Startseite Single-crystal structure refinement of YbF2 with a remark about YbH2
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Single-crystal structure refinement of YbF2 with a remark about YbH2

  • Olaf Reckeweg EMAIL logo und Francis J. DiSalvo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. November 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Transparent-yellow single crystals of YbF2 were obtained as only crystalline product from the solid-state reaction of Yb and teflon designed to yield ‘Yb3C3F2’ in addition to some amorphous black material. The first single-crystal structure determination of YbF2 (cubic space group Fmm, CaF2-type structure, a=559.46(16) pm; R1=1.2%, wR2=3.2%) was the starting point to compare isostructural binary fluorides MF2 and hydrides MH2 (M=Ca, Yb, Eu, Sr and Ba) exhibiting an as-yet unexplained small volume per formula unit for YbH2.

1 Introduction

Alkaline earth metals and some rare earth metals show similarities in their crystal chemistry due to their similar ionic radius and coordination need in the divalent state [1], e.g. Ca2+ and Yb2+ (112 pm vs. 114 pm for the coordination number CN=8) or Eu2+ and Sr2+ (125 pm vs. 126 pm for the coordination number CN=8). Therefore, it was intended to extend the chemistry of allenide [C=C=C]4− moieties by synthesizing compounds such as Ca2Cl2[C3] [2] by reacting teflon powder with metallic ytterbium or, alternatively, Yb, YbCl3 with elemental carbon. The reaction with the chloride yielded only recrystallized powders of YbCl3 and amorphous material, whereas the reaction of Yb with teflon produced mainly light yellow, transparent single crystalline YbF2 and some X-ray-amorphous material.

Besides the first single-crystal structure determination of YbF2 we also report a relatively small volume per formula unit for YbH2 compared to those of MF2 and MH2 compounds (M=Ca, Yb, Eu, Sr and Ba).

2 Experimental section

All preparations were carried out under a continuously purified and monitored argon atmosphere in glove boxes (Fa. M. Braun, Garching, Germany). The reactions took place in arc-welded Nb tubes (99.99%, Plansee, Germany).

Yb (99.9%, chips, Strem, Newburyport, MA, USA), and (CF2)n (Sigma-Aldrich, >40 μm powder St. Louis, MO, USA) were mixed and compacted manually in a 4: 3 molar ratio (overall mass: 0.3 g). This pellet was arc-welded into a Nb ampoule and subsequently silica-jacketed under vacuum. The reaction container was placed upright into a box furnace and heated to 1100 K within six hours. After 3 days at this temperature, the furnace was shut off. The reaction products were single crystals of YbF2 (approximately 30% of the product estimated with the naked eye) obtained next to X-ray-amorphous material as the main product. The title compound forms as irregularly shaped crystalline, moderately air and water stable material. With different molar ratios of Yb and (CF2)n similar products were obtained. All the crystals studied exhibit all the same composition according to single-crystal structure measurements performed on several selected specimens.

3 X-ray investigations

Samples of the material were immersed in polybutene oil (Aldrich, Mn ~320, isobutylene 90%). Suitable single crystals were selected under a polarization microscope, mounted in a drop of polybutene sustained in a plastic loop, and placed onto the goniometer. A cold stream of nitrogen [T=203(2) K] froze the polybutene oil, thus keeping the crystal stationary and protected from oxygen and moisture. Preliminary examination and subsequent data collection were performed on a Bruker X8 Apex II diffractometer equipped with a 4 K CCD detector and graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ=71.073 pm). The intensity data was handled with the program package that came with the diffractometer [3]. The intensity data was corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects and an empirical absorption correction was applied using Sadabs [4]. Initial positions 4a for ytterbium and 8c for fluoride were refined with Shelxl-97 [5, 6] by full-matrix least-squares techniques. It was attempted to place fluoride on the highest remaining rest electrons densities, but even with an unrestrained site occupation factor, no occupation with a positive displacement factor could be achieved. This is in line with the observed residual electron density of +1.41 e Å−3. Selected parameters of the measurements and results of the refinements are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1:

Details of the single-crystal structure determination on YbF2 (U11=U22=U33=Ueq and U23=U13=U12=0 due to site symmetries).

CompoundYbF2
Mr211.02
Crystal colorTransparent light yellow
Crystal shapeIrregular, spherical chunk
Crystal size, mm30.06×0.06×0.05
Crystal systemCubic
Space group (no.), ZFmm, (# 225), 4
Lattice parameter: a, pm559.46(16)
Atomic positionsYb in 4a [Ueq=46(3) pm2]
F in 8c [Ueq=85(11) pm2]
V, Å3175.11(9)
Dcalcd, g cm−38.01
F(000), e352
μ, mm−153.0
Scan mode; T, Kϕ and ω scans; 203(2)
Ranges, 2θmax, deg; h, k, l71.21; −8→4, −2→8, −2→8
Transmission: min/max0.511/0.747
Reflections: measured/unique138/36
Unique reflections with Fo>4 σ(Fo)36
Rint/Rσ0.009/0.009
Refined parameters4
R1a/wR2b/GoFc (all refl.)0.012/0.032/1.30
Factors x/y (weighting scheme)b0.024/0
Max. shift/esd, last refinement cycle<0.00005
Δρfin (max/min), e Å−3+1.41 (76 pm to Yb)

–1.10 (100 pm to Yb)
CSD number433046
  1. aR1=Σ||Fo|–|Fc||/Σ|Fo|; bwR2=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2w(Fo2)2]1/2, w=[σ2(Fo2)+(xP)2+yP]−1, where P=(Max(Fo2, 0)+2Fc2)/3; cGoF=S=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2/(nobsnparam)]1/2.

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from FIZ Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de) on quoting the deposition number CSD-433046 (YbF2).

4 Description of the crystal structures

All MF2 compounds (M=Ca, Yb, Eu, Sr and Ba) crystallize isostructurally in the well-known cubic fluorite structure type (CaF2, space group Fmm). The fluoride anions are surrounded tetrahedrally by the metal cations which are in turn coordinated in cube shaped fashion by the F anions (Fig. 1). The hydrides of the stoichiometry MH2 (M=Ca, Yb, Eu, Sr and Ba) crystallize also isostructurally, but in the orthorhombic PbCl2-type structure (cotunnite, Pnma) (Fig. 2) in which the cations are coordinated in the form of a tricapped trigonal prisms which share the trigonal faces to form columns. By sharing faces, these columns build corrugated layers of [MH9] units which are arranged perpendicular to the crystallographic c axis, but shifted by nearly exactly [0 ½ ½] with respect to each other.

Fig. 1: Perspective view of the crystal structure of YbF2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 95% probability level.
Fig. 1:

Perspective view of the crystal structure of YbF2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 95% probability level.

Fig. 2: Perspective view of the crystal structure of YbH2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 95% probability level.
Fig. 2:

Perspective view of the crystal structure of YbH2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 95% probability level.

5 Discussion

The first complete single-crystal structure determination on YbF2 shows no indications of fluoride ions occupying positions other than the Wyckoff site 8c. This result differs from conclusions drawn before [7] from XRPD data (here a splitting of some peaks was observed on long annealed material and the lattice parameter becomes smaller, e.g. YbF2 [light green, space group Fmm, a=559.93(1) pm] compared to YbF2.37 [nearly colorless, pseudo-cubic, a=557.05(1) pm]. The color of our product also indicates an ionic, divalent compound since trivalent fluorides are transparent, but colorless. The formula volume (Table 2) and the atomic distances of YbF2 [d(Yb–F)=242.25(7) pm] are as expected for divalent ytterbium.

Table 2:

Selected properties of MF2 (CaF2 type structure with the coordination number CN=8) and MH2 (PbCl2 type structure with CN=9) compounds (M=Ca, Yb, Eu, Sr and Ba).

Compd.ColorV (f.u.)Ref.
CaF2Colorless40.8[8]
YbF2Light yellow43.8This work
EuF2Yellow-green48.7[8]
SrF2Colorless48.8[8]
BaF2Colorless59.6[8]
CaH2Colorless36.8[9]
YbH2Translucent-dark35.7[10]
EuH2Gray42.6[11]
SrH2Colorless45.0[12]
BaH2Colorless55.6[13]
  1. The volume per formula unit V (f.u.) is given in Å3.

The fluoride and the hydride series attracted our attention since all compounds crystallize isotypically within the respective series either in the CaF2 or the PbCl2 structure type. The fluorides show the expected behavior which is a nearly linear increase of the formula volume with respect to the cation radius, but the hydrides follow a different trend. First of all, hydrides show a smaller volume per formula unit if compared to the fluoride compound with the same cation (Table 2). This can be understood because of the different crystal structure type adapted and because of the large polarizability of the soft hydride anion [1]. Nevertheless, YbH2 and EuH2 exhibit both deviations from a linear increase of the formula volume of the hydride series – YbH2 in particular (Table 2). The transparency of the crystals, measurements of the magnetic susceptibilities [14] as well as Mössbauer spectroscopic studies [15] on orthorhombic ytterbium hydride YbH2 are in accordance with the diamagnetic f14 configuration for Yb2+. Therefore, the presence of trivalent ytterbium in the YbH2 gives no explanation for its relatively small volume per formula unit which is not in accordance with the cation radius of Yb2+.

6 Conclusion

The first complete single-crystal structure determination on YbF2 is reported. The crystals obtained showed no signs of fluorides occupying other positions than the Wyckoff site 8c. Of the rare earth metal dihydrides, especially YbH2 shows an as-yet unexplained deviation from a linear increase of the formula volume with regard to the increasing radius of the respective M2+ cation. The smaller cation radius of Yb+3 (compared to Yb+2) cannot, therefore, explain the small lattice parameter of YbH2, since no Yb+3 is detected. Electronic structure calculations may produce some insight into this observation.

7 Supporting information

A picture of one frame of the X-ray data collection showing the rare incident of a streak originating from cosmic radiation is available in the online version (DOI: 10.1515/znb-2017-0147).


Dedicated to: Professor Thomas Schleid on the occasion of his 60th birthday.


References

[1] R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751.10.1107/S0567739476001551Suche in Google Scholar

[2] H.-J. Meyer, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1991, 593, 185.10.1002/zaac.19915930118Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Apex2 (version 1.22), Saint Plus,Xprep (version 6.14), Software for the CCD system, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 2003.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxl-97, Program for the Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Suche in Google Scholar

[7] O. Greis, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1977, 430, 175.10.1002/zaac.19774300117Suche in Google Scholar

[8] R. Blachnik (Ed.), D’Ans-Lax, Taschenbuch für Chemiker und Physiker, Vol. 3, 4th edition, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998, p. 1372.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] J. A. Alonso, M. Retuerto, J. Sánchez-Benítez, M. T. Fernández-Díaz, Z. Kristallogr. 2010, 225, 225.10.1524/zkri.2010.1258Suche in Google Scholar

[10] O. Reckeweg, F. Lissner, T. Schleid, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2012, 638, 1595.10.1002/zaac.201204058Suche in Google Scholar

[11] J. M. Haschke, M. R. Clark, High Temp. Sci. 1975, 7, 152.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] N. E. Breese, M. O’Keeffe, R. B. von Dreele, J. Solid State Chem. 1990, 88, 571.10.1016/0022-4596(90)90255-VSuche in Google Scholar

[13] J. Snyder, H. Borrmann, A. Simon, Z. Kristallogr. 1994, 209, 458.10.1524/zkri.1994.209.5.458Suche in Google Scholar

[14] J. C. Warf, K. L. Hardcastle, Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1736.10.1021/ic50044a021Suche in Google Scholar

[15] A. Mustachi, J. Phys. Chem. Solids1974, 35, 1447.10.1016/S0022-3697(74)80252-0Suche in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-2017-0147).


Received: 2017-9-7
Accepted: 2017-9-19
Published Online: 2017-11-15
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0147/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen