Startseite Optimized random sampling for the load level method in Wöhler tests
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Optimized random sampling for the load level method in Wöhler tests

  • Barbara Iglisch , Stefan Jetter und Bernd Bertsche
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. November 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

For the optimal planning of Wöhler tests, DIN 50100 offers tables with different methods, such as the load level method, the pearl-string method and staircase method, to identify the required minimum sample size. Based on this norm, the sampling planning by means of the load level method was optimized in this work. Analytical formulas were developed with statistical methods. These formulas enable a fast estimation of the sample size for arbitrary use cases. Another optimization was the implementation of varying standard deviation within the area of fatigue strength in the load level method corresponding to DIN 50100. This optimization decreases the sample size compared to a constant standard deviation. Both optimizations were implemented via a MATLAB® based tool which also contains the methods of DIN 50100.


*Correspondence Address, Stefan Jetter, Am Stettberg 47, 72336 Balingen, Germany, E-mail:

MSc Barbara Iglisch, was born in 1989. From 2012 to 2018 she studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Stuttgart. After her Master's degree, she started working as a Testing Engineer at the P3 Systems GmbH in Böblingen.

MSc Stefan Jetter, born in 1989, began his studies of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Stuttgart in 2009. After his Master's degree in 2014, he worked as a PhD student for the Daimler AG in cooperation with the Institute of Machine Components at the University of Stuttgart. Since 2017, he has been working in the chassis development at Daimler AG in Sindelfingen, responsible for the prediction of durability.

Prof. Dr.-Ing Bernd Bertsche earned his degree and Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Stuttgart. Afterwards, he worked for Mercedes-Benz AG in the passenger car development unit followed by a position as Professor at the University of Applied Sciences in Albstadt-Sigmaringen. Later, he received a Professorship at the University of Stuttgart. Since 2001, Professor Bertsche is the ordinary Professor and Director for the Institute of Machine Components at the University of Stuttgart.


References

1 E.Haibach: Betriebsfestigkeit, 3rd Ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006) 10.1007/3-540-29364-7Suche in Google Scholar

2 D.Radaj, M.Vormwald: Ermüdungsfestigkeit. Grundlagen für Ingenieure, 3rd Ed., Springer, Berlin, Germany (2007) 10.1007/978-3-540-71459-0Suche in Google Scholar

3 B.Bertsche, G.Lechner: Reliability in automotive and mechanical engineering, Springer, Berlin, Germany (2008) 10.1007/978-3-540-34282-3Suche in Google Scholar

4 DIN 50100: Schwingfestigkeitsversuch – Durchführung und Auswertung von zyklischen Versuchen mit konstanter Lastamplitude für metallische Werkstoffproben und Bauteile, Beuth-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (2016) 10.31030/2580844Suche in Google Scholar

5 C.Müller: Zur statistischen Auswertung experimenteller Wöhlerlinien, Dissertation, Technical University of Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany (2015) 10.21268/20150522-095904Suche in Google Scholar

6 J.Schijve: Fatigue predictions and scatter, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures17 (2004), No. 4, pp. 38139610.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00239.xSuche in Google Scholar

7 A.Wöhler: Über die Festigkeitsversuche mit Eisen und Stahl, Zeitschrift für Bauwesen20 (1870), pp. 73106 URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:109-1-13959565Suche in Google Scholar

8 M.Hück: Ein verbessertes Verfahren für die Auswertung von Treppenstufenversuchen, Zeitschrift für Werkstofftechnik14 (1983), No. 12, pp. 40641710.1002/mawe.19830141207Suche in Google Scholar

9 A.Martin, K.Hinkelmann, A.Esderts: Zur Auswertung von Schwingfestigkeitsversuchen im Zeitfestigkeitsbereich: Teil 1: Wie zuverlässig können 50 %-Wöhlerlinien aus experimentellen Daten geschätzt werden?, Materials Testing53 (2011), No. 9, pp. 50251210.3139/120.110255Suche in Google Scholar

10 A.Martin, K.Hinkelmann, A.Esderts: Zur Auswertung von Schwingfestigkeitsversuchen im Zeitfestigkeitsbereich: Teil 2: Wie zuverlässig kann die Standardabweichung aus experimentellen Daten geschätzt werden?, Materials Testing53 (2011), No. 9, pp. 51352110.3139/120.110256Suche in Google Scholar

11 VDI 4008-6: Monte Carlo simulation, Beuth-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1999)Suche in Google Scholar

12 R.Beyer, E.Lauster: Statistische Lebensdauerprüfpläne bei Berücksichtigung von Vorkenntnissen. QZ (1990), pp. 9398Suche in Google Scholar

13 A.Kleyner, S.Bhagath, M.Gasparini, J.Robinson, M.Bender: Bayesian techniques to reduce the sample size in automotive electronics attribute testing, Microelectronics Reliability37 (1997), No. 6, pp. 87988310.1016/S0026-2714(96)00253-3Suche in Google Scholar

14 A.Krolo: Planung von Zuverlässigkeitstests mit weitreichender Berücksichtigung von Vorkenntnissen, Dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany (2004)Suche in Google Scholar

15 B.Iglisch: Development of an optimized sampling frame for Wöhler tests, Seminar Paper, University of Stuttgart, Institut for Machine Components, Stuttgart, Germany (2017) 10.18419/opus-4023Suche in Google Scholar

16 L.Fahrmeir, T.Kneib, S.Lang: Regression. Modelle, Methoden und Anwendungen. Statistik und ihre Anwendungen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany (2009) 10.1007/978-3-642-01837-4Suche in Google Scholar

17 S.Jetter, F.Müller, R.Weller, B.Bertsche, P.Müller: Ein Vier-Stufen-Prozess zur simulativen Zuverlässigkeitsberechnung von Kurbelgehäusen, Konstruktion69 (2017), 07-08, pp. 698210.37544/0720-5953-2017-07-08-69Suche in Google Scholar

18 W.-W.Maenning: Das Abgrenzungsverfahren, eine kostensparende Methode zur Ermittlung von Schwingfestigkeitswerten, Materialprüfung19 (1977), No. 8, pp. 280289Suche in Google Scholar

19 D. J.Finney: Probit analysis, Cambrigde University Press, London, Great Britain (1947)Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-18
Published in Print: 2019-12-02

© 2019, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Heruntergeladen am 22.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/120.111433/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen