Abstract
Chemical investigation of the extract of the whole Ammania auriculata plant resulted in the identification of 13 polyphenols, including the hitherto unknown flavonoids, kaempferol 3-O-β-(6″-galloylglucopyranoside)-7-O-β-glucopyranoside, and its quercetin analogue. The structures of all isolates were elucidated by conventional methods, spectroscopic analysis, including 1D and 2D NMR, and by HRESI-MS as well.
1 Introduction
In Egypt, several plants rich in phenolics have been intensively investigated for their biological activities and their constitutive phenolics (e.g., [1–4]). Among those plants, little is known about the phytochemistry of Ammania auriculata Willd. (Lythraceae) (syn. Ammannia arenaria Kunth.) [5], apart from two reports describing the presence of kaempferol, quercetin, kaempferol-3-O-α-L-arabinofuranoside, kaempferol-3-O-β-D-xylopyranoside and ellagic acid in the whole plant [6], and 2,3-hexahydroxydiphenoyl-(α/β)-glucopyranose, 2,3-di-O-galloyl-(α/β)-glucopyranose, 1,6-di-O-galloyl-(α/β)-glucopyranose, kaempferol-3-O-β-(6″-p-coumaroylglucopyranoside), 1-monogalloyl-2,3-hexahydroxy-(α)-glucopyranose, quercetin 3-O-β-(6″-galloylglucopyranoside), gallic acid 3-O-β-glucoside, 2,3,6-tri-O-galloyl-(α/β)-glucose [7]. The plant is used as a counter irritant for rheumatic pains [8]. This species occurs throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the world, from Southeastern North America through Central America and the Caribbean to Argentina, from Egypt to South Africa and east through Pakistan and India east to China, as well as in Northern Australia. During the current study, we isolated and identified an additional 13 phenolic compounds (1–13) from the aqueous ethanol extract of whole A. auriculata plant. All compounds have been characterized for the first time from this plant. The isolates include two galloylated flavonol glucosides (12 and 13), both of which have not been reported previously to occur in nature.
2 Results and discussion
Dried specimens of whole flowering A. auriculata plants were exhaustively extracted with aqueous ethanol (3:1, v/v). The obtained extract was subjected to a series of column and preparative paper chromatographic separations to yield compounds 1–13.
Compound 12, a yellow amorphous powder, had chromatographic properties (dark purple spot on paper chromatogram under UV light, turning lemon yellow when fumed with ammonia vapor, moderate migration in aqueous and organic solvents) and color reactions (a lemon yellow color with Naturstoff reagent), which suggested a kaempferol derivative bearing a free 4′ hydroxyl group and an O-glycosylated one at the 3-position. The UV spectra of 12 in MeOH (268 nm, 316 nm, 360 nm) and upon addition of the diagnostic shift reagents, together with the Rf values were typical of those of 3-O,7-O diglycosylated kaempferol [9, 10] and confirmed the presence of a free hydroxyl at the C-4′-position (stable MeONa) and a glycosylated hydroxyl at the C-7 position (no shift with NaOAc). Normal acid hydrolysis of 12 (2 N aqueous HCl, 3 h, 100 °C) yielded glucose (comparative paper chromatography, Co-PC), kaempferol and gallic acid (Co-PC, UV spectra and 1H NMR). Compound 12 was hydrolyzed after incubation with β-glucosidase to yield kaempferol 3-O-β-(6″-galloylglucoside) [11]. Consequently, 12 is kaempferol 3-O-(galloylglucoside)-7-O-glucoside. The result of negative ESI-MS analysis of 12 indicated a molecular ion peak at [M–H]– 761, corresponding to a molecular mass (Mr) of 762. The accurate MSMS analysis of that ion revealed a fragmentation pattern (m/z: 447 [M–galloyl glucose]–, 285 [kaempferol]–, 152 [galloyl]–), consistent with the proposed structure. The molecular formula was concluded to be C34 H34O20 from its negative HRESI-MS, which showed an [M–1]– ion at m/z=762.6249 (calculated for C34H34O20: 762.6253). To determine the site of attachment of all moieties in the molecule of 12 and to allow the full assignment of all carbon and proton resonances, NMR spectroscopic analysis of 12, including 1D 1H and 13C, and 2D TOCSY, HMQC and HMBC, was then carried out. The 1H NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6, room temperature) revealed two distinct β-anomeric hexose proton resonances at ppm 5.02 and 5.31 (each d, J=8.5 Hz) attributed to the anomeric glucoside moieties at the kaempferol 7- and 3-positions, respectively. The spectrum also showed a pair of glucose proton resonances at 4.26 (dd, J=12 Hz and 5.5 Hz) and 4.12 ppm (m), assignable to the two methylenic glucose protons whose hydroxyl group is acylated by the galloyl moiety. The spectrum proved, in addition, the presence of a 7-O-substituted kaempferol moiety by the two distinct low field proton resonances at δ 6.32 (d, J=2.5 Hz) and 6.72 (d, J=2.5 Hz), assignable to the H-6 and H-8 of this moiety. In this spectrum, the singlet at δ ppm 6.99 was obviously due to the galloyl moiety. The 13C NMR analysis confirmed the suggested structure of 12. As expected, the spectrum (DMSO-d6, room temperature) exhibited 12 distinct glucose carbon resonances (see Experimental). The two β-glucose anomers at positions C-7 and C-3 of the flavonol moiety were recognized from the downfield resonances at δ ppm 99.8 and 102.91, respectively, while the most upfield resonances at δ ppm 60.10 and 63.17 were assigned to the methylenic C-6 glucose carbon bearing a free hydroxyl (located at the 7-position of the kaempferol moiety) and to the methylenic C-6 of the galloylated glucose (attached at the 3-position), respectively. The deshielding of the latter resonance (δ 63.17) is obviously due to the acylation by gallic acid. Assignment of the remaining glucose carbons was aided by comparison with the reported 13C chemical shifts of kaempferol 3,7-di-O-glucoside [12]. The presence of only a single galloyl moiety in 12 followed from the single carboxyl carbon resonance at δ 166.4 and from the recognized characteristic pattern of the remaining galloyl carbon resonances [13], (see Experimental). The recorded chemical shifts of the kaempferol carbon resonances in the 13C NMR spectrum confirmed substitution at the 3- and 7-positions. This followed from the relative upfield shifts of the kaempferol C-3 and C-7 resonances to 134.3 and 161.5, respectively [14]. Furthermore, the measured chemical shift values of the carbon resonances of the two glucose moieties confirmed that the sugar cores exist in the pyranose form [15]. The TOCSY spectrum confirmed that the methylinic proton resonances at δ 4.26 (dd, J=12 and 4.5 Hz) and 4.12 (m) of the C-6 galloylated glucose moiety belong to the glucoside moiety whose anomeric proton resonates at δ 5.31 ppm. That the galloylated glucose linked to the hydroxyl group at C-3 of the aglycone was unambiguously confirmed by a 3J long-range correlation between its anomeric proton (δ ppm 5.31) and C-3 (δ ppm 134.3) of the kaempferol moiety in the hetronuclear multi bond connectivity (HMBC) spectrum. This spectrum also showed a cross peak correlating to the second anomeric proton resonance at δ 5.02 to the kaempferol carbon C-7 at δ ppm 161.5. Consequently, 12 is identified as kaempferol 3-O-β-(6″-galloylglucopyranoside)-7-O-β-glucopyranoside, which has not been reported previously in nature (Figure 1).

Compound 12: R=H, compound 13: R=OH.
Compound 13 was isolated as a faint yellow amorphous powder which appeared dull purple on chromatograms under UV light, turning orange when fumed with ammonia vapor. It gave glucose, quercetin and gallic acid (Co-PC), on normal acid hydrolysis. Compound 13 exhibited an Mr of 778 in negative ESI-MS ([M–H]– at m/z=777). These data together with Rf values and UV spectral analysis (see Experimental) indicated that 13 is the quercetin analogue of 12. 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic analysis of 13 confirmed its structure to be quercetin 3-O-β-(6″-galloylglucopyranoside)-7-O-β-glucopyranoside, which has not been reported before as a natural product (Figure 1).
2.1 Known isolates
Gallic acid 1 [13], 1-O-galloyl 3,6-hexahydroxydiphenoyl glucose corilagin 2 [16], myricetin 3-O-β-glucopyranose 3 [17], quercetin 3-O-β-glucopyranose 4 [18], kaempferol 3-O-glucopyranoside 5 [19], 2,3-hexahydroxydiphenoyl-6-galloyl-(α/β)-glucopyranose 6 [20], 2,3-di-O-galloyl-4,6-hexahydroxydiphenoyl-(α/β)-glucopyranose, tellimagrandin II 7 [21], 1,2,3-tri-O-galloyl-(α)-glucopyranose 8 [22], 1,2,3-tri-O-galloyl-(β)-glucopyranose 9 [13], 1,4,6-tri-O-galloyl-(β)-glucopyranose 10 [13] and 2,3,6-tri-O-galloyl-(α/β)-glucopyranose 11 [7].
