Home Temperature-dependent volumetric and viscometric properties of amino acids in aqueous solutions of an antibiotic drug
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Temperature-dependent volumetric and viscometric properties of amino acids in aqueous solutions of an antibiotic drug

  • Suvarcha Chauhan EMAIL logo , Poonam Chaudhary , Kundan Sharma , Kuldeep Kumar and Kiran
Published/Copyright: June 28, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Volumetric and viscometric properties of glycine and methionine (amino acids) in a 0.2 vol. % amikacin sulphate (antibiotic drug) aqueous solution with the molality range of 0.025 mol kg−1–0.25 mol kg−1 were measured over the temperature range of 20°C–40°C at the interval of 5°C. Different parameters like apparent molar volume (ϕ V), apparent molar adiabatic compression (ϕ κ), isentropic compression (κ S) along with other acoustical parameters were calculated. Parameters like viscous relaxation time (τ), free volume (V F), internal pressure (Π I), and molar cohesive energy (MCE) were calculated from dynamic viscosity measurements. The ϕ V values are positive in both cases, but with higher magnitude observed in methionine. These positive values of ϕ V are indicative of strong solute-solvent interactions at all temperatures. In case of methionine there is a sharp initial increase in the ϕ V values which become almost constant with further additions of the amino acid. Structural differences in the two amino acids studied are clearly reflected in the different nature of the plots of different parameters. In case of an amino acid-drug system, dynamic viscosity increase has been attributed to the increase in the hydrophilic-ionic and hydrophilic-hydrophilic interactions with the increase in the amino acid concentration which in turn may cause more frictional resistance to the flow of the solution. All other parameters are discussed in terms of solute-solvent and solvent-solvent interactions.

[1] Arnold, F. H., & Zhang, J. H. (1994). Metal-mediated protein stabilization. Trends in Biotechnology, 12, 189–192. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7799(94)90081-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(94)90081-710.1016/0167-7799(94)90081-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] Aswale, S. S., Aswale, S. R., & Hajare, R. S. (2012). Adiabatic compressibility, intermolecular free length and acoustic relaxation time of aqueous antibiotic cefotaxime sodium. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 4, 2671–2677. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Castellanos, I. J., Crespo, R., & Griebenow, K. (2003). Poly(ethylene glycol) as stabilizer and emulsifying agent: a novel stabilization approach preventing aggregation and inactivation of proteins upon encapsulation in bioerodible polyester microspheres. Journal of Controlled Release, 88, 135–145. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00488-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00488-110.1016/S0168-3659(02)00488-1Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chauhan, S., Chauhan, M. S., Kaushal, D., Syal, V. K., & Jyoti, J. (2010). Study of micellar behavior of SDS and CTAB in aqueous media containing furosemide — a cardiovascular drug. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 39, 622–638. DOI: 10.1007/s10953-010-9534-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10953-010-9534-910.1007/s10953-010-9534-9Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chauhan, S., Sharma, K., Rana, D. S., Kumar, G., & Umar, A. (2012). Conductance, apparent molar volume and compressibility studies of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide in aqueous solution of leucine. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 175, 103–110. DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2012.07.029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2012.07.02910.1016/j.molliq.2012.07.029Search in Google Scholar

[6] Contreras, M. (2001). Densities and viscosities of binary mixtures of 1,4-dioxane with 1-propanol and 2-propanol at (25, 30, 35, and 40)°C. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 46, 1149–1152. DOI: 10.1021/je010045v. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je010045v10.1021/je010045vSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Dhondge, S. S., Zodape, S. P., & Parwate, D. V. (2012). Volumetric and viscometric studies of some drugs in aqueous solutions at different temperatures. The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 48, 207–212. DOI:10.1016/j.jct.2011.12.022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2011.12.02210.1016/j.jct.2011.12.022Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dhote, A., Aswale, S., & Aswale, S. (2012). Non destructive evaluation of diclofenac sodium by ultrasonic technique. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3, 2299–2302. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Gurney, R. W. (1954). Ionic processes in solutions. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Harned, H. S., & Owen, B. B. (1943). The physical chemistry of electrolytic solutions. New York, NY, USA: Reinhold. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Iqbal, M., & Verrall, R. E. (1989). Apparent molar volume and adiabatic compressibility studies of aqueous solutions of some drug compounds at 25 °C. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 67, 727–735. DOI: 10.1139/v89-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/v89-11110.1139/v89-111Search in Google Scholar

[12] Iqbal, M. J., & Siddiquah, M. (2006). Partial molar volume of mefenamic acid in alcohol at temperatures between T = 293.15 and T = 313.15 K. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 17, 851–858. DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532006000500006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-5053200600050000610.1590/S0103-50532006000500006Search in Google Scholar

[13] Iqbal, M. J., & Chaudhry, M. A. (2009). Volumetric and viscometric studies of antidepressant drugs in aqueous medium at different temperatures. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 54, 2772–2776. DOI: 10.1021/je8008864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je800886410.1021/je8008864Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jahagirdar, D. V., Arbad, B. R., Mirgane, S. R., Lande, M. K., & Shankarwar, A. G. (1998). Density, ultrasonic velocity and viscosity measurements of four pharmacologically significant drugs in methanol at 25°C. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 75, 33–43. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7322(97)00021-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7322(97)00021-410.1016/S0167-7322(97)00021-4Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kapadi, U. R., Chavan, S. K., & Yemul, O. S. (1997). Partial molar volumes and viscosity B coefficients of benzyltriethylammonium chloride in dimethyl sulfoxide + water at different temperatures. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 42, 548–550. DOI: 10.1021/je960216+. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je960216+10.1021/je960216+Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kawaizumi, F., & Zana, R. (1974). Partial molal volumes of ions in organic solvents from ultrasonic vibration potential and density measurements. I. Methanol. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 78, 627–634. DOI: 10.1021/j100599a014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100599a01410.1021/j100599a014Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kumar, H., & Kaur, K. (2012). Investigation on molecular interaction of amino acids in antibacterial drug ampicillin solutions with reference to volumetric and compressibility measurements. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 173, 130–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2012.07.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2012.07.00810.1016/j.molliq.2012.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[18] Oswal, S. L., & Patel, N. B. (1995). Speed of sound, isentropic compressibility, viscosity, and excess volume of binary mixtures. 2. Alkanenitriles + dimethylformamide, + dimethylac etamide, and + dimethyl sulfoxide. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 40, 845–849. DOI: 10.1021/je00020a024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je00020a02410.1021/je00020a024Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ottani, S., Vitalini, D., Comelli, F., & Castellari, C. (2002). Densities, viscosities, and refractive indices of poly(ethylene glycol) 200 and 400 + cyclic ethers at 303.15 K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 47, 1197–1204. DOI: 10.1021/je020030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je020030cSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Palaiologou, M. M., Molinou, I. E., & Tsierkezos, N. G. (2002). Viscosity studies on lithium bromide in water + dimethyl sulfoxide mixtures at 278.15 K and 293.15 K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 47, 1285–1289. DOI: 10.1021/je020030c. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je020063s10.1021/je020030cSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Papanastasiou, G. E., & Ziogas, I. I. (1992). Physical behavior of some reaction media. 3. Density, viscosity, dielectric constant, and refractive index changes of methanol + dioxane mixtures at several temperatures. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 37, 187–172. DOI: 10.1021/je00006a008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je00006a00810.1021/je00006a008Search in Google Scholar

