Abstract
α-Y2B4O9 was synthesized in a high-pressure/high-temperature experiment at 12.3 GPa/1020°C. The crystal structure has been determined via single-crystal X-ray diffraction. α-Y2B4O9 is isotypic to the lanthanide borates α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho) and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with the following lattice parameters: a=25.084(2), b=4.3913(2), c=24.726(2) Å, and β=99.97(1)°. The compound was further characterized via X-ray powder diffraction as well as IR and Raman spectroscopy.
1 Introduction
During the past two decades, approximately 30 new transition metal borates have been discovered in high-pressure experiments. Some of these compounds show previously unknown compositions (e.g. Ti5B12O26 [1]) or highly interesting structural features (e.g. Cd(NH3)2[B3O5(NH3)]2 [2], the first ammine borate, or Mo2B4O9 [3], the first transition metal cluster-containing borate).
Our most recent investigations yielded (NH4)YB8O14 [4], the first yttrium-bearing high-pressure borate. α-Y2B4O9 first occurred as a side product during the synthesis of (NH4)YB8O14. In the following, we report on its synthesis and characterization via X-ray single-crystal and powder diffraction as well as IR and Raman spectroscopy. The crystal structure is discussed in the context of the isotypic lanthanide borates α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho) [5], [6].
2 Results and discussion
2.1 Crystal structure
The yttrium borate α-Y2B4O9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with the lattice parameters a=25.084(2), b=4.3913(2), c=24.726(2) Å, and β=99.97(1)° (Table 1). The unit cell (V=2682.4(2) Å3) contains Z=20 formula units. The asymmetric unit comprises 38 atoms (5×Y, 10×B, and 23×O), all located on Wyckoff positions 8f except for O6, which resides on Wyckoff site 4e.
Crystal and structure refinement data for α-Y2B4O9.
Empirical formula | Y2B4O9 |
Molar mass, g·mol−1 | 365.06 |
Crystal system | Monoclinic |
Space group | C2/c (no. 15) |
Single-crystal data | |
T, °C | 26(2) |
Radiation; λ, Å | MoKα; 0.71073 |
a, Å | 25.084(2) |
b, Å | 4.3913(2) |
c, Å | 24.726(2) |
β, deg | 99.97(1) |
V, Å3 | 2682.4(2) |
Z | 20 |
Calculated density, g·cm−3 | 4.52 |
Absorption coeff., mm−1 | 21.6 |
F(000), e | 3400 |
Crystal size, mm3 | 0.08×0.04×0.02 |
θ Range, deg | 2.54–35.27 |
Range in hkl | −35→40, ±7, ±40 |
Reflections collected | 26234 |
Independent reflections | 5982 [Rint=0.048] |
Completeness to θ=25.24°, % | 99.9 |
Refinement method | Full-matrix least-squares on F2 |
Data/parameters | 5982/339 |
Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.068 |
Final R1/wR2 [I>2σ(I)] | 0.032/0.065 |
Final R1/wR2 (all data) | 0.047/0.069 |
Largest diff. peak/hole, e·Å−3 | 1.35/−1.40 |
Powder data | |
Radiation; λ, Å | MoKα1; 0.7093 |
a, Å | 25.076(2) |
b, Å | 4.3878(4) |
c, Å | 24.709(2) |
β, deg | 99.95(1) |
V, Å3 | 2677.8(4) |
2θ Range, deg | 2.0–32.0 |
2θ Step width, deg | 0.015 |
Rexp, % | 5.52 |
Rwp, % | 11.57 |
Rp, % | 8.23 |
α-Y2B4O9 exhibits a crystal structure isotypic to that of α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho) [5], [6]. The fundamental building block (FBB; see Fig. 1) consists of two edge-sharing tetrahedra in the center, which are surrounded by corner- sharing tetrahedra. Together with the edge-sharing tetrahedra, the corner-linked tetrahedra form five- and six-membered rings. Furthermore, they form three-membered rings and are linked to single tetrahedra, which are not part of any rings within the FBB. Within the crystallographic ac plane, the FBBs are interconnected by these single tetrahedra and, additionally, by one tetrahedron of each five-membered ring. The linkage of the FBBs in all three dimensions causes the formation of further rings of various sizes (Fig. 2). An analysis of the cycle class sequence is given in [5].

