Home High-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of the samarium meta-oxoborate γ-Sm(BO2)3
Article Open Access

High-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of the samarium meta-oxoborate γ-Sm(BO2)3

  • Birgit Fuchs , Robert O. Kindler , Gunter Heymann and Hubert Huppertz EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 29, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

γ-Sm(BO2)3 was obtained via a high-pressure/high-temperature approach in a multi-anvil apparatus at 10 GPa and 1673 K. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pca21 (no. 29) with the lattice parameters a = 18.3088(8), b = 4.4181(2), and c = 4.2551(2) Å. The compound was analysed by means of X-ray diffraction and vibrational spectroscopy. The structure is isotypic to that of the already known meta-oxoborates γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd) and built up of a highly condensed borate framework containing three-, four-, six-, and ten-membered rings. Next to neodymium, samarium represents the second rare earth element that forms the α-, β-, and γ-modification of the four known rare earth meta-oxoborate structure types.

1 Introduction

High-pressure/high-temperature investigations into the broad field of rare earth borates have yielded various compositions hitherto unknown at ambient pressure conditions. New oxoborates with striking features like edge-sharing BO4 tetrahedra as in RE4B6O15 (RE = Dy, Ho) [1], [2] and α-RE2B4O9 (RE = Sm−Ho) [], or RE3B5O12 (RE = Sc, Er–Lu) [6], [7], which is analogous to the beryllo-silicate semenovite, have been found. But also in the extensively investigated family of meta-oxoborates with the composition RE(BO2)3 (RE = rare earth), discoveries are still made to date. Here, four modifications are known, designated with the Greek letters α, β, γ, and δ. The longest known α-phase is well characterized, crystallizing in the monoclinic space group C2/c and is built up of chains of planar BO3 and tetrahedral BO4 units (Figure 1, top). The first detailed description of the crystal structure of the β-modification (Figure 1, middle), more accurate β-Tb(BO2)3, was published in 2003 by Nikelski and Schleid [8]. Further isotypic compounds of the series β-RE(BO2)3 (RE = Y, Nd, Sm–Gd, Dy–Lu) [9], [10], [11], [12] were synthesized under high-pressure conditions and β-Dy(BO2)3 additionally at ambient pressure conditions [13]. Investigations into the larger lanthanides led to another modification, designated as γ-phase (Figure 1, bottom), for γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd) under pressures of at least 7.5 GPa [14]. While the β-modification crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma, the γ-modification adopts the space group Pca21. For lanthanum and cerium, yet another monoclinic modification was found, δ-La(BO2)3 [15] and δ-Ce(BO2)3 [16] at 5.5 and 3.5 GPa, respectively.

Figure 1: Top: Crystal structure of α-Sm(BO2)3 comprising chains of BO3 groups and BO4 tetrahedra. Middle: Corrugated layers in the structure of β-Sm(BO2)3. Bottom: Network of BO4 tetrahedra in γ-Sm(BO2)3 forming six- membered rings.
Figure 1:

Top: Crystal structure of α-Sm(BO2)3 comprising chains of BO3 groups and BO4 tetrahedra. Middle: Corrugated layers in the structure of β-Sm(BO2)3. Bottom: Network of BO4 tetrahedra in γ-Sm(BO2)3 forming six- membered rings.

In contrast to the α-phase, all three other modifications are built up exclusively of BO4 tetrahedra, leading to complex borate frameworks with increasing condensation at higher pressures. This can be illustrated with the amount of threefold coordinated oxygen atoms within the structures, which concerns every sixth of the oxygen atoms in δ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La, Ce) and every third of the oxygen atoms in γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd).

In this work, we present γ-Sm(BO2)3, where samarium is now the fifth element of the lanthanoid series to exhibit this crystal structure and also only the second one to show the β- as well as the γ-modification. The various syntheses conditions are compared and the results of the single-crystal structure determination and the vibrational spectroscopic analysis are presented.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Crystal structure

γ-Sm(BO2)3 crystallizes, like its isotypic compounds γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd), in the orthorhombic space group Pca21 (no. 29). The unit cell comprises Z = 4 formula units and exhibits the lattice parameters a = 18.3088(8), b = 4.4181(2), and c = 4.2551(2) Å and a volume of V = 344.20(3) Å³. Table 1 shows all relevant details of the single-crystal structure refinement.

Table 1:

Crystal data and structure refinement of γ-Sm(BO2)3.

Empirical formulaγ-Sm(BO2)3
Molar mass, g mol−1278.78
Crystal systemorthorhombic
Space groupPca21 (no. 29)
Single-crystal data
T, K268(2)
Radiation; wavelength λ, pmMoKα; 71.07
a, Å18.3088(8)
b, Å4.4181(2)
c, Å4.2551(2)
V, Å3344.20(3)
Z4
Calculated density, g cm−35.38
Absorption coeff., mm−117.0
F(000), e500
Crystal size, mm30.08 × 0.03 × 0.02
θ range, deg3.3–41.2
Index ranges hkl−32 ≤ h ≤ 33, −8 ≤ k ≤ 8, −7 ≤ l ≤ 7
Reflections collected17034
Independent reflections2247
Rint/Rσ0.0435 / 0.0250
Completeness to θ = 25.2°, %100
Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters2247/1/87
Goodness-of-fit on F21.252
Final R1/wR2 indices [I > 2 σ(I)]0.0170/0.0378
Final R1/wR2 indices (all data)0.0171/0.0378
Largest diff. peak / hole, e Å−33.62/−2.12
Flack parameter0.066(6)
Powder diffraction data
Radiation; wavelength λ, pmMo1; 70.93
a, Å18.3000(3)
b, Å4.41802(6)
c, Å4.25542(6)
V, Å3344.050(8)
2θ range, deg2.0–42.0
2θ step width, deg0.015
Rexp, %2.66
Rwp, %4.21
Rp, %3.12

The crystal structure of γ-Sm(BO2)3 is built up exclusively of BO4 tetrahedra, which are connected by common corners to form a complex borate network. Alongside [001], the BO4 tetrahedra are arranged in ten-membered rings (Figure 2), formed by alternating layers (blue polyhedra) and zig-zag chains of BO4 tetrahedra (light blue polyhedra). The borate layers in the bc plane are extremely condensed, with one third of the oxygen atoms being threefold coordinated. The BO4 tetrahedra within these layers form three- and four-membered rings (Figure 3) with two of the three oxygen atoms in a three-membered ring being threefold coordinated and one of the oxygen atoms in a four-membered ring. Looking onto [010], six-membered rings are developed between the borate layers and the connecting zig-zag chains (Figure 1, bottom). The B–O bond lengths in this structure range from 1.427(4) to 1.553(4) Å with the longest distances between the threefold coordinated oxygen atom O1 and the respective boron atoms (1.527(4)–1.553(4) Å), which was found in the isotypic compounds γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd) as well [14]. The average B–O distance of 1.476 Å is in good agreement with the value of 1.48(4) reported by Zobetz [17]. The O–B–O angles also lie within a rather wide range of 105.6(3) and 118.5(3)°, but the average value of 109.5° corresponds well with the expected tetrahedral angle. All the bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 2 and Table 3. The positional parameters can be seen in Table 4.

Figure 2: Crystal structure of γ-Sm(BO2)3 viewed along [001].The borate layers (blue polyhedra) and zig-zag chains of BO4 tetrahedra (light blue polyhedra) form ten-membered rings.
Figure 2:

Crystal structure of γ-Sm(BO2)3 viewed along [001].The borate layers (blue polyhedra) and zig-zag chains of BO4 tetrahedra (light blue polyhedra) form ten-membered rings.

Figure 3: One of the borate layers of γ-Sm(BO2)3 viewed parallel to the bc plane. The BO4 tetrahedra form three- and four-membered rings. Threefold-coordinated oxygen atoms are shown in light blue.
Figure 3:

One of the borate layers of γ-Sm(BO2)3 viewed parallel to the bc plane. The BO4 tetrahedra form three- and four-membered rings. Threefold-coordinated oxygen atoms are shown in light blue.

Table 2:

Interatomic B–O and Sm–O distances (Å) for γ-Sm(BO2)3 (standard deviations in parentheses).

B1−O21.449(5)B2−O61.447(3)
−O51.452(4)−O31.451(7)
−O41.459(5)−O21.487(5)
−O11.548(4)−O31.488(5)
Ø1.477Ø1.468
B3−O41.428(5)Sm1−O52.342(6)
−O51.432(4)−O42.374(3)
−O11.527(4)−O52.395(6)
−O11.553(4)−O12.420(3)
−O52.442(2)
−O32.548(2)
−O22.780(3)
−O42.838(3)
−O12.970(3)
−O33.025(3)
Ø1.485Ø2.613
Table 3:

Bond angles/deg for γ-Sm(BO2)3 (standard deviations in parentheses).

O2–B1–O1108.0(3)O3–B2–O3106.1(2)O4–B3–O1105.6(3)
O5–B1–O1108.5(3)O6–B2–O2108.7(3)O5–B3–O1105.6(3)
O4–B1–O1108.7(2)O2–B2–O3109.3(4)O4–B3–O1107.3(3)
O2–B1–O4108.8(3)O6–B2–O3110.3(5)O1–B3–O1107.9(2)
O2–B1–O5109.9(3)O6–B2–O3110.7(3)O5–B3–O1111.4(3)
O5–B1–O4112.9(3)O3–B2–O2111.7(3)O4–B3–O5118.5(3)
Ø109.5Ø109.5Ø109.4
Table 4:

Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters Ueq2) of γ-Sm(BO2)3. All atoms are located on Wyckoff positions 4a.

AtomxyzUeq
Sm10.33892(2)0.69408(3)0.00019(8)0.00333(5)
B10.0738(2)0.1739(7)0.036(1)0.0024(7)
B20.2128(2)0.1473(6)0.003(2)0.0025(3)
B30.4983(2)0.3227(7)0.0613(8)0.0027(3)
O10.0153(2)0.3681(6)0.2041(5)0.0030(3)
O20.1450(2)0.2701(6)0.1470(6)0.0030(3)
O30.2772(2)0.2560(6)0.1843(6)0.0030(3)
O40.4307(2)0.2305(6)0.1984(6)0.0035(3)
O50.5618(2)0.1413(6)0.1169(6)0.0033(3)
O60.7091(2)0.1798(4)0.007(2)0.0034(3)

The samarium cations in γ-Sm(BO2)3 are coordinated by 8 + 2 oxygen atoms and are located in the six-membered rings along [010]. The ten-membered rings alongside [001] contain two Sm3+ cations each. The Sm–O distances range from 2.342(6) to 2.838(3) Å, with two additional oxygen atoms at slightly longer distances of 2.970(3) and 3.025(3) Å, that only coordinate weakly to the rare earth cations, leading to the 8 + 2 coordination (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Coordination sphere of the Sm3+ cation in γ-Sm(BO2)3. Sm–O distances shown in Å.
Figure 4:

Coordination sphere of the Sm3+ cation in γ-Sm(BO2)3. Sm–O distances shown in Å.

This was confirmed by calculation of the bond valence sums (ΣV) [18], [19] as well as the values based on the CHARDI (ΣQ) [20] concept, which show only a small contribution for these two oxygen atoms. The resulting formal ionic charges correspond well with the expected values of +3 for samarium and boron as well as −2 for oxygen as shown in Table 5.

Table 5:

Bond valence sums and charge distributions according to the bond-length/bond-strength (∑V) as well as the CHARDI (∑Q) concept, respectively.

Sm1B1B2B3O1O2O3O4O5O6
V+2.94+3.01+3.07+2.97−1.95−2.14−1.87−1.94−1.89−2.12
Q+2.82+3.10+2.85+3.23−2.03−1.90−2.07−2.08−2.25−1.69

The newly presented meta-oxoborate γ-Sm(BO2)3 is isotypic to the already known compounds γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd) and its lattice parameter fit well into this series, which is shown in Table 6 and Figure 5. The contraction of the structures due to the smaller radii for the lanthanide cations going from the left to the right in the periodic table (lanthanide contraction) is particularly distinct for the a parameter. The crystal structure seems to be more compressible in this direction because of the looser connectivity between the layers and the chains of BO4 tetrahedra compared to the shrinkage within the layers in the bc plane.

Table 6:

Comparison of the lattice parameters (Å) and volumes (ų) of γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Sm).