3 Experimental
3.1 General
NMR spectra were acquired in DMSO-d6 on a Jeol ECA 500 MHz NMR spectrometer (JEOL USA, Inc., MA, USA), at 500 MHz (El-Menya, Egypt). Standard pulse sequence and parameters were used to obtain 1D 1H and 13C, and 2D COSY, HSQC and HMBC spectra, respectively. 1H chemical shifts (δ) were measured in ppm, relative to tetramethyl silane (TMS) and 13C NMR chemical shifts to acetone-d6, and were converted to TMS scale by adding 29.8 ppm. HRESI mass spectra were measured using a Finnigan LTQ FT Ultra mass spectrometer (Thermo FisherScientific, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a Nanomate ESI interface (Advion). An average electrospray voltage of 1.7 kV and a transfer capillary temperature of 200 °C were applied. Collision induced dissociation was performed in the ion trap using a normalized collision energy of 35%, activation time of 30 ms, 0.25 activation Q and a precursor ion isolation width of 2 amu. High resolution product ions were detected in the Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance cell of the mass spectrometer. UV spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-Visible-1601 spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). Flame atomic absorption analysis was performed on a Varian Spectra-AA220 instrument (Cairo, Egypt), lamp current: 5 mA, fuel: acetylene, oxidant: air. Chromatographic analysis (PC) was carried out on Whatman No. 1 paper, using solvent systems: H2O; 15% HOAc; 6% HOAc; n-butanol-acetic acid-water (BAW; n-BuOH–HOAc–H2O, 4:1:5, v/v/v/, upper layer).
3.2 Plant material
Flowering whole plants of A. auriculata Willd. were collected with their roots from the rice fields near Banha City, 40 km north of Cairo, Egypt, in April 2012. A flowering voucher specimen (A 362) was deposited in the herbarium of the National Research Center (NRC), the identity of which was verified by Dr. S. Kawashty, Professor of Botany at NRC.
3.3 Extraction
Flowering whole plants were air-dried, and a 3 kg sample of the powder was extracted (3 times) with 5 L EtOH/H2O (3:1, v/v) under reflux for 8 h each. The extract was filtered and dried in vacuo to yield a dark brown amorphous powder (250 g).
3.4 Isolation and identification of phenolic compounds
The dried aqueous EtOH extract (115 g) was loaded onto a Sephadex LH-20 (900 g) column (120 cm×7.5 cm). Elution then started with H2O followed by isocratic elution in 10% steps from 10% MeOH-H2O (v/v) to 100% MeOH. Following removal of the solvents, 10 fractions (I–X) were obtained. Fraction I eluted with H2O, II with 10%, III with 20%, IV with 30%, V with 40%, VI with 50%, VII with 60%, VIII with 70%, IX with 80% and X with 90% MeOH, respectively. The fractions were individually collected and subjected to 2D PC. Compound 1 (108 mg) was isolated in pure form from 2.05 g of fraction II (eluted with 10% MeOH), by repeated precipitation (three times) from acetone by ether. Compounds 2 (104 mg) and 3 (75 mg) were individually separated in pure form by fractionation of 2.3 g of fraction IV (eluted with 30% MeOH) over a small Sephadex LH-20 (15 g) column using an MeOH/H2O mixture of decreasing polarity for elution. Compound 3 (92 mg) was individually isolated in pure form from 679 mg of V (eluted with 40% MeOH), by fractionation on a Sephadex LH-20 (13 g) column and 40% MeOH for elution, followed by preparative PC using BAW for final purification. Compound 4 (83 mg), was separated in pure form from 701 mg of fraction VI (eluted with 50% MeOH) by preparative PC, using water-saturated n-BuOH as solvent. Compound 5 (74 mg) was isolated in pure form from 807 mg of fraction VII (eluted with 60% MeOH) by polyamide column (35 g) fractionation and gradient elution with H2O/MeOH mixtures of decreasing polarities, whereby three successive subfractions were individually eluted, i.e., subfraction i by 20%, subfraction ii by 30% and subfraction iii by 50% MeOH. Purification by preparative PC using BAW as solvent yielded pure samples of compound 6 from iii.