Fundamental building block (FBB) of α-Y2B4O9. Edge-sharing tetrahedra are drawn in red, corner-linked tetrahedra in dark blue, and tetrahedra interconnecting the FBBs in light blue.
![Fig. 2: Crystal structure of α-Y2B4O9 viewed along [01̅0]. The color code of the tetrahedra is identical to that of Fig. 1.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0150/asset/graphic/j_znb-2017-0150_fig_002.jpg)
Crystal structure of α-Y2B4O9 viewed along [01̅0]. The color code of the tetrahedra is identical to that of Fig. 1.
The B–O distances and O–B–O angles vary between 1.382(4) and 1.576(4) Å and 94.0(2)–119.5(3)°, respectively (Tables 2 and 3 ). In accordance with α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho), the B8 tetrahedron (i.e. the [BO4] tetrahedron with B8 as central atom) shows the strongest distortion. The average B–O bond lengths and O–B–O angles lie in the range of 1.462–1.496 Å and 109.2–109.4° and are thus in line with the values reported by Zobetz (1.476(35) Å/ 109.44(2.78)°) [7].
Interatomic B–O distances (Å) for α-Y2B4O9.
B1–O2 | 1.426(4) | B2–O17 | 1.478(4) | B3–O11 | 1.434(4) | B4–O14 | 1.421(4) |
–O1 | 1.474(4) | –O21 | 1.480(4) | –O4 | 1.460(4) | –O13 | 1.464(4) |
–O3 | 1.492(4) | –O21 | 1.485(4) | –O13 | 1.475(4) | –O10 | 1.470(4) |
–O3 | 1.500(4) | –O20 | 1.511(4) | –O15 | 1.493(4) | –O2 | 1.508(4) |
Ø | 1.473 | Ø | 1.489 | Ø | 1.466 | Ø | 1.466 |
B5–O16 | 1.433(4) | B6–O9 | 1.434(4) | B7–O19 | 1.413(4) | B8–O18 | 1.382(4) |
–O5 | 1.457(4) | –O10 | 1.457(4) | –O12 | 1.497(4) | –O23 | 1.481(4) |
–O22 | 1.511(4) | –O17 | 1.468(4) | –O6 | 1.498(3) | –O1 | 1.543(4) |
–O9 | 1.511(4) | –O22 | 1.489(4) | –O5 | 1.504(4) | –O20 | 1.576(4) |
Ø | 1.478 | Ø | 1.462 | Ø | 1.478 | Ø | 1.496 |
B9–O8 | 1.419(4) | B10–O12 | 1.455(4) | ||||
–O11 | 1.473(4) | –O15 | 1.462(4) | ||||
–O7 | 1.505(4) | –O7 | 1.484(4) | ||||
–O4 | 1.525(4) | –O23 | 1.486(4) | ||||
Ø | 1.481 | Ø | 1.472 |
Average values in bold characters.
Selected bond angles (deg) for α-Y2B4O9.
O3–B1–O3 | 94.0(2) | O17–B2–O20 | 99.5(2) | O13–B3–O15 | 101.4(2) |
O2–B1–O3 | 109.5(2) | O17–B2–O21 | 109.1(2) | O4–B3–O15 | 105.2(2) |
O2–B1–O3 | 109.7(2) | O17–B2–O21 | 109.1(2) | O11–B3–O13 | 105.8(2) |
O1–B1–O3 | 112.6(2) | O21–B2–O20 | 111.3(2) | O11–B3–O4 | 113.9(2) |
O2–B1–O1 | 114.4(2) | O21–B2–O20 | 111.4(2) | O4–B3–O13 | 115.0(2) |
O1–B1–O3 | 114.8(2) | O21–B2–O21 | 115.2(2) | O11–B3–O15 | 115.1(2) |
Ø | 109.2 | Ø | 109.3 | Ø | 109.4 |
O13–B4–O10 | 102.1(2) | O5–B5–O9 | 105.1(2) | O10–B6–O17 | 101.6(2) |
O13–B4–O2 | 106.4(2) | O16–B5–O22 | 108.7(2) | O17–B6–O22 | 107.6(2) |
O10–B4–O2 | 106.4(2) | O16–B5–O9 | 109.9(2) | O9–B6–O10 | 108.1(2) |
O14–B4–O2 | 112.2(2) | O16–B5–O5 | 110.2(2) | O9–B6–O22 | 111.7(2) |
O14–B4–O10 | 114.2(2) | O22–B5–O9 | 111.0(2) | O9–B6–O17 | 113.3(2) |
O14–B4–O13 | 114.6(2) | O5–B5–O22 | 111.8(2) | O10–B6–O22 | 114.2(2) |
Ø | 109.3 | Ø | 109.5 | Ø | 109.4 |
O12–B7–O5 | 103.7(2) | O23–B8–O20 | 99.6(2) | O11–B9–O7 | 104.7(2) |
O12–B7–O6 | 104.5(2) | O23–B8–O1 | 102.2(2) | O11–B9–O4 | 108.3(2) |
O19–B7–O5 | 108.9(2) | O1–B8–O20 | 110.1(2) | O7–B9–O4 | 108.4(2) |
O6–B7–O5 | 109.8(2) | O18–B8–O20 | 111.9(2) | O8–B9–O7 | 110.6(2) |
O19–B7–O6 | 114.2(3) | O18–B8–O1 | 112.4(2) | O8–B9–O11 | 111.5(2) |
O19–B7–O12 | 115.0(2) | O18–B8–O23 | 119.5(3) | O8–B9–O4 | 113.1(2) |
Ø | 109.4 | Ø | 109.3 | Ø | 109.4 |
O7–B10–O23 | 102.4(2) | ||||
O15–B10–O23 | 104.2(2) | ||||
O15–B10–O7 | 108.1(2) | ||||
O12–B10–O23 | 110.4(2) | ||||
O12–B10–O15 | 114.2(2) | ||||
O12–B10–O7 | 116.3(2) | ||||
Ø | 109.3 |
Average values in bold characters.
The borate framework features channels which host the yttrium atoms (Fig. 2). The five different yttrium sites show coordination numbers (CN) between 8 and 11 with Y–O bond lengths in the range of 2.203(2)–3.095(2) Å (Table 4). In comparison to α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho), these values come closest to the corresponding Ho–O distances (2.212(7)–3.084(7) Å) because of the nearly identical ionic radii of Y3+ (r(Y3+)=1.215 Å for CN 9) and Ho3+ (r(Ho3+)=1.212 Å for CN 9) [8].
Interatomic Y–O distances (Å) for α-Y2B4O9.
Y1–O11 | 2.244(2) | Y2–O2 | 2.271(2) | Y3–O19 | 2.283(2) |
–O16 | 2.287(2) | –O17 | 2.325(2) | –O8 | 2.339(2) |
–O10 | 2.363(2) | –O14 | 2.372(2) | –O6 | 2.382(2) |
–O8 | 2.397(2) | –O22 | 2.389(2) | –O7 | 2.403(2) |
–O13 | 2.402(2) | –O18 | 2.399(2) | –O16 | 2.416(2) |
–O4 | 2.413(2) | –O1 | 2.399(2) | –O12 | 2.453(2) |
–O14 | 2.446(2) | –O20 | 2.472(2) | –O16 | 2.455(2) |
–O8 | 2.587(2) | –O17 | 2.631(2) | –O19 | 2.540(2) |
–O22 | 2.707(2) | –O10 | 2.672(2) | –O9 | 2.784(2) |
Ø | 2.427 | Ø | 2.437 | –O5 | 2.998(2) |
Ø | 2.505 | ||||
Y4–O5 | 2.203(2) | Y5–O3 | 2.256(2) | ||
–O23 | 2.269(2) | –O15 | 2.430(2) | ||
–O18 | 2.281(2) | –O14 | 2.454(2) | ||
–O20 | 2.309(2) | –O4 | 2.496(2) | ||
–O19 | 2.338(2) | –O13 | 2.553(2) | ||
–O9 | 2.343(2) | –O23 | 2.583(2) | ||
–O21 | 2.703(2) | –O1 | 2.590(2) | ||
–O12 | 2.763(2) | –O15 | 2.654(2) | ||
Ø | 2.401 | –O7 | 2.690(2) | ||
–O2 | 2.824(2) | ||||
–O18 | 3.095(2) | ||||
Ø | 2.602 |
Average values in bold characters.
Bond valence sums (BVS) were calculated according to the bond-length/bond-strength (BLBS) concept (Table 5) [9], [10]. The calculated values correspond to the expected formal ionic charges within the limits of this concept. The slightly decreased BVS of Y5 (2.62) and O21 (−1.64) were also observed for the corresponding sites in α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Eu, Gd, Tb) [5].
Bond valence sums in α-Y2B4O9 according to BLBS.
Y1 | 3.17 | O5 | −2.17 |
Y2 | 3.07 | O6 | −2.17 |
Y3 | 3.04 | O7 | −1.95 |
Y4 | 3.20 | O8 | −1.88 |
Y5 | 2.62 | O9 | −2.07 |
B1 | 3.05 | O10 | −2.12 |
B2 | 2.92 | O11 | −2.15 |
B3 | 3.10 | O12 | −1.95 |
B4 | 3.11 | O13 | −2.12 |
B5 | 3.01 | O14 | −1.88 |
B6 | 3.13 | O15 | −2.01 |
B7 | 3.01 | O16 | −1.98 |
B8 | 2.92 | O17 | −2.15 |
B9 | 2.99 | O18 | −1.82 |
B10 | 3.05 | O19 | −2.05 |
O1 | −1.95 | O20 | −2.01 |
O2 | −2.17 | O21 | −1.64 |
O3 | −1.96 | O22 | −1.94 |
O4 | −2.07 | O23 | −2.20 |
Table 6 shows a comparison of the lattice parameters and cell volumes of α-Y2B4O9 and α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho). The positional parameters are listed in Table 7.
Comparison of the lattice parameters (Å and deg), volumes (Å3), and ionic radii (Å) (for CN 9) [8] of α-Y2B4O9 and α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho).
Compound | a | b | c | β | V | r (M3+) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
α-Y2B4O9 | 25.084(2) | 4.3913(2) | 24.726(2) | 99.97(1) | 2682.4(2) | 1.215 | This work |
α-Sm2B4O9 | 25.572(5) | 4.4516(9) | 24.967(5) | 99.85(3) | 2800.3(2) | 1.272 | [6] |
α-Eu2B4O9a | 25.478(3) | 4.443(1) | 24.930(3) | 99.80(1) | 2781(1) | 1.260 | [5] |
α-Gd2B4O9a | 25.389(3) | 4.433(1) | 24.908(4) | 99.88(1) | 2761(1) | 1.247 | [5] |
α-Tb2B4O9a | 25.279(6) | 4.412(1) | 24.823(7) | 99.89(2) | 2728(1) | 1.235 | [5] |
α-Dy2B4O9a | 25.202(4) | 4.406(1) | 24.782(6) | 99.90(1) | 2711(2) | 1.223 | [5] |
α-Ho2B4O9 | 25.090(5) | 4.3941(9) | 24.742(5) | 99.83(3) | 2687.7(2) | 1.212 | [6] |
aLattice parameters derived from powder data.
Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters Ueq (Å2) for α-Y2B4O9.
Atom | Wyckoff position | x | y | z | Ueq |
Y1 | 8f | 0.06516(2) | 0.20776(6) | 0.07288(2) | 0.00404(5) |
Y2 | 8f | 0.21556(2) | 0.20467(6) | 0.12914(2) | 0.00401(5) |
Y3 | 8f | 0.01168(2) | 0.67018(6) | 0.17874(2) | 0.00386(5) |
Y4 | 8f | 0.35925(2) | 0.17606(6) | 0.20739(2) | 0.00403(5) |
Y5 | 8f | 0.15326(2) | 0.23322(6) | 0.96179(2) | 0.00757(6) |
B1 | 8f | 0.2420(2) | 0.7239(7) | 0.0388(2) | 0.0043(5) |
B2 | 8f | 0.2513(2) | 0.1623(7) | 0.2818(2) | 0.0047(5) |
B3 | 8f | 0.9283(2) | 0.2988(7) | 0.0230(2) | 0.0038(5) |
B4 | 8f | 0.1466(2) | 0.7281(7) | 0.0589(2) | 0.0034(5) |
B5 | 8f | 0.0994(2) | 0.1745(7) | 0.1928(2) | 0.0036(5) |
B6 | 8f | 0.3538(2) | 0.1949(7) | 0.3369(2) | 0.0039(5) |
B7 | 8f | 0.9476(2) | 0.1798(7) | 0.2245(2) | 0.0042(5) |
B8 | 8f | 0.3047(2) | 0.6530(7) | 0.1338(2) | 0.0051(5) |
B9 | 8f | 0.9713(2) | 0.8120(7) | 0.0656(2) | 0.0037(5) |
B10 | 8f | 0.9086(2) | 0.1296(7) | 0.1230(2) | 0.0043(5) |
O1 | 8f | 0.27054(9) | 0.5179(4) | 0.08130(8) | 0.0043(4) |
O2 | 8f | 0.19870(9) | 0.8908(5) | 0.05513(9) | 0.0054(4) |
O3 | 8f | 0.22223(9) | 0.5636(5) | 0.98554(8) | 0.0051(4) |
