Home The possessive enclitics with kinship nouns in Italo-Romance and the possessive determiners in the Francoprovençal of Faeto
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The possessive enclitics with kinship nouns in Italo-Romance and the possessive determiners in the Francoprovençal of Faeto

Two syntactic linearizations?
  • Michela Russo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 20, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper deals with the possessive constructions in Italo-Romance dialects compared with the possessive constructions of one Francoprovençal (Gallo-Romance) variety spoken in Faeto (Foggia, Apulia). Francoprovençal possessive constructions are at a first glance distinct from Central and Southern Italian possessive constructions, mainly since in Francoprovençal (as in French) possessive forms (clitics) are prenominal. In Central and Southern Italian dialects, we find instead a split possession: 1) postnominal enclitic possessives (weak possessive markers) associated with parental kinship nouns distinct from 2) prenominal possessives associated with common nouns and postnominal strong possessive forms. Crucially, I claim that enclitic possessives are inflexional affixes, that receive a structural word-internal linearization from the same external (syntactical) linearization identified for proclitic possessive markers (in Faeto). I retain that the distinction between postnominal weak enclitics in Italian dialects and Francoprovençal weak prenominal possessive constructions is based on the inalienability (parental kin nouns + enclitics in DP). All possessive clitics (proclitics and enclitics) show a common syntactic configuration and differ only in Distributed Morphology, according to a “late” feature insertion and operations after syntax. Indeed, the possessive determiners represent three different morphological spells out of the same syntactic object: the bundle of features [Person], [(Gender) Number], [Definite], generated in functional heads.


Acknowledgement

I wish to thank Elena Soare and Anne Zribi-Hertz for their helpful and stimulating remarks.


8 References

AIS = Jaberg, Karl/Jud, Jakob, Sprach- und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz, 8 vol., Zofingen, Ringier, 1928–1940, online under: Tisato, Graziano G., AIS Digital Atlas and Navigation Software, 2009, <http://www3.pd.istc.cnr.it/navigais/> [last access: June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark, Incorporation. A theory of grammatical function changing, Chicago, Chicago University Press, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Benincà, Paola/Poletto, Cecilia, The third dimension of person features, in: Cornips, Leonie/Corrigan, Karen (edd.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological and the social, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2006, 264–299.10.1075/cilt.265.15benSearch in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Judy B., Focusing the “right” way in Romance determiner phrases, Probus 13 (2001), 1–29.10.1515/prbs.13.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Bernstein, Judy B., On the morpho-syntax of possessive constructions, Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 34 (2005), 55–76.10.4000/rlv.1364Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna, On the deficient/strong opposition in possessive systems, in: Alexiadou, Artemis/Wilder, Chris (edd.), Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1998, 17–53.10.1075/la.22.03carSearch in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna/Starke, Michal, The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns, University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2 (1994), 41–109.Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna/Starke, Michael, The typology of structural deficiency. A case study of the three classes of pronouns, in: van Riemsdijk, Henk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, Berlin, Mouton De Gruyter, 1999, 145–233.10.1515/9783110804010.145Search in Google Scholar

Castellani, Arrigo, Nuovi testi fiorentini del Dugento, 2 vol., Firenze, Sansoni, 1952.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo, On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP, in: Cinque, Guglielmo/Koster, Jan/Pollock, Jean-Yves/Rizzi, Luigi/Zanuttini, Raffaella (edd.), Paths towards Universal Grammar. studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, Washington D.C., Georgetown University Press, 1994, 85–110.Search in Google Scholar

Cornilescu, Alexandra/Nicolae, Alexandru, Romanian possessives: adjectives or pronouns? A comparative perspective, in: Nedelcu, Isabela/Nicolae, Alexandru/ Toma, Alice/Zafiu, Rodica (edd.), Studii de lingvistică. Omagiu doamnei profesoare Angela Bidu-Vrănceanu, Bucharest, Editura Universitatii din Bucuresti, 2011, 111–143.Search in Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, Roberta/Migliori, Laura, Sui possessivi enclitici nelle varietà italo-romanze meridionali non estreme, in: D’Alessandro, Roberta/Iannàccaro, Gabriele/Passino, Diana/Thornton, Anna M. (edd.), Di tutti i colori, Utrecht University Repository, 2017, 55–71.Search in Google Scholar

