Counter-Cyclical and Counter-Inflation Monetary Policy Rules and Comovement Properties of Money Growth
- 
            
            
        Soyoung Kim
        
This paper shows that counter-cyclical and counter-inflation monetary policy rules are crucial for monetary business cycle models to match the observed negative (or weak) correlation of the growth rate of money and output, inflation, and the interest rate at business cycle frequencies, which were reported as puzzling in Cooley and Hansen (1998) under the AR-1 money growth rate rule. The results are robust for both flexible and sticky price models. Regarding the relative performance of the realistic and/or estimated monetary policy rules in matching the comovement properties of money growth, the feedback interest rate setting rule on output and inflation, which is consistent with a simple VAR model, outperforms the policy rule suggested by Taylor (1993), the forward-looking monetary policy rule as in Clarida, Gali, and Gertler (2000), the feedback money growth rate rules on output and inflation, and the feedback money growth rate rules on productivity shocks.
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Topics Article
- Counter-Cyclical and Counter-Inflation Monetary Policy Rules and Comovement Properties of Money Growth
- Hicks Neutral Technical Change Revisited: CES Production Function and Information of General Order
- R&D Subsidies and the Surplus Appropriability Problem
- Literacy and Growth
- The Fed's Preference for Policy Rate Smoothing: Overestimation Due to Misspecification?
- Inflation Targeting in Western Europe
- On the Political Economy of Housing's Tax Status
- Rating Agencies and Sovereign Debt Rollover
- How Does the New Keynesian Monetary Model Fit in the U.S. and the Eurozone? An Indirect Inference Approach
- Fertility Choice and Semi-Endogenous Growth: Where Becker Meets Jones
- Equilibrium Wage Dispersion: An Example
- Exchange Rate Regimes, Specialization and Trade Volume
- A Refinement in the Specification of Empirical Macroeconomic Models as an Extension to the EBA Procedure
- Education, Growth, and Redistribution in the Presence of Capital Flight
- Measuring the Dissemination of Volatility across Levels of Development
Articles in the same Issue
- Topics Article
- Counter-Cyclical and Counter-Inflation Monetary Policy Rules and Comovement Properties of Money Growth
- Hicks Neutral Technical Change Revisited: CES Production Function and Information of General Order
- R&D Subsidies and the Surplus Appropriability Problem
- Literacy and Growth
- The Fed's Preference for Policy Rate Smoothing: Overestimation Due to Misspecification?
- Inflation Targeting in Western Europe
- On the Political Economy of Housing's Tax Status
- Rating Agencies and Sovereign Debt Rollover
- How Does the New Keynesian Monetary Model Fit in the U.S. and the Eurozone? An Indirect Inference Approach
- Fertility Choice and Semi-Endogenous Growth: Where Becker Meets Jones
- Equilibrium Wage Dispersion: An Example
- Exchange Rate Regimes, Specialization and Trade Volume
- A Refinement in the Specification of Empirical Macroeconomic Models as an Extension to the EBA Procedure
- Education, Growth, and Redistribution in the Presence of Capital Flight
- Measuring the Dissemination of Volatility across Levels of Development