CompoundabcVReference
γ-La(BO2)318.482(5)4.4781(7)4.308(2)356.55(9)[14]
γ-Ce(BO2)318.442(9)4.461(2)4.294(2)353.3(2)[14]
γ-Pr(BO2)318.381(6)4.4464(7)4.278(2)349.6(2)[14]
γ-Nd(BO2)318.348(7)4.4394(8)4.272(2)348.0(2)[14]
γ-Sm(BO2)318.3088(8)4.4181(2)4.2551(2)344.20(3)this work
Figure 5: Comparison of the cell parameters and cell volumes in the γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Sm) series.
Figure 5:

Comparison of the cell parameters and cell volumes in the γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Sm) series.

Samarium now represents the second lanthanide cation, the other being neodymium, to form the α-, β-, and γ-meta-oxoborate. The compound presented here was synthesized under quite extreme conditions of 10 GPa and 1673 K, while the β-compound γ-Sm(BO2)3 was first found at conditions of 7.5 GPa and 1323 K. Recent investigations in connection with the neighbouring phase β-Eu(BO2)3 have demonstrated that β-Sm(BO2)3 can already be formed at lower pressures of 4 GPa. This difference in the required pressure can also be observed for the compounds β- and γ-Nd(BO2)3. Here, the β-compound was found at 3.5 GPa and the γ-compound at 7.5 GPa.

This structure type has also been found for BiB3O6 prepared under high-pressure conditions of 5.5 GPa and 1093 K, designated as δ-BiB3O6. The two compounds differ mainly in the coordination of the cation [21]. Because of the sterically active lone pair of Bi3+, the cation is only sevenfold coordinated by oxygen atoms and the Bi–O distances are slightly shorter (2.26–2.73 Å) than in the γ-Sm(BO2)3 form presented here (Sm–O = 2.342−3.025 Å).

Looking onto [010], the structure of γ-Sm(BO2)3 is very similar to that of the ambient pressure phase SrB4O7 [] and its isotypic compounds PbB4O7 [23], [25] and EuB4O7 [26], as well as the high-pressure borates β-CaB4O7 [27] and β-HgB4O7 [28], exhibiting the same crystal structure. These compounds also feature borate layers in the bc plane that are condensed to form six-membered rings in [010]. In contrast to the γ-meta-oxoborates, these layers are not separated by zig-zag chains of BO4 tetrahedra but are connected directly via a mirror plane (Figure 6). This symmetrical arrangement also leads to an increased cation coordination of CN = 15 by oxygen atoms.

Figure 6: Comparison of the crystal structures of γ-Sm(BO2)3 (top) and SrB4O7 (bottom).
Figure 6:

Comparison of the crystal structures of γ-Sm(BO2)3 (top) and SrB4O7 (bottom).

2.2 X-ray powder diffraction

Figure 7 shows the Rietveld refinement plot of γ-Sm(BO2)3 derived from the structural model obtained through single-crystal diffraction. No obvious side product can be found, but the halo at small 2θ angles indicates the presence of an amorphous phase, most likely excess B2O3. The signal at approximately 2θ = 8° stems from the grease that was used to prepare the sample. Further details on the Rietveld refinement can be found in Table 1.

Figure 7: Rietveld refinement plot of γ-Sm(BO2)3.
Figure 7:

Rietveld refinement plot of γ-Sm(BO2)3.

2.3 Vibrational spectroscopy

Figure 8 depicts the infrared (IR) spectrum of a γ-Sm(BO2)3 powder sample in the range between 400 and 2500 cm−1. In the upper range of the spectrum (2000–4000 cm−1), no vibrational bands due to hydroxyl groups or water are visible. Between 900 and 1200 cm−1, typical stretching vibrations of the BO4 tetrahedra are present [29]. The absorption bands that appear at around 1300 cm−1 and below 790 cm−1 are in a range normally characteristic for BO3 groups. Since γ-Sm(BO2)3 does not feature BO3 groups, these bands could be attributed to O–B–Sm, B–O–B, O–B–O, and B–O bending and stretching vibrations, as confirmed by quantum-chemical calculations for β-ZnB4O7, a high-pressure compound that also features exclusively BO4 tetrahedra, and β-CaB4O7, which is isotypic to the aforementioned SrB4O7 [30]. BO4 bending vibrations are observed below ∼900 cm−1.

Figure 8: IR spectrum of a γ-Sm(BO2)3 powder sample.
Figure 8:

IR spectrum of a γ-Sm(BO2)3 powder sample.

3 Conclusion

The new γ-meta-oxoborate γ-Sm(BO2)3 has been synthesized under high-pressure/high-temperature conditions of 10 GPa and 1673 K. It is isotypic to the already known series of γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE = La−Nd), which were all formed at not so extreme conditions of 7.5 GPa and 1273 K. Besides neodymium, samarium now represents only the second rare earth element that is able to develop the α-, β-, and γ-phase of the meta-oxoborate structure family.

The structure is built up of highly condensed BO4 layers in the bc plane, which are connected via zig-zag chains of BO4 tetrahedra. This borate network forms six-membered rings along [010] and ten-membered rings along [001], wherein one or two samarium cations are located, respectively. These Sm3+ cations are coordinated by 8 + 2 oxygen atoms.

These findings indicate that the use of higher pressure can be a successful route to further extend the already large meta-oxoborate structure family. Ongoing experiments suggest that also for Eu3+, which is even smaller than Sm3+, the γ-meta-oxoborate crystal structure can be formed at sufficiently high pressure.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Synthesis

A high-pressure/high-temperature experiment in a hydraulic 1000 t press with a modified Walker-type module (both Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Germany) was performed to obtain the title compound γ-Sm(BO2)3. A mixture of a stoichiometric ratio (1:6) of Sm2O3 (Smart Elements, Wien, Austria, 99.9%) and H3BO3 (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany, >99.8%) was grinded together in an agate mortar under ambient conditions and filled into a Pt capsule, that was placed in an α-BN crucible, closed with a lid of the same material (both Henze Boron Nitride Products AG, Germany) and subsequently centered in a pressure transmitting octahedron (MgO, doped with 5% Cr2O3; Ceramic Substrates & Components Ltd, Newport, United Kingdom). The high-pressure/high-temperature experiment was carried out in an 18/11 assembly. A more detailed description of the experimental setup can be found in the literature [].

The sample was compressed to 10 GPa in 270 min and then heated up to 1673 K in the following 15 min. This temperature was kept for the next 10 min, before it was lowered to room temperature in the following 25 min. Afterwards, the pressure was relieved in the following 810 min. The product was found to be light green crystal needles of γ-Sm(BO2)3.

4.2 X-ray diffraction measurements

The reaction product was characterized by powder diffraction analysis on a STOE Stadi P powder diffractometer (STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), carried out on a flat sample in transmission geometry. The measurement was performed with Ge(111)-monochromatized Mo1 radiation (λ = 70.93 pm) and detected with a Mythen 1 K detector (Dectris) in the 2θ range of 2–52° with a step size of 0.015°. The Rietveld refinement was performed employing the Topas 4.2 software [34].

For the single-crystal structure analyses, suitable crystals were separated under a polarization microscope and measured on a Bruker D8 Quest Kappa diffractometer equipped with an Incoatec microfocus X-ray tube, a multilayer optic to generate monochromatized Mo radiation (λ = 0.7107 Å) and a Photon 100 CMOS detector. Reflections were measured in the range 3.3 ≤ θ ≤ 41.2° and the structure solution and parameter refinement were performed with Direct Methods using Shelxs/l-2017/1 [35], [36] implemented in the program WinGX-2013.3 [37]. All atoms except the boron atom B2 could be refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. The atomic coordinates were standardized employing STRUCTURE TIDY [38] as implemented in Platon [39].

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre CCDC/FIZ Karlsruhe deposition service via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures on quoting the deposition number CCDC 1995888 for γ-Sm(BO2)3.

4.3 Vibrational spectroscopy

For further characterization of γ-Sm(BO2)3, an FTIR-ATR (Attenuated Total Reflection) spectrum of a powder sample was acquired with a Bruker ALPHA Platinum-ATR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, USA). The spectrometer is provided with a 2 × 2 mm diamond ATR-crystal and a DTGS detector. 320 scans of the powder sample were obtained in the spectral range of 400–4000 cm−1 and afterwards corrected for atmospheric influences employing the Opus 7.2 software [40].


Corresponding author: Hubert Huppertz, Institut für Allgemeine, Anorganische und Theoretische Chemie, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 80–82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria, E-mail:

Funding source: Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union

Acknowledgments

R. O. Kindler wants to thank the Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union for the financial support of his research internship.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Huppertz, H., von der Eltz, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9376–9377. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja017691z.Search in Google Scholar

2. Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2003, 58b, 278–290; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2003-0406.Search in Google Scholar

3. Emme, H., Huppertz, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3623–3633. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200204696.Search in Google Scholar

4. Emme, H., Huppertz, H. Acta Crystallogr. 2005, C61, i29–i31; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270104030446.Search in Google Scholar

5. Schmitt, M. K., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2017, 72b, 977–982; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2017-0150.Search in Google Scholar

6. Emme, H., Valldor, M., Pöttgen, R., Huppertz, H. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 2707–2715; https://doi.org/10.1021/cm047741.10.1021/cm047741+Search in Google Scholar

7. Neumair, S. C., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2009, 64b, 1339–1344; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2009-11-1213.Search in Google Scholar

8. Nikelski, T., Schleid, T. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2003, 629, 1017–1022; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.200200446.Search in Google Scholar

9. Schmitt, M. K., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2017, 72b, 983–988; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2017-0151.Search in Google Scholar

10. Emme, H., Nikelski, T., Schleid, T., Pöttgen, R., Möller, M. H., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. B. 2004, 59, 202–215; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2004-0213.Search in Google Scholar

11. Fuchs, B., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2019, 74b, 685–692; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2019-0117.Search in Google Scholar

12. Emme, H., Heymann, G., Haberer, A., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2007, 62b, 765–770; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2007-0603.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nikelski, T., Schäfer, M. C., Huppertz, H., Schleid, T. Z. Kristallogr. 2008, 223, 177–178; https://doi.org/10.1524/ncrs.2008.0073.Search in Google Scholar

14. Emme, H., Despotopoulou, C., Huppertz, H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004, 630, 2450–2457; https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.200400202.Search in Google Scholar

15. Heymann, G., Soltner, T., Huppertz, H. Solid State Sci. 2006, 8, 821–829; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2006.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

16. Haberer, A., Heymann, G., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2007, 62b, 759–764; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2007-0602.Search in Google Scholar

17. Zobetz, E. Z. Kristallogr. 1990, 191, 45–57; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1990.191.1-2.45.Search in Google Scholar

18. Brown, I. D., Altermatt, D. Acta Crystallogr. 1985, B41, 244–247; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768185002063.Search in Google Scholar

19. Brese, N. E., Keeffe, M.Ó Acta Crystallogr. 1991, B47, 192–197; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768190011041.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hoppe, R., Voigt, S., Glaum, H., Kissel, J., Müller, H. P., Bernet, K. J. Less-Common Met. 1989, 156, 105–122; https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(89)90411-6.Search in Google Scholar

21. Knyrim, J. S., Becker, P., Johrendt, D., Huppertz, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 8239–8241; https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200703399.Search in Google Scholar

22. Krogh-Moe, J. Acta Chem. Scand. 1964, 18, 2055–2060; https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.18-2055.Search in Google Scholar

23. Perloff, A., Block, S. Acta Crystallogr. 1966, 20, 274–279; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X66000525.Search in Google Scholar

24. Pan, F., Shen, G., Wang, R., Wang, X., Shen, D. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 241, 108–114; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(02)00873-4.Search in Google Scholar

25. Corker, D. L., Glazer, A. M. Acta Crystallogr. 1996, B52, 260–265; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768195013310.Search in Google Scholar

26. Machida, K.-I., Adachi, G.-Y., Shiokawa, J. Acta Crystallogr. 1980, B36, 2008–2011; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567740880007820.Search in Google Scholar

27. Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2003, 58b, 257–265; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2003-0403.Search in Google Scholar

28. Emme, H., Weil, M., Huppertz, H. Z. Naturforsch. 2005, 60b, 815–820; https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2005-0801.Search in Google Scholar

29. Neumair, S. C., Vanicek, S., Kaindl, R., Többens, D. M., Martineau, C., Taulelle, F., Senker, J., Huppertz, H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 4147–4152; https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201100618.Search in Google Scholar

30. Kaindl, R., Sohr, G., Huppertz, H. Spectrochim. Acta A 2013, 116, 408–417; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2013.07.072.Search in Google Scholar

31. Walker, D., Carpenter, M. A., Hitch, C. M. Am. Mineral. 1990, 75, 1020–1028.Search in Google Scholar

32. Walker, D. Am. Mineral. 1991, 76, 1092–1100.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar

33. Huppertz, H. Z. Kristallogr. 2004, 219, 330–338; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633.Search in Google Scholar

34. Topas (version 4.2); Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI (USA), 2009.Search in Google Scholar

35. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112–122; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767307043930.Search in Google Scholar

36. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8; https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053229614024218.Search in Google Scholar

37. Farrugia, L. J. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2012, 45, 849–854; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812029111.Search in Google Scholar

38. Gelato, L. M. Parthé, E., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 139–143; https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889887086965.Search in Google Scholar

39. Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr. 2009, D65, 148–155; https://doi.org/10.1107/S090744490804362X.Search in Google Scholar

40. Opus (version 7.2); Bruker: Billerica, MA (USA), 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-09
Accepted: 2020-04-19
Published Online: 2020-06-29
Published in Print: 2020-08-27

© 2020 Birgit Fuchs et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Research articles
  4. Derivatives of the triaminoguanidinium ion, 7: unsymmetrically substituted N,N',N''-triaminoguanidinium salts via a cyclopentanone spiroaminal intermediate
  5. Diethyl (iodoethynyl)phosphonate and (iodoethynyl)diphenylphosphane oxide: crystal structures and some cycloaddition reactions
  6. Synthesis, molecular structure and BSA-binding properties of a new binuclear Cd(II) complex based on 2-(1H-tetrazol-1-methyl)-1H-imidazole-4,5-dicarboxylic acid
  7. Microwave synthesis of a blue luminescent silver(I) coordination polymer with a rigid tris-triazole ligand
  8. Single-crystal structure determination of LaNi5–xInx and LaNi9–xIn2+x
  9. The reaction of imidazo[1,5-a]pyridines with ninhydrin revisited
  10. The syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of two mononuclear manganese(II) complexes involving in situ hydrothermal decarboxylation
  11. A cobalt(II) coordination polymer constructed with the 2-carboxy-phenoxyacetate linker showing a corrugated layer structure: synthesis, structure analysis and magnetic properties
  12. Hexaniobate anions connected by [Ni(cyclam)]2+ complexes yield two interpenetrating three-dimensional networks
  13. High-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of the samarium meta-oxoborate γ-Sm(BO2)3
  14. High-pressure synthesis and characterization of the non-centrosymmetric scandium borate ScB6O9(OH)3
  15. Al5B12O25(OH) and Ga4InB12O25(OH) – two additional triel borates with the structure type M5B12O25(OH) (M = Ga, In)
  16. Al/N-based active Lewis pairs: isocyanate insertion products as efficient nucleophiles employed for the facile generation of highly functional molecules
  17. New compounds of the Li2MSn3S8 type
  18. Synthesis and magnetic properties of the extended RE4Pd9Al24 series (RE = Sc, Y, Ce–Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu)
  19. Solid solutions EuAu4Cd2−xMgx with a remarkably stable ferromagnetic ground state
  20. Mechanistic investigations on C–H activated dealkylating cyclo-amination reactions of substituted triazenes, formamidines and amidines
  21. Orthoamide und Iminiumsalze, IIC. Darstellung von N-(ω-Ammonioalkyl)-N,N′,N′,N″,N″-peralkylierten Guanidiniumsalzen und N-(ω-Aminoalkyl)-N′,N′,N″,N″-tetramethylguanidinen
  22. Orthoamide und Iminiumsalze, IC. Synthese und Reaktionen von N,N,N′,N′,N′′-Pentaalkyl-N′′-[2-(N,N,N′,N′,N′′-pentaalkylguanidinio)ethyl]-guanidiniumsalzen
  23. Orthoamide und Iminiumsalze, C. Vinyloge Guanidiniumsalz-basierte ionische Flüssigkeiten sowie phenyloge Guanidiniumsalze und Orthoamide
  24. Notes
  25. La5Ir1.73In4.27 with Lu5Ni2In4-type structure
  26. The scandium-rich indide Sc50Pt13.47In2.53
Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2020-0045/html
Scroll to top button