Startseite Algorithms for Two Gate Optimization in Injection Molding
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Algorithms for Two Gate Optimization in Injection Molding

  • M. Zhai , Y. C. Lam und C. K. Au
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. April 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In injection molding, the injection pressure is often limited by the capacity of injection machines. Therefore, for large-volume part, multiple gates are needed so that the maximum flow path can be shortened, with a corresponding decrease in injection pressure. Many components produced by injection molding today require more than one gate. As multiple gates affect resin flow in a mold interactively, their locations might not be easily determined. For a mold with two gates, a pressure gradient search scheme (PGSS) is proposed to optimize their locations in this investigation. A search direction associated with pressure gradient is developed based on the physical nature of the mold-filling process. An alternative scheme based on genetic algorithm is also employed for comparison. Through minimizing the objective function of injection pressure, the optimum gates can be located to achieve balanced flow. Examples indicate that the proposed pressure gradient search scheme is more efficient than genetic algorithm for two gate location optimization.


Mail address: M. Zhai, School of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 E-mail:

References

1 Pandelidis, I., Zou, Q.: Poly. Eng. Sci.30(15), p. 883 (1990).10.1002/pen.760301503Suche in Google Scholar

2 Britton, G. A., Deng, Y.-M., Lam, Y. C.: Journal of Injection Molding Technology6(4), p. 305 (2002).Suche in Google Scholar

3 Lam, Y. C., Britton, G. A., Deng, Y.-M.: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology in press.Suche in Google Scholar

4 Lee, B. H., Kim, B. H.: Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering34 (5), p. 793 (1995).10.1080/03602559508009600Suche in Google Scholar

5 Park, S. J., Kwon, T. H.: Poly. Eng. Sci.38 (9), p. 1450 (1998).10.1002/pen.10316Suche in Google Scholar

6 Lam, Y. C., Zhai, L.Y., Tai, K., Fok, S. C.: International Journal of Production Research in press.Suche in Google Scholar

7 Lam, Y. C., Seow, L. W.: Poly. Eng. Sci.40 (6), p. 1273 (2000).10.1002/pen.11255Suche in Google Scholar

8 Jin, S., Lam, Y. C.: Journal of Injection Molding Technology6 (4), p. 284 (2002).Suche in Google Scholar

9 Pandelidis, I., Zhou, Q.: Poly. Eng. Sci.30 (15), p. 873 (1990).10.1002/pen.760301502Suche in Google Scholar

10 Lam, Y. C., Jin, S.: Journal of Injection Molding Technology5 (3), p. 180 (2001).Suche in Google Scholar

11 Gokce, A., Hsiao, K., Advani, S. G.: Composites: Part A, 33, p. 1263 (2002).10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00047-7Suche in Google Scholar

12 Lee, B. H., Kim, B. H.: Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering35 (2), p. 253 (1996).10.1080/03602559608000583Suche in Google Scholar

13 Young, W. B.: Journal of Composite Material12 (28), p. 1098 (1994).10.1177/002199839402801202Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-4-14
Accepted: 2004-12-9
Published Online: 2013-04-30
Published in Print: 2005-03-01

© 2005, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.1860/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen