research grows out of historical social conditions. As times change, so the problems, strategies and, indeed, the very methods of research are transformed. Even the histories of disciplines and research can come to look out of date very quickly. Reading A. H. Halsey’s A History of Sociology (2004) is salutary: it shows how few women were involved before the 1970s, how there was a major neglect of race, and demonstrates the lack of interest in anything remotely postcolonial or ‘queer’. Halsey’s important history, published only 17 years ago, already documents a very different bygone world: a much more gentlemanly and privileged world. The worlds of research methods and its subjects keep being constructed and reconstructed, moving on through time and space.

In this chapter, we take issues of class, race and gender as major examples. Ill-defined and often absent in research of earlier periods, these become key issues strategically developed through research fields and methodologies. We show briefly how by the mid-1980s a major multiple/intersectional research field of social divisions was being carved out – one that did not exist before.

As Frank Bechhofer recalled of the 1950s:We thought, everybody had been studying the working-class, it is a miracle that the working-class of Britain did not rise as a man and slaughter the sociologists, even if they didn’t overthrow the government, because every sociologist in Britain seemed to be studying the luckless working-class! I mean, I think every miner had their own sociologist! It was really strange! (p 15)

Heruntergeladen am 28.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447333531-017/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen