Home Physical Sciences Investigation of smectite hydration properties by modeling experimental X-ray diffraction patterns: Part I. Montmorillonite hydration properties
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Investigation of smectite hydration properties by modeling experimental X-ray diffraction patterns: Part I. Montmorillonite hydration properties

  • EMAIL logo , , and
Published/Copyright: March 28, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Hydration of the <1 μm size fraction of SWy-1 source clay (low-charge montmorillonite) was studied by modeling of X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns recorded under controlled relative humidity (RH) conditions on Li-, Na-, K-, Mg-, Ca-, and Sr-saturated specimens. The quantitative description of smectite hydration, based on the relative proportions of different layer types derived from the fitting of experimental XRD patterns, was consistent with previous reports of smectite hydration. However, the coexistence of smectite layer types exhibiting contrasting hydration states was systematically observed, and heterogeneity rather than homogeneity seems to be the rule for smectite hydration. This heterogeneity can be characterized qualitatively using the standard deviation of the departure from rationality of the 00l reflection series (ξ), which is systematically larger than 0.4 Å when the prevailing layer type accounts for ~70% or less of the total layers (~25% of XRD patterns examined). In addition, hydration heterogeneities are not distributed randomly within smectite crystallites, and models describing these complex structures involve two distinct contributions, each containing different layer types that are interstratifed randomly. As a result, the different layer types are partially segregated in the sample. However, these two contributions do not imply the actual presence of two populations of particles in the sample.

XRD profile modeling also has allowed the refinement of structural parameters, such as the location of interlayer species and the layer thickness corresponding to the different layer types, for all interlayer cations and RH values. From the observed dependence of the latter parameter on the cation ionic potential (v/r; v = cation valency and r = ionic radius) and on RH, the following equations were derived:

Layer thickness (1W) = 12.556 + 0.3525 × (v/r . 0.241) × (v × RH . 0.979)

Layer thickness (2W) = 15.592 + 0.6472 × (v/r . 0.839) × (v × RH . 1.412)

which allow the quantification of the increase of layer thickness with increasing RH for both 1W (one water) and 2W (two water) layers. In addition, for 2W layers, interlayer H2O molecules are probably distributed as a unique plane on each side of the central interlayer cation. This plane of H2O molecules is located at ~1.20 Å from the central interlayer cation along the c* axis

Received: 2004-7-26
Accepted: 2005-1-20
Published Online: 2015-3-28
Published in Print: 2005-8-1

© 2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Crystal-size and shape distributions of magnetite from uncultured magnetotactic bacteria as a potential biomarker
  2. Tourmaline-bearing rocks in the Singhbhum shear zone, eastern India: Evidence of boron infiltration during regional metamorphism
  3. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) study of the 4a and 6a superstructure of bornite Cu5FeS4
  4. Possible Fe/Cu ordering schemes in the 2a superstructure of bornite (Cu5FeS4)
  5. TEM-specimen preparation of cell/mineral interfaces by Focused Ion Beam milling
  6. Direct observation of spinodal decomposition in the magnetite-hercynite system by susceptibility measurements and transmission electron microscopy
  7. Thermodynamics of uranyl minerals: Enthalpies of formation of rutherfordine, UO2CO3, andersonite, Na2CaUO2(CO3)3(H2O)5, and grimselite, K3NaUO2(CO3)3H2O
  8. Mixing and ordering behavior in manganocolumbite-ferrocolumbite solid solution: A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study
  9. Structure change of MgSiO3, MgGeO3, and MgTiO3 ilmenites under compression
  10. Dehydration processes in the meta-autunite group minerals meta-autunite, metasaléeite, and metatorbernite
  11. Investigation of the martensitic-like transformation from Mg2GeO4 olivine to its spinel structure polymorph
  12. A high-temperature diffraction study of the solid solution CaTiOSiO4-CaTiOGeO4
  13. The vibrational spectrum of synthetic hydrogrossular (katoite) Ca3Al2(O4H4)3: A low-temperature IR and Raman spectroscopic study
  14. Structural characterization of biogenic Mn oxides produced in seawater by the marine bacillus sp. strain SG-1
  15. Investigation of smectite hydration properties by modeling experimental X-ray diffraction patterns: Part I. Montmorillonite hydration properties
  16. Synthesis and crystal-chemistry of alkali amphiboles in the system Na2O-MgO-FeO-Fe2O3- SiO2-H2O as a function of fO2
  17. Compositional zoning in sphalerite crystals
  18. Structure and the extent of disorder in quaternary (Ca-Mg and Ca-Na) aluminosilicate glasses and melts
  19. Makarochkinite, Ca2Fe42+Fe3+TiSi4BeAlO20, a new beryllosilicate member of the aenigmatite-sapphirine-surinamite group from the Ilʼmen Mountains (southern Urals), Russia
  20. Formation of lava stalactites in the master tube of the 1792-1793 flow field, Mt. Etna (Italy)
  21. Crystal-size distributions of garnets in metapelites from the northeastern Bushveld contact aureole, South Africa
  22. Early diagenetic origin of Al phosphate-sulfate minerals (woodhouseite and crandallite series) in terrestrial sandstones, Nova Scotia, Canada
  23. Scandium silicates from the Baveno and Cuasso al Monte NYF-granites, Southern Alps (Italy): Mineralogy and genetic inferences
  24. Letter. The effect of Fictive temperature on Al coordination in high-pressure (10 GPa) sodium aluminosilicate glasses
  25. Letter. α-PbO2-type nanophase of TiO2 from coesite-bearing eclogite in the Dabie Mountains, China
  26. Letter. Morphological characteristics of ordered kaolinite: Investigation using electron back-scattered diffraction
Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2138/am.2005.1776/html
Scroll to top button