Compound 7 (91 mg) was individually obtained in pure form from 812 mg of fraction VII through repeated preparative PC (three times). Sephadex LH-20 column chromatography of 835 mg of fraction VIII (eluted with 70%), using water-saturated n-BuOH for elution, yielded four subfractions (i–iv). A pure sample of compound 8 (72 mg) was separated from subfraction i through polyamide S6 column fractionation, using 50% MeOH for elution.
Compound 9 was obtained from 67 mg of subfraction ii through an MCI gel (CHP-20P) column fractionation, using gradient elution with H2O/MeOH mixtures of decreasing polarities. On successive preparative PC (twice) of 735 mg of fraction IX, using 6% AcOH, four individual bands were detected on the chromatograms under UV light. Sephadex LH-20 column purification, using H2O as solvent, of each of the materials eluted from the four bands afforded pure samples of 10 (44 mg), 11 (32 mg), 12 (54 mg) and 13 (66 mg).
3.5 Kaempferol 3-O- β-(6″-galloylglucopyranose)-7-O-β-glucopyranoside (12)
Mr: 762, ESI-MS: negative ion: m/z (rel. int.): 762 (52), [M-H]-, 447 (30), [M-galloylglucose]-, 285 (39), [kaempferol]-. Rf values: 54 (H2O), 59 (15% HOAc), 44 (BAW). UV in MeOH λmax nm: 268, 316, 360; NaOAc: 268, 317, 366; NaOAc+H3BO3: 268, 318; AlCl3: 275, 312, 392; NaOMe: 277, 362. Normal acid hydrolysis gave glucose (Co-PC), kaempferol and gallic acid (Co-PC, 1H NMR). β-Glucosidase [lyophilized, chromatographically pure, salt-free enzyme from almond, BDH Merck, Poole Dorset, UK (E.C. 3.2.1.21)] for 24 h, at 37 °C in acetate buffer, pH 5.1, enzymatic hydrolysis yielded kaempferol 3-O-β-(6″-galloylglucoside), 1H NMR of 12: galloyl moiety: δ ppm 6.99 (s); kaempferol moiety: δ ppm 6.32 (d, J=2.5 Hz, H-6), 6.72 (d, J=2.5 Hz, H-8), 6.86 (d, J=7.5 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 8.0 (d, J=7.5 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 11.8 (s,OH-5); β-glucoside moieties: δ ppm 5.02 (d, J=8.5 Hz, anomeric glucose proton at flavone C-7), 5.31 (d, J=8.5 Hz, anomeric at flavone C-3), 4.26 (dd, J=12 and 5.5 Hz, one methylenic H2-6 proton), 4.12 (m, one methylenic H-6 proton), 3.3–3.9 (m, glucose protons). 13C NMR of 12: kaempferol moiety: δ ppm 156.9 (C-2), 134.3 (C-3), 177.6 (C-4), 160.8 (C-5), 99.2 (C-6), 161.5 (C-7), 94.6 (C-8), 156.0 (C-9), 104.5 (C-10), 121.2 (C-1′), 129.8 (C-2′ and C-6′), 115.7 (C-3′ and C-5′), 159.9 (C-4′); galloyl moiety: 121.9 (C-l), 109.6 (C-2 and C-6), 145.5 (C-3 and C-5), 138.9 (C-4), 166.4 (C=O); C-7-glucose moiety: 99.8 (C-1), 73.1 (C-2), 76.4 (C-3), 69.7 (C-4), 76.5 (C-5), 60.1 (C-6); C-3-glucose moiety: 102.91 (C-1), 74.3 (C-2), 77.1 (C-3), 69.5 (C-4), 76.8 (C-5), 63.17 (C-6).
3.6 Quercetin 3-O- β-(6″-galloylglucopyranose)-7-O-β-glucopyranoside (13):
Mr: 778, ESI-MS: negative ion: m/z (rel. int.): 777 (60), [M-H]-, 463 (28), [M-galloyl glucose]-, 301 (36) , [quercetin]-, 151 (33), [galloyl]-. Rf values: 50 (H2O), 55 (15% AcOH), 40 (BAW). UV λmax nm in MeOH: 254, 266, 294 (shoulder), 313, 354; +NaOAc: 256 (shoulder), 266, 300, 374; +NaOAc/H3BO3: 272, 299, 438 (shoulder); +AlCl3: 243, 274, 367. Normal acid hydrolysis gave glucose (Co-PC), quercetin and gallic acid [Co-PC, UV spectral data; 1H NMR of 13: galloyl moiety: δ ppm 6.97; quercetin moiety: ppm 6.36 (d, J=2.5 Hz, H-6), 6.75 (d, J=2.5 Hz, H-8), 6.8 (d, J=7.5 Hz, H-5′), 7.52 (m, H-2′ and H-6′), 12.6 (s, OH-5); β-glucoside moieties: ppm 5.16 (d, J=8.5 Hz, anomeric proton of C-7 glucoside), 5.50 (d, J=8.5 Hz, anomeric proton of C-3 glucoside), 4.4 (dd, J=12 and 5.5 Hz, one methylenic H2-6 proton), 4.24 (m, one methylenic H-6 proton), 3.3–3.9 (m, glucose protons). 13C NMR of 13: quercetin moiety: δ ppm 156.5 (C-2), 133.9 (C-3), 177.5 (C-4), 161.8 (C-5), 99.7 (C-6), 160.5 (C-7), 94.3 (C-8), 156.4 (C-9), 104.4 (C-10), 122.2 (C-1′), 115.4 (C-2′), 144.7 (C-3′), 148.9 (C-4′), 115.9 (C-5′), 121.3 (C-6′); galloyl moiety: 121.7 (C-l), 109.5 (C-2 and C-6), 145.5 (C-3 and C-5), 138.9 (C-4), 166.4 (C=O); glucose moiety at flavonol C-7: 99.8 (C-1), 73.1 (C-2), 76.4 (C-3), 69.7 (C-4), 76.5 (C-5), 60.1 (C-6); glucose moiety at flavonol C-3: 102.91 (C-1), 74.3 (C-2), 77.1 (C-3), 69.5 (C-4), 76.8 (C-5), 63.17 (C-6).
4 Conclusion
The present study has revealed that A. auriculata is capable of synthesizing and accumulating several ellagitannins, gallotannins and acylated flavonol glycosides [7], together with normal flavonol glycosides [6].
Acknowledgments
This research was supported and financed by the Alexander von Humboldt foundation through the group linkage program (joint project: “Bioactive phenolics from Egyptian folk medicinal plants”, 3.4-Fokoop-DEU/1093980) awarded to U. Lindequist and M. Nawwar.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest.
References
1. Nawwar MA, Hussein SA, Ayoub NA, Hashim AN, El-Sharawy RT, Lindequist U, et al. Constitutive phenolics of Harpephyllum caffrum. Fitoterapia 2011;82:1265–71.10.1016/j.fitote.2011.08.014Search in Google Scholar
2. Nawwar MA, Ayoub NA, El-Rae MA, Bassyouny F, Mostafa ES, Al-Abd A, et al. Cytotoxic ellagitannins from Reaumuria vermiculata. Fitoterapia 2012a;83:1256–66.10.1016/j.fitote.2012.06.007Search in Google Scholar
3. Nawwar MA, Ayoub NA, Hussein SA, Hashim AN, El-Sharawy RT, Wende K, et al. A flavonol triglycoside and investigation of the antioxidant and cell stimulating activities of Annona muricata Linn. Arch Pharmacol Res 2012b;35:761–7.10.1007/s12272-012-0501-4Search in Google Scholar
4. Nawwar MA, Swilam NF, Hashim AN, Al-Abd AM, Abdel-Naim A, Lindequist U. Cytotoxic isoferulic acid amide from Myricaria germanica (Tamaricaceae). Plant Sign Behav 2013;8:33–41.10.4161/psb.22642Search in Google Scholar
5. Taeckholm V. Student flora of Egypt, 2nd ed. Published by Cairo University, 1974:177.Search in Google Scholar
6. Gohar AA, Maatooq GT, Mrawan EM, Zaki AA, Takaya Y. Two oleananes from Ammannia auriculata Willd. Nat Prod Res 2012;26:1328–33.10.1080/14786419.2011.582841Search in Google Scholar
7. Nawwar MA, Ayoub NA, El-Raey MA, Zaghloul S, Hashem AN, Mostafa ES, et al. Polyphenols in Ammania auriculata: structures, antioxidative activity and cytotoxicity. Pharmazie 2014;69:860–4.Search in Google Scholar
8. Parekh J, Chanda S. Antibacterial and phytochemical studies on twelve species of Indian medicinal plants. African J Biomed Res 2007;10:175–81.Search in Google Scholar
9. Harborne JB, Williams CA. Identification. In: Harborne JB, Mabry TJ, Mabry H, editors. The flavonoids. London: Chapman & Hall, 1975:383.Search in Google Scholar
10. Mabry TJ, Markham KR, Thomas MB. The systematic identification of the flavonoids. New York: Springer, 1969.10.1007/978-3-642-88458-0Search in Google Scholar
