Startseite β-Y(BO2)3 – a new member of the β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) structure family
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

β-Y(BO2)3 – a new member of the β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) structure family

  • Martin K. Schmitt und Hubert Huppertz EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. November 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

β-Y(BO2)3 was synthesized in a Walker-type multianvil module at 5.9 GPa/1000°C. The crystal structure has been elucidated through single-crystal X-ray diffraction. β-Y(BO2)3 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (no. 62) with the lattice parameters a=15.886(2), b=7.3860(6), and c=12.2119(9) Å. Its crystal structure will be discussed in the context of the isotypic lanthanide borates β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu).

1 Introduction

In the recent past, one of our main research objectives was the high-pressure synthesis and structure elucidation of novel transition metal borates. These investigations yielded a considerable amount of new phases with hitherto unknown compositions (e.g. Co7B24O42(OH)2·2H2O [1]) or striking structural motifs (e.g. Mo2B4O9 [2], the first borate incorporating transition metal clusters into its crystal structure). Since not all M-B-O(˗H) (M=transition metal) systems have been explored via high-pressure methods as yet, our most recent studies aimed at the synthesis of novel high-pressure yttrium borates. The compounds (NH4)YB8O14 [3] and α-Y2B4O9 [4] are the first results of these investigations. Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of the third high-pressure yttrium borate β-Y(BO2)3 and discuss its crystal structure with regard to the isotypic lanthanide borates β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) [5], [6], [7], [8].

To date, four modifications are known for compounds exhibiting the composition Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=lanthanides). They are designated with the Greek letters α, β, γ, and δ in chronological order. The first detailed description of the crystal structure of the orthorhombic β-modification was published in 2003 by Nikelski and Schleid [5], who synthesized β-Tb(BO2)3 in sealed platinum ampoules. Only 1 year later, Emme et al. reported the high-pressure synthesis of β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Dy–Lu) [6]. The phases β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd) [7] were also synthesized under high-pressure conditions by Emme et al. in 2007, whereas Nikelski et al. [8] showed the synthesis of β-Dy(BO2)3 also under normal pressure in 2008.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Crystal structure

β-Y(BO2)3 crystallizes isotypically to β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) [5], [6], [7], [8] in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (no. 62). The lattice parameters are a=15.886(2), b=7.3860(6), and c=12.2119(9) Å (Table 1). The unit cell (V=1432.8(2) Å3) contains Z=16 formula units and the asymmetric unit comprises 25 atoms (4×Y, 6×B, and 15×O) distributed over the Wyckoff positions 4c and 8d.

Table 1:

Crystal and structure refinement data for β-Y(BO2)3.

Empirical formulaYB3O6
Molar mass, g·mol−1217.34
Crystal systemorthorhombic
Space groupPnma (no. 62)
Single-crystal data
T, °C24(2)
 Radiation; λ, ÅMoKα; 0.71073
a, Å15.886(2)
b, Å7.3860(6)
c, Å12.2119(9)
V, Å31432.8(2)
Z16
 Calculated density, g·cm−34.03
 Absorption coeff., mm−116.2
F(000), e1632
 Crystal size, mm30.060×0.025×0.020
θ range, deg2.10–37.56
 Range in hkl±27, ±12, −18 → 20
 Reflections collected50786
 Independent reflections3996 [Rint=0.128]
 Completeness to θ=25.24°, %100.0
 Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F2
 Data/parameters3996/196
 Goodness-of-fit on F21.051
 Final R1/wR2 [I>2 σ(I)]0.034/0.065
 Final R1/wR2 (all data)0.052/0.070
 Largest diff. peak/hole, e·Å−31.25/−1.40
Powder data
 Radiation; λ, ÅMoKα1; 0.7093
a, Å15.8924(5)
b, Å7.3856(2)
c, Å12.2131(4)
V, Å31433.50(7)
 2θ range, deg2.0–42.2
 2θ step width, deg0.015
Rexp, %2.03
Rwp, %6.63
Rp, %4.30

The anionic skeleton of the compound consists exclusively of [BO4] tetrahedra. A central feature of the structure is a “windmill-like” structural unit built up of three tetrahedra sharing the common oxygen atom O7 (Fig. 1, top). This “windmill” is linked to a symmetry equivalent entity through the oxygen atoms O1, O2, and O3 residing on a mirror plane (Fig. 1, bottom). Along the b axis, these “double-windmills” are interconnected via three [B2O7] groups, each composed of two vertex-sharing [BO4] tetrahedra (Fig. 2). Thus, infinite ribbons with an approximately triangular cross section are formed that run along [010]. These ribbons are interconnected through common oxygen atoms along [001] to form corrugated layers of [BO4] tetrahedra parallel to (100) (Fig. 3). The layers are condensed by the yttrium atoms, each of which is coordinated by eight oxygen atoms (Fig. 4).

Fig. 1: Top: Three tetrahedra sharing a common corner to form a “windmill-like” structural unit. Bottom: “double-windmill” composed of two symmetry equivalent entities connected through common vertices.
Fig. 1:

Top: Three tetrahedra sharing a common corner to form a “windmill-like” structural unit. Bottom: “double-windmill” composed of two symmetry equivalent entities connected through common vertices.

Fig. 2: The “double-windmills” (dark blue) are interconnected by three [B2O7] groups (light blue) to form infinite ribbons along [010].
Fig. 2:

The “double-windmills” (dark blue) are interconnected by three [B2O7] groups (light blue) to form infinite ribbons along [010].

Fig. 3: The approximately triangular ribbons are interconnected via common vertices along [001]. This leads to the formation of corrugated layers parallel to the bc plane. The yttrium atoms are located between these layers.
Fig. 3:

The approximately triangular ribbons are interconnected via common vertices along [001]. This leads to the formation of corrugated layers parallel to the bc plane. The yttrium atoms are located between these layers.

Fig. 4: Coordination spheres of the four crystallographically independent yttrium atoms.
Fig. 4:

Coordination spheres of the four crystallographically independent yttrium atoms.

The B–O distances and O–B–O angles lie in the ranges 1.434(3)–1.532(3) Å and 102.8(2)–115.2(2)°, respectively (Tables 2 and 3 ). The corresponding average values (1.465–1.479 Å and 109.4–109.5°, respectively) are similar to those reported by Zobetz (1.476(35) Å/109.44(2.78)°) [9].

Table 2:

Interatomic B–O distances (Å) for β-Y(BO2)3.

B1–O131.434(3)B2–O121.449(3)B3–O31.452(3)
 –O101.440(3) –O21.460(3) –O91.454(3)
 –O11.487(3) –O141.472(3) –O81.479(3)
 –O71.532(3) –O71.508(3) –O71.519(3)
Ø1.473Ø1.472Ø1.476
B4–O101.445(3)B5–O131.464(3)B6–O151.435(3)
 –O41.446(3) –O51.465(3) –O91.443(3)
 –O111.460(3) –O121.466(3) –O141.519(3)
 –O81.518(3) –O111.466(3) –O61.520(3)
Ø1.467Ø1.465Ø1.479
  1. Average values in bold characters.

Table 3:

Selected bond angles (deg) for β-Y(BO2)3.

O10–B1–O1106.0(2)O12–B2–O14106.2(2)O9–B3–O7107.1(2)
O13–B1–O7107.5(2)O12–B2–O2107.3(2)O9–B3–O8107.2(2)
O10–B1–O7108.9(2)O2–B2–O14110.2(2)O3–B3–O8107.4(2)
O13–B1–O10109.4(2)O14–B2–O7110.3(2)O3–B3–O9110.3(2)
O13–B1–O1112.1(2)O2–B2–O7110.8(2)O8–B3–O7111.6(2)
O1–B1–O7112.9(2)O12–B2–O7111.8(2)O3–B3–O7113.2(2)
Ø109.5Ø109.4Ø109.5
O4–B4–O8102.8(2)O5–B5–O11106.4(2)O14–B6–O6105.3(2)
O10–B4–O11106.2(2)O12–B5–O11109.6(2)O15–B6–O14107.3(2)
O10–B4–O8106.2(2)O13–B5–O12109.8(2)O15–B6–O6107.9(2)
O4–B4–O11112.2(2)O13–B5–O11110.1(2)O9–B6–O14109.9(2)
O11–B4–O8114.7(2)O13–B5–O5110.3(2)O9–B6–O6110.8(2)
O10–B4–O4114.8(2)O5–B5–O12110.6(2)O15–B6–O9115.2(2)
Ø109.5Ø109.5Ø109.4
  1. Average values in bold characters.

Each of the four crystallographically different yttrium atoms is coordinated by eight oxygen atoms. The Y–O bond lengths lie between 2.250(2) and 2.823(2) Å, where Y1 shows the largest scattering of Y–O distances (Table 4). In β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu), the corresponding values range from ~2.21 to 2.96 Å. β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Dy, Ho, Er) show Ln–O distances between 2.26 and 2.84 Å and thus come closest to the Y–O bond lengths in β-Y(BO2)3 because of the similar ionic radii of Y3+ (r (Y3+)=1.215 Å for CN 9), Dy3+ (r (Dy3+)=1.223 Å for CN 9), Ho3+ (r (Ho3+)=1.212 Å for CN 9), and Er3+ (r (Er3+)=1.202 Å for CN 9) [10].