O4 | 8f | 0.06172(8) | 0.3797(4) | 0.97967(8) | 0.0028(3) |
O5 | 8f | 0.40270(9) | 0.7924(5) | 0.25255(9) | 0.0051(4) |
O6 | 4e | 0 | 0.3246(6) | ¼ | 0.0036(5) |
O7 | 8f | 0.06140(9) | 0.1461(4) | 0.88931(8) | 0.0049(4) |
O8 | 8f | 0.02255(9) | 0.6832(5) | 0.08672(9) | 0.0051(4) |
O9 | 8f | 0.38041(9) | 0.3512(4) | 0.29807(8) | 0.0053(4) |
O10 | 8f | 0.37043(9) | 0.3365(5) | 0.39043(8) | 0.0047(4) |
O11 | 8f | 0.97668(8) | 0.1207(4) | 0.04393(8) | 0.0040(4) |
O12 | 8f | 0.93477(9) | 0.3174(5) | 0.16838(8) | 0.0050(4) |
O13 | 8f | 0.10516(9) | 0.8605(4) | 0.01638(8) | 0.0044(4) |
O14 | 8f | 0.15181(9) | 0.4067(4) | 0.05586(8) | 0.0042(4) |
O15 | 8f | 0.10819(9) | 0.7038(5) | 0.92837(8) | 0.0046(4) |
O16 | 8f | 0.04634(9) | 0.1750(5) | 0.15996(9) | 0.0055(4) |
O17 | 8f | 0.29504(9) | 0.2440(5) | 0.32756(9) | 0.0057(4) |
O18 | 8f | 0.30251(9) | 0.9673(5) | 0.13478(9) | 0.0058(4) |
O19 | 8f | 0.94815(9) | 0.8582(4) | 0.22575(8) | 0.0040(4) |
O20 | 8f | 0.21284(9) | 0.0074(4) | 0.31373(8) | 0.0048(4) |
O21 | 8f | 0.22738(9) | 0.4456(5) | 0.25505(9) | 0.0067(4) |
O22 | 8f | 0.36334(9) | 0.8603(4) | 0.33615(9) | 0.0053(4) |
O23 | 8f | 0.35745(8) | 0.4991(4) | 0.13548(9) | 0.0044(4) |
Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor.
Further details on the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +497247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de) on quoting the deposition number CSD-433610 for α-Y2B4O9.
2.2 X-ray powder diffraction
A Rietveld refinement was carried out between 2.0 and 32.0° in 2θ using the structural model obtained through single-crystal diffraction. Apart from an amorphous phase, the sample consisted only of α-Y2B4O9. More details are given in Table 1. However, the obtained results can only be considered as approximate values because of a high roughness of the measured curve, which is probably due to a moderate crystallinity of the sample and the fluorescence of yttrium caused by molybdenum radiation.
2.3 Vibrational spectroscopy
The single-crystal IR and Raman spectra are displayed in Fig. 3. Both spectra exhibit some unexpected but only minor peaks at wavenumbers >1400 cm−1. The origin of these peaks is uncertain, but we assume they can be ascribed to surface impurities or inclusions in the crystals.

Single-crystal IR (red) and Raman (black) spectrum of α-Y2B4O9.
DFT calculations for (NH4)YB8O14 [4] showed that stretching vibrations of the [BO4] tetrahedra give rise to IR and Raman modes in the wavenumber range ~1300–850 cm−1, while the corresponding bending vibrations can be observed between ~1100 and 300 cm−1. Complex B–O–Y vibrations occur from ~800 through to 700 cm−1, whereas vibrational modes in the wavenumber ranges ~500–250 cm−1 and ~400–100 cm−1 are associated with Y–O stretching and bending modes, respectively.
3 Conclusions
α-Y2B4O9 crystallizes isotypically to the lanthanide borates α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Sm–Ho). The crystal structure consists of edge- and vertex-sharing tetrahedra forming rings of different sizes, which are interconnected to a three-dimensional network. The network features channels hosting the yttrium atoms in various coordination environments.
While the lanthanide compounds were synthesized at 10 GPa/1150°C (α-Ln2B4O9 (Ln=Eu–Dy)), 10 GPa/1050°C (α-Ho2B4O9), and 7.5 GPa/1050°C (α-Sm2B4O9), the X-ray pure synthesis of α-Y2B4O9 required a somewhat higher pressure of ~12.3 GPa/1020°C.
4 Experimental section
4.1 Synthesis
A 1:4 molar mixture of Y2O3 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA, 99.99%) and H3BO3 (Carl Roth, Germany, ≥99.8%) was weighed and ground in an agate mortar under ambient conditions. The mixture was then filled into a crucible, closed with a lid (both made of α-BN; Henze Boron Nitride Products AG, Germany), and placed in an 18/11 assembly. A Walker-type multi-anvil module and a 1000 t press (both Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Germany) were employed to compress the sample. More details regarding the experimental setup can be found in the literature [11], [12], [13].
The sample was compressed to ~12.3 GPa within 334 min and then heated to ~1020°C over 10 min. This temperature was maintained for 30 min before the sample was cooled down to 200°C in 10 min and subsequently quenched to room temperature by switching off the heating. Afterwards, the pressure was released within 1000 min. The colorless reaction product was mechanically separated from the BN crucible.
4.2 Single-crystal structure analysis
The single-crystal intensity data were acquired using a Bruker D8 Quest Kappa diffractometer equipped with a Photon 100 detector. Monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ=0.7107 Å) was generated by an Incoatec microfocus X-ray tube (power settings: 50 kV and 1 mA) and a multilayer optic. Sadabs [14] was employed to correct the data set for absorption effects. The structure was solved using Shelxt (version 2014/4) [15] and further refined with Shelxl (version 2016/6) [16] as implemented in the WinGX suite (version 2013/3) [17]. Atom labels were chosen according to α-Gd2B4O9 [5] to allow for an easier comparison of the structures.
4.3 X-ray powder diffraction
X-ray powder diffraction was carried out on a STOE Stadi P powder diffractometer in transmission geometry. The flat sample was irradiated with Ge(111)-monochromatized MoKα1 radiation (λ=0.7093 Å). The diffracted radiation was detected by means of a Dectris Mythen 1 K detector. Due to the strong fluorescence of yttrium by molybdenum radiation, a horizontal background line was subtracted from the original diffractogram before the Rietveld refinement was accomplished using Topas 4.2 [18].
4.4 Vibrational spectroscopy
The single-crystal Raman measurement was carried out on a Horiba Jobin Yvon Labram-HR-800 spectrometer. A 532 nm frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser and a 50× objective lens were used to excite an area of approximately 5 μm in diameter. The scattered light was dispersed by an optical grating with 1800 lines mm−1 and collected by a 1024×256 Andor CCD detector in the range of 100–3700 cm−1. Two spectra with an acquisition time of 100 s each were averaged employing Labspec [19] (version 5.93.20). The background was approximated via a fifth order polynomial line segment function and subtracted from the original spectrum.
A Bruker Vertex 70 FT-IR spectrometer (spectral resolution 4 cm−1) equipped with a Globar mid-IR source and a KBr beam splitter was employed to acquire the absorption spectrum of a single crystal in the range of 600–4000 cm−1. The spectrometer is coupled to a Bruker Hyperion 3000 microscope, which is equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector. For the measurement in transmittance mode, the sample was placed on a BaF2 window. One-hundred sixty scans of the sample were recorded using a 15× IR objective. Data processing was accomplished employing Opus [20].
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Wurst for the single-crystal diffraction data, D. Vitzthum for the IR spectroscopic measurements, R. Stalder for granting us access to the FT-IR spectrometer, and B. Joachim for the Raman-spectroscopic measurements.
References
[1] A. Haberer, H. Huppertz, J. Solid State Chem.2009, 182, 484.10.1016/j.jssc.2008.11.022Search in Google Scholar
[2] G. Sohr, N. Ciaghi, M. Schauperl, K. Wurst, K. R. Liedl, H. Huppertz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2015, 54, 6360.10.1002/anie.201500706Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] M. K. Schmitt, O. Janka, R. Pöttgen, C. Benndorf, M. de Oliveira, H. Eckert, F. Pielnhofer, A.-S. Tragl, R. Weihrich, B. Joachim, D. Johrendt, H. Huppertz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017, 56, 6449.10.1002/anie.201701891Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] M. K. Schmitt, H. Huppertz, Inorg. Chem.2017, 56, DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02402.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02402Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] H. Emme, H. Huppertz, Chem. Eur. J.2003, 9, 3623.10.1002/chem.200204696Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] H. Emme, H. Huppertz, Acta Crystallogr.2005, C61, I29.10.1107/S0108270104030446Search in Google Scholar
[7] E. Zobetz, Z. Kristallogr.1990, 191, 45.10.1524/zkri.1990.191.1-2.45Search in Google Scholar
[8] A. F. Holleman, N. Wiberg, E. Wiberg, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie, 102nd edition, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2007.10.1515/9783110177701Search in Google Scholar
[9] I. D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr.1985, B41, 244.10.1107/S0108768185002063Search in Google Scholar
[10] N. E. Brese, M. O’Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr.1991, B47, 192.10.1107/S0108768190011041Search in Google Scholar
[11] H. Huppertz, Z. Kristallogr.2004, 219, 330.10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633Search in Google Scholar
[12] D. Walker, Am. Mineral.1991, 76, 1092.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar
[13] D. Walker, M. A. Carpenter, C. M. Hitch, Am. Mineral.1990, 75, 1020.Search in Google Scholar
[14] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA) 2001.Search in Google Scholar
[15] G. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, A71, 3.10.1107/S2053273314026370Search in Google Scholar
[16] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3.Search in Google Scholar
[17] L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2012, 45, 849.10.1107/S0021889812029111Search in Google Scholar
[18] Topas, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA) 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Labspec, Horiba Jobin Yvon GmbH, Bensheim (Germany) 2005.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Opus, Bruker, Billerica, Massachusetts (USA) 2008.Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Improvement of the Van Leusen reaction in the presence of β-cyclodextrin: a green and efficient synthesis of oxazoles in water
- Nano-colloidal silica-tethered polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes with eight branches of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane as high-performance catalyst for the preparation of bis-thiazolidinones under ultrasonic conditions
- A Mn(II) coordination polymer from a polycarboxylate-containing ligand: synthesis, structural characterization, and properties
- Syntheses, crystal structures and phosphorescence properties of cyclometalated iridium(III) bis(pyridylbenzaldehyde) complexes with dithiolate ligands
- A supramolecular tetranuclear zinc(II) complex constructed from an asymmetrical Salamo-type ligand: synthesis, structure and fluorescence properties
- Bioactive chemical constituents from the resin of Aloe vera
- Synthesis and structural characterization of Li3K3Eu7(BO3)9
- Ni6B22O39·H2O – extending the field of nickel borates
- High-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of α-Y2B4O9
- β-Y(BO2)3 – a new member of the β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) structure family
- Antiferromagnetic ordering in the plumbide EuPdPb
- Note
- Single-crystal structure refinement of YbF2 with a remark about YbH2
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Improvement of the Van Leusen reaction in the presence of β-cyclodextrin: a green and efficient synthesis of oxazoles in water
- Nano-colloidal silica-tethered polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes with eight branches of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane as high-performance catalyst for the preparation of bis-thiazolidinones under ultrasonic conditions
- A Mn(II) coordination polymer from a polycarboxylate-containing ligand: synthesis, structural characterization, and properties
- Syntheses, crystal structures and phosphorescence properties of cyclometalated iridium(III) bis(pyridylbenzaldehyde) complexes with dithiolate ligands
- A supramolecular tetranuclear zinc(II) complex constructed from an asymmetrical Salamo-type ligand: synthesis, structure and fluorescence properties
- Bioactive chemical constituents from the resin of Aloe vera
- Synthesis and structural characterization of Li3K3Eu7(BO3)9
- Ni6B22O39·H2O – extending the field of nickel borates
- High-pressure synthesis and crystal structure of α-Y2B4O9
- β-Y(BO2)3 – a new member of the β-Ln(BO2)3 (Ln=Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) structure family
- Antiferromagnetic ordering in the plumbide EuPdPb
- Note
- Single-crystal structure refinement of YbF2 with a remark about YbH2