11. Collins FW, Bohm BA, Wilkins CK. Flavonol glycoside gallates from Tellima grandiflora. Phytochemistry 1975;14:1099–102.10.1016/0031-9422(75)85195-8Search in Google Scholar
12. Markham KR, Ternai B, Stanley R, Geiger H, Mabry TJ. 13C NMR studies of flavonoids – III. Naturally occurring flavonoid glycosides and their acylated derivatives. Tetrahedron 1978;34:1389–97.10.1016/0040-4020(78)88336-7Search in Google Scholar
13. Nawwar MA, Buddrus J, Bauer H. Dimeric phenolic constituents from the roots of Tamarix nilotica. Phytochemistry 1982;21:1755–8.10.1016/S0031-9422(82)85054-1Search in Google Scholar
14. Nawwar MA, Ishak MS, Linscheid MW, Buddrus J. Leaf flavonoids of Ziziphus spina-christi. Phytochemistry 1984;23:2110–1.10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84999-7Search in Google Scholar
15. Nawwar MA, Hussein SA. Gall polyphenolics of Tamarix aphylla. Phytochemistry 1994;36:1035–7.10.1016/S0031-9422(00)90486-2Search in Google Scholar
16. Matsuda H. Studies on the constituents of the leaves of Rhus and of some species of related genera in Japan. Chem Pharm Bull 1966;14:877–83.10.1248/cpb.14.877Search in Google Scholar
17. Ikramov MT, Mavasheva FA, Batirov EKh. Myricetin-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (isomyricetin). Chem Nat Comp 1990;26:226.10.1007/BF00607556Search in Google Scholar
18. Liu H, Yan M, Zhao J, Wang J, Zhou L, Wang M, et al. Flavonoids from Halostachys caspica and antioxidant activities. Molecules 2010;15:7933–45.10.3390/molecules15117933Search in Google Scholar
19. Adam KP. Phenolic constituents of the fern Phegopetris connectilis. Phytochemistry 1999;52:929–34.10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00326-XSearch in Google Scholar
20. Panthama N, Kanokmedhakul S, Kanokmedhakul K. Galloyl and hexahydroxydiphenoyl esters of phenylpropanoid glucosides. Phenyl propanoids and phenylpropanoid glucosides from Rhizome of Balanophora fungosa. Chem Pharm Bull 2009;57:1352–5.10.1248/cpb.57.1352Search in Google Scholar
21. Hatano T, Hattori S, Okuda T. Coriariin A and B, new dimeric and monomeric hydrolysable tannins. Chem Pharm Bull 1986;34:4092–7.10.1248/cpb.34.4092Search in Google Scholar
22. Nishizawa K, Nakata I, Kishida, Aver WA, Browne LM. Some biologically active tannins of Nuphar variegatum. Phytochemistry 1990;29:2491–4.10.1016/0031-9422(90)85172-CSearch in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Larvicidal activity of the essential oil of Youngia japonica aerial parts and its constituents against Aedes albopictus
- Antiviral and antitumor activities of the lectin extracted from Aspidistra elatior
- Susceptibility of Microsporum canis arthrospores to a mixture of chemically defined essential oils: a perspective for environmental decontamination
- Central analgesic activity of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the leaves of Albizia lebbeck: role of the GABAergic and serotonergic pathways
- Three further triterpenoid saponins from Gleditsia caspica fruits and protective effect of the total saponin fraction on cyclophosphamide-induced genotoxicity in mice
- Acylated flavonol diglucosides from Ammania auriculata
- Synthesis and antimicrobial properties of N-substituted derivatives of (E)-2′,3″-thiazachalcones
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Larvicidal activity of the essential oil of Youngia japonica aerial parts and its constituents against Aedes albopictus
- Antiviral and antitumor activities of the lectin extracted from Aspidistra elatior
- Susceptibility of Microsporum canis arthrospores to a mixture of chemically defined essential oils: a perspective for environmental decontamination
- Central analgesic activity of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of the leaves of Albizia lebbeck: role of the GABAergic and serotonergic pathways
- Three further triterpenoid saponins from Gleditsia caspica fruits and protective effect of the total saponin fraction on cyclophosphamide-induced genotoxicity in mice
- Acylated flavonol diglucosides from Ammania auriculata
- Synthesis and antimicrobial properties of N-substituted derivatives of (E)-2′,3″-thiazachalcones