Table 4:

Interatomic Y–O distances (Å) for β-Y(BO2)3.

Y1–O152.250(2)Y2–O132.256(2)
 –O92.264(2) –O62.342(2)
 –O42.297(2) –O82.375(2)
 –O82.480(2) –O152.557(2)
 –O12.823(2) –O32.570(2)
Ø2.389Ø2.411
Y3–O112.307(2)Y4–O102.273(2)
 –O22.327(2) –O52.376(2)
 –O122.354(2) –O142.384(2)
 –O142.536(2) –O152.421(2)
 –O62.627(2) –O12.534(2)
Ø2.419Ø2.383
  1. Average values in bold characters.

Bond valence sums (BVS) were calculated according to the bond-length/bond-strength (BLBS) concept (Table 5) [11], [12]. The calculated values correspond well with the expected formal ionic charges.

Table 5:

Bond valence sums in β-Y(BO2)3 according to BLBS.

Y13.26O4−2.11
Y22.93O5−1.93
Y32.85O6−1.95
Y43.06O7−2.00
B13.05O8−2.09
B23.05O9−2.14
B33.02O10−2.15
B43.09O11−2.02
B53.10O12−1.99
B63.01O13−2.15
O1−1.82O14−2.05
O2−2.01O15−1.94
O3−1.83

A comparison of the lattice parameters and cell volumes of β-Y(BO2)3 and β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) is given in Table 6. The positional parameters are displayed in Table 7.

Table 6:

Comparison of the lattice parameters (Å), volumes (Å3), and ionic radii (Å) (for CN 9) [10] of β-Y(BO2)3 and β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu).

CompoundabcVr (M3+)Reference
β-Y(BO2)315.886(2)7.3860(6)12.2119(9)1432.8(2)1.215This work
β-Nd(BO2)316.162(3)7.474(2)12.442(3)1502.8(5)1.303[7]
β-Sm(BO2)316.125(2)7.4602(4)12.4087(7)1492.7(2)1.272[7]
β-Gd(BO2)316.028(2)7.4270(4)12.3217(7)1466.8(2)1.247[7]
β-Tb(BO2)315.9897(9)7.4139(4)12.2958(7)1457.6(2)1.235[5]
β-Dy(BO2)315.930(2)7.402(2)12.264(1)1446(1)1.223[6]
β-Ho(BO2)315.919(2)7.395(2)12.233(2)1440(1)1.212[6]
β-Er(BO2)315.876(2)7.380(2)12.189(2)1428(1)1.202[6]
β-Tm(BO2)315.816(2)7.362(2)12.162(2)1416(1)1.192[6]
β-Yb(BO2)3a15.791(3)7.352(2)12.140(3)1410(1)1.182[6]
β-Lu(BO2)315.767(2)7.347(2)12.115(2)1403(1)1.172[6]
  1. aLattice parameters derived from powder data.

Table 7:

Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters Ueq2) for β-Y(BO2)3.

AtomWyckoff positionxyzUeq
Y14c0.37889(2)¼0.00853(3)0.00449(6)
Y24c0.17226(2)¼0.43438(3)0.00451(6)
Y34c0.04822(2)¼0.08873(3)0.00488(6)
Y44c0.37252(2)¼0.73155(3)0.00446(6)
B18d0.2175(2)0.0704(3)0.8147(2)0.0047(4)
B28d0.0569(2)0.0734(3)0.8457(2)0.0042(4)
B38d0.1099(2)0.0768(3)0.6432(2)0.0041(4)
B48d0.2417(2)0.0689(3)0.1284(2)0.0043(4)
B58d0.3476(2)0.0775(3)0.4827(2)0.0044(4)
B68d0.0319(2)0.0598(3)0.3227(2)0.0045(4)
O14c0.2451(2)¼0.8564(2)0.0053(4)
O24c0.0482(2)¼0.8982(2)0.0054(4)
O34c0.0779(2)¼0.6053(2)0.0053(4)
O44c0.2752(2)¼0.1396(2)0.0056(4)
O54c0.3411(2)¼0.5413(2)0.0037(4)
O64c0.0651(2)¼0.3027(2)0.0060(4)
O78d0.1289(2)0.0742(2)0.7652(2)0.0045(3)
O88d0.1854(2)0.0340(2)0.5774(2)0.0040(3)
O98d0.4514(2)0.0655(2)0.1227(2)0.0048(3)
O108d0.2768(1)0.0213(2)0.7306(2)0.0052(3)
O118d0.1639(2)0.0653(2)0.0648(2)0.0051(3)
O128d0.4306(2)0.0589(2)0.4317(2)0.0047(3)
O138d0.2820(2)0.0650(2)0.3989(2)0.0047(3)
O148d0.4780(2)0.0233(2)0.7097(2)0.0051(3)
O158d0.4039(2)0.0408(2)0.8787(2)0.0053(3)
  1. Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor.