Delsing, Lars-Olof/Egerland, Verner, Kinship nouns in possessive constructions in Italian and Scandinavian, Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 55 (2002), 103–120.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, À propos de la structure du groupe nominal en roumain, Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 12 (1987), 123–152.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen, Genitives and determiners, in: Kim, Ji-jung/Lander, Yury A./Partee, Barbara H. (edd.), Possessives and beyond. Semantics and syntax, Amherst (Mass.), GLSA Publications, 2004, 115–132.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen/Giurgea, Ion, Agreeing possessors and the theory of case, Unpublished manuscript of the conference given at at Institutul de Lingvistică al Academiei Române “Iorgu Iordan – Al. Rosetti”, Bucureşti, November 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Egerland, Verner, On the grammar of kinship. Possessive enclisis in Italian dialects, in: Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten/Lindschouw, Jan (edd.), Deixis and pronouns in Romance languages, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2013, 69–84.10.1075/slcs.136.05egeSearch in Google Scholar

Embick, David/Noyer, Rolf, Movement operations after syntax, Linguistic Inquiry 32 (2001), 555–595.10.1162/002438901753373005Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David/Noyer, Rolf, Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface, in: Ramchand, Gillian/Charles Reiss (edd.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, 289–324.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199247455.013.0010Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra/Longobardi, Giuseppe, The syntax of noun phrases, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana, Heads and modifiers across determiners. Evidence from Rumanian, in: Cinque, Guglielmo/Giusti, Giuliana (edd.), Advances in Roumanian linguistics, Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1995, 103–125.10.1075/la.10.05giuSearch in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana, The categorial status of determiners, in: Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative syntax, London/New York, Longman, 1997, 95–123. Search in Google Scholar

Giusti, Giuliana, I possessivi, in: Salvi, Giampaolo/Renzi, Lorenzo (edd.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico, vol. 1, Bologna, il Mulino, 2010, 359–375.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris/Marantz, Alec, Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflexion, in: Hale, Kenneth/Keyser, Samuel Jay (edd.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge (Mass.)/London, MIT Press, 1993, 111–176.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris/Marantz, Alec, Some key features of distributed morphology, in: Carnie, Andrew/Harley, Heidi/Bures, Tony (edd.), Papers on phonology and morphology = The MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21 (1994), 275–288.Search in Google Scholar

Kattenbusch, Dieter, Das Frankoprovenzalische in Süditalien. Studien zur synchronischen und diachronischen Dialektologie, Tübingen, Narr, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S., Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection, Studia Linguistica 47 (1993), 3–31.10.1111/j.1467-9582.1993.tb00837.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S., The antisymmetry of syntax, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S., Parameters and universals, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000. 10.1093/oso/9780195102352.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kihm, Alain, À propos de l’état construit, in: Guéron, Jacqueline/Zribi-Hertz, Anne (edd.), La grammaire de la possession, Nanterre, Publidix, 1998, 61–82.Search in Google Scholar

Knittel, Marie-Laurence, La structure morphosyntaxique des syntagmes nominaux possessivés du hongrois, in: Guéron, Jacqueline/Zribi-Hertz, Anne (edd.), La grammaire de la possession, Nanterre, Publidix, 1998, 83–128.Search in Google Scholar

Lodrup, Helge, Split possession and the syntax of kinship nouns in Norwegian, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17 (2014), 35–37.10.1007/s10828-014-9065-7Search in Google Scholar

Longobardi, Giuseppe, Reference and proper names, Linguistic Inquiry 25 (1994), 609–666.Search in Google Scholar

Loporcaro, Michele/Paciaroni, Tania, The dialects of Central Italy, in: Maiden, Martin/Ledgeway, Adam (edd.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 2016, 228–245.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Maiden, Martin, Romanian, Istro-Romanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Aromanian, in: id./Ledgeway, Adam (edd.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 2016, 91–138.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Melillo, Michele, Intorno alle probabili sedi originarie delle colonie franco-provenzali di Celle e Faeto, Revue de linguistique romane 23 (1959), 1–34.Search in Google Scholar

Melillo, Michele, Briciole francoprovenzali nell’Italia meridionale, Vox Romanica 40 (1981), 39–47.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Philip, Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar, New York, Garland, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, Naomi, Faetar, Munich, Lincom Europa, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Percopo, Erasmo, I Bagni di Pozzuoli. Poemetto napoletano del secolo XIV, Archivio storico per le province napoletane 11 (1886), 597–750.Search in Google Scholar

Perrin, Manon, Le francoprovençal des colonies du sud de l’Italie. Évolutions présentes à Faeto dans les cartes de l’AIS, l’“Atlas linguistique et ethnographique de l’Italie et de la Suisse”, Master’s Thesis, Lyon, Université Jean Moulin (Lyon 3), 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Renzi, Lorenzo (ed.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Bologna, il Mulino, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian, Agreement and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 2010. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rohlfs, Gerhard, Historische Grammatik der italienischen Sprache und ihrer Mundarten, 3 vol., Bern, Francke, 1949–1954.Search in Google Scholar