[22] Romahlo, T. C., & da Cunha, E. F. F. (2011). Thermodynamic framework of the interaction between protein and solvent drives protein folding. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 28, 645–646. DOI: 10.1080/073911011010524975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391101101052497510.1080/073911011010524975Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Rubinstein, A., & Sherman, S. (2004). Influence of the solvent structure on the electrostatic interactions in proteins. Biophysical Journal, 87, 1544–1557. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.038620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.103.03862010.1529/biophysj.103.038620Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Sakami, W., & Harrington, H. (1963). Amino acid metabolism. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 32, 355–398. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.32.070163.002035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.32.070163.00203510.1146/annurev.bi.32.070163.002035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Sharma, P., Chauhan, S., Chauhan, M. S., & Syal, V. K. (2008). Ultrasonic velocity and viscosity studies of Tramacip and Parvodex in binary mixtures of alcohol. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics, 46, 839–843. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Shulgin, I. L., & Ruckenstein, E. (2005). Relationship between preferential interaction of a protein in an aqueous mixed solvent and its solubility. Biophysical Chemistry, 118, 128–134. DOI:10.1016/j.bpc.2005.07.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2005.07.00810.1016/j.bpc.2005.07.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Singh, J., Kaur, T., Ali, V., & Gill, D. S. (1994). Ultrasonic velocities and isentropic compressibilities of some tetraalkylammonium and copper(I) salts in acetonitrile and benzonitrile. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions, 90, 579–582. DOI: 10.1039/ft9949000579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ft994900057910.1039/ft9949000579Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sonar, A. N., & Pawar, N. S. (2010). Ultrasonic velocity, density, and viscosity measurement of substituted heterocyclic drugs in 1, 4-dioxane at 303 K. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 3, 38–43. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Surdo, A. L., Shin, C., & Millero, F. J. (1978). The apparent molal volume and adiabatic compressibility of some organic solutes in water at 25°C. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 23, 197–201. DOI: 10.1021/je60078a005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je60078a00510.1021/je60078a005Search in Google Scholar

[30] Syal, V. K., Kumari, U., Chauhan, S., & Chauhan, M. S. (1992). Ultrasonic studies of alkali bromides in DMSO + dioxane solvent mixtures at 25°C. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics, 30, 719–723. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Syal, V. K., Bhalla, V., & Chauhan, S. (1995a). Ultrasonic studies of some tetraalkylammonium salts in acetonitrile + dioxane mixtures at 35°C. Acustica, 81, 276–278. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Syal, V. K., Lal, G., Bisht, P., & Chauhan, S. (1995b). Ultrasonic measurements of some 1: 1 electrolytes in chlorobenzene + methanol mixtures. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 63, 317–328. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7322(94)00795-x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-7322(94)00795-X10.1016/0167-7322(94)00795-XSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Syal, V. K., Chauhan, S., & Gautam, R. (1998). Ultrasonic velocity measurements of sucrose in binary solvent mixtures of H2O + Acetonitrile at 25°C, 35°C and 45°C. Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics, 36, 108–112. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Syal, V. K., Chauhan, A., & Chauhan, S. (2005a). Ultrasonic velocity, viscosity and density studies of poly(ethylene glycols) (PEG-8,000, PEG-20,000) in acetonitrile (AN) and water (H2O) mixtures at 25°C. Journal of Pure and Applied Ultrasonics, 27 61–69. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Syal, V. K., Thakur, S. K., Chauhan, S., & Sharma, P. (2005b). Ultrasonic velocity studies of drug Parvon-spas in mixed alcohol-water solvent systems at 25°C. International Journal of Thermophysics, 26, 807–826. DOI: 10.1007/s10765-005-5579-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10765-005-5579-110.1007/s10765-005-5579-1Search in Google Scholar

[36] Tanford, C. (1980). Hydrophobic effect: Formation of micelles and biological membranes (2nd ed). New York, NY, USA: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

[37] Tsierkezos, N. G., & Molinou, I. E. (1998). Thermodynamic properties of water + ethylene glycol at 283.15, 293.15, 303.15, and 313.15 K. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 43, 989–993. DOI: 10.1021/je9800914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je980091410.1021/je9800914Search in Google Scholar

[38] Wyn-Jones, E., & Gormally, J. (1983). Aggregation process in solutions. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-6-28
Published in Print: 2013-11-1

© 2013 Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Downloaded on 27.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2478/s11696-013-0404-y/html
Scroll to top button