Startseite Physicochemical and instrumental characterization of rice husk and its potential use as a low cost adsorbent for mutagenic dye bromophenol blue
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Physicochemical and instrumental characterization of rice husk and its potential use as a low cost adsorbent for mutagenic dye bromophenol blue

  • Sabiha Sultana EMAIL logo , Kamran Rehan , Imran Rehan , Fahad Ali , Salman Waris , Muhammad Zahoor , Syed Muhammad Salman , Sanaullah Khan und Muhammad Saad Rehan
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Dezember 2020

Abstract

In this study fine powder of rice husk were used as novel adsorbent for the removal of bromophenol dye. Different conventional physicochemical analysis and instrumental techniques were used to characterize the adsorbent. The surface area of the adsorbent was found to be 160.6 m2/g with bulk density of 1.139 g/dm3. Proximate and ultimate analysis showed that the selected material is a rich source of carbon with the advantage of not having Sulphur contents. FTIR and SEM analysis confirmed the surface modification via aqua regia in comparison to parental material (that have enhanced its surface porosity). The maximum uptake capacity (0.8 mg/g) of dye was reached at pH 3, 20 ppm of adsorbate concentration, and 0.5 g of treated rice husk dosage at room temperature and 60 min of equilibrium time. The equilibrium adsorption data was best explained by Freundlich adsorption isotherm with R 2 value of 0.998. Kinetic studies revealed that adsorption follows pseudo second order kinetic model with R 2 value of 0.997, K 2 equal to 0.831 (g/mg min), and q e value of 0.97 mg/g. The thermodynamic parameters (∆S° = 6.78 J/mol, ∆H° = 1501 J/mol, ∆G° −1.50, 0.5, 0.621 and 0.0787 kJ/mol corresponding to 293, 303, 313 and 333 K) pointed towards the endothermic and spontaneous nature of the process.


Corresponding author: Sabiha Sultana, Department of Chemistry, Islamia College University Peshawar, Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

  3. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

References

1. McKay, G., Otterburn, S. M., Aga, A. D. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1985, 24, 307; https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00161790.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Acemioglu, A. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 274, 371.10.1016/j.jcis.2004.03.019Suche in Google Scholar

3. Mall, D., Srivastava, V. C., Agarwal, N. K., Mishra, I. M. Chemosphere 2005, 61, 492; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.065.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Han, R., Wang, Y., Han, P., Shi, J., Yang, J., Lu, Y. J. Hazard Mater. 2006, B137, 550; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.029.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Chandrasekhar, S., Pramada, N. P. Adsorption 2006, 12, 27; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-006-0136-1.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Mane, V. S., Mall, I. D., Srivastava, V. C. J. Environ. Manag. 2007, 84, 390; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.024.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Kannan, N., Sundaram, M. M. Dyes Pigments 2001, 51, 25; https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-7208(01)00056-0.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Kumar, U., Bandyopadhyay, M. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 104; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.027.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Syuhadah, S. N., Rohasliney, H. Health Environ. J. 2012, 3, 89.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Zhang, Y., Zheng, R., Zhao, J., Ma, F., Zhang, Y., Meng, Q. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 1; https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/496878.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Masih, M., Anthony, P., Siddiqui, S. H. Environ. Nanotech. Monitoring & Management 2018, 10, 189; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2018.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Malik, A., Khan, A., Shah, N., Khan, M. S. Z. Phys. Chem. 2019, 234, 1448.10.1515/zpch-2019-1448Suche in Google Scholar

13. Malik, A., Khan, A., Hamayun, M. Z. Phys. Chem. 2018, 233, 1190.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Kreft, S., Kreft, M. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2009, 26, 1576; https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.26.001576.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Khayam, S. M. U., Zahoor, M., Khan, E., Shah, M. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2020, 29, 1397.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Bari, W. U., Zahoor, M., Zeb, A., Khan, I., Nazir, Y., Khan, A., Rehman, N. U., Ullah, R., Shahat, A. A., Mahmood, H. M. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1386; https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2019.1650763.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Bansal, M., Garg, U., Singh, D., Garg, V. K. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 162, 312; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.037.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Daffalla, S. B., Mukhtar, H., Shaharun, M. S. J. Appl. Sci. 2010, 10, 1060; https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.1060.1067.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Sarma, P. J., Kumar, R., Pakshirajan, K. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2015, 9, 635.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Deshmukh, P., Bhatt, J., Peshwe, D., Pathak, S. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2020, 65, 63.10.1007/s12666-011-0071-zSuche in Google Scholar

21. Abdullah, R., Ishak, C. F., Kadir, W. R., Bakar, R. A. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 2015, 12, 9314; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809314.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-02
Accepted: 2020-11-28
Published Online: 2020-12-09
Published in Print: 2021-10-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 26.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zpch-2020-1670/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen