Home Physical Sciences The high-pressure phase of CePtAl
Article Publicly Available

The high-pressure phase of CePtAl

  • Gunter Heymann , Birgit Heying , Ute Ch. Rodewald and Oliver Janka EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 28, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The intermetallic aluminum compound HP-CePtAl was synthesized by arc melting of the elements with subsequent high-pressure/high-temperature treatment at 1620 K and 10.5 GPa in a multianvil press. The compound crystallizes in the hexagonal MgZn2-type structure (P63/mmc) with lattice parameters of a=552.7(1) and c=898.8(2) pm refined from powder X-ray diffraction data. With the help of single crystal investigations (wR=0.0527, 187 F2 values, 13 variables), the proposed structure type was confirmed and the mixed Pt/Al site occupations could be refined. Magnetic susceptibility measurements showed a disappearance of the complex magnetic ordering phenomena, which are observed in NP-CePtAl.

1 Introduction

Among equiatomic intermetallic rare earth (RE) compounds RETX (T=transition metal of groups 7–12; X=element of groups 13–15) [1], [2], the most prominent structure types are orthorhombic TiNiSi [3] and hexagonal ZrNiAl [4], [5]. For both cases, the Pearson database lists more than 800 entries each [6]. Of these, cerium compounds in particular have received broad interest during recent decades because of their remarkable physical properties. These unique properties are based on the two possible valence states for cerium: the trivalent state [Xe] 4f1 state, which is paramagnetic, and the tetravalent state [Xe] 4f0, which is diamagnetic. The possible phenomena observed in such cerium intermetallics are the Kondo effect as, e.g. in CeAgAl [7] and CeAgGa [8] or the heavy-fermion behavior in CePdAl [9]. Recently, several review articles have been published summarizing the physical properties of equiatomics [10] and of CeTX compounds with respect to their crystal structures [11], [12], [13], [14]. Of these, CePtAl exhibits an exceedingly complex magnetic behavior. Dönni et al. [15] were the first to describe CePtAl with commensurate-incommensurate phase transitions. Three different magnetic ordering phenomena have been observed at transition temperatures of T1=5.9 K, T2=4.3 K, and T3=2.2 K. The complexity of the magnetic structure was ascribed to exchange interactions between two chains of Ce atoms with distances of 356 pm along the b axis and 377 pm along the a axis. The effective magnetic moment was determined to be μeff=2.58 μB per Ce atom with a Weiss constant θp=6.5 K. Simulating the magnetic data revealed a Kramers doublet ground state [16]. For high-field magnetization experiments at up to 300 kOe, single crystals of CePtAl grown using the Czochralsky method were used. In these crystals, a magnetic anisotropy was detected, which was attributed to crystalline-electric field interactions. Directional-dependent measurements showed that the a axis corresponds to the easy axis, whereas the hard axis changes from c (T>39 K) to b (T<39 K) [17]. Ueda et al. [18] also used a high-quality single crystal to study the de Haas–van Alphen effect by detection of the field modulation using fields up to 170 kOe and temperatures down to 30 mK. They suggest that the Fermi surfaces in CePtAl consist of multiple connected Fermi surfaces. Finally, the pressure dependence of the magnetic susceptibility and the electrical resistivity were measured to determine the critical pressure pc at which the magnetic ordering effects vanish. A shift of the Kondo features was observed with a collapse level higher than 6 GPa [19], [20], [21].

We have investigated CePtAl with respect to pressure- and temperature-induced phase transitions. The conditions for the high-pressure synthesis were adapted from the literature [22], and a new high-pressure modification of CePtAl crystallizing in the MgZn2-type structure was obtained. The X-ray pure sample was used for structural investigations and magnetic susceptibility measurements.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 High-pressure investigations

Attempts to obtain a high-pressure/high-temperature phase transition of CePtAl have been conducted at 4.5 and 10.5 GPa (see Section 3). Although phase pure samples of HP-CePtAl in the MgZn2-type structure could be obtained under the latter conditions, the first conditions resulted in unreacted NP-CePtAl (TiNiSi type) along with a yet unidentified phase. The indexing of the second phase reflections resulted in unit cell dimensions, which could not be indexed by binary or ternary structure types listed in the Pearson database [6]. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis, however, confirmed that the chemical composition was still equiatomic CePtAl and no other compositions arise on the high-pressure/high-temperature treatment (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Scanning electron microscopic image of HP-CePtAl synthesized at 4.5 GPa: (left) secondary electron image; (right) back scattered electron image.
Fig. 1:

Scanning electron microscopic image of HP-CePtAl synthesized at 4.5 GPa: (left) secondary electron image; (right) back scattered electron image.

2.2 Crystal structure

NP-CePtAl crystallizes in the orthorhombic TiNiSi-type structure with space group Pnma and lattice parameters of a=719.98 pm, b=448.17 pm, and c=779.38 pm [23]. High-pressure/high-temperature treatment resulted in the formation of HP-CePtAl, which crystallizes in the hexagonal Laves phase (MgZn2 type, P63/mmc) with lattice parameters of a=552.7(1) pm and c=898.8(2) pm. Similar transitions from the orthorhombic TiNiSi to the hexagonal MgZn2-type structure have been observed for HP-EuPdSn [22], HP-EuPd0.72In1.28 [24], and HP-EuPt0.56In1.44 [24]. The NP-AEZn2 (AE=Ca–Ba, all KHg2 type, Imma) compounds were also transformed to MgZn2-type HP-AEZn2 [25]. In the crystal structure of the prototype Mg occupies one position (4f) while for the Zn atoms two positions (2a and 6h) exist. Ce is detected on the Mg site in HP-CePtAl, whereas Pt and Al occupy the Zn sites. Because of the retained composition of 1-1-1, platinum/aluminum mixing on the Zn sites has to take place. The unit cell of CePt0.98(1)Al1.02(1) is depicted in Fig. 2, emphasizing the network of condensed [Pt0.49(1)Al0.51(1)] tetrahedra. These tetrahedra are alternately condensed via common triangular faces and corners in the c direction. The basal triangular faces condense via all corners to Kagomé networks in the ab plane. The distances between the platinum and the aluminum atoms range from 257 (within the Kagomé net) to 282 pm (connecting atoms), which is in line or slightly longer than the sum of the covalent radii for Pt+Al of 254 (129+125) pm [26]. The cerium atoms are located in voids formed by the [Pt0.49(1)Al0.51(1)] network and are surrounded by 16 atoms in the shape of a Frank–Kasper polyhedron (Ce@(Pt/Al)12Ce4) [27], [28]. The interatomic Ce–Ce distances range from 333 to 352 pm, which is significantly shorter compared to 356 and 377 pm in NP-CePtAl and close to the sum of the covalent radii of 330 pm [26]. Taking larger interatomic distances into account, the two Pt/Al sites are surrounded by 12 atoms in the shape of icosahedra (Pt/Al@(Pt/Al)6Ce6). Details of the structure refinement are listed in Tables 13.

Fig. 2: Crystal structure of HP-CePtAl in the MgZn2-type structure. (Top) Extended unit cell depicting the Kagomé nets in z=1/4 and 3/4 along with the trigonal bipyramidal coordination environments. (Bottom) View along [001] onto the unit cell. Ce atoms are depicted in blue, Pt atoms in black, and Al atoms in open white circles. The mixed occupation ratios are indicated by the fragmented circles.
Fig. 2:

Crystal structure of HP-CePtAl in the MgZn2-type structure. (Top) Extended unit cell depicting the Kagomé nets in z=1/4 and 3/4 along with the trigonal bipyramidal coordination environments. (Bottom) View along [001] onto the unit cell. Ce atoms are depicted in blue, Pt atoms in black, and Al atoms in open white circles. The mixed occupation ratios are indicated by the fragmented circles.

Table 1:

Crystallographic data and structure refinement for HP-CePtAl, space group P63/mmc, Z=4.

