Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Area function calibration in nanoindentation using the hardness instead of Young's modulus of fused silica as a reference value

Published/Copyright: May 23, 2013

Abstract

For nanoindentation hardness and Young's modulus measurements the area function of the indenter has to be calibrated carefully since direct measurement of the contact area is not possible. Most often this is done by making a series of indentations into a material with known Young's modulus, e. g. fused silica. In this paper it will be shown that this method may lead to significant deviations in hardness values found over the lifetime of the indenter due to successive rounding of the tip. Additionally, depth-dependent hardness values may apparently be found which would falsify all hardness determinations. Using instead the hardness of fused silica as a reference value these problems will be avoided. Additionally, the calibration becomes independent of material constants such as the Young's modulus of the diamond tip and the Poisson ratios of both indenter and sample, which enter into the conventional calibration method.

Finally, this paper discusses whether the indentation modulus determined by nanoindentation and the Young's modulus determined by, for example, tensile testing, are quantitatively equal. This is a precondition for the traceability of the Young's modulus method often mentioned as its main advantage.


* Correspondence address, Dr. Kirsten Ingolf Schiffmann, Fraunhofer Institut für Schicht- und Oberflächentechnik, Bienroder Weg 54E, D-38108 Braunschweig, Germany, Tel.: +49 531 2155 577, Fax: +49 531 2155 900, E-mail: , www.ist.fhg.de

References

[1] W.C.Oliver, G.M.Pharr: J. Mater. Res.7 (6) (1992) 1564.10.1557/JMR.1992.1564Search in Google Scholar

[2] ISO 14577-1, (Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters), European Committee for Standardization, Bruxelles (2000).Search in Google Scholar

[3] N.M.Jennet, A.S.Maxwell, K.Lawrence, L.N.McCartney, R.Hunt, J.Koskinen, J.Meneve, W.Wegener, T.Muukkonen, F.Rossi, N.Gibson, Z.Xu, A.J.Bushby, S.Brookes, A.Cavaleiro, K.Herrmann, B.Bellaton, R.Consiglio, F.Augereau, O.Kolosov, D.Schneider, T.Chudoba: INDICOAT Final Report, Determination of Hardness and Modulus of Thin Films and Coatings by Nanoindentation, NPL Report, London (2001), ISSN 1473-2734.Search in Google Scholar

[4] U.Hangen: 1. Hysitron User Meeting (1999) Braunschweig, Germany.Search in Google Scholar

[5] K.I.Schiffmann, R.L.Küster: Int. J. Mat. Res. (Z. Metallkd.)95 (2004) 311.Search in Google Scholar

[6] G.Simmons, H.Wang: Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties: A Handbook; M.I.T. Press (1971)Search in Google Scholar

[7] T.Chudoba, F.Richter: Surf. Coat. Technol.148 (2001) 191.10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01340-8Search in Google Scholar

[8] S.Stauss, P.Schwaller, J.-L.Bucaille, R.Rabe, L.Rohr, J.Michler, E.Blank: Microelectron. Eng.67–68 (2003) 818.Search in Google Scholar

[9] C.S.Oh, H.J.Lee, S.G.Ko, S.W.Kim, H.G.Ahn: Sens. Actuators A117 (2005) 151.10.1016/j.sna.2004.06.008Search in Google Scholar

[10] M.Yang, Y.Akiyama, T.Sasaki: J. Mater. Process. Technol.151 (2004) 232.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.114Search in Google Scholar

[11] M.R.VanLandingham: J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol.108 (2003) 249.10.6028/jres.108.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2007-1-12
Accepted: 2007-3-15
Published Online: 2013-05-23
Published in Print: 2007-05-01

© 2007, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/146.101488/html
Scroll to top button