Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

Policy Press

Home Policy Press Voices 4 Old and new trends
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Voices 4 Old and new trends

  • , and

Abstract

Research projects are rarely straightforward. However logically first planned, their success depends on negotiating misfortunes such as ill-health or interpersonal competition, and also rivalry between different groups in the wider research world. Here are some accounts of conflict and also of building up research groupings. Much was expected of Margaret Stacey’s second Banbury Study. It proved a disappointment, and a turning point, the start of the decline of community studies. Colin Bell, lead fieldwork researcher, reflects on the tangle of intellectual doubts and personal difficulties which led to this crucial disappointment: So, to Banbury. Your Tikopia. You once wrote, ‘Banbury will forever be the social system with which I compare all else. It is my Nuer land and my Tikopia.’ You see, that’s there. You see, it was there, I really wanted to be a proper anthropologist! I think that’s no longer true. And I went through Banbury fairly recently, and was quite sort of taken aback with the changes. But it was, it was expansive fieldwork. It was a full community. It was a full range, there were poor people, there were titled people. It had a working economy, an aluminium factory. While we were there General Foods moved Maxwell House Coffee and Birds Custard out of the centre of Birmingham to Banbury... I think, this is almost metaphysical, and I don’t really think I understood – I do now – the constraints that anyone who does a replication, is going to be under, if the person who wrote the first study, which is a bloody good book – a bloody good book – the constraints I was actually under, and I don’t think, deep down, I didn’t own those constraints, I hadn’t internalised those constraints.

Abstract

Research projects are rarely straightforward. However logically first planned, their success depends on negotiating misfortunes such as ill-health or interpersonal competition, and also rivalry between different groups in the wider research world. Here are some accounts of conflict and also of building up research groupings. Much was expected of Margaret Stacey’s second Banbury Study. It proved a disappointment, and a turning point, the start of the decline of community studies. Colin Bell, lead fieldwork researcher, reflects on the tangle of intellectual doubts and personal difficulties which led to this crucial disappointment: So, to Banbury. Your Tikopia. You once wrote, ‘Banbury will forever be the social system with which I compare all else. It is my Nuer land and my Tikopia.’ You see, that’s there. You see, it was there, I really wanted to be a proper anthropologist! I think that’s no longer true. And I went through Banbury fairly recently, and was quite sort of taken aback with the changes. But it was, it was expansive fieldwork. It was a full community. It was a full range, there were poor people, there were titled people. It had a working economy, an aluminium factory. While we were there General Foods moved Maxwell House Coffee and Birds Custard out of the centre of Birmingham to Banbury... I think, this is almost metaphysical, and I don’t really think I understood – I do now – the constraints that anyone who does a replication, is going to be under, if the person who wrote the first study, which is a bloody good book – a bloody good book – the constraints I was actually under, and I don’t think, deep down, I didn’t own those constraints, I hadn’t internalised those constraints.

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447333531-012/html
Scroll to top button