Further details on the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (Fax: +497247-808-666; E-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de) on quoting the deposition number CSD-433609 for β-Y(BO2)3.

2.2 X-ray powder diffraction

The result of the Rietveld refinement is shown in Fig. 5. The amorphous halo at low 2θ angles indicates the presence of considerable amounts of amorphous material. Apart from that, no crystalline phases other than β-Y(BO2)3 were present in the sample. More details can be found in Table 1.

Fig. 5: Rietveld refinement plot.
Fig. 5:

Rietveld refinement plot.

2.3 Vibrational spectroscopy

Figure 6 displays the single-crystal IR and Raman spectra. Both spectra show some minor peaks at wavenumbers >3000 cm−1 which we ascribe to surface impurities or inclusions in the crystals. The broad Raman band between 2800 and 3000 cm−1 stems from the oil used to prepare the crystals, whereas the origin of the broad IR mode at approximately 1600 cm−1 is uncertain. Similar to (NH4)YB8O14 [3], stretching vibrations of [BO4] tetrahedra are expected to cause vibrational bands between 1300 and 850 cm−1, while bending vibrations give rise to modes in the wavenumber range ~1100–300 cm−1. Between approximately 800 and 700 cm−1, complex B–O–Y vibrations can be observed. Y–O stretching and bending vibrations occur between ~500–250 cm−1 and ~400–100 cm−1 [3].

Fig. 6: Single-crystal IR (red) and Raman (black) spectrum of β-Y(BO2)3.
Fig. 6:

Single-crystal IR (red) and Raman (black) spectrum of β-Y(BO2)3.

3 Conclusions

β-Y(BO2)3 was synthesized in a high-pressure/high-temperature experiment at ~5.9 GPa/1000°C. It crystallizes isotypically to the lanthanide borates β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu). The crystal structure is built up of triangular ribbons running along [010], which are interconnected along [001] to form corrugated layers. The borate layers are condensed by the yttrium atoms residing in the interspace between these layers.

The aforementioned compounds were synthesized at quite different reaction conditions. While β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Tb, Dy) could be obtained at ambient pressure, β-Nd(BO2)3 was synthesized at 3.5 GPa, β-Y(BO2)3 at 5.9 GPa, and β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Sm, Gd, Ho–Lu) at 7.5 GPa.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Synthesis

β-Y(BO2)3 was formed in a high-pressure/high-temperature synthesis at ~5.9 GPa/1000°C using a Walker-type multianvil module and a 1000 t press (both Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Germany). The mixture was prepared by weighing and grinding Y2O3 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, 99.99%) and H3BO3 (Carl Roth, Germany, ≥99.8%) in a stoichiometric ratio of 1:6 in an agate mortar under ambient conditions. Subsequently, the starting mixture was filled into a crucible and closed with a lid (both made of α-BN; Henze Boron Nitride Products AG, Germany), before it was placed in an 18/11 assembly. For a more detailed description of the experimental setup, the reader is referred to the corresponding literature [13], [14], [15].

The pressure of ~5.9 GPa was reached within 150 min. Afterwards, the sample was heated to 1000°C over 10 min. This temperature was maintained for 30 min before it was reduced to 400°C during the following 20 min. Subsequently, the heating was switched off and the 16 h lasting process of decompression started. The colorless reaction product was mechanically separated from the BN crucible as well as possible.

4.2 Single-crystal structure analysis

A Bruker D8 Quest Kappa diffractometer equipped with a Photon 100 detector was employed to collect the single-crystal intensity data. An Incoatec microfocus X-ray tube and a multilayer optic were used to generate monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ=0.7107 Å). The absorption correction was carried out with Sadabs [16] before the structure was solved with Shelxt (version 2014/4) [17] and further refined with Shelxl (version 2016/6) [18] as implemented in the WinGX suite (version 2013/3) [19]. Atom labels were chosen according to β-Tb(BO2)3 [5].

4.3 X-ray powder diffraction

A STOE Stadi P was used to investigate the reaction product via X-ray powder diffraction. The flat sample was irradiated with Ge(111)-monochromatized MoKα1 radiation (λ=0.7093 Å). A Dectris Mythen 1K detector was employed to collect the diffracted radiation. Because of the strong fluorescence of yttrium caused by molybdenum radiation, a horizontal background line was subtracted from the original diffractogram before the Rietveld refinement was accomplished with Topas 4.2 [20].

4.4 Vibrational spectroscopy

The single-crystal IR spectrum was recorded on a Bruker Vertex 70 FT-IR spectrometer (spectral resolution 4 cm−1) equipped with a Globar mid-IR source and a KBr beam splitter. The spectrometer was equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector and coupled to a Bruker Hyperion 3000 microscope. The measurement covered the wavenumber range 600–4000 cm−1 and was carried out in transmittance mode using a BaF2 window and a 15× IR objective lens. 320 scans of the sample were recorded. Data processing was accomplished with Opus [21].

A Horiba Jobin Yvon Labram-HR-800 spectrometer was used to acquire the Raman spectrum of an arbitrarily oriented single-crystal. An area of approximately 5 μm in diameter was excited using a 532 nm frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser. A 50× objective lens, a 100 μm slit, a 1000 μm pinhole, and an optical grating with 1800 lines mm−1 were used for the measurement. The scattered radiation was detected with a 1024×256 Andor CCD detector in the wavenumber range 100–3700 cm−1. Two spectra with an acquisition time of 70 s each were averaged with Labspec (version 5.93.20) [22].

Acknowledgments

We thank G. Heymann for collecting the single-crystal diffraction data, D. Vitzthum for the IR spectroscopic measurements, R. Stalder for granting us access to the FT-IR spectrometer, and B. Joachim for the Raman spectroscopic measurements.

References

[1] S. C. Neumair, R. Kaindl, H. Huppertz, J. Solid State Chem.2012, 185, 1.10.1016/j.jssc.2011.10.028Suche in Google Scholar

[2] M. K. Schmitt, O. Janka, R. Pöttgen, C. Benndorf, M. de Oliveira, H. Eckert, F. Pielnhofer, A.-S. Tragl, R. Weihrich, B. Joachim, D. Johrendt, H. Huppertz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017, 56, 6449.10.1002/anie.201701891Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] M. K. Schmitt, H. Huppertz, Inorg. Chem.2017, 56, DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02402.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02402Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] M. K. Schmitt, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch. B. in press.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] T. Nikelski, Th. Schleid, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2003, 629, 1017.10.1002/zaac.200200446Suche in Google Scholar

[6] H. Emme, T. Nikelski, Th. Schleid, R. Pöttgen, M. H. Möller, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2004, 59b, 202.10.1515/znb-2004-0213Suche in Google Scholar

[7] H. Emme, G. Heymann, A. Haberer, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2007, 62b, 765.10.1515/znb-2007-0603Suche in Google Scholar

[8] T. Nikelski, M. C. Schäfer, H. Huppertz, Th. Schleid, Z. Kristallogr. NCS2008, 223, 177.10.1524/ncrs.2008.0073Suche in Google Scholar

[9] E. Zobetz, Z. Kristallogr.1990, 191, 45.10.1524/zkri.1990.191.1-2.45Suche in Google Scholar

[10] A. F. Holleman, N. Wiberg, E. Wiberg, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie, 102nd edition, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2007.10.1515/9783110177701Suche in Google Scholar

[11] I. D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr.1985, B41, 244.10.1107/S0108768185002063Suche in Google Scholar

[12] N. E. Brese, M. O‘Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr.1991, B47, 192.10.1107/S0108768190011041Suche in Google Scholar

[13] H. Huppertz, Z. Kristallogr.2004, 219, 330.10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633Suche in Google Scholar

[14] D. Walker, Am. Mineral.1991, 76, 1092.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Suche in Google Scholar

[15] D. Walker, M. A. Carpenter, C. M. Hitch, Am. Mineral.1990, 75, 1020.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] G. M. Sheldrick, sadabs, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, A71, 3.10.1107/S2053273314026370Suche in Google Scholar

[18] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2012, 45, 849.10.1107/S0021889812029111Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Topas, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA) 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Opus, Bruker, Billerica, Massachusetts (USA) 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Labspec, Horiba Jobin Yvon GmbH, Bensheim (Germany) 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-9-20
Accepted: 2017-9-30
Published Online: 2017-11-21
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 25.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0151/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen