Advantages and disadvantages of using parallel texts in typological investigations
-
Bernhard Wälchli
In this paper, advantages and disadvantages of using parallel texts in typological studies are considered according to the criteria of diversity, domains, analysis, per-spective, quality, representativity, and comparability. It is shown in a case study of multi-verb constructions (including serial verb constructions, converb constructions, etc.) in two motion event domains (BRING and RUN) how typology can profit from parallel texts especially in the investigation of quantitative variables. A method is introduced to transform features with continuous distributions into ternary features with low, intermediate, and high values which can then be tested for correlations.
© Akademie Verlag
Articles in the same Issue
- Parallel texts: using translational equivalents in linguistic typology
- Harry Potter meets Le petit prince – On the usefulness of parallel corpora in crosslinguistic investigations
- Advantages and disadvantages of using parallel texts in typological investigations
- Demonstratives in parallel texts: a case study
- Some remarks on the use of Bible translations as parallel texts in linguistic research
- Using Strong's Numbers in the Bible to test an automatic alignment of parallel texts
- From questionnaires to parallel corpora in typology
Articles in the same Issue
- Parallel texts: using translational equivalents in linguistic typology
- Harry Potter meets Le petit prince – On the usefulness of parallel corpora in crosslinguistic investigations
- Advantages and disadvantages of using parallel texts in typological investigations
- Demonstratives in parallel texts: a case study
- Some remarks on the use of Bible translations as parallel texts in linguistic research
- Using Strong's Numbers in the Bible to test an automatic alignment of parallel texts
- From questionnaires to parallel corpora in typology