Rouveret, Alain, Functional categories and agreement, The Linguistic Review 8 (1991), 853–387.10.1515/tlir.1991.8.2-4.353Search in Google Scholar

Rouveret, Alain, Syntax du gallois. Principes généraux et typologie, Paris, CNRS, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

Rouveret, Alain, Arguments minimalistes. Une présentation du programme minimaliste de Noam Chomsky, Lyon, ENS, 2015.10.4000/books.enseditions.5588Search in Google Scholar

Russo, Michela, L’Italia dell’anno 1000: le origini del raddoppiamento sintattico nell’italiano meridionale antico e non solo. Un’analisi scrittologica, in: Danler, Paul/Konecny, Christine (edd.), Dall’architettura della lingua italiana all’architettura linguistica dell’Italia. In honor of Heidi Siller-Runggaldier, Frankfurt am Main et al., Lang, 2014, 145–163.Search in Google Scholar

Russo, Michela, Stress shift, stressed enclitics and Raddoppiamento Sintattico in Central and Southern Italian dialects, Conference presented at GPRT 2017 – The Government Phonology Round Table – The annual Meeting of all the GP-ISTS of the world, Budapest (Péter Catholic University, Hungary), 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Russo, Michela, Le déplacement d’accent et la gémination dans les séquences à (double) enclitiques dans les dialectes italiens, L’Italia Dialettale, to appear.Search in Google Scholar

Russo, Michela/Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti, Phonological lenition and the inherent strength of the word-initial position. The view from Southern Italian dialects, Vox Romanica 78 (2019), 19–56.Search in Google Scholar

Salvi, Giampaolo, La formazione della struttura di frase romanza. Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 2004.10.1515/9783110945508Search in Google Scholar

Salvi, Giampaolo/Renzi, Lorenzo (edd.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico, Bologna, il Mulino, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Sportiche, Dominique/Koopman, Hilda/Stabler, Edward, Introduction to syntactic theory and analysis, Chichester, Blackwell, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Stehl, Thomas, Apulien und Salento, in: Holtus, Günter/Metzeltin, Michael/Schmitt, Christian (edd.), Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik (LRL), vol. 4: Italienisch, Korsisch, Sardisch, Tübingen, Niemeyer, 1988, 695–716.10.1515/9783110966107.695Search in Google Scholar

TLIO = Tesoro della lingua italiana delle origini, fondato da Pietro G. Beltrami, poi diretto da Lino Leonardi e attualmente da Paolo Squillacioti, Firenze, Opera del Vocabolario Italiano, 1998ss., <http://tlio.ovi.cnr.it/TLIO/> [last access: 05/09/2020].Search in Google Scholar

Torcolacci, Giuseppe, Il raddoppiamento fonosintattico e la codifica di tratti morfosintattici. Il caso dei dialetti meridionali, in: D’Alessandro, Roberta/Di Felice, Claudio/Franco, Irene/Ledgeway, Adam (edd.), Approcci diversi alla dialettologia italiana contemporanea, Special Issue of L’Italia Dialettale 75 (2014), 247–271.Search in Google Scholar

Van Peteghem, Marleen, Possessives and grammaticalization in Romance, Folia linguistica 46 (2012), 605–634.Search in Google Scholar

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger/Zubizarreta, Maria Louisa, The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and English, Linguistic Inquiry 23 (1992), 595–652.Search in Google Scholar

Zribi-Hertz, Anne, On the dual nature of the “possessive” marker in Modern English, Journal of Linguistics 33 (1997), 511–537.10.1017/S0022226797006543Search in Google Scholar

Zribi-Hertz, Anne, Les syntagmes nominaux possessifs en français moderne. Syntaxe et morphologie, in: Guéron, Jacqueline/Zribi-Hertz, Anne (edd.), La grammaire de la possession, Nanterre, Publidix, 1998, 129–166.Search in Google Scholar

Zribi-Hertz, Anne, Le système des possessifs en français standard moderne, in: Deladier, Anne (ed.), Le groupe nominal. Contraintes distributionnelles et hypothèses de descriptions, Langue française 122 (1999), 7–29.10.3406/lfr.1999.6285Search in Google Scholar

Zribi-Hertz, Anne, On the asymmetrical but regular properties of French possessive DPs, in: Coene, Martine/D’hulst, Yves (edd.), From NP to DP. The expression of possession in noun phrases, vol. 2, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 2003, 141–163.10.1075/la.56.10zriSearch in Google Scholar

Zribi-Hertz, Anne/Diagne, Lamine, Clitic placement after Syntax. Evidence from Wolof person and locative markers, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20 (2002), 823–884.10.1023/A:1020494714861Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2021-03-20
Erschienen im Druck: 2021-03-11

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zrp-2021-0007/html
Scroll to top button