Empirical formulaCePt0.98(1)Al1.02(1)
Molar mass, g mol−1358.8
Lattice parameters, pma=551.87(13)
(Single crystal)c=897.5(2)
Cell volume, nm3V=0.2367
Lattice parameters, pma=552.7(1)
(Powder diffraction)c=898.8(2)
Cell volume, nm3V=0.2378
Density calcd., g cm−310.07
Crystal size, μm35×30×30
Transm. ratio (max/min)0.499/0.163
Detector distance, mm40
Exposure time, s60
Integr. param. A/B/EMS7.0/−6.0/0.030
Range in hkl−7:+8; −7:+8;±13
F(000), e591
θ range, deg4.3–31.8
Absorption coefficient, mm−176.8
No. reflections2358
Independent reflections/Rint187/0.1875
Reflections with I>3 σ(I)/Rσ78/0.1339
Data/parameters187/13
Goodness of fit0.85
R/wR for I>3 σ(I)0.0315/0.0527
R/wR for all data0.1334/0.0857
Extinction coefficient27(15)
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−3+3.54/−3.59
Table 2:

Atom positions and anisotropic displacement parameters (pm2) for HP-CePtAl.

AtomWyckoff positionxyzU11U22U33U12Ueq
Ce4f1/32/30.0541(3)269(11)U11228(14)134(6)255(9)
M1a2a000319(16)U11228(14)160(8)289(11)
M2b6h0.3564(9)2x1/4250(20)273(15)174(14)126(10)235(13)

Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor. Coefficient Uij of the anisotropic displacement factor tensor of the atoms are defined as follows: −2π2[(ha*)2U11 + … + 2hka*b*U12]. U13=U23=0.

aM1: Pt1/Al1=88(2)/12(2)%.

bM2: Al2/Pt2=64(1)/36(1)%.

Table 3:

Interatomic distances (pm) for HP-CePtAl, obtained from the single crystal data.

Ce3M2310.6M16M2281.7M22M2256.8
3M1322.36Ce322.32M1281.7
6M2327.42M2295.0
3Ce333.12Ce310.6
1Ce351.64Ce327.4

All distances of the first coordination spheres are listed. Standard deviations are equal or smaller than 0.5 pm.

The comparably low quality of the single crystals can be ascribed to the low crystallinity of the sample, as seen by powder X-ray diffraction. The broadening of the base of the reflections and a significant contribution to the background, most likely by amorphous parts of the sample, are visible. Therefore, only multidomain crystals could be investigated; the best measurement is presented here.

2.3 Magnetic properties

HP-CePtAl was investigated by magnetic susceptibility measurements at 10 kOe (1 kOe=7.96×104 A m−1). The χ and the χ−1 data are shown in Fig. 3, top panel. A fit of the χ−1 data in the region higher than 150 K using the Curie–Weiss law revealed an effective magnetic moment of μeff=2.54(1) μB per Ce atom and a Weiss constant of θp=−151(5) K. The effective magnetic moment matches the theoretical value for a free Ce3+ ion. The large negative value of the Weiss constant is due to crystal field splitting, which is also responsible for the pronounced curvature below 100 K. Crystal field splitting occurs rather frequently in intermetallic cerium compounds because of the proximity of the ground state energies. Prominent examples exhibiting strong crystal field splitting are, e.g. CeAgAl [29], CeRhGe [30], or CePtGe [30]. In the latter two compounds, the negative Weiss constant was also attributed to the presence of the Kondo effect, backed up by resistivity measurements. Because of the small sample size, we were not able to conduct these experiments. To obtain more information about possible ordering phenomena, a low-field measurement was performed in a zero-field- and field-cooled mode (ZFC/FC), which is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 3. No bifurcation between the ZFC and the FC curves and no magnetic ordering were observed down to 2.5 K. The inset in Fig. 3 (bottom panel) displays the magnetization isotherms of HP-CePtAl measured at 3, 10, and 50 K. The 50 K isotherm displays a linear field dependency of the magnetization as expected for a paramagnetic material, whereas the 3 and 10 K isotherms exhibit slight curvatures. At higher fields, no saturation effects can be observed. The saturation magnetization at 3 K and 80 kOe is μsat=0.19(2) μB per Ce atom, which is drastically below the expected saturation magnetization of 2.14 μB per Ce according to gJ×J, however, in line with that of several other intermetallic cerium compounds, e.g. Ce16Au3Al10 [31].

Fig. 3: Magnetic properties of HP-CePtAl. (Top) Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ and its reciprocal χ−1 measured with a magnetic field strength of 10 kOe. (Bottom) Magnetic susceptibility in zero-field- (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) mode at 100 Oe. (Inset) Magnetization isotherms recorded at 3, 10, and 50 K.
Fig. 3:

Magnetic properties of HP-CePtAl. (Top) Temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ and its reciprocal χ−1 measured with a magnetic field strength of 10 kOe. (Bottom) Magnetic susceptibility in zero-field- (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) mode at 100 Oe. (Inset) Magnetization isotherms recorded at 3, 10, and 50 K.

3 Experimental

3.1 Synthesis

CePtAl was synthesized directly from the elements using pieces of cerium metal (Smart Elements), platinum sheets (Allgemeine Gold- und Silberscheideanstalt, Pforzheim), and aluminum turnings (Koch Chemicals), all with stated purities higher than 99.5%. The cerium ingots were cut into smaller pieces and first arc melted [32] to a button under argon (approximately 800 mbar). The argon was purified with titanium sponge (873 K), silica gel, and molecular sieves. The cerium button was subsequently mixed with pieces of the platinum sheet and the aluminum turnings in the ideal 1:1:1 atomic ratio and reacted in the same arc-melting furnace. The product buttons were remelted several times to ensure homogeneity. The purity of the precursor compound was checked by powder X-ray diffraction (vide infra) to ensure that only X-ray pure samples were used for the subsequent high-pressure experiments.

3.2 High-pressure/high-temperature syntheses

The high-pressure/high-temperature treatments were conducted via a multianvil press, equipped with a Walker-type module. Details about the technique and the construction of the different assemblies can be found in numerous references [33], [34], [35], [36]. Carefully milled powders of NP-CePtAl were loaded into 14/8 assembly crucibles made of hexagonal boron nitride and compressed within 67 and 250 min to pressures of 4.5 and 10.5 GPa, respectively. Subsequent heating to 1620 K within 15 min was followed by a period of 10 min at a constant temperature. Afterward, the samples were gently cooled down to 970 K for the next 120 min (4.5 GPa experiment) or 90 min (10.5 GPa experiment). This annealing process under pressure at elevated temperatures is important to enhance the crystallinity of the samples and was followed by quenching the samples to room temperature. After decompression, the samples were carefully separated from the surrounding assembly parts by mechanical fragmentation. The polycrystalline samples are silvery with metallic lustre. Powdered samples of both products are dark gray and stable in air.

3.3 EDX analyses

The HP-CePtAl sample was studied by electron microscopy with attached back scattering devices because high-pressure decomposition was observed in the HP-EuTIn (T=Ni, Pd) system [24]. A piece of the high-pressure sample that adhered to the boron nitride crucible was studied. The surface was left unetched for the electron-microscopic characterization. An electron microscopic image and a 200×300-μm cutout of the unpolished surface taken in backscattering mode are presented in Fig. 4. EDX data at various points of the surface showed a homogeneous composition of Ce/Pt/Al, 31(1):34(1):35(1) at%.

Fig. 4: Scanning electron microscopic image of HP-CePtAl synthesized at 10.5 GPa. (Left) Boron nitride (BN) crucible with adhered HP-CePtAl. (Right) Enlarged BSE image of HP-CePtAl.
Fig. 4:

Scanning electron microscopic image of HP-CePtAl synthesized at 10.5 GPa. (Left) Boron nitride (BN) crucible with adhered HP-CePtAl. (Right) Enlarged BSE image of HP-CePtAl.

The single crystal measured on the diffractometer was analyzed semiquantitatively using a Zeiss EVO® MA10 scanning electron microscope with Ce2O3, Pt, and Al2O3 as standards. No impurity elements heavier than sodium (detection limit of the instrument) were observed. The experimentally determined element ratios Ce/Pt/Al (32:34:34 at%) were within 2 at% of the theoretical values.

3.4 X-ray diffraction

The polycrystalline samples were characterized by Guinier patterns (imaging plate detector, Fujifilm BAS-1800 scanner) with CuKα1 radiation using α-quartz (a=491.30, c=540.46 pm, Riedel-de-Häen) as an internal standard. The correct indexing of the diffraction lines was ensured through intensity calculations. The lattice parameters were obtained through least squares fits [37]. Small block-shaped crystals of HP-CePtAl were selected from the samples by the mechanical fragmentation of the high-pressure button. The crystals were glued to thin quartz fibers using beeswax and first investigated by Laue photographs on a Buerger camera (white molybdenum radiation, image plate technique; Fujifilm, BAS-1800) to check their quality. Intensity data sets were collected at room temperature by use of a Stoe StadiVari four-circle diffractometer (μ-source; MoKα radiation, λ=71.073 pm; oscillation mode) with an open Eulerian cradle setup equipped with a reverse-biased silicon diode array detector (Dectris Pilatus 100 K; resolution, 487×195 pixel; pixel size, 0.172×0.172 mm2 [38]) in oscillation mode. Numerical absorption correction was applied to the data set. Details of the data collections and the structure refinements are listed in Tables 13.

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from FIZ Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de) on quoting the deposition number CSD-432027.

3.5 Magnetic properties

A polycrystalline piece of the HP/HT-treated ingot was packed in Kapton foil and attached to the sample holder rod of a vibrating sample magnetometer unit for measuring the magnetization M(T,H) in a quantum design Physical Property Measurement System. The samples were investigated in the temperature range of 2.5–300 K and with magnetic flux densities up to 80 kOe.

References

[1] M. L. Fornasini, F. Merlo, J. Alloys Compd.1995, 219, 63.10.1016/0925-8388(94)05010-4Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Szytuła, J. Leciejewicz, Handbook of Crystal Structures and Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Intermetallics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. B. Shoemaker, D. P. Shoemaker, Acta Crystallogr.1965, 18, 900.10.1107/S0365110X65002189Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. F. Zumdick, R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, Z. Naturforsch.1999, 54b, 45.10.1515/znb-1999-0111Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. E. Dwight, M. H. Mueller, R. A. Conner, J. W. Downey, H. W. Knott, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME.1968, 242, 2075.Search in Google Scholar

[6] P. Villars, K. Cenzual, Pearson’s Crystal Data: Crystal Structure Database for Inorganic Compounds (on DVD; release 2015/2016), ASM International®, Materials Park, Ohio (USA), 2015/2016.Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Ślebarski, D. Kaczorowski, W. Głogowski, J. Goraus, J. Phys. Condens. Matter.2008, 20, 315208.10.1088/0953-8984/20/31/315208Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Goraus, A. Ślebarski, M. Fijałkowski, Phys. Stat. Solidi B.2011, 248, 2857.10.1002/pssb.201046607Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Kitazawa, A. Matsushita, T. Matsumoto, T. Suzuki, Physica B.1994, 199–200, 28.10.1016/0921-4526(94)91726-4Search in Google Scholar

[10] S. Gupta, K. G. Suresh, J. Alloys Compd.2015, 618, 562.10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.079Search in Google Scholar

[11] R. Pöttgen, B. Chevalier, Z. Naturforsch.2015, 70b, 695.10.1515/znb-2015-0109Search in Google Scholar

[12] O. Janka, O. Niehaus, R. Pöttgen, B. Chevalier, Z. Naturforsch.2016, 71b, 737.10.1515/znb-2016-0101Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Pöttgen, O. Janka, B. Chevalier, Z. Naturforsch.2016, 71b, 165.10.1515/znb-2016-0013Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. Pöttgen, B. Chevalier, Z. Naturforsch.2015, 70b, 289.10.1515/znb-2015-0018Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. Dönni, H. Kitazawa, P. Fischer, J. Tang, M. Kohgi, Y. Endoh, Y. Morii, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 1995, 7, 1663.10.1088/0953-8984/7/8/013Search in Google Scholar

[16] Y.-S. Li, Y. Lu, Q.-F. Lu, J. Jiangxi Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci.).2006, 30, 532.Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. Kitazawa, S. Nimori, J. Tang, F. Iga, A. Dönni, T. Matsumoto, G. Kido, Physica B.1997, 237–238, 212.10.1016/S0921-4526(97)00104-XSearch in Google Scholar

[18] T. Ueda, H. Harima, T. Yasuda, T. Kawai, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.2007, 310, 391.10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.098Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. Ueda, M. Nakashima, M. Hedo, Y. Uwatoko, H. Nakashima, A. Thamizhavel, T. D. Matsuda, Y. Haga, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.2005, 74, 3393.10.1143/JPSJ.74.3393Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Nakashima, T. Ueda, K. Shimizu, H. Nakashima, A. Thamizhavel, N. Tateiwa, Y. Haga, M. Hedo, Y. Uwatoko, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, K. Izawa, G. Knebel, B. Salce, J. Flouquet J. Magn. Magn. Mater.2007, 310, e9.10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.056Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Ueda, M. Nakashima, H. Nakashima, A. Thamizhavel, M. Hedo, Y. Uwatoko, T. D. Matsuda, Y. Haga, R. Settai, Y. Ōnuki, Physica B.2006, 378–380, 801.10.1016/j.physb.2006.01.292Search in Google Scholar

[22] G. Heymann, B. Heying, U. C. Rodewald, O. Janka, H. Huppertz, R. Pöttgen, J. Solid State Chem.2016, 236, 138.10.1016/j.jssc.2015.06.044Search in Google Scholar

[23] F. Hulliger, J. Alloys Compd.1993, 196, 225.10.1016/0925-8388(93)90600-RSearch in Google Scholar

[24] H. Huppertz, G. Kotzyba, R.-D. Hoffmann, R. Pöttgen, J. Solid State Chem.2002, 169, 155.10.1016/S0022-4596(02)00051-8Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Kal, E. Stoyanov, J.-P. Belieres, T. L. Groy, R. Norrestam, U. Häussermann, J. Solid State Chem.2008, 181, 3016.10.1016/j.jssc.2008.07.036Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. Emsley, The Elements, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[27] F. C. Frank, J. S. Kasper, Acta Crystallogr.1958, 11, 184.10.1107/S0365110X58000487Search in Google Scholar

[28] F. C. Frank, J. S. Kasper, Acta Crystallogr.1959, 12, 483.10.1107/S0365110X59001499Search in Google Scholar

[29] D. T. Adroja, B. D. Rainford, S. K. Malik, Physica B.1993, 186–188, 566.10.1016/0921-4526(93)90636-KSearch in Google Scholar

[30] P. Rogl, B. Chevalier, M. J. Besnus, J. Etourneau, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.1989, 80, 305.10.1016/0304-8853(89)90134-0Search in Google Scholar

[31] F. Stegemann, O. Janka, Dalton Trans.2016, 45, 13863.10.1039/C6DT02649DSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] R. Pöttgen, T. Gulden, A. Simon, GIT Labor-Fachzeitschrift1999, 43, 133.Search in Google Scholar

[33] D. C. Rubie, Phase Trans.1999, 68, 431.10.1080/01411599908224526Search in Google Scholar

[34] D. Walker, Am. Mineral.1991, 76, 1092.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar

[35] D. Walker, M. A. Carpenter, C. M. Hitch, Am. Mineral.1990, 75, 1020.Search in Google Scholar

[36] H. Huppertz, Z. Kristallogr.2004, 219, 330.10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633Search in Google Scholar

[37] K. Yvon, W. Jeitschko, E. Parthé, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1977, 10, 73.10.1107/S0021889877012898Search in Google Scholar

[38] Dectris, Technical Specification and Operating Procedure Pilatus 100K-S Detector System, (version 1.7), Baden-Dättwil (CH), 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-6
Accepted: 2016-10-19
Published Online: 2016-12-28
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0215/html
Scroll to top button